PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING / COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # 3 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public scoping meeting community workshop 3 community
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING / COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # 3 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING / COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # 3 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # 3 I 80 / SR 65 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (PA&ED) PHASE JANUARY 15, 2013 Project


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING / COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # 3 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP # 3

I‐80 / SR 65 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (PA&ED) PHASE

JANUARY 15, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Project Partners

PCTPA Caltrans Federal Highway Administration Placer County PCTPA Caltrans Federal Highway Administration Placer County Administration Administration City of Roseville City of Rocklin City of Lincoln Project Team City of Roseville City of Rocklin City of Lincoln Project Team

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Public Scoping Meeting

  • Inform the Public
  • Receive Input and Comments
  • Information Stations
  • Project Location
  • Current Schedule
  • Environmental Process
  • Project Alternatives
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background: Project Overview

  • Study Area
  • Project Phases
  • Project Study Report (PSR)
  • Project Approval &

E i l D Environmental Document (PA&ED)

  • Design, Right of Way, and
  • Design, Right of Way, and

Construction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Goals and Objectives of the Project

  • Reduce congestion
  • Reduce congestion
  • Improve traffic operations and enhance safety
  • Maintain community access
  • Maintain community access
  • Consider all travel modes and users
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Draft Purpose & Need

  • Congestion
  • Efficiency
  • Accessibility
  • Safety
  • Alternative

Transportation

  • Land Use Plans
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Where We’ve Been and What’s Ahead

Current PA&ED Phase Current PA&ED Phase

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Where We’ve Been…

St k h ld d C it W k h

  • Stakeholder and Community Workshops
  • August 23 and April 14, 2011
  • January 11 and January 25, 2012

y y ,

  • January 9 and Today, 2013
  • Project Communications
  • Website, Newspaper, Newsletters
  • Preliminary Surveying, Traffic,

Environmental, and Design , g

  • 7 Concepts to 5 Project Alternatives
  • Notice of Preparation

Notice of Preparation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SR 65 N thb d R t i

Near‐Term Projects Considered

  • SR 65 Northbound Restripe
  • Add 3rd lane I‐80 to Galleria I/C
  • I

t 1 t Ph f

  • Incorporate as 1st Phase of

interchange improvements

  • I‐80 Westbound Auxiliary Lane
  • Add 5th lane, Douglas to

Riverside Riverside

  • Pursue as separate project
slide-10
SLIDE 10

… and What’s Ahead

  • Evaluate the Project Alternatives
  • Perform Environmental Field & Technical Studies
  • Hold Community and Stakeholder Workshops
  • Prepare Draft Environmental Document & Project Report
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Concepts Moving Forward As Alternatives

  • Alternative 1 – Taylor Road Full Access I/C (Diamond‐Shaped)

l i l d ll / ( h d)

  • Alternative 2 – Taylor Road Full Access I/C (Trumpet‐Shaped)
  • Alternative 3 – Taylor Road I/C Eliminated
  • Alternative 4 – Transportation System Management (TSM)
  • Alternative 5 – No‐Build (No Project)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Common Benefits of Alternatives 1, 2, & 3

  • Widen I‐80

Westbound From 6 to 7 Lanes

Widen I 80

  • Add additional mixed‐flow lanes
  • Add additional auxiliary lanes

From 6 to 7 Lanes

  • Add additional auxiliary lanes

Eastbound From 5 to 7 Lanes Southbound

  • Widen SR 65

From 3 to 5 Lanes

  • Add carpool/HOV lanes
  • Add additional mixed‐flow lanes

Northbound From 2 to 5 Lanes

  • Add additional mixed flow lanes
  • Add additional auxiliary lanes
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Common Benefits of Alternatives 1, 2, & 3

I 80/SR 65 I/C

West to North Ramp South to West Ramp

  • I‐80/SR 65 I/C

Ramps

  • Add

l

West to North Ramp 2 Lanes South to West Ramp 3 Lanes

  • Add ramp lanes
  • Improved design

at existing EB to at existing EB to NB loop ramp

South to East Ramp 2 Lanes East to North Ramp 3 Lanes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Common Benefits of Alternatives 1, 2, & 3

I 80/SR 65 I/C

Southbound SR 65 to

  • I‐80/SR 65 I/C

Carpool/ HOV Connector

Southbound SR 65 to Westbound I‐80 1 Lane

Connector

  • Add HOV Ramp direct

connection

  • One lane in each

direction

Eastbound I‐80 to Northbound SR 65 1 Lane

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Common Benefits of Alternatives 1, 2, & 3

Improve Taylor Road From 2 to 5 Lanes From 2 to 5 Lanes Remove the existing I‐80/ Taylor Road I/C Ramps

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Alternatives 1, 2, & 3 – Taylor Road Interchange

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Alternative 1 – Taylor Road Full Access I/C (Diamond‐Shaped) Diamond Interchange

BENEFITS: I i b t i t h BENEFITS: I i b t i t h

  • Improves spacing between interchanges
  • Improves traffic operations on I‐80
  • Improves local access
  • Improves spacing between interchanges
  • Improves traffic operations on I‐80
  • Improves local access
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Alternative 2 – Taylor Road Full Access I/C (Trumpet‐Shaped) Trumpet Interchange

BENEFITS: I i b t i t h BENEFITS: I i b t i t h

  • Improves spacing between interchanges
  • Improves traffic operations on I‐80
  • Improves local access
  • Improves spacing between interchanges
  • Improves traffic operations on I‐80
  • Improves local access
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Alternative 3 – Taylor Road Interchange Eliminated

BENEFITS:

  • Improves spacing between interchanges

BENEFITS:

  • Improves spacing between interchanges

CONCERNS:

  • Reduces number of access connections

CONCERNS:

  • Reduces number of access connections
  • Improves spacing between interchanges
  • Improves traffic operations on I‐80
  • Improves spacing between interchanges
  • Improves traffic operations on I‐80
  • Reduces number of access connections
  • Shifts local access to Eureka Rd, Galleria

Blvd, and Rocklin Rd I/C’s

  • Reduces number of access connections
  • Shifts local access to Eureka Rd, Galleria

Blvd, and Rocklin Rd I/C’s

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Alternative 4 – Transportation System Management (TSM) R M t i (S t d

  • Ramp Metering (System and

On/Off Ramps)

  • HOV Bypass Lanes
  • HOV Bypass Lanes
  • Changeable Message Signs

(CMS) (CMS)

  • Traffic Signal Coordination
  • Transit Options
  • Transit Options
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Alternative 5 – No‐Build (No Project)

  • “The Do Nothing Alternative”
  • Existing Facilities and Conditions Remain
  • Other Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)

Projects

  • Required for Environmental Review
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Environmental Studies

J t B i i !

  • Just Beginning!
  • Assessing the project site

conditions and alternatives conditions and alternatives

  • Seeking Your Input
  • Alternatives presented

p

  • Areas of concerns
  • Ideas or opportunities
  • Any other items you see as

important

slide-23
SLIDE 23

How to Get Involved?

  • Give us your input tonight

– Information stations – Comment cards

  • Visit project website (NOP posted)

– www.8065interchange.org

  • Sign up for email notifications
  • Attend upcoming workshops