Ridesharing and crowdshipping Niels Agatz Dagstuhl 2016 New ways - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ridesharing and crowdshipping
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ridesharing and crowdshipping Niels Agatz Dagstuhl 2016 New ways - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ridesharing and crowdshipping Niels Agatz Dagstuhl 2016 New ways of business: collaborative consumption Make use of journeys that are already happening Low occupancy rate of cars (1.2-1.8) People: dynamic ridesharing Dynamic ridesharing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ridesharing and crowdshipping

Niels Agatz

Dagstuhl 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

New ways of business: collaborative consumption

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Make use of journeys that are already happening

Low occupancy rate of cars (1.2-1.8)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

People: dynamic ridesharing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Dynamic ridesharing features

  • Dynamic: established on short-notice
  • Non-recurring trips: different from carpooling
  • Automated matching: different from online notice-boards
  • Independent drivers: different from taxis
  • Cost-sharing: variable trip related expenses
  • Prearranged: different from spontaneous, casual ride-

sharing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Various providers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Freight: crowdsourced delivery

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Various providers

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dynamic ride-share variants

Single driver Multiple drivers Single rider Multiple riders Easy (Bipartite Matching) Difficult (Routing) Difficult (Transfers) Difficult (Routing + Transfers)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Who are the drivers?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What motivates drivers?

 Help others /neighbors / the community  Save the environment  Make some extra money

 Different driver payment schemes: hourly payment, per mile,

per task…

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Business model of providers

 Platform to create matches and arrange payments  Platform takes a cut for providing the infrastructure  Backup option to guarantee timely service?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Critical success factors

 Drivers: ↓ inconvenience  Society: ↓ traffic and congestion  Rider/ sender: ↓ costs ↑ speed, convenience, mobility 1.

Maximize the number of matched riders/ parcels

2.

Minimize total vehicle miles in system

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How to establish matches?

Centralized automated matching Decentralized approach

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dynamics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Driver considerations

 How much time does the driver have available?  Information exchange: departure time alone may not

suffice

  • departure time flexibility?
  • travel time flexibility?
  • stops flexibility?
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Driver time information

Departure time Latest arrival time

direct travel time flexibility time window for matching Lead-time

Earliest Latest Announcement time

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How many stops is the driver willing to make?

One stop Two stops Task Driver

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Other considerations

 friends ↔ strangers  neighbors ↔ strangers  Enable trust/ safety / reliability

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ensure safety/ reliability

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Project 1: dynamic ridesharing

 Two-way matching of drivers and riders  Impact of dynamics  Impact of role flexibility

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Project 2: stable rideshare matching

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Project 3: ridesharing meeting points

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Project 4: ridesharing flexibility

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Project 5: crowdsourced delivery

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Key challenges to make this work

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • 1. Building demand and supply

 How to reach a critical mass fast?  What incentives can be offered?  How to organize the backup?

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • 2. Dealing with uncertainty

 How to make sure that you have enough drivers when

you need them?

 Dynamic incentives?

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • 3. Regulatory issues
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Work in progress

 Simulation study based on actual traffic data  Combined ridesharing and public transport  Crowdsourcing with transfers

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Papers

 Stiglic, M, Agatz, N.A.H., Savelsbergh, M.W.P. & Gradisar, M. (2016). The

Benefits of Meeting Points in Ride-Sharing Systems. Transportation Research. Part B, Methodological,

 Agatz, N.A.H., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M.W.P. & Wang, X. (2012). Optimization

for Dynamic Ride-Sharing: A Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 223 (2), 295-303.

 Agatz, N.A.H., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M.W.P. & Wang, X. (2011). Dynamic

Ride-Sharing: A Simulation Study in Metro Atlanta. Transportation Research. Part B, Methodological, 45 (9), 1450-1464.

 X Wang, N Agatz, A Erera, Stable matching for dynamic ride-sharing systems,

ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2015-006-LIS

 Arslan, Alp and Agatz, Niels and Kroon, Leo G. and Zuidwijk, Rob A.,

Crowdsourced Delivery -- A Pickup and Delivery Problem with Ad-Hoc Drivers (February 2, 2016). ERIM Report Series Reference.

 Stiglic, M, Agatz, N.A.H., Savelsbergh, M.W.P. & Gradisar, M. (2016). Making

Dynamic Ride-sharing Work:The Impact of Driver and Rider Flexibility

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Collaborators

 Alp Arslan  Alan Erera  Leo Kroon  Martin Savelsbergh  Mitja Stiglic  Xing Wang  Rob Zuidwijk