Priority of Service Provision in the Workforce Innovation and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

priority of service provision in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Priority of Service Provision in the Workforce Innovation and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Serving More High-Need Adults: Priority of Service Provision in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Anna Cielinski, Senior Policy Analyst, CLASP Amy Martinez, South Central Workforce Council, Yakima, WA Debby Kratky, Workforce


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Serving More High-Need Adults: “Priority of Service” Provision in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act

Anna Cielinski, Senior Policy Analyst, CLASP Amy Martinez, South Central Workforce Council, Yakima, WA Debby Kratky, Workforce Solutions for Tarrant County, Fort Worth, TX

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Priority of Service under WIOA

  • For receipt of career and training services

provided through WIOA Title I Adult funds, priority is to be given to: –Recipients of public assistance, –Other low-income individuals, and –Individuals who are basic skills deficient.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Priority of Service Under WIA

  • Priority was for recipients of public assistance

and other low-income individuals

  • Only went into effect if local areas determined

that funds were limited

  • Many determined that funding was not limited,

so the priority did not apply

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Priority of Service in Statute

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 Workforce Investment Act

  • f 1998
  • Sec. 134(c)(3)(E) Priority.--With respect

to funds allocated to a local area for adult employment and training activities under paragraph (2)(A) or (3)

  • f section 133(b), priority shall be

given to recipients of public assistance,

  • ther low-income individuals, and

individuals who are basic skills deficient for receipt of career services described in paragraph (2)(A)(xii) and training services.

  • Sec. 134(d)(4)(E) Priority.--In the event

that funds allocated to a local area for adult employment and training activities under paragraph (2)(A) or (3)

  • f section 133(b) are limited, priority

shall be given to recipients of public assistance and other low-income individuals for intensive services and training services.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WIOA Proposed Regulations

  • Some positive steps toward serving more high-

need adults

  • Some potentially problematic language

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Proposed regulations that would strengthen the priority

  • As under WIA, the WIOA draft regulations

require States and local areas to establish criteria for providing this priority.

  • New under WIOA, local plans are required to

include the process by which priority of service must be applied by the one-stop operator.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proposed regulations that could weaken the priority

  • The Local Board and the Governor may

establish a process that also gives priority to

  • ther eligible individuals, provided that it is

consistent with priority of service for veterans.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CLASP’s Recommendations

  • 1. Clearly define “priority of service”; clarify local implementation
  • 2. Clarify interaction of “basic skills deficient” and “priority of

service,” to remove potential loophole

  • 3. Clarify the rule for designating “other eligible individuals” for

priority of service, to ensure that targeted high-need individuals and Veterans come first in priority

  • 4. Priority of service for targeted high-need adults should be just

as robust and detailed as priority of service for veterans.

  • 5. Set benchmarks for increased percentages of targeted high-

need individuals who receive services from WIOA Title I Adult funds; tie discretionary grant funding to progress on this goal.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

We are seeking your input on CLASP’s recommendations

For instance:

  • DOL should base implementation of priority of

service for targeted high-need adults on the pattern of the existing, robust and detailed rules/guidance regarding priority of service for veterans.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DOL Already Knows How To Do This

Upon passage of the Jobs for Veterans Act of 2002, the DOL’s final rule and guidance provided immediate clarification and extensive implementation support for implementing the veterans’ priority of service, including:

  • Requiring states to address priority of service in comprehensive state plan
  • Requiring states to develop policies governing state, regional, local boards

and one stops

  • Policies to identify eligible individuals at point of entry
  • Identifying how eligible individuals would be informed
  • Requiring all local plans to articulate policies and protocols
  • Requiring policies to be made publically available and accessible
  • Defining in detail what it means to provide priority of service
  • Requiring federal monitoring of this provision in the final rule
  • Requiring reporting on priority of service as part of annual report.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Question for participants

  • Chat box: What do you think of CLASP’s

potential recommendation to implement the priority for high-need adults in the same way as the priority for veterans?

  • Let us know while we hear from our

presenters from the field.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Presenters

  • Amy Martinez, South Central

Workforce Council, Yakima, WA

  • Debby Kratky, Workforce

Solutions for Tarrant County, Fort Worth, TX

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

South Central Workforce Council

Washington State Local Workforce Investment Board

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adult Education Levels

County Adult Read below 6th Grade level Adults Read Below 2nd Grade Level Kittitas 36% 14% Klickitat 49% 21% Skamania 44% 15% Yakima 52% 23%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Poverty and Public Assistance

Poverty Rates Families Kittitas County Klickitat County Skaman ia County Yakim a County Washing ton State All Families 10.3% 13.7% 6.2% 16.8% 8.2% Single Female Families with Children under 18 57.3% 57.4% 33.8% 51.0% 34.4% Families with Children under 18 17.7% 29.7% 10.7% 25.2% 13.1%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Local Priority of Service Policy

The South Central Workforce Council has set TANF populations as a priority since the days of JTPA legislation This priority was changed by the board during WIA to include low income individuals.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Limited Funding Determination

The South Central Workforce Council has determined that WIA Adult funds are limited. This determination is further supported by the board’s Strategic Plan and census data that demonstrates the eligible population.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Demographics of the WIA Adult Program

The following demographics represent the current WIA Adult program case load (as of

01/2015):

 5% are Veterans or their eligible spouses

  • n public assistance or low income

 95% are on public assistance or low income

  • 12% have a disability
  • 10% on public assistance
  • 15% basic skills deficient
  • 25% ex-offenders

Note: more than one of the above barriers can be represented in each population

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Local Priority of Service Policy FIRST PRIORITY: Shall be given to program-eligible Covered persons (veterans and eligible spouses) who are low-income individuals

  • r recipients of public

assistance.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Local Priority of Service Policy

SECOND PRIORITY: Shall be given to recipients of public assistance and other low income individuals that are defined as an individual who:

  • Receives, or is a member of

a family that receives, cash payments under a Federal, State, or local income-based public assistance program.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Local Priority of Service Policy

  • Received an income/is a

member of a family that received a total family income for the 6-month period prior to program enrollment that does not exceed the income guidelines.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Local Priority of Service Policy

  • Is a member of a household that

receives or has been determined within the 6 month period prior to enrollment to be eligible to receive food benefits (SNAP); or

  • Qualifies as a homeless individual, a

defined in the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act; or

  • Is an individual with a disability whose
  • wn income meets the requirement of

a program described in section 1 or 2 above.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Local Priority of Service Policy

THIRD PRIORITY (State requirement): Shall be given to program-eligible Covered persons (veterans and eligible spouses) who are not low- income and are not recipients

  • f public assistance.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Local Priority of Service Policy

FOURTH PRIORITY: shall be given to individuals who meet

  • ne of the following conditions:
  • Their family is not yet self-sufficient

(www.thecalculator.org), or

  • Unemployed or underemployed

and are pursuing training in local high demand occupational clusters as approved by the Board.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Questions? amy.martinez@co.yakima.wa.us

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Priority of Service

The key to success in performance and collaboration

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Understanding Our Role

  • The new regulations are clear, the services provided

with WIOA funds can be a pathway to the middle class for low income adults, including public assistance recipients, and individuals who are basic skills deficient. .

  • These new regulations are also clear about who

should be providing these services: requiring that programs and providers collocate, coordinate, and integrate activities and information so that the system as a whole is cohesive and accessible.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Priority of Service Customers Make Performance Measures Work

  • A little over two years ago, ex-
  • ffenders Gloria Hulsey, 50, and

Kenneth Wiley, 60, were walking out

  • f prison for the first time in years.

Gloria had been in twice for dealing methamphetamines, and Kenneth had been in for 37 years for robbery and murder…. “People hear about your background, and they slam the door in your face. They judge you. I tried for a year and gave up,” Gloria said.

  • Both Gloria and Kenneth celebrated

two years of freedom this year. Gloria got a second job on her own selling advertisements for the Thrifty Nickel and has stayed sober longer than she has since 21 years old. She got her children back and is watching them finish their last years of school.”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Next STEP Model

  • Grant for $5,886,258 for

a four year demonstration grant

  • Research done by MDRC

using a control and experimental model

  • Transitional employment

and wrap around services for the experimental group

  • Target group – newly

paroled customers with multiple barriers

  • Total number served: 503

in the experiential group and 497 in the control group

  • Next STEP model worked

directly with parole, including their leadership, in order to determine best practices

  • Relied on evidence-based

assessment and case management models

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Employment assessments are the keys to success in Next xt STEP model

  • Assessments include:
  • 1. CAI (Career Assessment

Inventory)

  • 2. WRAT – 4 (wide range

achievement test)

  • 3. Shipley – 2 (cognitive

abilities)

  • 4. SSI/AOD (Simple

Screening Instrument for Alcohol and Other Drugs)

  • 5. QUID-SR (Quick Inventory of

Depressive Symptoms)

  • 6. Gallup Strengths Finder 2.0
  • 7. TCU Criminal Thinking Scale
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Discovering Your Strengths

  • Starts with a simple

assessment – StrengthsFinder 2.0

  • Continues with a

Strengths Coach

  • Is enhanced by

practicing those talents every day

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Customized Job Placement

  • Finding the right job for

each customer

  • Playing to the

customer’s strengths in job search

  • The employer is the

customer, as well

  • Putting our own “skin in

the game”

  • Use assessment as a

guide

  • Teaching the customer

about real time labor market information

  • Support both the

customer and the employer through the first few weeks on the job

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Looking at the Numbers around Recidivism

  • Department of Labor’s

definition of recidivism and reported results:

  • Looks at new crimes

during the first year for each customer

  • Last year of the project

with the final group being measured is for October 31, 2014

  • At the final year of the

project, 503 customers have met their one year anniversary

  • The goal for the grant

was 22%

  • During their unique one

year marker, only 24 out

  • f 503 show to have gone

back to prison for a new crime (less than 5%)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Behind the numbers

  • Average age of the

participants was mid- thirties

  • Many crimes were of an

aggravated nature

  • Average sentence

exceeded five years and in many cases exceeded ten years

  • Over 80% were males
  • Assessment results didn’t

always match reality:

  • Criminal thinking scale

(TCU Criminal Thinking Scale) done at enrollment – showed 53% of our customers were highly likely to recidivate at enrollment

  • Average for cognitive

thinking averaged in the lower percentiles

  • WRAT (reading and math)

scores were lower than normal

slide-35
SLIDE 35

WIOA Gives Us a Glimpse into Successful Partnerships – You’re Not Alone

No single grantee is able to provide all of the services that a participant will need to succeed along her or his chosen career pathway, so, WIOA gives us many examples of partnerships needed, such as:

  • Key partnerships in industry

sectors including employers and training providers

  • Apprenticeship programs
  • Elected Officials
  • Chambers of Commerce
  • School systems
  • Governmental agencies at the

federal, state and local levels Nonprofits that provide niche services for targeted groups like:

  • Homeless individuals and

families

  • Reentry from prisons and jails
  • Youth with multiple barriers
  • Low wage earners and their

families

  • Fatherhood programs
  • Victims of domestic violence
  • Veterans
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Look for Niche Services with Common Goals

  • Homeless providers
  • Reentry programs
  • Low wage workers
  • TANF and SNAP

customers

  • Veterans services
  • Juvenile Justice (youth)
  • Substance Abuse

providers

  • Mental Health

providers

  • Older workers

programs

  • Disability Services
  • Pregnant and parenting

teens program

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Just Give Me a Call or Drop Me an Email

  • Debby Kratky
  • debby.Kratky@workforcesolutions.net
  • (817) 528-0402
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Questions? Use the chat box!

Contact Information: Anna Cielinski, Senior Policy Analyst, CLASP acielinski@clasp.org