Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quantum error correction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication Institute of Physics, University of Mainz Peter van Loock Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication Institute of Physics, University of Mainz Peter van


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication

Peter van Loock

Institute of Physics, University of Mainz

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication

Peter van Loock, Fabian Ewert, Marcel Bergmann

Institute of Physics, University of Mainz

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview

 Ultrafast Long-Distance Quantum Communication  Old versus New Quantum Repeaters: QED vs. QEC  Photon Loss Codes

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview

 Ultrafast Long-Distance Quantum Communication with Linear Optics  Old versus New Quantum Repeaters: QED vs. QEC  Photon Loss Codes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Classification of Quantum Repeaters

1.) Original Quantum Repeaters (Briegel et al., DLCZ,…): use entanglement distribution, swapping, purification (loss, local errors) 2.) Quantum repeaters with purification (loss) and QECC (local errors) 3.) Quantum repeaters with QECC only (loss and local errors)

  • S. Muralidharan, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M.D. Lukin, and L. Jiang , PRL 112, 250501 (2014)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Original Quantum Repeaters: Quantum Error Detection for Long-Distance Quantum Communication

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Direct Transmission of Flying Qubits

1

in

    

in

  • ut

 

 

1 . c . H 1

2

  • ut

          

 

att

/

exp L L   

L

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Direct Transmission of Flying Qubits

01 10

in

    

in

  • ut

 

00 00 1

in in

  • ut

       

 

in

  • ut

in att

/

exp         F L L

L

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Direct Transmission of Flying Qubits

01 10

in

    

in

in in PS

  • ut

    

 

 

PS

  • ut

succ att

Tr exp

/

      P L L

L

QED

PS

  • ut

slide-10
SLIDE 10

QED on Flying Qubits

01 10

in

    

in

QED

?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

QED on Flying Qubits

01 10

in

    

in

QED

?

….need to detect the qubit non-destructively

slide-12
SLIDE 12

QED on Flying Qubits

BM

 L L L

Bell measurement detects syndrome and „recovers“ in one step: no loss = 2-photon detection, photon lost =1-photon detection

classical channel

in

slide-13
SLIDE 13

QED on Flying Qubits

BM

 L L L

classical channel

in

Complications:  on-demand generation of local Bell states  Bell measurement with unit success probability  never beats direct transmission

slide-14
SLIDE 14

QED on Flying Qubits

BM

 L L L

classical channel

in

 

 

 

att att BM succ

/ /

exp exp

/

L L L L P P

L L

   

L

( for any )

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Original Quantum Repeater

Essence of subexponential scaling: some form of quantum error detection and quantum memories

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Original Quantum Repeater

 distribute known, entangled states  distribute different copies in each segment  QED/entanglement purification  quantum memories  two-way classical communication

slide-17
SLIDE 17

With Memories: Quantum Repeater

 

) 3 / 2 ( log ) / ( log swap distr

swap 2 2

/ ~ 3 2 ~ Rate

P L L

L L P P      

distr

P

distr

P L L

swap

P L

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Without Memories: Quantum Relay

distr

P

distr

P L L

swap

P L

1 / swap / distr

~ Rate

L L L L

P P

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Original Quantum Repeater

 Entanglement Purification (Quantum Error Detection)  Entanglement Distribution  Entanglement Swapping  Quantum Memories

slide-20
SLIDE 20

DLCZ Quantum Repeater

1 1 $ r    

1 1 

) (

2 2 distr

1 ; ~ r O F r P    

1 1 $ r    

L.M. Duan, M.D. Lukin, J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, Nature 414, 413 (2001)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

DLCZ Quantum Repeater

1 1 $ r    

1 1 

) (

2 2 distr

1 ; ~ r O F r P    

1 1 $ r    

 

) ( 0011 1100 0000

2

r

O r     

no-loss space

slide-22
SLIDE 22

DLCZ Quantum Repeater

1 1 $ r    

1 1 

) (

2 2 distr

1 ; ~ r O F r P    

1 1 $ r    

 

) ( 0011 1100 0000

2

r

O r     

loss space: only QED, not QEC!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Original Quantum Repeater

 distribute known, entangled states  distribute different copies in each segment  QED/entanglement purification  quantum memories  two-way classical communication Problems: very slow, limited by CC rates, good memories required

e.g. 100Hz/1000km

)) O(poly( / 1 ~ L

slide-24
SLIDE 24

New Quantum Repeaters: Quantum Error Correction for Long-Distance Quantum Communication

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Encoded Quantum Repeaters: Local Errors

  • 2. Encoded Connection
  • 3. Pauli Frame
  • L. Jiang et al., Phys. Rev. A 79, 032325 (2009);

W.J. Munro et al., Nat. Photon. 4, 792 (2010)

implementation-independent HQR with encoding secret key rates in QKD

111 1 000

,

 

etc.

  • S. Bratzik, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, PRA 89, 032335 (2014)

N.K. Bernardes and P.v.L., PRA 86, 052301 (2012)

)) ) ( O(poly(log / 1 ~ L

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Encoded Quantum Repeaters: Loss Errors

A.G. Fowler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 180503 (2010) W.J. Munro et al., Nature Photon. 6, 777 (2012)

parity loss codes topological surface codes

  • K. Azuma, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, arXiv: 1309.7207 cluster states and feedforward
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Photon Loss Codes

22 1 , 2 04 40   

Leung‘s bosonic code: exact Leung‘s AD code:

2 1100 0011 1 , 2 1111 0000    

] 1 , 4 [

approximate

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Photon Loss Codes

m m m m n n m m m n

  

    

       

01 1 , 10 with , 2 1

) , (

Quantum Parity Code (QPC):

T.C. Ralph, A.J.F. Hayes, and A. Gilchrist., PRL 95, 100501 (2005)

2 1 , 2

) , ( ) , ( ) , ( ) , ( ) , ( ) , (

           

       

m n m n m n m n m n m n

QPC(n,n) corrects (n – 1) photon losses

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Photon Loss Codes

 ,

2 01 10

) 1 , 1 (

  

QPC(1,1):

01 1 , 10

) 1 , 1 ( ) 1 , 1 (

 

QPC(2,2):

2 01011010 10100101 1 , 2 01010101 10101010

) 2 , 2 ( ) 2 , 2 (

   

Rail Dual ] 1 , 4 [ ) 2 , 2 ( QPC 

 C C C 

(is exact!)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Photon Loss Codes

1 1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ...( 1 ) 1 ...( 1 , ... 1

, 1 1 1 ,

         

  

nm n m n n i X X m j n i Z Z

j i m j ij j i ij

Quantum Parity Code (QPC):

  • S. Muralidharan, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M.D. Lukin, and L. Jiang , PRL 112, 250501 (2014)

stabilizers for physical Pauli operators independent stabilizers QPC(2,2):

XXXX IIZZ ZZII X X X X Z Z Z Z , , , ,

22 12 21 11 22 21 12 11

] 1 , 4 [

like code

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Ultrafast Quantum Communication

) , ( in m n

) , ( m n

BM

) , ( m n

) , ( m n

 L L L

…replace DR-qubit/Bell states/BM‘s by QPC-encoded qubit/Bell states/BM‘s, use stabilizer formalism and exploit transversality of QPC code as a CSS code

classical channel

  • S. Muralidharan, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M.D. Lukin, and L. Jiang , PRL 112, 250501 (2014)
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Ultrafast Quantum Communication

) , ( in m n

) , ( m n

BM

) , ( m n

) , ( m n

 L L L

classical channel

…many physical BM‘s for one logical BM via many physical CNOTs and many physical Hadamards: need nonlinear operations, matter-light interactions,…

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Ultrafast Long-Distance Quantum Communication with Linear Optics

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

) , ( in m n

) , ( m n

BM

) , ( m n

) , ( m n

 L L L

…replace matter-qubit-based QPC-Bell states by optical QPC-Bell states and nonlinear light-matter interactions by static linear optics

classical channel

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

) , ( in m n

) , ( m n

BM

) , ( m n

) , ( m n

 L L L

…replace matter-qubit-based QPC-Bell states by optical QPC-Bell states and nonlinear light-matter interactions by static linear optics

classical channel

/

) 1 (

, BM succ

L L

l l nm nm l l

l nm P P                

 

 

 

att 0 /

exp L L   

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

) , ( in m n

) , ( m n

BM

) , ( m n

) , ( m n

 L L L

…replace matter-qubit-based QPC-Bell states by optical QPC-Bell states and nonlinear light-matter interactions by static linear optics

classical channel

What is ? Can we again exploit „transversality“?

l

P

, BM

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

BM of QPC(2,2) encoded Bell states:

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

BM of QPC(2,2) encoded Bell states:

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

QPC-encoded BM works asymptotically well with linear optics (no loss) and it even still works in the presence of losses !

n l

P

 

  2 1

, BM

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Linear-Optics Quantum Communication

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Success Probabilities (Temporal Cost)

1000 km

succ /

Rate t P R

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Success Probabilities (Temporal Cost)

10000 km

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Success Probabilities (Temporal Cost)

150000 km

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Total Cost

1000 km

succ

/ ) / 2 ( / ) / 2 ( L L P t nm L L R nm C  

  • S. Muralidharan, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M.D. Lukin, and L. Jiang , PRL 112, 250501 (2014)
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Total Cost

1000 km

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Summary

 Standard quantum repeaters using QED are scalable in principle, but slow  New generation of quantum repeaters using QEC significantly improve the rates  Ultrafast loss-code-based scheme is implementable with linear optics

QR rates near CC rates, only limited by local times