PSM/RMP Modernization Programs in California 2016 Developments - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

psm rmp modernization programs in california
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PSM/RMP Modernization Programs in California 2016 Developments - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PSM/RMP Modernization Programs in California 2016 Developments & Correlation to Evolution at the Federal Level (GCPS2017 Paper 479475) Steven T. Maher Aleksandar Metulev Cho Nai Cheung Michael A. Vigliarolo Download Presentation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PSM/RMP Modernization Programs in California

2016 Developments & Correlation to Evolution at the Federal Level

(GCPS‐2017 – Paper 479475)

Steven T. Maher Aleksandar Metulev Cho Nai Cheung Michael A. Vigliarolo

Download Presentation & Handout – www.SEMS1.com/GCPS/2017.htm

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Steven T. Maher, PE CSP

Risk Management Professionals

  • 37-Year Engineer – 33 in Process Safety Consulting

Specializing in Hazard Analysis and QRA

  • Mechanical Engineering

– BS – Duke University – MS – Carnegie-Mellon University

  • Professional Engineer – Mechanical & Chemical

Engineering

  • CCPS Technical Steering Committee – mid-1980s
  • Past-President Southern CA Society for Risk Analysis
  • Landmark Efforts

– Platform Safety Shutdown System Effectiveness Study – Torrance Refinery Safety Advisor for MHF Conversion

  • Paper & Book Publications – See www.RMPCorp.com
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aleksandar Metulev

Risk Management Professionals

  • Chemical Engineering / Materials Science &

Engineering - University of California Irvine

  • HAZOP / LOPA Study Facilitator

– Onshore and Offshore Production Facilities – Petroleum Refineries – Ammonia Refrigeration – Chemical Manufacturing – Pharmaceuticals

  • Dispersion Modeling
  • P&ID Development
  • CalARP / RMP / PSM Program Development
  • Auditing
  • Webinar / Presentation Speaker on PSM/RMP

Issues

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PSM/RMP Modernization Programs in California

2016 Developments & Correlation to Evolution at the Federal Level

(GCPS‐2017 – Paper 479475)

Steven T. Maher Aleksandar Metulev Cho Nai Cheung Michael A. Vigliarolo

Download Presentation & Handout – www.SEMS1.com/GCPS/2017.htm

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Key Topics

  • Current SMS Program Elements &

Overlap

  • Expansion/Modernization Initiatives

Overview – 2016 Developments

  • Key Elements of Regulatory

Expansion/Modernization Efforts

  • Status, Impact, &

Strategies

  • Questions?
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Current Safety Management System (SMS) Program Elements & Overlap

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Evolution of SMS Guidelines & Regulations to Performance (Goal) – Based Standards

Onshore Process Safety (USA) Offshore Safety Management Systems (USA) Offshore Safety Management Systems (UK)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Overlap of Key Current CA SMS Programs (Onshore Facilities)

PSM CalARP/RMP

EP HA PSI PHA OP TRN MI MOC PSSR II EPR HWP CON

M i n i m a l

CA

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Overview of SMS Program Expansion/Modernization Initiatives – 2016 Developments

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Key Modernization Activities

(Onshore Facilities)

www.RMPCorp.com/SMS_Regulatory_Updates/

EPA IRTF CCC & CoR CalOES/CalEPA CSB OSHA Cal/OSHA

CalOES: California Office of Emergency Services; Cal/OSHA: California Occupational Safety & Health Administration; CSB: Chemical Safety Board; EPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency; IRTF: Interagency Refinery Task Force; OSHA: U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration; CalEPA: California Environmental Protection Agency; CCC: Contra Costa County; CoR: City of Richmond

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recent US SMS Regulatory Activities (Onshore Facilities)

EPA & OSHA Chemical Safety Board & White House California Agencies & Initiatives

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CalARP-P4/CalPSM-R Affected Facilities

1 CalARP-P4/ CalPSM-R Facility 5 CalARP-P4/ CalPSM-R Facilities 3 CalARP-P4/ CalPSM-R Facilities 7 CalARP-P4/ CalPSM-R Facilities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Addressing Key Elements of CalARP, CalPSM-R, & RMP Regulatory Expansion/Modernization Efforts (with Implementation Tips)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Types of Changes

Facility/ Program Applicability Schedule Elements

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Current (2016) PSM Elements

PSM

EP PSI PHA OP TRN CON PSSR MI HWP MOC II EP&R CA

  • Employee Participation
  • Process Safety Information
  • Process Hazard Analysis
  • Operating Procedures
  • Training
  • Contractors
  • Pre-Startup Safety Review
  • Mechanical Integrity
  • Hot Work Permit
  • Management of Change
  • Incident Investigation
  • Emergency Planning &

Response

  • Compliance Audits (CA-IIPP)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Impact Categories

  • The changes in CalARP-P4 and

CalPSM-R are expected to have different implementation challenges:

* minimal changes to regulation or minimal effort needed for compliance ** moderate changes to regulation or moderate effort needed for compliance *** new element or significant effort needed for compliance

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CalPSM-R Elements

PSM-R

PSMP PSI PHA OP TRN CON PSSR MI

DMR IST/ HCA/ STAA

HW MOC II-RCA EP&R

EP PSCA HF MOOC

CA

  • Process Safety Information
  • Process Hazard Analysis
  • Operating Procedures
  • Training
  • Contractors
  • Pre-Startup Safety Review
  • Mechanical Integrity
  • Damage Mechanism Review
  • Hierarchy of Hazard Control

Analysis (IST/HCA/STAA)

  • Hot Work
  • Management of Change
  • Incident Investigation - RCA
  • Emergency Planning & Response
  • Employee Participation
  • Process Safety Culture Assessment
  • Human Factors
  • Management of Organizational

Change

  • Compliance Audits
  • PSM Program (PSMP0
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Current Cal/OSHA, CalARP, & RMP Initiatives

Program Element CalPSM-R

(Draft)

CalARP

(P4-Draft)

EPA-RMP

(P2/3-Jan17)

Process Safety Information (PSI) * 5189.1(d) 2762.1 68.65 Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) * Safeguard Protection Analysis (SPA) ** (CA-Only) 5189.1(e) 2762.2 2762.2.1 68.50/67 Operating Procedures (OP) ** 5189.1(f) 2762.3 68.69 Training (TRN) * 5189.1(g) 2762.4 68.71 Contractors (CON) * 5189.1(h) 2762.12 68.87 Pre-Startup Safety Review (PSSR) * 5189.1(i) 2762.7 68.77 Mechanical Integrity (MI) * Damage Mechanism Review (DMR) *** (CA-Only) 5189.(j) 5189.1(k) 2762.5 68.73 IST / HCA / STAA *** 5189.1(l) 2762.13 68.67 Hot Work (HW) * 5189.1(m) 2762.11 68.85 Management of Change (MOC) ** 5189.1(n) 2762.6 68.75 Incident Inv. – Root Cause Analysis (II-RCA) ** 5189.1(o) 2762.9 68.81 Emergency Planning and Response (EP&R) *** 5189.1(p) 2765.2/3 68.95/96 Employee Participation (EP) * 5189.1(q) 2762.10 68.83 Process Safety Culture Assessment (PSCA) *** 5189.1(r) 2762.14

  • Human Factors (HF) ***

5189.1(s) 2762.15

  • Management of Organizational Change (MOOC) ***

5189.1(t) 2762.6

  • Compliance Audits (CA) ** (Fed Rqmt. for 3rd Party)

5189.1(u) 2762.8 68.58/59/79/80 Process Safety Management Program (PSMP) ** 5189.1(v,w) 2762.16

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Status, Impact, & Strategies

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Key Modernization Activities

(Onshore Facilities)

www.RMPCorp.com/SMS_Regulatory_Updates/

EPA IRTF CCC & CoR CalOES/CalEPA CSB OSHA Cal/OSHA

CalOES: California Office of Emergency Services; Cal/OSHA: California Occupational Safety & Health Administration; CSB: Chemical Safety Board; EPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency; IRTF: Interagency Refinery Task Force; OSHA: U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration; CalEPA: California Environmental Protection Agency; CCC: Contra Costa County; CoR: City of Richmond

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Status and What to Expect

  • Chemical Safety Board (CSB)

– April 2013, October 2014, January 2015 – All 3 Investigation Reports Published – Investigation Completed, Recommendations Tracked

  • U.S. EPA

– 13Jan17 – Final Amendments to the RMP Rule Published – 14Mar17 – EPA Issues Administrative Stay to Delay Effective Date Until 17Jun17

  • Federal OSHA

– RFI Comments to be Processed – Promulgation of Updated PSM Requirements and Timing Unclear – Timeline – “Years, not Months” – Interest Areas Handled by LoI

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Status and What to Expect

  • Contra Costa County & City of Richmond

– June 2014 – Issued ISO 450-8 (“Risk Management”) & Analogous CoR ISO – Current Initiative to Increase Involvement of Community Oversight Group in Process Safety Culture Assessments

  • California Interagency Refinery Task Force (IRTF)

– Agency Meetings Continue – Additional Reports Not Planned

  • Cal/OSHA CalPSM-R

– 2015-2016 Updated §5189.1 Drafts Issued – 10Feb17 – Notice of Proposed Modifications to §5189.1 – Final Regulation Promulgation – Estimated Summer 2017 – Initially, 2 Separate PSM Regulations in California – No Planned Synchronization w/Federal PSM/RMP

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Status and What to Expect

  • CalEPA & CalOES CalARP

– 01Jan15 – Promulgation of Minor Update to CalARP – 2015-2016 Updated Drafts Issued Aligning with §5189.1

– 14Feb17 – Notice of Proposed Modifications to §5189.1

– Final Regulation Promulgation – Estimated Summer 2017 – Single CalARP Regulation with Additional Requirements (Program 4) for “High Hazard Facilities” (NAICS 32411) – Initially, Harmonization with §5189.1, but No Synchronization w/Federal PSM/RMP

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Overlap of Key Current CA SMS Programs (Onshore Facilities)

PSM CalARP/RMP

EP HA PSI PHA OP TRN MI MOC PSSR II EPR HWP CON

M i n i m a l

CA

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Overlap of Post-2016 CA SMS Programs (Onshore Petroleum Refineries)

Fed-RMP – 2017? CalPSM-R (5189.1) CalARP

EP PSI PHA --- SPA OP TRN MI --- DMR MOC --- MOOC PSCA II-RCA EPR HW CON HA CA-3 IST/HCA/STAA

Schedule & Other “Minor” Differences

HF PSMP PSSR

Schedule & Other “Minor” Differences

CA-1 EPR EPR

slide-26
SLIDE 26

What Should I be Doing Now?

  • All California CalARP-Covered Facilities

– Adherence to New 01Jan15 CalARP Requirements

  • Contra Costa County & City of Richmond – 9

Facilities

– Adherence to June 2014 CCC ISO 450-8 & Analogous CoR ISO

  • California Petroleum Refineries

– 2016 did not see significant changes in the substance

  • f the upcoming CalARP-P4/CalPSM-R requirements

– Implementation planning is important – Some elements (e.g., IST/HCA/STAA) are significantly more cost-effective in the design-phase,

  • r at the earliest possible opportunity
slide-27
SLIDE 27

What Should I be Doing Now?

  • U.S. PSM/RMP-Covered Petroleum Processing

Facilities

– Awareness of CalPSM-R for Best Practices for “High Hazard Facilities”

  • All – Closely Monitor Regulatory Changes
  • Potential for:

– Later expansion to other highly-hazardous facilities in California – Later expansion to non-California petroleum refineries & others – Inference to new requirements as best practices – General Duty Clause Correlation - SB 612 clarifies Owner/Operator responsibilities

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Resources for Handling Evolving Requirements

  • HAZOP/LOPA Facilitation Webinar Series (Module 10) – Effective approaches to

handling CSB recommendations and PSM and CalARP changes

– DMR – SPA – Inherently Safer Technology/Design (i.e., IST/HCA/STAA)

  • 2015 Global Congress on Process Safety – Papers

– Maher, Nour, Schultz, “Effectively Addressing New PSM/RMP Damage Mechanism Review Requirements with an Integrated PHA (iPHA)”

  • 2017 Global Congress on Process Safety – Papers

– Maher, Metulev, Cheung, Vigliarolo, “PSM/RMP Modernization Programs in California (2016 Developments and Correlation to Evolution at the Federal Level)”

  • Webinars – Updates on the PSM/RMP Regulatory Modernization Programs

– 19Aug14 – 25Sep14 – 22Jan15 – 09Apr15 – 25Jun15 – 30Jul15 – 27Aug15 – 28Jun16 – 29Oct15 – Regional Seminar – Simulcast as Webinar

  • Webinar – DMR and the Integrated PHA (iPHA)

Approach – 26Mar15 & 27Aug15 (w/simplifications)

  • Links are provided on www.RMPCorp.com/SMS_Regulatory_Updates/
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summary & Conclusions

  • Agencies have taken a fresh look at SMS

Programs

  • California and Refineries have biggest changes
  • Potential for:

– Expansion – Link to General Duty Clause & Best Practices

  • Initial promulgation harmonizes

CalARP & CalPSM-R

  • No current plan to synchronize California and

federal requirements

  • There are “easy“ steps to take now

to infuse some of the new requirements into your PSM/RMP/CalARP activities

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Summary & Conclusions

  • Recommendation from a Key Regulator – Begin

Applying “High-Value/Priority” Elements of CalPSM-R Now – Once promulgated, “schedule will be tight,” and if substantial progress has been made, selective ”grandfathering” may be allowed

  • Tight schedules could result in a resource shortage
  • In addition, some elements (e.g., IST/HCA/STAA) are

significantly more cost-effective in the design-phase, or at the earliest possible opportunity

  • Risk Management & Process Safety Professionals should:

– Carefully monitor modernization programs – Focus on charting the course for the long-term success of your facility’s programs – Develop a strategy for effective implementation

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Steven T. Maher, PE CSP

Steve.Maher@RMPCorp.com

Aleksandar Metulev

Aleks.Metulev@RMPCorp.com

Cho Nai Cheung

ChoNai.Cheung@hsd.cccounty.us

Michael A. Vigliarolo

MVigliarolo@ppcla.com

Questions?