Pros and cons of prophylactic indomethacin in very preterm infants - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pros and cons of prophylactic indomethacin in very
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pros and cons of prophylactic indomethacin in very preterm infants - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Barbara Schmidt, MD, MSc, CM Pros and cons of prophylactic indomethacin in very preterm infants Based on randomized trials, the relative risk reduction of prophylactic indomethacin on severe IVH is 35% If the average risk of What is the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pros and cons of prophylactic indomethacin in very preterm infants

Barbara Schmidt, MD, MSc, CM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Based on randomized trials, the relative risk reduction of prophylactic indomethacin

  • n severe IVH is 35%

If the average risk of severe IVH in your hospital is: What is the absolute risk reduction if you use indomethacin prophylaxis?

10% ? % 20% ? %

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

  • Effects of prophylactic indomethacin
  • n severe IVH and disability
  • Relative and absolute effects of

indomethacin for different baseline risks of severe IVH

  • Effects of prophylactic indomethacin
  • n PDA and BPD
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Prophylactic indomethacin

P I C O T

Very low birth weight infants Prophylactic indomethacin No drug therapy Severe IVH Before first discharge home

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

Comparison: Prophylactic indomethacin vs. control Outcome: IVH Grade 3 and 4

Total (95% CI) 115/1285 177/1303

Favours treatment Favours control

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Prophylactic indomethacin

P I C O T

Very low birth weight infants Prophylactic indomethacin No drug therapy Disability At 18 months corrected age

slide-8
SLIDE 8

USA Canada Hong Kong Australia New Zealand

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Death or Disability at 18 months Indomethacin Placebo

261 of 569 46%

OR = 1.1 95% CI 0.8-1.4 p = 0.61

271 of 574 47%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

Outcome: Death or severe neurosensory impairment at 18 – 36 mo corrected age

Total (95% CI) 304/743 299/748

Favors treatment Favors control

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Evidence-Based Practice

Those who prescribe prophylactic indomethacin practice evidence-based medicine. Those who don’t prescribe prophylactic indomethacin also practice evidence-based medicine.

Roger Soll, MD

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A Riddle?

  • Prophylactic indomethacin

reduces the risk of severe IVH

  • Severe IVH increases the risk of

childhood disability

  • Why does prophylactic

indomethacin not reduce the risk

  • f disability?
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Therapies that reduce a serious neonatal morbidity but not disability

Therapy Severe IVH BPD Severe ROP Indomethacin ↓ No Diff No Diff Vitamin A No Diff ↓ No Diff Oxygen Saturation Targeting No Diff No Diff ↓

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Outline

  • Effects of prophylactic indomethacin
  • n severe IVH and disability
  • Relative and absolute effects of

indomethacin for different baseline risks of severe IVH

  • Effects of prophylactic indomethacin
  • n PDA and BPD
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

The relative treatment effects of prophylactic indomethacin

  • n severe IVH are stable across all risk quartiles
slide-20
SLIDE 20

A Relative Risk Reduction of 35% will have variable absolute effects of prophylactic indomethacin on severe IVH Baseline Risk Absolute Risk Reduction NN Treat 20% 7.0% 15 10% 3.5% 29 5% 1.8% 58

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Relative versus absolute effects

  • Relative effects (e.g. relative risk,
  • dds ratio) of prophylactic

indomethacin on severe IVH do not vary with the baseline or predicted risk of severe IVH

  • In contrast, absolute treatment

effects (e.g. absolute risk reduction, NNT) will depend on baseline risk

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Will “targeted” indomethacin prophylaxis reduce death or disability?

No!

  • In TIPP, there was no treatment effect of

prophylactic indomethacin on death or disability

  • This (lack of a) relative treatment effect of

prophylactic indomethacin on death or early childhood disability does not change with the baseline risk of severe IVH

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Outline

  • Effects of prophylactic indomethacin
  • n severe IVH and disability
  • Relative and absolute effects of

indomethacin for different baseline risks of severe IVH

  • Effects of prophylactic indomethacin
  • n PDA and BPD
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

Comparison: Prophylactic indomethacin vs. control Outcome: Symptomatic PDA Favours treatment Favours control

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

Comparison: Prophylactic indomethacin vs. control Outcome: Chronic lung disease in surviving infants (36 weeks)

Total (95% CI) 496 503

Favours treatment Favours control

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Why does prophylactic indomethacin reduce PDA but not BPD?

  • PDA may just be a marker but

not a cause of BPD; or

  • The benefit of PDA closure

may be offset by harm from the therapy

slide-27
SLIDE 27

J Pediatr 2006;148:730-4

slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Proportion of infants treated with prophylactic indomethacin at each of 35 study hospitals

slide-30
SLIDE 30

BPD at 36 weeks PMA

Prophylactic Indomethacin No Prophylactic Indomethacin

For Prophylactic Indomethacin

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

45% 44% 0.9

(0.7-1.1)

Observed Rates:

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conclusions

  • Prophylactic indomethacin reduces the

risk of severe IVH but not the risk of early childhood disability

  • The absolute effects of indomethacin on

severe IVH increase with increasing baseline risk of IVH

  • Prophylactic indomethacin reduces the

risk of PDA but not the risk of BPD