PROTEA Trial Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy PROTEA: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

protea trial
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PROTEA Trial Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy PROTEA: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy PROTEA Trial Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy PROTEA: Study Design Study Design: PROTEA Study Background : Randomized, controlled, open label, phase 3b trial evaluate noninferiority


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy

PROTEA Trial

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy

PROTEA: Study Design

Source: Antinori A, et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19525.

Darunavir 800 mg QD + Ritonavir 100 mg QD

(n = 137)

Darunavir 800 mg QD + Ritonavir 100 mg QD + 2 NRTIs

(n = 136)

Study Design: PROTEA Study

  • Background: Randomized, controlled, open label,

phase 3b trial evaluate noninferiority of darunavir + ritonavir (monotherapy) versus darunavir + ritonavir + 2NRTIs (triple therapy) in virologically suppressed patients

  • Inclusion Criteria (n = 273)
  • HIV RNA <50 copies/mL x 24 weeks on 3-drug ART
  • CD4 count >200 cells/mm3
  • CD4 count nadir >100 cells/mm3
  • No PI resistance or history of virologic failure
  • Treatment Arms*
  • Darunavir 800 mg QD + RTV 100 mg QD
  • Darunavir 800 mg QD + RTV 100 mg QD + 2 NRTIs

*Both arms: 4-week run-in with DRV + RTV + 2 NRTIs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy

PROTEA: Result

Week 48: Virologic Response, by Statistical Efficacy Analyses

Source: Antinori A, et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19525.

86 92 95 96 20 40 60 80 100

ITT, Switch=Failure Switch-included analysis

HIV RNA <50 copies/mL Statistical Analyses Darunavir + Ritonavir Darunavir + Ritonavir + 2NRTIs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy

PROTEA: Result

Week 48: Virologic Response, by Nadir CD4 Count

Source: Antinori A, et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19525.

66 95 97 94 20 40 60 80 100

CD4 nadir <200 cells/μL CD4 nadir ≥200 cells/μL

HIV RNA <50 copies/mL CD4 Nadir Darunavir + Ritonavir Darunavir + Ritonavir + 2NRTIs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy

PROTEA: Result

Week 48: Virologic Response, by Nadir CD4 Count

Source: Antinori A, et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19525.

66 95 97 94 20 40 60 80 100

CD4 nadir < 200 cells/mm3 CD4 nadir ≥ 200 cells/mm3

HIV RNA <50 copies/mL CD4 Nadir Darunavir + Ritonavir Darunavir + Ritonavir + 2NRTIs

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Darunavir/r Monotherapy versus Triple Therapy

PROTEA: Conclusions

Source: Antinori A, et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19525.

Conclusions: “In this study for patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed lower efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy at Week 48 in the primary switch equals failure analysis (86% versus 95%). However, this lower efficacy was seen mainly in patients with CD4 nadir levels below 200 cells/µL. There was no development of PI resistance.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Acknowledgment

The National HIV Curriculum is an AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) Program resource funded by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration. The project is led by the University of Washington and the AETC National Coordinating Resource Center.

The content in this slide set does not represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources & Services Administration.