reduction plan terp
play

Reduction Plan (TERP) Joint Hearing of the House Appropriations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overview of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Joint Hearing of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Article VI, VII and VIII and the House Environmental Regulation Committee July 10, 2012 Prepared by the Legislative Budget Board


  1. Overview of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Joint Hearing of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Article VI, VII and VIII and the House Environmental Regulation Committee July 10, 2012 Prepared by the Legislative Budget Board

  2. Why TERP Was Created • TERP was established through the creation of Chapters 386 and 387, Health and Safety Code, by Senate Bill 5, 77 th Legislature, 2001, with the following main goals set forth: – “To assure that the air in this state is safe to breathe and meets minimum federal standards established under the Federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. section 7407); – To develop multi- pollutant approaches to solving the state’s environmental problems; and – To adequately fund research and development that would make the state a leader in new technologies to solve environmental problems while creating new business and industry in the state.” Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP), Biennial Report to the Legislature, December 2010 Legislative Budget Board Page 2

  3. Why TERP Was Created (continued) • Senate Bill 5 also directed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to remove two mandatory measures for achieving reductions in emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) identified in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and replace them with voluntary incentive programs. (SIP is the roadmap the state uses to demonstrate to the EPA that Texas is on target to reach air quality attainment status.) The two removed strategies, which applied only in the Houston-Galveston and Dallas-Fort Worth nonattainment areas, were: – a limit on the use of construction and industrial equipment from 6 am to 10 am; and – a requirement that the owners and operators of certain diesel-powered construction, industrial, commercial, and lawn and garden equipment replace such equipment with authorized lower emission replacements. • Incentive funding was also expected to be available to help achieve reductions in counties located in other nonattainment and near-nonattainment areas. Legislative Budget Board Page 3

  4. Original Components of TERP Program Implementing Agency Current Status Emissions Reduction Incentive TCEQ Existing grants Motor Vehicle Purchase or Lease Comptroller of Public Accounts Never Implemented Incentive Program Energy Efficiency Program Public Utility Commission Never Implemented Eliminated by the 82 nd New Technology Research and Texas Council on Environmental Technology (TCET) — moved to Development Program (NTRD) Legislature, Regular the TCEQ in 2005 Session, 2011 Building Energy Performance Energy Systems Laboratory Existing Standards (ESL) /Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) Legislative Budget Board Page 4

  5. Original TERP Funding Sources • Revenues related to the TERP were directed to the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan Account No. 5071, a General Revenue-Dedicated Account created through passage of Senate Bill 5, 77 th Legislature, 2001. The fund originally consisted of: – $225 title fee on out-of-state vehicles registering in Texas, the main funding source envisioned for TERP; – 10 percent of the registration fee for truck trailers and commercial vehicles; – 1 percent surcharge on each sale, lease, or rental of new or used off-road equipment; – 2.5 percent of the total charge for retail sale or lease of year 1996 and earlier on-road diesel motor vehicles over 14,000 lbs; and – $10 fee per commercial motor vehicle inspection. Legislative Budget Board Page 5

  6. Funding Changes by the 78 th Legislature • The $225 registration fee on out-of-state vehicles was ruled unconstitutional and was never collected. • To replace the lost revenue source, the 78 th Legislature enacted House Bill 1365 which: – Established a new vehicle title transfer fee of $15 to $20, depending on the county where the vehicle is registered; – Increased the surcharge on off-road equipment from 1 to 2 percent; and – Added a 1 percent surcharge for the sale, lease, or use of model year 1997 and later heavy-duty on-road vehicles. • Revenue collections for TERP increased from $20.6 million in fiscal year 2002 to $143.1 million in fiscal year 2004. Legislative Budget Board Page 6

  7. TERP Legislation • Since it’s creation by the 77 th Legislature, every succeeding legislature has modified TERP.  78 th Legislature, 2003 − House Bill 37, which transferred appropriations made to TCET to the TCEQ; − House Bill 43, which defined roles of the TCEQ and TCET in administering NTRD; and − House Bill 1365, which established new revenue sources for TERP and increased the number of counties and types of projects eligible for funding. Legislative Budget Board Page 7

  8. TERP Legislation (continued)  79 th Legislature, 2005 – House Bill 2481 • Designated that a portion of the certificate of title fee going to the TERP Account No. 5071 would instead be directed to the Texas Mobility Fund, with an equal amount of money being sent from the State Highway Fund No. 6 to the TERP Account No. 5071; and • Eliminated the TCET and designated that all NTRD funding would be transferred to a nonprofit research organization in Houston. – House Bill 3469, which authorized the TCEQ to create the Texas Clean School Bus Program to provide grants for technologies that reduce diesel-exhaust emissions inside the cabin of a school bus. Legislative Budget Board Page 8

  9. TERP Legislation (continued)  80 th Legislature, 2007 − Senate Bill 12, which raised the maximum cost-effectiveness of a grant project and added marine vessels to the list of vehicles and equipment eligible for funding. − House Bill 160 added “rail relocation and improvement” as projects eligible for TERP funding.  81 st Legislature, 2009 − Senate Bill 1759 established the Clean Fleet Program, providing incentives for the owners of large vehicle fleets to replace diesel vehicles with hybrids or alternative fuel vehicles. Legislative Budget Board Page 9

  10. TERP Legislation (continued)  81 st Legislature, 2009 (cont’d) − House Bill 1796 • Established the New Technology Implementation (NTIG) Program within TERP to provide incentives for clean energy projects, new technology projects, and electricity storage projects; and • Transferred the administration of the NTRD program back to the TCEQ from the nonprofit research organization that had been administering it. Legislative Budget Board Page 10

  11. TERP Legislation (continued ) 82 nd Legislature, 2011 − Senate Bill 20 and Senate Bill 385 both establish three new grant programs within TERP: • The Natural Gas Vehicle Rebate Program; • The Natural Gas Fueling Station program; and • The Alternative Fueling Facilities Program. − Senate Bill 527 eliminates the NTRD program and creates a new air monitoring program to fund regional air monitoring projects. − Currently, the TERP program is set to expire on September 1, 2019. Legislative Budget Board Page 11

  12. Current Statutory Funding Allocations for TERP Statutory Funding Program Allocation (Annual) TCEQ administrative costs Up to $3.4 million Regional Air Monitoring Program Up to $7 million in 2012 and 2013 & up to $3 million in future years Emissions Reduction Incentive grants Remaining funds Clean Fleet Program 5 percent Clean School Bus Program Up to 4 percent On-Road Diesel Purchase or Lease Incentives Up to 10 percent New Technology Incentive Grants, including electricity storage projects related to Specified amount renewable energy Air Quality Research Specified amount Health effects study Up to $200,000 Supplement funding for Air Quality planning – transfer to Clean Air Account No. 151 Up to $500,000 Energy Systems Lab (ESL) – develop and compute creditable emissions reductions Up to $216,000 obtained through wind and other renewable energy resources for the SIP ESL administrative costs Up to 1.5 percent Legislative Budget Board Page 12

  13. 2012-13 Estimated Expenditures 2012-13 Expenditures (in millions) Percent of Total TCEQ Administration $6.4 5.6% Regional Air Monitoring Program $14.0 12.1% Emissions Reduction Incentive Grants 1 $55.7 48.3% Texas Clean Fleet Program (minimum) $5.7 5.0% Texas Clean School Bus Program (maximum) $4.6 4.0% Texas Natural Gas Vehicle Grant Program (minimum) $18.3 15.9% Alternative Fueling Stations/Clean Transportation Triangle Program (maximum) $4.6 4.0% Alternative Fueling Facilities Program $2.3 2.0% Health Effects Study (maximum) $0.4 0.3% TCEQ Research $2.0 1.7% Energy System Laboratory Contract (maximum) $0.4 0.4% TCEQ Total $114.3 99.2% Texas Engineering Experiment Station (ESL admin. costs) $0.9 0.8% GRAND TOTAL $115.2 100.0% 1 TCEQ Rider 21 allocates an additional $8M per fiscal year for Emissions Reduction Incentive Grants, once revenue exceeds the Biennial Revenue Estimate. This is not included above. Legislative Budget Board Page 13

  14. TERP Revenue Sources Fiscal Year 2011 Interest On-Road Diesel Fee $4.1 (1%-2.5%) (3%) $10.0 (6%) 2% Fee on Sale/Lease of Off-Road Diesel $34.2 Total Revenue: $10 Commercial (21%) $162.2 million Vehicle Surcharge $5.3 (3%) Vehicle Title 10% Commercial Transfer Fee Vehicle Registration $98.5 Surcharge (61%) $10.1 (6%) Legislative Budget Board Page 14

  15. TERP GR-Dedicated Account No. 5071 Revenue, Expenditures &Fund Balance (in millions) Fiscal Years 2002 to 2013 $700 $600 $500 $400 Expenditures $300 Revenues $200 Fund Balance $100 $0 (*projected) Sources: TCEQ, Comptroller of Public Accounts, LBB Legislative Budget Board Page 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend