QUARK GLUON PLASMA DROPLETS WITH THREE DIFFERENT GEOMETRIES T. Csrg - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quark gluon plasma droplets with three different
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

QUARK GLUON PLASMA DROPLETS WITH THREE DIFFERENT GEOMETRIES T. Csrg - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

QUARK GLUON PLASMA DROPLETS WITH THREE DIFFERENT GEOMETRIES T. Csrg 1,2 and M. Csand 3 for the PHENIX Collaboration 1 MTA Wigner FK, Budapest, Hungary 2 EKE KRC, Gyngys, Hungary 3 ELTE, Budapest, Hungary Based on: arXiv:1807.11928, PRL


slide-1
SLIDE 1

QUARK GLUON PLASMA DROPLETS

  • T. Csörgő 1,2 and M. Csanád 3

for the PHENIX Collaboration

1 MTA Wigner FK, Budapest, Hungary 2 EKE KRC, Gyöngyös, Hungary 3 ELTE, Budapest, Hungary

Based on: arXiv:1807.11928, PRL 121 (2018) 222301 arXiv:1805.02973, Nature Physics, v15 (2019) (3)

RHIC geometry scan p/d/3He+Au: v2, v3 Hydrodynamic predictions CGC postdictions QGP droplets engineered Summary

Based on M. Csanád’s PHENIX talk at Zimányi 2018, Sylvia Morrow’s talk at DNP-JSPS18 talk and Xiao Qu’s talk at WWND 2019

WITH THREE DIFFERENT GEOMETRIES

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Nature Physics Editorial: QGP, drop by drop

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0375-6

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PHENIX DETECTOR SYSTEM

3

CNT: Charged particle tracking, central arm FVTX: Charged p. tracking, event plane; BBC: event plane, centrality

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BEAM ENERGY SCAN: CAN WE TURN IT OFF? Is it hydrodynamics?

4

RHIC operations: versatility. Beam energy scan x geometry scan, for d+Au: 19.6 ≤ √s ≤ 200 GeV

slide-5
SLIDE 5

GEOMETRY SCAN: 3 DIFFERENT SHAPES Is it hydrodynamics?

5

RHIC operations: versatility. Geometry scan: p+Au, d+Au and 3He+Au at √s =200 GeV

slide-6
SLIDE 6

GEOMETRY SCAN: 3 DIFFERENT SHAPES Is it hydrodynamics?

6

Hydrodynamics (SONIC, lQCD EoS, 1+2d): Different initial geometry /energy deposition translated by 𝛼p to different final state momentum space correlations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GEOMETRY SCAN: v2 RESULTS Is it hydrodynamics?

7

v2 RESULTS CONSISTENT WITH HYDRO ORDERING

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0360-0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

GEOMETRY SCAN: v3 RESULTS Is it hydrodynamics?

8

v3 RESULTS CONSISTENT WITH HYDRO ORDERING

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0360-0

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GEOMETRY SCAN: v2 RESULTS Is it hydrodynamics?

9

v2, v3 Results CLEARLY NOT inconsistent with hydro ordering What about quantitative tests and/or alternative explanations?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GEOMETRY SCAN VS HYDRO PREDICTIONS

10

v2, v3 : Data within syst errors quantitatively consistent with 2 different detailed hydro model predictions: SONIC/iEBE-VISHNU

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION: SATURATION?

11

https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09342 (MSTV)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

GEOMETRY SCAN VS MSTV CGC SATURATION

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

GEOMETRY SCAN VS GLUON SATURATION

13

https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09342 (MSTV) MSTV – CGC model misses geometry in v3(pt)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CROSS-CHECK ON MVST - CGC

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS

15

p-value: probability that the model describes the data Hydrodynamic models (SONIC, iEBE-VISHNU, lQCD EoS, 1+2d) MSTV: Gluon saturation, Color Glass Condensate

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FORWARD PARTICLE PRODUCTION

Wounded quark model (WQM) works for dn/dh 3d hydrodynamic models also describe qualitatively dn/dh WQM: Barej, Bzdak, Gutowski, PRC 97 (2018) 034901 3d hydro: Bozek, Broniowski, PLB 739, 304 (2014)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

DETAILES OF FORWARD PRODUCTION

Wounded quark model (WQM) OK for centrality of dn/dh v2(h) scales approximately with dn/dh WQM: Barej, Bzdak, Gutowski, PRC 97 (2018) 034901

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

RHIC: versatility Geometry and beam energy scan PHENIX: Perfect fluid of sQGP, drop-by-drop in p/d/3He+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

19

Partially supported by NKTIH FK 123842 and FK123959 and EFOP 3.6.1-16-2016-00001