Risicoperceptie en HEALTH RISKS AND crisiscommunicatie EMERGENCIES - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

risicoperceptie en
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Risicoperceptie en HEALTH RISKS AND crisiscommunicatie EMERGENCIES - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Communication Risicoperceptie en HEALTH RISKS AND crisiscommunicatie EMERGENCIES The Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport Verdiepingsbijeenkomst VWS Jan van Zomeren Dep. Director Maike Delfgaauw Directorate of Communication


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Risicoperceptie en crisiscommunicatie

Verdiepingsbijeenkomst VWS Maike Delfgaauw Nationaal Crisiscentrum 5 maart 2013

Communication HEALTH RISKS AND EMERGENCIES The Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport

Jan van Zomeren

  • Dep. Director

Directorate of Communication June 3rd, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Q(uery) Fever Schmallenberg Virus EHEC Fukushima A H1N1 ESBL Recent Health Risks

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Headlines

  • A changing world
  • Communication management structure
  • Manual in brief
  • Communication basics
  • Leasons learned
slide-4
SLIDE 4

A changing world (in the Netherlands)

  • Mass production of meat and chicken
  • Use of antibiotics on a large scale
  • Changing climate; immigration of animals, plants, insects,

diseases

  • CO2 emissions of beef, chicken and pork industries
  • Turning point: biological food, less meat
  • Turning point: more animal rights (living conditions)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

A changing world (in the Netherlands)

  • Less public trust in authorities
  • Authorities/Government loose their monopoly on

communication and information

  • Explosion of new technology and the use of mobile phone

and social media

  • Media research versus Government transparency
  • Impact of perception of health emergencies, crisis, and

hazards versus facts and figures

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Strategies of communication on health risks

Perception of risks

  • Disaster/Hazard: immediate (seasonal flue) versus creeping

(HIV)

  • Media Attention: blog versus national tv news
  • Voluntary: own choice (eat meat) versus environment

(meat industry)

  • Control: Me (healthy) versus He (obese)
  • Profits: direct (mobile phone) indirect (oil spills)
  • Knowledge (radiation, ESBL)
  • Trust in authorities/organisations (nuclear plants)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Structure

Hazard Outbreak Management Team

Commission of Local, regional and national administrators

Ministry

  • f Health,

Welfare and Sport Ministry

  • f Public

Safety and Justice

National Institute for Public Health

Local action

partners

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Communication team

  • Press officer
  • Strategic advisor/Team coordinator
  • Web editor
  • Information analist
  • Community manager/online specialist
  • Webcare hosts
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Management of communication on health risks

  • Share information:

facts and figures

  • Damage control:

how to act

  • Address risks and measures

perspective

  • Address emotions

address stress, frustrations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Strategies of communication on health risks

Taking responsibility and decisive action Swine Flue Attack and recover Q -fever Reticent, monitor EHEC

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Communication basics on health risks

 Timing  Trust (On behalf of Public interest and safety)  Transparent, clear for all  Empathy when needed  Factual and context, invalidate rumors  Coordinated with relevant organisations  Public spokesperson(s)  Expert Pool  Relevant channels and instruments  Media monitoring, analysis  Webcare

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Communication on health risks

Webcare: Twitter and health risk communication:

  • 1. Source information
  • 2. Combined information
  • 3. Supporting information
  • Retweets
  • Recommendations
  • Re-sourcing
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Communication on health risks

Webcare: Twitter and health risk communication: Type of tweets:

  • bservation/perception: public
  • information: authorities, public
  • sourcing: authorities, public
  • appeals: authorities, public
  • action: authorities, public
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Communication on health risks

Media Monitoring and analysis Monitoring: Continuously daily reports:

  • Finchline: online and social media (quantitative)
  • LexisNexis: all media (articles, blogs)
  • Coosto: social media (tweets)
  • Zoom media* (radio and tv items)

* Dutch origin

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Communication on health risks

Media Monitoring and analysis

Analysis:

  • Type of media
  • Type of information
  • Influentials/opponents
  • Geographic information
  • Tone of voice
  • Content/message
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Communication on health risks

Channels and instruments

  • One central website (facts, figures, context, how to act)
  • Facebook (Q and A) opt-in
  • Twitter (Refer, encourage, address) opt-in
  • YouTube (how to act, context, infographics)
  • SMS Alert (via Smartphone: how to act, refer) opt-in
  • Cell broadcasting (via Smartphone: how to act, refer) opt-out

Live chats and videochats, advertising, expert meetings, posters and tv displays, leaflets

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Communication on health risks

Our leasons:

  • 1. Risk assessments: keep it practical
  • 2. Take political context into account
  • 3. Understand the necessity of compromise
  • 4. Convince authorities with strong arguments
  • 5. Keep information clear, straight and transparent
  • 6. Look for sponsors and support
  • 7. Know your opponents
  • 8. Make partnerships
  • 9. Keep in touch:
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Communication on health risks

Keep in touch:

  • Don’t reassure the public
  • Admit uncertainties, share points of view
  • Respect the public opinion and emotion
  • Don’t make comparisons
  • Show the public what to do/how to act

and renew the manuals once a year and organize a simulation/exercise twice a year !

slide-19
SLIDE 19