Project Team & HIA Members Project Purpose & Study - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

• −

Project Team & HIA Members

• −

Project Purpose & Study Area − Project Work Plan & Timeline

• −

What is Health & Health Determinants − Health & the Built Environment − What is a HIA & Steps in the process − HIA Role & Responsibility

• County Staff:
• Rachel Zenuk, MPH; Assistant Director Public Health (HIA Project Manager)
• Steve Abraham, AICP; Planning Manager (STV Project Manager)
• Michael Baker International:

Over 40 years of combined public and private sector experience in the preparation of local government comprehensive and specific area plans, policies and ordinances in Arizona

• Matt Klyszeiko, AICP; Project Manager
• Jenna Tourje, AICP; HIA Task Lead
• Advisory Committee Members:
• Please share your name and organization

Owner Acreage Percent Private 26,232.72 66.96% State Trust 12,281.93 31.35% BLM 478.77 1.22% Bureau of Reclamation 183.80 0.47% Total 39,177.22 100.00%

• ‒

‒ ‒ ‒ ‒

Phase I

PROJECT INITIATION

Phase II

PLAN ALTERNATIVES

Phase III

PREFERRED PLAN

Phase IV

60-DAY PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

Phase V

PUBLIC HEARINGS / ADOPTION

Oct - Dec Jan - Mar Apr - June July - Sept Oct - Dec

Planning Built Environment Options Behaviors / Lifestyle Public Health

Screening

• Determines

whether a proposal is likely to have health impacts and,

• Whether the

HIA will provide useful information

Scoping

• Establishes the

scope of health impacts that will be included in the HIA,

• The populations

affected,

• The sources of

data and,

• Methods to be

used

Assessment

• First describes

the baseline health status of the affected population

• Then assess

potential impacts

Recommendations

• Suggest alternatives

that could be implemented to improve health or,

• Identify actions that

could be taken to manage health effects

Reporting

• presents findings

and recommendations to stakeholders and decision- makers

Monitoring and Evaluation

• Includes

monitoring the implementation of recommendations

• Evaluates process,

impact or

• utcomes

2010 Census ACS 2010-2014 ESRI ESRI 2010 Census 2010 Census ACS 2010-2014 2010 Census

San Tan Valley Special Area Plan

• Land Use
• Circulation
• Parks & Open Space
• Economic

Development

• Housing
• Public Facilities

Direct Impacts

• As a group review

the direct impacts identified on the worksheet and add any additional impacts Health Determinants

• Utilize post-it-notes

to identify potential health impacts that are caused by the direct impacts identified in Step 1 and place them on the worksheet (one thought per post-it) Health Outcomes

• Utilize post-it-notes

to record the primary health

• utcomes that are

most commonly associated with the health determinants identified in Step 2 and place them on the worksheet (one thought per post-it)