RESULTS English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Science Measuring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
results
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RESULTS English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Science Measuring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 19, 2023 303 likes •703 views

RESULTS English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Science Measuring College and Career Readiness TOMS RIVER REGIONAL SCHOOLS October 10, 2018 1 Reference Points For Tonights Discussion Measurement and Progress Increasing

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Measuring College and Career Readiness

RESULTS

English Language Arts (ELA)…Mathematics…Science

TOMS RIVER REGIONAL SCHOOLS October 10, 2018

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

฀Measurement and Progress ฀Increasing Instructional Capacity ฀Resources for Parents

Reference Points For Tonight’s Discussion

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Measurement and Progress

How are we doing compared to the State and our District?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations (650-699)  Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations (700-724)  Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations (725-749)  Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations (750- varies)  Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations (varies – 850)

PARCC (ELA and Mathematics)

PERFORMANCE LEVELS

Score Range 650-850

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Elementary

Grades 3, 4, 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

PARCC Elementary ELA District Trend Lines

48% 47% 50% 52% 51% 53% 51% 57% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

PARCC Elementary ELA District

47% 48% 54% 52% 53% 51% 50% 47% 56% 51% 59% 57% 52% 50% 58% 53% 58% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% State District State District State District 2016 2017 2018

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

PARCC Elementary ELA Subgroups

36% 68% 32% 52% 31% 22% 36% 70% 21% 55% 33% 20% 31% 70% 38% 57% 32% 15% 31% 65% 32% 52% 28% 18% 35% 81% 32% 57% 32% 19% 40% 87% 30% 61% 39% 20% 33% 73% 34% 55% 32% 18% 40% 73% 26% 57% 35% 22% 47% 76% 40% 63% 40% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 3

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

PARCC Elementary Math District Trend Lines

55% 50% 48% 51% 48% 44% 48% 44% 49%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

PARCC Elementary Math District

52% 55% 46% 51% 47% 48% 53% 50% 48% 48% 46% 44% 53% 48% 50% 44% 48% 49% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% State District State District State District 2016 2017 2018

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

PARCC Elementary Math Subgroups

40% 79% 36% 61% 39% 31% 30% 79% 27% 55% 33% 25% 27% 64% 38% 53% 30% 17% 31% 72% 31% 55% 33% 24% 31% 76% 25% 54% 29% 23% 25% 74% 23% 48% 28% 19% 29% 78% 28% 53% 31% 22% 29% 63% 17% 48% 28% 17% 38% 74% 22% 54% 29% 21% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Middle School

Grades 6, 7, 8

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

PARCC Middle School ELA District Trend Lines

56% 53% 54% 53% 59% 61% 44% 55% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

PARCC Middle School ELA District

52% 56% 57% 53% 56% 44% 53% 53% 59% 59% 59% 55% 56% 54% 63% 61% 60% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% State District State District State District 2016 2017 2018

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

PARCC Middle School ELA Subgroups

42% 86% 43% 58% 34% 12% 39% 77% 23% 56% 36% 13% 34% 65% 31% 46% 26% 10% 34% 77% 41% 58% 35% 10% 48% 89% 49% 62% 45% 19% 40% 79% 30% 58% 41% 13% 40% 82% 30% 58% 37% 17% 48% 74% 49% 66% 41% 13% 42% 87% 39% 61% 35% 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

PARCC Middle School Math District Trend Lines

39% 36% 34% 28% 31% 35% 17% 14% 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016 2017 2018 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

PARCC Middle School Math District

43% 39% 38% 28% 26% 17% 44% 36% 40% 31% 28% 14% 44% 34% 43% 35% 28% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% State District State District State District 2016 2017 2018

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

PARCC Middle School Math Subgroups

26% 63% 24% 42% 21% 13% 12% 65% 10% 30% 13% 4% 15% 54% 13% 17% 13% 6% 17% 57% 17% 41% 20% 5% 18% 64% 22% 33% 16% 7% 11% 28% 8% 16% 12% 3% 20% 69% 9% 37% 18% 9% 19% 51% 15% 41% 18% 6% 17% 38% 16% 21% 14% 3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

slide-19
SLIDE 19

High School

Grades 9, 10, 11

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

PARCC High School ELA District Trend Lines

46% 51% 52% 50% 48% 54% 52% 43% 39%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016 2017 2018 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

PARCC High School ELA District

48% 46% 43% 50% 39% 52% 51% 51% 45% 48% 37% 43% 54% 52% 50% 54% 38% 39% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% State District State District State District 2016 2017 2018

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

PARCC High School ELA Subgroups

31% 74% 18% 49% 28% 8% 37% 72% 21% 52% 38% 12% 40% 79% 25% 54% 39% 15% 33% 68% 32% 56% 33% 7% 38% 69% 23% 51% 30% 12% 30% 64% 23% 46% 30% 10% 37% 78% 29% 55% 35% 9% 41% 71% 30% 57% 39% 11% 33% 66% 16% 41% 32% 15% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

PARCC High School Math District Trend Lines

35% 32% 38% 18% 23% 21% 24% 24% 19% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018 Algebra I Algebra II Geometry

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

PARCC High School Math District

41% 35% 25% 18% 27% 24% 42% 32% 27% 23% 30% 24% 45% 38% 29% 21% 30% 19%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% State District State District State District 2016 2017 2018

Algebra I Algebra II Geometry

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

PARCC High School Math Subgroups

18% 59% 8% 38% 17% 9% 8% 51% 6% 18% 10% 3% 13% 40% 6% 26% 13% 4% 14% 68% 11% 35% 20% 4% 16% 36% 13% 24% 14% 3% 12% 35% 7% 28% 12% 4% 22% 67% 16% 42% 19% 7% 7% 46% 11% 22% 10% 2% 6% 44% 5% 21% 13% 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 2017 2018

Algebra I Algebra II Geometry

slide-26
SLIDE 26

฀NJSLA-Science

▪New Jersey Student Learning Assessment – Science

▪Grades 5, 8 and 11 ▪Next Generation Science Standards ▪Computer Based Test

฀Pilot Year

▪No data will be generated to districts

Science (Under Construction)

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Alternate assessment for students with the most significant intellectual disabilities

ELA and Math

Grades 3-8 and 11

Science

Grades 5, 8, and 11

Performance Levels

Emerging Approaching Target At Target Advanced

2017…132 students 2018…138 students

27

Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

63% 57% 68% 36% 56% 73% 53% 48% 47% 78% 52% 85% 61% 54% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 2017 2018

ELA ELA

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

74% 64% 32% 64% 33% 12% 40% 46% 35% 33% 32% 38% 22% 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 2017 2018

Mathematics

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

21% 33% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11

Science

2018

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ESSA Accountability Profile Administered annually K-12

Monitors student progress in learning academic English

Overall Score (Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing)  Performance Levels

▪1-Entering ▪2-Emerging ▪3-Developing ▪4-Expanding ▪5-Bridging ▪6-Reaching

2017…189 students 2018…243 students

31

Access for ELLs

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

ACCESS for ELLs

24% 18% 43% 14% 1% 0% 27% 23% 31% 16% 3% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Entering Emerging Developing Expanding Bridging Reaching 2017 2018

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Increasing Instructional Capacity

How do we use data to plan for instructional shifts and supports to increase student growth?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Data Cycle

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Data Sources

District level data School/Grade level data Disaggregated data by subgroups Disaggregated data by categories (i.e., standards,strands,clusters) Evidence Statements Item analysis Student-level analysis Benchmark assessments Quarterly assessments Reading levels Report Card Grades Student Attendance PSAT, SAT, AP Course Rigor Student Discipline

  • PERFORMANCE MATTERS – data warehouse

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Data Team

District Team Elementary Teams Staff Middle School Teams Staff High School Teams Staff

36

Analysis of multi-year trends, grade levels, content areas, subgroups, student growth

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Identify strengths and gaps with curriculum and instruction Inform the conversations of our educators Consideration for resources necessary to meet the learning needs of all students Determine program and professional development needs

37

Analysis

slide-38
SLIDE 38

฀Grades K-5

▪New Math program adoption ▪Ready Math ▪I Ready Diagnostics

  • I Ready Diagnostics ELA

▪Standards based report cards

฀Grades 6-12

▪Achieve 3000 ELA Level setting for all students (6-8) ▪Implementation of Achieve 3000 Science articles (6-8) ▪I Ready Math Diagnostics for all students (6-8) ▪Freshman Academy Data Analysis PLC ▪Increased implementation of cross curricular projects (6-12)

฀ELLs K-12

▪Sheltered English Instruction ▪Collaborative Teaching – Walnut Street ▪Technology Initiative ▪Translation, Visual and Video supports

฀Special Education

▪Creative Curriculum (Pre School) ▪Tiered Autism Programs

฀Social Emotional Learning (SEL) K-12

▪Engaging the Whole Child

฀Performance Matters K-12

38

Next Steps…Implementation

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Resources For Parents

Resources are made available to parents by accessing our district’s website and visiting the State assessment FAQ page:

 What is PARCC/NJSLA-Science?  State assessment testing windows  Sample test items and tutorials  Interpreting score reports  Graduation requirements  New Jersey specific PARCC information http://www.trschools.com/parents/PARCC  NJSLA-Science resources can be found at: https://www.measinc.com/nj/  Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) https://dynamiclearningmaps.org/  Access for ELLs https://www.nj.gov/education/bilingual/ells/20/  New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) http://www.nj.gov/education/assessment/

39