Removing obstacles to children’s dental care in Medicaid: A renewed push for change
Webinar hosted by the Children’s Dental Health Project
Removing obstacles to childrens dental care in Medicaid: A renewed - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Removing obstacles to childrens dental care in Medicaid: A renewed push for change August 29, 2018 Webinar hosted by the Childrens Dental Health Project About the Childrens Dental Health Project Colin Reusch, MPA Director of Policy,
Webinar hosted by the Children’s Dental Health Project
Colin Reusch, MPA Director of Policy, Children’s Dental Health Project
2
Children’s Dental Health Project
In 1997, Children’s Dental Health Project was conceived to advance innovative policy solutions so no child suffers from tooth decay. We advocate for systems that nourish families…
Remove oral health as barrier to success Configure communities to support families manage their health Support those trusted in communities Champion solutions to end inequities
A vision of what oral health care should be
4
Every child’s needs are different and there are tools to assess those needs One-size-fits-all approach to oral health care is insufficient and incompatible with Medicaid Medicaid/CHIP programs must incentivize appropriate care State are ultimately responsible for ensuring that each child gets what she needs Greater program efficiency AND better outcomes CAN be achieved together
Every child should get what they need to be healthy
Evidence-based clinical guidelines Risk assessment tools & guidance Statutory requirements for individualized care Minimally- invasive disease management strategies Medical/dental codes available Quality improvement requirements
with periodicity schedules
establish the minimum recommended services (and State policies should not inhibit more frequent care when needed)
MCOs/payers are aligned with the periodicity schedule/priorities
– American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry – American Academy of Pediatrics
CMS Bulletin encourages states to…
Removing Obstacles to Children’s Dental in Medicaid: A Renewed Push for Change
August 29, 2018 Laurie J. Norris, JD
Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit
Screening Services Vision Services Dental Services
At intervals which meet reasonable standards of dental practice At such other intervals as are medically necessary At a minimum include relief of pain and infections, restoration of teeth, and maintenance of dental health
Hearing Services Other services necessary to correct or ameliorate defects and physical and
mental illnesses and conditions
Every state is required to adopt a pediatric dental periodicity schedule “after consultation with recognized dental organizations involved in child health care.”
9
See Section 1905(r)(3) of the Social Security Act.
Dental coverage:
Adopt a periodicity schedule for exams and prevention Subject to the same “medical necessity” parameters as other health care for children in Medicaid Allow for interperiodic visits more frequent than outlined in the periodicity schedule, as medically necessary Minimum coverage parameters: relief of pain and infections, restoration of teeth, maintenance of dental health, and medically necessary
Available at https://www.medicaid.gov/med icaid/benefits/downloads/keep- kids-smiling.pdf
10
Finding: Two of four states in the study failed to align their payment policies with their periodicity schedules Recommendation:
Ensure that States pay for services in accordance with their periodicity schedules Require States to conduct regular reviews of their periodicity schedules and payment policies to ensure that States are paying for services in accordance with their periodicity schedules
Available at https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/rep
11
“CMS concurs with this
with states to crosswalk their payment policies with their dental periodicity schedules and make any necessary adjustments to their payment policies.”
12
States should ensure that fee schedules and payment policies are aligned with periodicity schedules.
States with dental managed care should ensure that the managed care plans’ fee schedules and payment polices align with the state’s periodicity schedule. Payment policies for oral health services provided in primary care should also be examined for alignment with the state’s pediatric periodicity schedules.
Available at: https://www.medicaid.gov/fe deral-policy- guidance/downloads/cib0504 18.pdf
13
Aligning Dental Payment Policies and Periodicity Schedules in the Medicaid and CHIP Programs
The periodicity schedule should be treated as a “floor” for coverage of dental services, not a “ceiling.”
Additional services should be covered based on each individual child’s risk profile and health needs. Allow for individualized care plans Cover and reimburse dental care necessary to correct or ameliorate an individual child’s condition
Even when these services fall outside of the standard scope and even when the frequency of services is greater than specified in the periodicity schedule or coverage policy.
14
Aligning Dental Payment Policies and Periodicity Schedules in the Medicaid and CHIP Programs
Implement a mechanism through which providers can obtain timely approval
additional or more frequent dental services beyond what is specified in the periodicity schedule or coverage policy. States delivering dental services to children through managed care or other contracting arrangements should ensure that a similar mechanism is available through their contracted plan(s).
15
Aligning Dental Payment Policies and Periodicity Schedules in the Medicaid and CHIP Programs
Is there alignment between your state’s pediatric dental periodicity schedule and the payment policies? Obtain and examine your state’s pediatric dental periodicity schedule, dental fee schedule, dental provider manual, dental provider advisories, etc. Compare them for alignment on ages, frequencies, etc. Talk to providers. Find out what they are experiencing. Is there alignment between your state’s primary care (medical) periodicity schedule for oral health services and its payment policies? What is the mechanism in your state to cover (and pay for) medically necessary dental and oral health services that exceed what is specified in the relevant periodicity schedule? How has your state ensured MCO / dental plan compliance with these requirements?
16
Early Identify problems early, starting at birth Periodic Check children’s health at periodic, age- appropriate intervals and as needed Screening Provide pediatrician-recommended screenings of physical, mental and developmental health Diagnostic Perform diagnostic tests to follow up when a risk is identified Treatment Treat any problems that are found
18
19
below
taking into account a particular child’s needs
20
Mandatory Services
Family planning services and supplies Federally Qualified Health Clinics and Rural Health Clinics Home health services Inpatient and outpatient hospital services Laboratory and X-Rays Medical supplies and durable medical equipment Non-emergency medical transportation Nurse-midwife services Pediatric and family nurse practitioner services Physician services Pregnancy-related services Tobacco cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy for pregnant women
Optional Services
Community supported living arrangements Chiropractic services Clinic services Critical access hospital services Dental services Dentures Emergency hospital services (in a hospital not meeting certain federal requirements) Eyeglasses State Plan Home and Community Based Services Inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under age 21 Intermediate care facility services for individuals with intellectual disabilities Optometry services Other diagnostic, screening, preventive and rehabilitative services Other licensed practitioners’ services Physical therapy services Prescribed drugs Primary care case management services Private duty nursing services Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) services Prosthetic devices Respiratory care for ventilator dependent individuals Speech, hearing and language disorder services Targeted case management Tuberculosis-related services
See Social Security Act § 1905(a)
Cost Effective Alternatives Utilization Controls Experimental Treatment
Permitted Prohibited
Utilization controls, such as prior authorization for some services × Prior authorization for screenings × Using utilization controls that delay the provision of necessary treatment × Service caps (“Hard limits”) While EPSDT does not require coverage of experimental services, a state may do so if it determines that treatment would address a child’s condition Relying on the latest scientific evidence to inform coverage decisions Considering cost when deciding to cover a medically necessary treatment or an alternative Covering services in a cost effective way, permitted they are as good as or better than the alternative × Denying treatment due to cost alone
22
Marielle Kress Director, Federal Advocacy American Academy of Pediatrics
Protect and strengthen children’s Medicaid benefits under EPSDT at the federal and state levels by:
Educating and raising awareness among policymakers and other stakeholders about EPSDT and its critical role for children Strengthening the capacity for collaborative initiatives between state child advocates and AAP chapters (including technical assistance with 6 states) Identifying and executing state-level strategies to strengthen EPSDT protections for children enrolled in Medicaid
day in February, using a new EPSDT fact sheet
dashboard focusing
quality measures
section of health plan manual
Three-Pronged Approach:
EPSDT brochure for
EPSDT benefits to CHIP program
a legislative breakfast and meeting with gubernatorial candidates
administrative procedures to help increase coverage (ELE and 12- month continuous)
access roundtable focused on transportation barriers
folding separate CHIP into Medicaid
with MCOs & influence new MCO contracts
staff and considering push to add EPSDT to CHIP
providers
November
day in Feb, still using resources to educate providers and lawmakers about EPSDT
Profiles
us/advocacy-and-policy/federal- advocacy/Pages/Childrens-Health- Care-Coverage-Fact-Sheets.aspx
Strategies and tools for effective advocacy
32
Colin Reusch, MPA Director of Policy, Children’s Dental Health Project
programs
Care Organizations [MCOs], Dental Contractors, etc.)
covered by Medicaid and CHIP
Unaware of the bulletin and its implications Focused on specific
individualized care Constrained by existing care models and costs May believe they are already sufficiently in compliance
Unaware of the bulletin and it’s implications Focused on specific
individualized care Constrained by existing care models and costs May believe they are already sufficiently in compliance
schedule, dental periodicity schedule, provider manual, etc.) for alignment
Director…
communicated to providers and plans/contractors?
articulated in state/plan documents (e.g., provider manual)?
appropriate care (quality strategies, auditing/oversight, etc.)?
does it impact care/payment?
and incentivizing care protocols
policies and procedures for alignment?
principles of EPSDT, especially for high-risk kids?
bulletin with providers on their panels?
being provided to children (i.e. medical necessity & prior authorization policies, internal tracking and auditing measures)?
road and must have a clear understanding
working with professional
communicated to participating providers?
encountered barriers to providing appropriate oral health care? Can members identify specific issues, procedures, or policies that require attention?
such policies as outlined in provider manuals and other communications? (Does a lack of clarity disincentivize care)?
Medicaid or CHIP:
individualized care to treat oral health issues as well as mitigate any worsening disease?
risk for tooth decay?
available to families?
in different settings (dentists office, pediatrician
available to them (e.g., more frequent follow-up for high-risk patients)?
Medicaid/CHIP Agencies
Schedules & Payment Policies
contractors
improvement strategies
Payers (MCOs, dental plans, etc.)
policies
providers
authorization procedures
Providers & Professional Orgs
members
payer policies
barriers
Patients/Families
Medicaid agencies, payers, and providers
benefits, limits, etc.
individualized care & risk factors
Children receive care based on their needs without unnecessary delay
schedule doesn’t mean kids are getting the care they need
become real barriers to necessary care
financial
responsible for ensuring contractors & their policies don’t conflict with EPSDT or state CHIP requirements
Oral Health Programs
Childhood Tooth Decay
For more information:
Follow us on Facebook or Twitter:
Web: www.cdhp.org Twitter: @Teeth_Matter
Colin Reusch
Director of Policy Email: creusch@cdhp.org Phone: 202.417.3595
Type your question in to the chat box.
Contacts for further questions: Colin Reusch, Children’s Dental Health Project Director of Policy Email: creusch@cdhp.org Phone: 202.417.3595 Amy Cotton, Children’s Dental Health Project Policy Communications Manager Email: acotton@cdhp.org Phone: 202.417.3602