Pulsed Neutron Source for Liquid Argon TPC Calibration Jingbo Wang - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pulsed neutron source for liquid argon tpc calibration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pulsed Neutron Source for Liquid Argon TPC Calibration Jingbo Wang - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pulsed Neutron Source for Liquid Argon TPC Calibration Jingbo Wang University of California, Davis, Department of Physics Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors 2018/12/11, Fermilab Outline Why neutron source?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pulsed Neutron Source for Liquid Argon TPC Calibration

Jingbo Wang University of California, Davis, Department of Physics

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors 2018/12/11, Fermilab

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Outline

§ Why neutron source? § How does the neutron source work? § How to use the neutron source? § Neutron capture study § Conclusion

Slide 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Needs for LArTPC Calibration

§ For LArTPC, it is essential to understand the detector effects and develop calibration scheme to precisely determine the amount of energy deposition. § In LArTPC, the amount of detected charge is not always uniform throughout the whole volume. It depends on many factors:

– Electrical field distortion, space charge – Electron lifetime (argon impurity) – Electron-ion recombination – Noise level

§ It is highly desirable to have a "standard candle" energy deposition that can be detected for different positions throughout the detector volume

Slide 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Why Neutron Source?

§ cosmic muons and Michel electrons could be used, however

– Limited if deep underground: In DUNE, expect 4000 cosmics/day/10 kt

  • > 30 stopping muons and 20 Michel electrons

Slide 4

§ Radioactive source with known energy could be used, however

– The source must be physically placed at the point of interest inside the cryostat – Need to deploy in low electrical field to minimize induced E-field distortions

§ One way around these issues is to use an external neutron source, which is a newly developed calibration technique. § All different calibration systems are complementary

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

How does it work?

§ The neutron anti–resonance “dip” in the cross-section makes 40-Ar near transparent to 57 keV neutrons § 38-Ar and 36-Ar have different resonance structures that keep the natural argon from being totally transparent § The effective mean free path in natural argon is ~30 m

Slide 5

36-Ar, 0.3336% ! = 16 cm @ 57 keV 40-Ar, 99.6035% ! = 1.5 km @ 57 keV 38-Ar, 0.0634% ! = 47 cm @ 57 keV

40-Ar 38-Ar 36-Ar

57 keV anti-resonance

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Slide 6

§ In Ar-40, the width of the the anti- resonance window is 20 keV. The fractional energy loss is 4.8% per scatter § Statistically, most neutrons above anti-resonance energy could fall into the anti-resonance window § Once in the window, it takes a few scatters for the neutron to get

  • ut

§ The neutrons are thermalized and captured, emitting 6.1 MeV gamma cascade as a “standard candle” for detector calibration

18-Ar-40 EL Cross-section

∆ " # #$ = #$ − #' #$ = 1 2 1 − * − 1 * + 1

,

If we can produce anti-resonance neutrons, we could “deliver” the neutron captures to a very far distance.

How Does it Work?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

How to make anti-resonance neutrons?

Slide 7

§ Neutron source sits on top of Cryostat. Cryostat insulation has to be removed, but there is no need to open the Cryostat membrane § DD generator produces 2.5 MeV initial neutrons § Fe-S-Li moderator reduces the energy down to 73 keV § Ni neutron reflector increases the flux

Elastic scattering cross-section 40-Ar 32-S

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Geant4 Simulation for DUNE-size TPC

Slide 8

Neutron spread in a 60m × 10m × 8m LArTPC

One neutron source can illuminate half of the DUNE-size TPC

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

How to use the source?

§ It’s pulsed: plenty of neutron captures allow fast calibration run – Up to 107 neutrons/pulse from DD generator – More than 20,000 neutron captures/pulse in DUNE-size TPC § It’s in situ: detector energy response measurement – t0 provided by DD generator (rough) or the photodetector (precise) – Can provide fixed charge deposition as a function of (x, y, z) throughout the TPC volume § It’s “standard”: a “standard candle” for energy deposition calibration – The total 6.1 MeV neutron binding energy is visible in the form of gamma cascade. – Possible to see the energy spectrum from individual gammas § Could help to improve high-level neutrino energy reconstruction : deserves more study § Test of SN trigger efficiency

Slide 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Energy deposition calibration

§ Need to understand the neutron capture very well: ACED experiment that was done last year at Los Alamos National Laboratory § Need to develop a neutron capture tagging algorithm in liquid argon TPC: simulations have shown promising results

Slide 10

167 keV 1.2 MeV 4.7 MeV

Predicted by GEANT Measured by ACED

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Slide 11

167 keV 2.6 MeV 3.4 MeV

Input: Output: clustered electrons

How to Identify Neutron Captures

167 keV 2.6 MeV 3.4 MeV 30 cm vertex G4 step point Gamma

Method: 3D clustering + electron counting Input: Neutron capture with gamma cascade emission

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Clustering can identify individual gammas

Slide 12

§ The clustering works well, but has to be done in 3D. § Smearing due to electron lifetime, electron diffusion, velocity variation and recombination is not simulated, but we expect mm-level effects § Need to do a more realistic simulation

4.7 MeV 6.1 MeV 1.2 MeV 516 keV 516 keV 167 keV 167 keV 4.7 MeV 1.2 MeV

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Argon Capture Experiment at DANCE

Slide 13

Detector for Adva vanced Neutron Capture Experiments (DANCE)

§ DANCE has nearly 4! coverage § DANCE is a sphere of 160 BaF2 crystals, each couples to a PMT § High segmentation allows gamma multiplicity measurement § Neutron energies obtained using Time-of-Flight § Upstream monitors measure energy-dependent neutron beam flux

John Ullman

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

ACED measurement

Slide 14

§ ACED measured the thermal neutron capture cross-section and the correlated-gamma cascade § The data is now being analyzed to reconstruct individual gammas

  • n an event-by-event basis.

§ Will provide precise capture cross-sections around thermal energies § Will provide the simulation software with a database of gamma cascades

167 keV 1.2 MeV 4.7 MeV

Predicted by GEANT Measured by ACED

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Neutron Capture Cross-section

§ Using Time-of-Flight, the neutron velocity can be calculated on event-by- event basis (never done for Ar before ACED). § Data analysis nearly complete. Still need to further analyze the data for beam normalization § Just did a beam normalization measurement last week. § Paper to be published soon

Slide 15

2 −

10 × 2

1 −

10

1 −

10 × 2 1 2 (eV)

n

E

2

10 × 2

2

10 × 3

2

10 × 4

2

10 × 5

3

10

3

10 × 2 (mb) σ

ENDF/B-VII.1

  • W. Koehler (1963)

R.L.D. French et al. (1965)

  • N. Ranakumar et al. (1969)

Before ACED After ACED

from fit

Credit: Luca Pagani

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Future Elastic Scattering Experiment measurement

Slide 16

§ At 57 keV, the theory predicts that there is a “deep” anti-resonance dip § Previous measurement doesn’t agree with the theory (a factor 100 difference) § The sensitivity of previous measurement is limited § Measurement needs to be done with high precision

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Neutrons are Important in LArTPC

Slide 17

§ To turn neutrino physics into a precision science, we need to understand the complex neutrino- nucleus interactions – Neutrons carry away a large fraction of energy – Neutron yield is model dependent – Neutrons are hard to detect in LArTPC § Understanding the neutrons are also essential for low energy physics – Modeling the supernova event – Tagging the neutron background for dark matter and 0!"" searches

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Conclusion

§ External Pulsed Neutrons Source can be used to calibrate the liquid argon TPC § Feasibility study has shown the neutrons can illuminate a large volume of the TPC, providing 6.1 MeV gamma cascades as a “standard candle” for energy deposition calibration. § Simulation has shown that 3D clustering can identify individual correlated gammas § We did the ACED experiment to understand the neutron capture, and will do another experiment to understand the neutron scattering § First test possibly at ProtoDUNE

Slide 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Backup

Slide 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Advantage of DD Generator

§ DD Generators are commercial devices that could provide a source of low energy (2.5 MeV) neutrons. § 2.5 MeV is well below the neutron and proton separation energy of most elements – little activation expected. § Monoenergetic spectrum (unlike TT) which will simplify neutron degrader design and shielding § Costs are low (~$100k) and they can be operated in pulse mode to give a trigger signal.

Slide 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Candidate DD source

Slide 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Neutrons in SN events

Slide 22

§ Missing the emitted neutron leads to a large error on the reconstructed neutrino energy § Several difficulties in modeling this process

– Elastic scattering cross-section below 100 keV was not well-measured – The event-by-event capture γ- ray distributions are unmeasured (would be valuable to tag these neutrons) – The thermal (n,γ) cross section is poorly measured

§ Measurements of the neutron transport properties are needed § The current MARLEY models suggest that 15-30% of supernova νeCC events will involve neutron emission

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Neutrons in Low Background Experiments

Slide 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Optimization: Moderator study

Slide 24

§ Materia must have medium elastic scattering and low absorption for neutrons § Fe was chosen as the most efficient moderator to degrade the neutron energy from 2.5 MeV to less than 1 MeV § Best Fe thickness is 17 cm

S.Conlon

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Optimization: Filter study

Slide 25

§ The filter further reduces the neutron energy and transmits neutrons at anti- resonance energy § Liquid argon itself is the best filter but the need for a cryostat brings complication § Sulfur is a good filter due to its n 73 keV anti-resonance for neutron elastic scattering § Thickness of Sulfur filter was studied

S.Conlon

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Optimization: Shielding study

Slide 26

§ Lithium-Polyethylene is used as the shielding material § Shield is to block both neutrons and gammas from neutron capture § 2.2 MeV gamma peak is from neutron capture on hydrogen § Shield can effectively block the lower energy gammas peaks but is only able to degrade 2.2 MeV gammas § The dose of radiation form 2.2 MeV gammas is 1.8 x 10-7 mrem per pulse (106 neutrons) for a person standing 1 meter away from the source § The source could run 7.7 x 107 shots per day being compliant with the limit ( 5 merm annual radiation dose) set by Nuclear Regulation Commission (NRC)

12 cm Lithium-Polyethylene

S.Conlon

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Neutron Energy Moderation

Slide 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Slide 28

516 keV 5.5 MeV

Input: Output:

Clustering can identify individual gammas

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Slide 29

167 keV 2.6 MeV 3.4 MeV

Input: Output:

Clustering can identify individual gammas

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

Slide 30

167 keV 1.2 MeV 4.7 MeV

Input: Output:

Clustering can identify individual gammas

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Workshop on Calibration and Reconstruction for LArTPC Detectors, December 11th, 2018

An example: electron lifetime

§ Electron lifetime can be obtained using the relation: !"#$%&'#( = !*'&##+*(',-*

.

§ The drift time can be determined by either:

– Rough t0 provided by the DD generator: the drift time will be smeared by the DD neutron pulse width (can be tuned down to 10 μs level) and the neutron life time (1 μs thermalization time + 100 μs capture time) – Precise t0 provided by the photodetector system: no smearing due to the neutron lifetime, but need low intensity operation to avoid photodetector pileup.

§ Ideally, measure the electron lifetime for every m3 volume.

Slide 31