recent progress in regge limit
play

Recent progress in Regge limit Agust n Sabio Vera Universidad Aut - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Recent progress in Regge limit Agust n Sabio Vera Universidad Aut onoma de Madrid, Instituto de F sica Te orica UAM/CSIC Hadron Structure & QCD, GATCHINA, RUSIA, June 30 - July 4, 2014 Agust n Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT)


  1. Recent progress in Regge limit Agust´ ın Sabio Vera Universidad Aut´ onoma de Madrid, Instituto de F´ ısica Te´ orica UAM/CSIC Hadron Structure & QCD, GATCHINA, RUSIA, June 30 - July 4, 2014 Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 1 / 16

  2. BFKL is a beautiful theory At very high energies new degrees of freedom arise Present in QCD, SUSY and gravity They allow to calculate many processes to all orders � s In the limit s ≫ t , Q 2 we have α s ( Q ) log � ∼ O (1) . t These dominate the amplitudes and must be resummed to all orders. Kinematic origin: where y A − y B is the difference in rapidity of particles A and B. Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 2 / 16

  3. s log n ( s ) ∼ α n s ( y A − y B ) n . When s → ∞ we should resum α n � y A � y 1 � y n − 1 ∞ � σ LL C LL ( k i ) α n = dy 1 dy 2 . . . dy n tot n s y B y B y B n =0 ∞ C LL ( k i ) � s ( y A − y B ) n n α n = n ! � �� � n =0 LL LL BFKL formalism allows us to calculate the coefficients C LL ( k i ). n Real physics starts at NLL: sensitive to the running & choice of energy scale: ∞ C LL ( k i ) � n ( y A − y B − B ) n � � n α s − A α 2 σ tot = s n ! n =1 � � ∞ B C LL ( k i ) + ( n − 1) A C LL n − 1 ( k i ) � n s ( y A − y B ) n − 1 = σ LL α n tot − ( n − 1)! � �� � n =1 NLL besides, quarks enter the game ... Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 3 / 16

  4. LHC phenomenology : examples with a cut Production of Jets, W, Z y Drell-Yan in different topologies: Production of quark pairs & Higgs in different topologies: Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 4 / 16

  5. LHC phenomenology : examples without a cut Diffractive production in different topologies: Gap = region in the detector without hadronic activity. Clear signal. Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 5 / 16

  6. • Need to find at least one observable where ”pure” BFKL at NLO fits the data and all other approaches fail. • From there we can introduce corrections: Lower the p T : Treatment of the running in the infrared Asymmetric scales: Collinear corrections Larger energies: Non-linearities • We need two ingredients: △ NLO Coupling of Pomeron to external system. Lipatov high energy effective action is very useful for this: We have used it to obtain [ Chachamis, Hentschinski, Madrigal, SV ]: NLO gluon Regge trajectory NLO Mueller-Navelet vertex NLO Mueller-Tang vertex. △ Exact solution to the NLO gluon Green function with access to all its exclusive information. Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 6 / 16

  7. Monte Carlo for ”pure” NLO BFKL Effective Feynman rules: Simplest case, minijet production at LL. Gluon Regge trajectory: log q 2 q ) = − α s N c ω ( � λ 2 π Modified propagators in the t -channel: � � ω ( t i ) s i = e ω ( t i )( y i − y i +1 ) s 0 � 1 − λ 2 � � 2 − λ 2 � � α s N c � 2 � k 2 � k 2 θ θ δ (2) � � d 2 � d 2 � � k A + � k 1 + � k 2 − � k 1 k 2 k B π k 2 π k 2 π 1 2 � Y � y 1 dy 2 e ω ( � k A ) ( Y − y 1 ) e ω ( � k A + � k 1 ) ( y 1 − y 2 ) e ω ( � k A + � k 1 + � k 2 ) y 2 × dy 1 0 0 Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 7 / 16

  8. � d 2 � k A d 2 � k B φ A ( Q 1 ,� k A ) φ B ( Q 2 ,� f ( � k A ,� σ ( Q 1 , Q 2 , Y ) = k B ) k B , Y ) � �� � � �� � PROCESS − DEPENDENT UNIVERSAL � � � k A ,� f k B , Y = � � i − λ 2 � n � k 2 ∞ δ (2) � � α s N c θ � � e ω ( � k A ) Y � k A − � d 2 � = + k B k i π k 2 π i n =1 i =1 � � � � y i − 1 n � dy i e ( ω ( � k A + � i l =1 � k l ) − ω ( � k A + � i − 1 l =1 � k l )) y i δ (2) � � k l − � × k A + k B 0 l =1 This is not a model of BFKL, it is full NLO BFKL at cross section level Agreement with all known analytic results at NLO in QCD and N=4 SUSY (singlet and adjoint) Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 8 / 16

  9. Number of emissions? The area is the gluon Green function [Chachamis,ASV] [PLB709 2012] Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 9 / 16

  10. Gluon | p T | in a given rapidity bin? [Chachamis, ASV][PLB717 2012] [...+Salas][PRD87 2013][...+Murdaca, Caporale, Madrigal][PLB724 2013] Modifications of BFKL (non-perturbative or saturation) suppress IR diffusion. This is the same effect as momentum transfer in elastic non-forward amplitudes. Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 10 / 16

  11. � � � k A ,� Growth with energy? = f k B , Y Forward LO BFKL Singlet Green function (q = 0) f n (k A = 15 GeV, k B = 30 GeV, Y, α = 0.2) 0.01 n = 0 1 2 0.001 0.0001 1e-05 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Y Different growth for different components in the azimuthal angle: � � � � � 2 π | � k A | , | � � k A ,� d θ f n k B | , Y = 2 π f k B , Y cos ( n θ ) 0 n = 0 grows and n > 0 decrease with Y VERY IMPORTANT: this happens only in BFKL dynamics We can use it to distinguish BFKL from other approaches Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 11 / 16

  12. BFKL CCFM All CCFM projections grow, not in BFKL. [Chachamis,Deak,ASV,Stephens][NPB849 2011] Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 12 / 16

  13. In BFKL cross sections � d 2 k a d 2 k b φ A ( Q 1 , k a ) φ B ( Q 2 , k b ) f ( k a , k b , Y ) σ ( Q 1 , Q 2 , Y ) = LO NLO N 2 LO N 3 LO N 4 LO f (k a , k b = 20, � = 0.2, Y = 3) 0.001 Bessel 0.0001 1e-05 0.1 1 10 k a / k b collinear regions important if impact factors allow for asymmetric scales. To remain in strict BFKL domain we need “delta-like” impact factors φ A , B & Q 1 ≃ Q 2 . Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 13 / 16

  14. DIS data: F 2 ( x , Q 2 ) ≃ x − λ Hadron-Pomeron coupling based on NLL BFKL 0.5 Combined HERA data Real cuts: Λ = 0.21 GeV, Q 0 = 0.27 GeV, δ = 6.9 Smooth cuts: Λ = 0.21 GeV, Q 0 = 0.27 GeV, δ = 6.9 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 λ 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 1 10 100 Q 2 (GeV 2 ) Transition from Hard to Soft Pomeron well described. But it is NLL BFKL plus many other things - It is too inclusive [Hentschinski,ASV,Salas][PRL110, PRD87 2013] Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 14 / 16

  15. Observable proposed in [ASV][NPB746 2006] [ASV,Schwennsen][NPB 2007,PRD77 2008] as perfect to capture BFKL dynamics C 1 = < cos (2 θ ) > C 2 < cos ( θ ) > Conformal observable: [Angioni,Chachamis,Madrigal,ASV][PRL107 2011] There should be no contribution from n = 0 component Predictions at LO and NLO are very similar for this observable Confirmation of this idea in 2013 [Caporale,Murdaca,ASV,Salas][NPB 875 2013] . Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 15 / 16

  16. Recent progress in Regge limit Rich phenomenology, all ingredients are ready. New observables? Workshops Series in Madrid on MRK (October 2012, February 2014) Agust´ ın Sabio Vera (UAM, IFT) Recent progress in Regge limit April 15, 2014 16 / 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend