PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG is to Discuss the Need and Present the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
purpose of thi s meeti ng
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG is to Discuss the Need and Present the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 19, 2023 231 likes •732 views

PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG is to Discuss the Need and Present the Proposed Alternatives to Improve US-62 From SH-9 to Anadarko in Caddo County N City of Anadarko Project Beginning Project End Caddo County, Oklahoma PURPOSE OF THE

slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

PURPOSE OF THI S MEETI NG

…is to Discuss the Need and Present the Proposed Alternatives to Improve US-62 From SH-9 to Anadarko in Caddo County

Project Beginning Project End

N

Caddo County, Oklahoma

City

  • f

Anadarko

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT

…is to Correct the Deficient Curves on US-62 and Improve the Safety of the Roadway

Anadarko, OK NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd. NS 2630 Rd.

East Project West Project

Apache “Y”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Initial Alternative Screening Develop Preliminary Alternatives Initial Data Collection Identify Problem Tribal Meeting TODAY Public Meeting

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PROJECT HI STORY

  • Prior Study by ODOT
  • Three Alternatives Studied
  • Improvements to Existing
  • North Alignment
  • South Alignment
  • Public Meeting Held

February 28, 2012

  • North Alternative Selected
  • Field Survey – Found Isolated

Grave Site

  • Additional Alternatives

Considered Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CORRI DOR WI DE I MPROVEMENTS

  • SH-9 From Fort Cobb to US-62 (Apache “Y”)

Initial Data Collection Preliminary Options Option Screening

N 2570 Rd. N 2610 Rd.

Fort Cobb

E 1340 Rd N 2580 Rd. Apache “Y” E 1350 Rd E 1330 Rd

Washita River

N

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PROJECT AREA I NFORMATI ON

  • General Data
  • 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulders
  • Speed Limit – Posted 65 mph
  • 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek)
  • Existing (2015) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Day
  • Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day (10% Trucks)

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PROJECT AREA I NFORMATI ON

  • General Data
  • 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulders
  • Speed Limit – Posted 65 mph
  • 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek)
  • Existing (2015) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Day
  • Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day (10% Trucks)

N

NS 2620 Rd.

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PROJECT AREA I NFORMATI ON

  • General Data
  • 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulders
  • Speed Limit – Posted 65 mph
  • 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek)
  • Existing (2016) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Day
  • Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day

(10% Trucks)

  • Collision Data
  • Total: 90 Documented Accidents (2009-2015)
  • 48 Personal Property Damage
  • 38 Injury
  • 4 Fatal

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

  • More Than Twice the State Average for Collisions

(expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles)

  • US-62: 155.4 (65.6 injury, 6.9 fatality)
  • Statewide for Non Interstates: 63.82 (30.56 injury, 2.60 fatality)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

COLLI SI ON DATA

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS WARRANT I MPROVEMENT

  • Roadway Deficiencies
  • Narrow Shoulders
  • Roadway Geometry
  • Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient

(Curvature and Superelevation)

  • Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient
  • Limited Sight Distance

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-12
SLIDE 12

EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS WARRANT I MPROVEMENT

Anadarko, OK NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd. NS 2630 Rd.

East Project West Project

Apache “Y”

  • Roadway Deficiencies
  • Narrow Shoulders
  • Roadway Geometry
  • Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient

(Curvature and Superelevation)

  • Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient
  • Limited Sight Distance
slide-13
SLIDE 13

EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS WARRANT I MPROVEMENT

  • Roadway Deficiencies
  • Narrow Shoulders
  • Roadway Geometry
  • Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient

(Curvature and Superelevation)

  • Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient
  • Limited Sight Distance

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

East Project West Project

NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection

  • Identified Project Constraints
  • Topography
  • Homes & Businesses
  • Driveways
  • Local Access
  • Utilities
  • Tribal Properties & Cultural Sites
  • Environmental Resources

Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection

  • Identified Project Constraints
  • Topography
  • Homes & Businesses
  • Driveways
  • Local Access
  • Utilities
  • Tribal Properties & Cultural Sites
  • Environmental Resources

Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection

  • Identified Project Constraints
  • Topography
  • Homes & Businesses
  • Driveways
  • Local Access
  • Utilities
  • Tribal Properties & Cultural Sites
  • Environmental Resources

Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

  • Data Collection Area
  • Encompassed all Alternatives
  • Database Research and Field Reconnaissance

Anadarko, OK NS-2620 Rd.

N

NS-2610 Rd. NS-2630 Rd. Apache “Y”

East Project West Project

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

  • Tribal Properties (West Project)
  • Trust Lands (Hatched)
  • According to Information From the Counties and BIA
  • Primarily in the West Project

N

Apache “Y” NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd.

West Project

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

  • Tribal Church and Cemetery
  • Ware’s Chapel
  • Ware’s Cemetery
  • Grave Site (Helen James

Died 1912?)

Ware’s Cemetery Ware’s Chapel Grave Site

NS-2620 Rd.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

  • Tribal Church and Cemetery
  • Ware’s Chapel
  • Ware’s Cemetery
  • Grave Site (Helen James

Died 1912?)

Ware’s Cemetery Ware’s Chapel Grave Site

NS-2620 Rd.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

  • Wetlands and Streams
  • Streams – Hog Creek &

Tributaries, Washita River

  • Wetlands – Associated With

Washita River

  • Large Floodplain

Anadarko, OK

N

NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. NS-2630 Rd. Apache “Y”

East Project West Project

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PROJECT CONSTRAI NTS

  • Cultural Resources
  • OK Indian Missionary Conference

Center and Campground (Potential Historic Buildings)

  • One Known Archaeological Site

Anadarko, OK

N

Campground

NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. NS-2630 Rd. Apache “Y”

East Project West Project

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATI VES

  • Proposed Design Criteria
  • Roadway Section
  • Two 12-Foot Lanes
  • 8-Foot Shoulders
  • Design Speeds – 65 mph
  • Clear Zone – 28 Feet
  • Maximum Superelevation of 8%

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATI VES

8% 8% 8%

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ALTERNATI VES OVERVI EW

  • Overview
  • West Project – Alternatives 1, 2 and 3
  • Different Alignments Cross Country
  • Hog Creek Bridge
  • County Road Intersections With Heavier Movement
  • East Project – Alternatives A, B and C
  • Different Offsets – North
  • Far East End – All Centered on Existing
  • Horizontal Curve Corrections
  • Combinations

Anadarko, OK NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd. NS 2630 Rd.

East Project West Project Alternative 3

Apache “Y”

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ALTERNATI VES - WEST PROJECT

  • Overview
  • West Project – Alternatives 1, 2, and 3
  • Different Alignments Cross Country
  • Hog Creek Bridge
  • County Road Intersections With Heavier Movement
  • South Alternative – Floodplain, NRCS Dam, & Reservoir

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd.

Alternative 3

Apache “Y”

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ALTERNATI VE 1

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Closest to Existing Alignment
  • Key Features
  • Offset 50 feet South
  • Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd.

Apache “Y”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

ALTERNATI VE 1

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Closest to Existing Alignment
  • Key Features
  • Offset 50 Feet South
  • Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
  • Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd., 5%

NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd.

East Project West Project

NS 2620 Rd. Cemetery

  • NS 2620 Rd.

5.00%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

ALTERNATI VE 1

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Closest to Existing Alignment
  • Key Features
  • Offset 50 Feet South
  • Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd.
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
  • Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd., 5%
  • Bridge Over Hog Creek Offset to South – 50 Feet

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd.

Apache “Y”

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ALTERNATI VE 2

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Key Features
  • Offset 35 Feet North
  • Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Climbing Lane
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd.

Apache “Y”

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ALTERNATI VE 2

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Key Features
  • Offset 35 Feet North
  • Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Climbing Lane
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
  • Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., < 4%

East Project West Project

NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd.

< < - 4%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ALTERNATI VE 2

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Key Features
  • Offset 35 Feet North
  • Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Climbing Lane
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
  • Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., < 4%
  • Bridge Over Hog Creek Offset to South – 50 Feet
  • Portion of Existing Highway to Remain

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd.

Apache “Y”

slide-34
SLIDE 34

ALTERNATI VE 3

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Key Features
  • Offset 50 Feet South
  • One Curve Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Climbing Lane
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd.

Apache “Y”

Climbing Lane

slide-35
SLIDE 35

ALTERNATI VE 3

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Key Features
  • Offset 60 Feet South
  • One Curve Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Climbing Lane
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
  • Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., 4%

East Project West Project

NS 2620 Rd. NS 2610 Rd. NS 2620 Rd.

  • 4.00%
slide-36
SLIDE 36

ALTERNATI VE 3

  • Overview
  • Aligns With Improvements at Apache Y
  • Key Features
  • Offset 60 Feet South
  • One Curve Greater Than 6% Superelevation
  • Climbing Lane
  • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
  • Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., 4%
  • Bridge Over Hog Creek – Near Washita River
  • Portion of Existing Highway to Remain

NS 2620 Rd.

N

NS 2610 Rd.

Apache “Y”

Climbing Lane

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Anadarko, OK Washita River

N

NS 2630 Rd.

ALTERNATI VES – EAST PROJECT

  • East Project – Alternatives A, B and C
  • Different Offsets – North
  • Far East End – All Centered on Existing
  • Horizontal Curve Improvements (5 Curves)
slide-38
SLIDE 38

ALTERNATI VES – EAST PROJECT

  • Offset Roadways
  • Alternative A – 0 feet, Centered on Existing
  • Temporary Widening (22 ft), South Side at Horizontal Curves
  • Overlay Existing Pavement With New Shoulders, One Lane Flagging Needed
  • Alternative B – 13 feet North
  • Temporary Widening (8 ft), South Side
  • Overlay Existing Pavement With New Pavement on North Side (20 ft)
  • Alternative C – 50 feet North
  • No Temporary Widening Needed
  • New Pavement with Old Pavement Removed
  • Far East End - Overlay Existing Pavement With New Shoulders
  • South Offset Considered – Eliminated due to Number of Structures Impacted

N

50 ft 13 ft

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40

COMPARI SON OF ALTERNATI VES

  • Compare the Impacts of the Various Options
  • Overlay Each Option and Tabulate Impacts
  • Develop a Relative Means of Comparison

Anadarko, OK

N

NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. NS-2630 Rd. Apache “Y”

East Project West Project Alternative 3

slide-41
SLIDE 41

COMPARI SON OF ALTERNATI VES

  • All Alternatives Will Avoid the Cemetery, Ware’s Chapel, and the

Grave Site

  • If There are Other Culturally Important Sites That we Should Avoid,

Please Let us Know

Anadarko, OK

N

NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. NS-2630 Rd. Apache “Y”

East Project West Project Alternative 3

slide-42
SLIDE 42

COMPARI SON OF ALTERNATI VES

  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Roadway Geometrics, Intersections, and Safety
  • Impacts to Tribal & Private Property
  • Impacts to Homes & Businesses
  • Impacts to Environmental Resources
  • Constructability and Maintenance of Traffic During Construction
  • Cost – Construction, Right-of-Way, Utilities
  • Tribal and Public Input

Anadarko, OK

N

NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. NS-2630 Rd. Apache “Y”

East Project West Project Alternative 3

slide-43
SLIDE 43

GEOMETRI CS AND SAFETY

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

  • West Project
  • Improvements to Grades and Sight Distance Under Alternative 1 are

Limited Due to Adjacent Properties and Cemetery

  • Alternative 2 Improves Curves but Intersection at NS-2620 is Not Ideal
  • Alternative 3 Has the Most Desirable Grades, Intersections, and Sight

Distance

  • Alternatives 2 and 3 Will Require a Climbing Lane Due to the Length of

Grade

NS-2620 Rd. NS-2610 Rd. Apache “Y”

Alternative 3

slide-44
SLIDE 44

GEOMETRI CS AND SAFETY

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

  • East Project
  • All of the Alternatives Will Correct the Horizontal Curves
  • All of the East Project Alternatives are Similar in Terms of Safety

NS-2630 Rd. Anadarko, OK

Washita River

slide-45
SLIDE 45

I MPACTS – WEST PROJECT

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

  • West Project
  • Alternative 1 Has the Most Impacts to Homes and Businesses
  • One Business (Fruit Stand) Will be Affected by All Alternatives
  • Alternative 3 Requires the Most Property and Affects Wetlands

Alternative Total Cost Right-of-Way (Acres) Number of Relocations Tribal Property (acre) Wetlands (acre) Cultural Resources Traffic- Dependent Businesses Maintenance

  • f Traffic

(Lanes Closed)

2

1

3

63 75 21.7 1.7 15.5 20.2

1 (relocation) 1 1

$15.7 M

JP No. 27076(04) US-62 West of Anadarko, Caddo County West Project Matrix

4

1

34 1 $15.8 M $13.5 M

slide-46
SLIDE 46

I MPACTS – EAST PROJECT

Identify Problem Initial Data Collection Preliminary Alternatives Alternative Screening

  • East Project
  • Alternative C Requires the Most Property
  • Alternative A Would Require One-Lane Traffic for a Longer Period
  • Other Impacts are Similar for the East Project Alternatives

Alternative Total Cost Right-of-Way (Acres) Number of Relocations Tribal Property (acre) Wetlands (acre) Cultural Resources Traffic- Dependent Businesses Maintenance

  • f Traffic

(Lanes Closed) 1

C

$10.1 M $10.1 M 0.10 29

A

1

$10.4 M 0.10 33 1

B

29 0.10

1

1

JP No. 27076(04) US-62 West of Anadarko, Caddo County East Project Matrix

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48

NEXT PROJECT STEPS

Public Input TODAY Comment Period May 19, 2016 Select Preferred Alternative Construction 2023 Right-of-Way 2018 Prepare Environmental Document

slide-49
SLIDE 49

THANK YOU!

Please Submit Your Comments by May 19, 2016

 Leave Your Comment Form Here Today  Mail the Comment Form Back to ODOT: Environmental Programs Division 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105  Email Your Comments to ODOT-Environment@ODOT.ORG

QUESTIONS?