research productivity of
play

Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools For Discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools For Discussion at CFBSD Meeting Toronto, 7 December 2010 Ali Dastmalchian Gustavson School of Business @ UVic Purposes of Project 1. To compare research productivity across business


  1. Research Productivity of Canadian Business Schools For Discussion at CFBSD Meeting Toronto, 7 December 2010 Ali Dastmalchian Gustavson School of Business @ UVic

  2. Purposes of Project 1. To compare research productivity across business schools in Canada. 2. To assess whether the business research landscape has changed since data was collected more than 10 years ago (Beamish, 2000) 3. Additionally, to use the results to measure one of Gustavson School’s aims (to be the best small -sized research business school in Canada)

  3. Process • Schools were contacted in late summer/fall 2010 and invited to participate • Scope: Initially the 20 schools with either AACSB or EQUIS accreditation (a few other schools were also contacted and have provided data) • The hope is to collect data from as many schools as possible…

  4. Process • Schools were asked to provide:  a list of the school’s peer reviewed journal publications from 2005-2009  their faculty FTE for 2005-2009

  5. Hiccups • A few schools opted not to participate or just didn’t respond • Some schools reported incomplete data • Issues with consistency in defining FTE o to standardize, we opted to use the number that schools report to AACSB in their annual Business School Questionnaire (BSQ), where possible o When not available, we used (1) FTE reported to us by the school, or (2) FTE listed on web site, or (3) FTE from the nearest year we did know for that school

  6. Data – small schools FTE Data collected? (2009) EQUIS AACSB 0-79 FTE Carleton yes 64 Dalhousie limited 37 Yes Laurentian yes 22 Manitoba limited 75 Yes McMaster not participating 72 Yes Ottawa yes 68 Yes Yes Saskatchewan yes 32 UVic yes 38 Yes

  7. Data – medium-sized schools FTE Data collected? (2009) EQUIS AACSB 80-139 FTE Brock yes 111 Yes Calgary yes 80 Yes Laval yes 121 Yes Yes Memorial yes 104 Yes Queen's yes 94 Yes Yes Simon Fraser yes 118 Yes Yes St. Mary's no reply 86 Yes UBC yes 121 Yes Yes W. Ontario yes 93 Yes

  8. Data – large schools FTE Data collected? (2009) EQUIS AACSB 140 + FTE Alberta yes 184 Yes Concordia yes 208 Yes HEC yes 331 Yes Yes Toronto no reply 196 Yes UQAM limited 240 Yes Wilfred Laurier yes 149 Yes

  9. Results • In collecting this data, we are able to make: • Comparisons among Canadian Biz Schools • Comparisons among size groupings • Comparisons among schools with AACSB and/or EQUIS accreditation • Comparisons using FT40 (and FT45?) publication rates and/or total journal publication rates

  10. Results – sorted by school size FT40 pubs/FT faculty, averaged by school grouping 0,16 FT40 pubs/FTE faculty members 0,14 0,12 0,10 0-79 FTE 0,08 80-139 FTE 0,06 140 + FTE 0,04 0,02 0,00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

  11. Results – sorted by school size Total pubs/FT faculty, averaged by school grouping 0,90 FT40 pubs/FTE faculty members 0,80 0,70 0,60 0-79 FTE 0,50 80-139 FTE 0,40 140 + FTE 0,30 0,20 0,10 0,00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

  12. Results – sorted by AACSB status FT40 output by years accredited with AACSB 0,22 FT40 pubs/FTE, average across group 0,20 0,18 0,16 0,14 Not AACSB Accredited 0,12 AACSB for 1-5 years 0,10 AACSB for 5-9 years 0,08 AACSB for 10 + years 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

  13. Results – sorted by AACSB status Total output by years accredited 1,00 Total pubs/FTE, average across group 0,90 0,80 0,70 Not AACSB Accredited 0,60 AACSB for 1-5 years 0,50 AACSB for 5-9 years 0,40 AACSB for 10 + years 0,30 0,20 0,10 0,00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

  14. Conclusion • We will be working with this data further • The more complete our data is, the more informative the results – please consider participating • Contact us at Gustavson School of Business to update or complete your data • If there is interest, we may consider collecting this information annually

  15. Schools for Which we have no Data Yet…. From Beamish’s List: Other: 1. McGill 7. UNB (2) 13. Trent 2. Waterloo 8. St. Fr. Xavier 14. RRU 3. York 9. Acadia 15.U of F.V. 4. Lethbridge 10.Sherbrooke 16. TRU 5. UPEI 11. Regina 17. UOIT 6. Guelph 12. Windsor 18. TWU 19. Nipissing 20. Kwantlen 21. Moncton 22. UNBC 23. Bishop’s

  16. What is required? • Schools are asked to provide:  a list of the school’s peer reviewed journal publications from 2005-2009  their faculty FTE for 2005-2009

  17. Thank you!

  18. Publications per FT Faculty 2005-2009 Wilfrid Laurier Memorial Queen's Alberta Manitoba Victoria Avg. total pubs/faculty Laurentian member per year, 2005-09 Laval Western Ontario Avg. FT40/faculty member per year, 2005-09 Concordia HEC Calgary Brock Saskatchewan UBC UQAM Carleton Simon Fraser Dalhousie Ottawa 0,00 0,25 0,50 0,75 1,00 1,25 1,50

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend