Private Partnerships (PPPs) a focus on Latin America Mara Jos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A critical assessment of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) – a focus on Latin America

María José Romero, Eurodad IMF/WBG Spring Meetings Washington DC., April 20, 2017

• 1. What are PPPs?
• 2. Why use PPPs?
• 3. How important are PPPs (globally and

in LAC?

• Specific features of PPPs in LAC
• Are countries getting ready?
• 4. PPP: Problems, Problems, Problems
• 5. Concluding remarks

Presentation: main points

• 1. a medium / long-term contractual

arrangement between the state and a private company;

• 2. private sector supplies ‘public’ assets and

services (those traditionally provided by government, such as hospitals, schools, prisons, roads, sanitation etc)

• 3. risk sharing between the public and private

sector.

• 1. What are PPPs (I)?

• 1. ‘User pays’ – close to a genuine private

investment

• 2. ‘Government pays’ – another form of

government borrowing

• 1. What are PPPs (II)?

Advantages for governments:

• Hides government debt.
• Efficiency + ideology: “the private sector is more

efficient” Advantages for the private sector:

• New business sector (government pays)
• Reduced risk (guaranteed income + government

and multilateral guarantees.)

• 2. Why use PPPs?

• 3. How important are PPPs? (I)

Figure 1: Total investment in PPPs and number of projects in the developing world, 2003–2015 (billion US$ in real terms) Source: Eurodad’s own calculations based on Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects Database (*adjusted by US Consumer Price Index)

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Total investment commitments in PPPs per region (in million dollars)

Latin America and Caribbean South Asia East Asia and Pacific Europe and Central Asia Middle East and North Africa Sub Saharan Africa

• 3. How important are PPPs? (II)

• Special features of PPPs in LAC:

Over 94% of total PPP investment in LAC concentrated in only 5 countries:

• 1. Brazil (65%)
• 2. Mexico (11%)
• 3. Colombia (7%)
• 4. Peru (6.4%)
• 5. Chile (5.3%)
• However, relative to the size of the economy,

Honduras led the region with PPP investments of 2% of GDP, followed by Peru (1.6%), Nicaragua (1.5%), and Jamaica (1.3%).

• 3. How important are PPPs (III)?

• Special features of PPPs in LAC:
• PPP investment in LAC is highly concentrated in

energy (over 48% of total PPP investment) and transport (over 46%, mostly road investment).

• Public finance is key! about a third of PPP

financing comes from public institutions, and about half of all PPP deals in LAC received some form of government support (direct or indirect), which creates contingent liabilities on public coffers.

• 3. How important are PPPs (IV)?

• Are countries getting ready for PPPs?
• Infrascope (2014) does not yet rank any country in

LAC as “mature.” The top 5 are ranked as “developed” PPP environments, nine as “emerging,” and five as “nascent.”

• MDBs focus on the enabling environment for PPPs:

changes in the regulatory framework.

• Is this source of relief or cause for concern?

Most guidelines are problematic and DO NOT warn countries explicitly and clearly against the fiscal risks associated with PPPs.

• 3. How important are PPPs (V)?

• Usually the most expensive method of financing
• Up to twice cost of government borrowing.
• User fees can exclude poor from access to

services.

• Very complex to negotiate - often renegotiated

 55% PPPs renegotiated, increase in tariffs in 62%

• f cases.

 In LAC: 70% infrastructure PPPs renegotiated, and 92% water-related projects.

• Low transparency and limited public scrutiny
• PPP contracts are subject to commercial

confidentiality issues.

• 4. Problems Problems Problems

• Driving forces behind PPP push not developmental:
• Hide government debts off balance sheet
• Ideological push by international actors (and

behind them commercial lobby)

• A cause of concern: changes in the regulatory

framework

• Main demand? Select the best financing

mechanism, including examining the public borrowing option, on the basis of a comprehensive and transparent analysis of the true costs and benefits over the lifetime of the project, and the risk comparison of each option.

• 5. Concluding remarks