Quick report on HV testing of Fiber- Reinforced Plastic (FRP): - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quick report on hv testing of fiber reinforced plastic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quick report on HV testing of Fiber- Reinforced Plastic (FRP): - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quick report on HV testing of Fiber- Reinforced Plastic (FRP): delamination seen Jennifer Tyler Glenn Horton-Smith 2016-07-13 Reminder: Two-sided charge-up Electric potential Uniformly charged surface in external field Charged


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quick report on HV testing of Fiber- Reinforced Plastic (FRP): delamination seen

Jennifer Tyler Glenn Horton-Smith 2016-07-13

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Reminder: Two-sided charge-up

  • Charged
  • Analytic form confirms

dependence on aspect ratio for w/d >> 1.

  • High fields at corners:

analytical expression gives logarithmic divergence of E at corners

Electric potential Uniformly charged surface in external field Bo's simulation of surface charged until field canceled at surface

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Effect of bulk resistance?

  • Current Flux J = (Field) / (Resistivity)
  • To limit internal field in material to some amount Emax,

corresponding resistivity is Emax / J.

  • For 4” box-beam with 1/4” walls centered in 40 cm gap, exterior

drift is 15 cm, interior is 10 cm.

  • different charge-up currents, slightly higher field inside box channel at

equilibrium

  • J ~ 20 pA/m2
  • To limit Emax < 10 kV/cm, need resistivity less than

(10e3 V/cm)/(2.4e-15 A/cm^2) = 4e18 ohm-cm.

  • To keep field above 500 V/cm, need resistivity greater than

2e17 ohm-cm.

  • These resistances are all way larger than lower limits given by

vendors...

slide-4
SLIDE 4

We have been measuring current through 12”x12”x1/4” FRP

20 G I + V

  • Keithley

electrometer Stainless plate Conductive foam FRP sample

slide-5
SLIDE 5

We have interesting results we will describe in more detail later

  • Bulk resistivity – apparently in the range we want
  • Apparent hysteresis in charging complicates analysis

– Weirdly consistent with a ferroelectric effect (?); we

are still checking for instrumental effects

  • Clear observation of delamination of edges when

HV applied!

– Conditions: 2.8 kV applied over 11.5”x11.5” area of

12”x12” plate, 3 days and 0.5 day tests.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

After 3 days at 2.9 kV (4.6 kV/cm)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

After filing edge to clean and camfer, then 0.5 days at 2.9 kV