project 16hs3 controlled stirling power unit
play

Project 16HS3: Controlled Stirling Power Unit Seth Thomas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Georgia Institute of Technology | Marquette University | Milwaukee School of Engineering | North Carolina A&T State University | Purdue University | University of California, Merced | University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign | University of


  1. Georgia Institute of Technology | Marquette University | Milwaukee School of Engineering | North Carolina A&T State University | Purdue University | University of California, Merced | University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign | University of Minnesota | Vanderbilt University Project 16HS3: Controlled Stirling Power Unit Seth Thomas Vanderbilt University Photo Advisor: Dr. Eric Barth CCEFP Industry-University Summit College Station, TX | April 4 - 5, 2017

  2. Rationale • Goal: Portable, untethered, high-energy-density power supply for human-scale robotic applications. Li-ion Batteries with Hydrocarbons with Servomotors Controlled Stirling Power Unit Fuel source 700 kJ/kg Fuel source 45,000 kJ/kg energy density energy density Efficiency of energy ~50% - 90% Efficiency of energy ~8% - 10% conversion and conversion, Stirling actuation via DC cycle, and hydraulic motors actuation (estimate) Specific mechanical ~350-630 kJ/kg Specific mechanical ~3600-4500 output output kJ/kg 2

  3. Stirling Engine Cycle 3

  4. Stirling Engine Variants Kinematic Dynamic Displacer Piston Displacer Piston Power Piston Power Piston 4

  5. Stirling Power Unit Design heater head • Controlling displacer piston with Sealed Engine Section linear motor Inconel engine • Return chamber is connected to cylinder the engine section via an orifice displacer piston plate cooling fins • Helium is used as the working fluid - better heat transfer extension rod properties than air power connection Return chamber • Electric heaters for accurate ports (not shown ) temperature control shaft coupling • Engine cylinder housing made linear motor from Inconel 5

  6. Thermocompressor Principles Stirling engine vs. Stirling Thermocompressor Design of Stirling Power Unit hot side hot side Regenerator/ Regenerator/ Displacer Displacer cold side cold side power check piston valves 6

  7. Return chamber Sealed Engine Section Dynamic Model 7

  8. Model Validation Setup heater head Sealed Engine Section Cartridge heaters Inconel engine cylinder displacer piston cooling fins Thermocouple PCB Pressure sensor extension rod Needle valve Kulite Pressure sensor power connection 3 way ball valve Return chamber ports (not shown ) Motor leads Helium inlet shaft coupling Temperature control linear motor 8

  9. Experimental Results • Heater head temperature 250 C • Average engine pressure 10 bar • Displacer frequency of 2 Hz Sinusoidal motion profile Square wave motion profile 9

  10. Experimental Results • Heater head temperature 500 C • Average engine pressure 20 bar • Displacer frequency of 2 Hz Sinusoidal motion profile Square wave motion profile 10

  11. Control Parameters - He 2,526 kPa 131 kPa 11

  12. Control Parameters - He 22.4 % 3.0 % 12

  13. 2nd Generation Design • Increase Frequency of Oscillating Displacer Piston – Limitations of current linear motor 13

  14. 2nd Generation Design • Streamlined Profile – Ports for instruments unnecessary – Smaller, more compact design • Difficulties in Managing Helium – Costly and difficult to seal – Air is relatively easy to use 14

  15. Control Parameters - Air 1,102 kPa 102 kPa 15

  16. Control Parameters - Air 13.6 % 0.6 % 16

  17. Multi-Stage Model Tank P atm 17

  18. Multi-Stage Simulation 18

  19. Multi-Stage Simulation 19

  20. Next Steps • Continue to design the 2 nd generation prototype setup, using air as the working fluid. • Fabricate 2 nd generation prototype (late May/early June) and experimentally characterize its performance. (Sept. 2017) • Design and fabrication of hydrocarbon heater. (Jan. 2018) • Final high energy density Stirling device design complete. (May 2018) 20

  21. Conclusions • Used validated model for simulation of control parameter space and multi-stage design. – High temperature difference is essential to high efficiency and high power output – High median engine pressure is largely responsible for large final pressure differences between high and low pressure tanks – Mid-to-low frequencies result in higher overall efficiencies, given current setup – Using air in a multi-stage design has potential 21

  22. Contact Information • Seth Thomas – benjamin.s.thomas@vanderbilt.edu • Dr. Eric J. Barth – eric.j.barth@vanderbilt.edu 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend