PWSRCAC Response System Optimization Project PWS RCAC Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pwsrcac response system optimization project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PWSRCAC Response System Optimization Project PWS RCAC Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PWSRCAC Response System Optimization Project PWS RCAC Board Meeting Meeting May 4, 2017 Research Question What is the optimal configuration of containment, skimming, and storage (primary and secondary) for nine PWS recovery systems


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PWSRCAC Response System Optimization Project

PWS RCAC Board Meeting Meeting May 4, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Research Question

  • What is the optimal configuration of

containment, skimming, and storage (primary and secondary) for nine PWS recovery systems (three open-water and six nearshore) over a five-day simulated spill response assuming favorable weather conditions?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Weir Skimmer

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Oleophilic Disc Skimmer

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Scenario

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Operational Periods

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What Are We Optimizing?

  • The amount of oil recovered for a given
  • perational period
  • Trying to match De-rated Encounter Rate with

De-rated Skimmer Rate and make both as high as possible

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RESULTS

  • Open-Water Response Systems

– Base Case – Optimized

  • Nearshore Response Systems

– Base Case – Optimized

  • Secondary Storage Analysis

– Nearshore

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Recovered Fluids

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TRANSREC/GRAMREC - BASE CASE

38,067 bbl

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CB8 BARGE- BASE CASE

53,012 bbl

slide-12
SLIDE 12

VALDEZ STAR - BASE CASE

14,290 bbl

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TRANSREC/GRAMREC - OPTMIZE

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CB8 BARGE- OPTIMIZE

slide-15
SLIDE 15

VALDEZ STAR- OPTIMIZE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

NEARSHORE BASE CASE

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BBL OP 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OP 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OP 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BBL

Free Water Water in Emulsion Oil

CB4 CB2 J-boom Weir Disc

BBL BBL BBL OP OP

2,236 bbl 1,573 bbl 2,236 bbl 2,076 bbl 1,860 bbl 593 bbl

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CB4 WEIR - OPTIMIZE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CB4 DISC - OPTIMIZE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CB2 WEIR - OPTIMIZE

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CB2 DISC - OPTIMIZE

slide-21
SLIDE 21

J-BOOM WEIR - OPTIMIZE

Essentially the same as CB4 Weir

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SECONDARY STORAGE - OPTIMIZE

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Secondary Storage Optimal

Operating Area Size for 10 Offload Stations

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Secondary Storage Model

Radius X nm

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Secondary Storage Model

Secondary Storage Barge

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Secondary Storage Model

Skimming System Primary Storage Barge

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Secondary Storage Model

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Secondary Storage Model

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Secondary Storage Model

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Secondary Storage Model

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Secondary Storage Model

Inputs:

  • Radius
  • Slick thickness
  • OP length
  • Time step length
  • Number and specs. of skimming systems
  • Number and specs. of mini-barges
  • Number of offload stations
  • Number of iterations

Outputs:

  • Status of everything at each time step
  • Total fluids recovered
  • Total oil recovered
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Secondary Storage Model

Scenarios:

  • Assumed 120 vessels in a scenario
  • Varied number of skimmers and and mini-

barges to utilize all 120 vessels (each skimming system uses 3 vessels and each mini-barge uses one vessel)

  • e.g. 20 skimmers and 60 mini-barges (20 x

3 + 60 = 120)

  • Ran every combination from
  • zero skimmers, 120 mini-barges
  • 60 skimmers, zero mini-barges
  • Ran for weir skimming system with 10 and

18 offload stations on secondary storage barge

  • Ran for disc skimming system with 6 and

10 offload stations on secondary storage barge

  • Ran for 2 nm to 40 nm radius
  • Ran each scenario 100 times
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Secondary Storage Model

40 20 skimmers 60 mini-barges 19,419 bbl

18 Offload Stations WEIR SKIMMERS 2 nm area

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Secondary Storage Model

40 14 skimmers 78 mini-barges 13,040 bbl

10 Offload Stations WEIR SKIMMERS 2 nm area

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Secondary Storage Model

40 M i n i

  • b

a r g e

  • l

i m i t e d S k i m m e r

  • l

i m i t e d

18 Offload Stations WEIR SKIMMERS 2 nm area

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Secondary Storage Model

40 Mini-barge-limited Skimmer-limited Station-limited

10 Offload Stations WEIR SKIMMERS 2 nm area

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Secondary Storage Model

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Secondary Storage Optimal

Weir Skimming Systems

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Secondary Storage Optimal

Disc Skimming Systems

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Secondary Storage Optimal

Decanting Mini-Barges

  • In OP 4 a weir skimmer can fill a mini-barge in 22 minutes
  • When full, the mini-barge will hold 189 bbl of free-water
  • The capacity of the de-cant pump is 17 bbl/hr
  • Thus it will require 8.9 hours to decant 80% of that free-

water

  • Considering the time it would take run back and forth to

the Secondary Storage Barge at 5 kts, rig/de-rig, and pump-out the mini-barge, the mini-barge would have to be at least 20.8 nm away from the Secondary Storage Barge for decanting to make sense.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Considerations

  • Potential oil recovery is valuable as a comparative metric
  • nly.
  • Real-world testing and training are critical.
  • Oil properties and weather conditions impact results.
  • Realistic equipment assumptions are critical.
  • Results regarding disc skimmers could apply to oleophilic

skimmers generally.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

FINDINGS

  • Oleophilic skimmers have significant advantages over weir

skimmers due to the lack of free-water recovered.

  • The sooner systems are deployed the better total oil

recovery will be for the response.

  • Open-water systems are encounter rate limited.

Improvements to these systems can be achieved by increasing the swath-width.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

FINDINGS

  • Nearshore systems are pump rate limited and can be

improved by increasing skimmer capacity.

  • Secondary storage will require more offload stations if

weir skimmers are used, compared to disc skimmers.

  • The optimal configuration for weir skimming systems is 18
  • ffload stations, 20 skimming systems and 60 mini-barges.
  • The optimal configuration for disc skimming systems is 10
  • ffload stations, 26 skimming systems and 42 mini-barges.
slide-44
SLIDE 44

FINDINGS

  • Total oil recover declines by about 2% per nm from the

secondary storage barge.

  • Large operating areas require more mini-barges to operate

efficiently.

  • Decanting mini-barges is not efficient.