presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing
play

Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules . Ensiyeh Amanzadeh with Mohammad T. Dibaei IPM 12th seminar on commutative algebra and related topics School of Mathemaics, IPM, 2015 . . . . . . Presentations of rings


  1. . Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules . Ensiyeh Amanzadeh with Mohammad T. Dibaei IPM 12th seminar on commutative algebra and related topics School of Mathemaics, IPM, 2015 . . . . . .

  2. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Semidualizing modules Throughout R is a commutative Noetherian local ring. . Definition . An R –module C is called semidualizing , if • C is finite (i.e. finitely generated) • The natural homothety map χ R C : R − → Hom R ( C , C ) is an isomorphism • For all i > 0, Ext i R ( C , C ) = 0 . . Example . Examples of semidualizing modules include • R • The dualizing module of R if it exists (dualizing module is a semidualizing module with finite injective dimension). . . . . . . .

  3. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Semidualizing modules Throughout C assumed to be a semidualizing R –module. . Basic properties . • Ann R ( C ) = 0 and Supp R ( C ) = Spec ( R ). • dim R ( C ) = dim ( R ) and Ass R ( C ) = Ass R ( R ). • If R is local, then depth R ( C ) = depth ( R ). . If R is Gorenstein and local, then R is the only semidualizing R –module. Conversely, if the dualizing R –module is just the only semidualizing R –module, then R is Gorenstein. . . . . . .

  4. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Totally C –reflexive modules . Definition . A finite R –module M is totally C – reflexive when it satisfies the following conditions. • The natural homomorphism δ C M : M − → Hom R ( Hom R ( M , C ) , C ) is an isomorphism. • For all i > 0, Ext i R ( M , C ) = 0 = Ext i R ( Hom R ( M , C ) , C ). . • Every finite projective R –module is totally C –reflexive. • The G C -dimension of a finite R –module M , denoted G C - dim R ( M ), is defined as { } � � there is an exact sequence of R − modules � G C − dim R ( M ) = inf n ⩾ 0 0 → G n → · · · → G 1 → G 0 → M → 0 � such that each G i is totally C − reflexive . . . . . .

  5. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules The set G 0 ( R ) The set of all isomorphism classes of semidualizing R –modules is denoted by G 0 ( R ), and the isomorphism class of a semidualizing R –module C is denoted [ C ]. • Write [ C ] ⊴ [ B ] when B is totally C –reflexive. • Write [ C ] ◁ [ B ] when [ C ] ⊴ [ B ] and [ C ] ̸ = [ B ]. • For each [ C ] ∈ G 0 ( R ) set � { } � [ C ] ⊴ [ B ] G C ( R ) = [ B ] ∈ G 0 ( R ) . • If [ C ] ⊴ [ B ], then (1) Hom R ( B , C ) is a semidualizing, and (2) [ C ] ⊴ [ Hom R ( B , C )]. . . . . . .

  6. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Chain in G 0 ( R ) A chain in G 0 ( R ) is a sequence [ C n ] ⊴ · · · ⊴ [ C 1 ] ⊴ [ C 0 ], and such a chain has length n if [ C i ] ̸ = [ C j ] whenever i ̸ = j . . Theorem (Gerko) . If [ C n ] ⊴ · · · ⊴ [ C 1 ] ⊴ [ C 0 ] is a chain in G 0 ( R ), then one gets C n ∼ = C 0 ⊗ R Hom R ( C 0 , C 1 ) ⊗ R · · · ⊗ R Hom R ( C n − 1 , C n ) . . . . . . . .

  7. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Chain in G 0 ( R ) Assume that [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ C 0 ] is a chain in G 0 ( R ). • For each i ∈ [ n ] set B i = Hom R ( C i − 1 , C i ). • For each sequence of integers i = { i 1 , · · · , i j } with j ⩾ 1 and 1 ⩽ i 1 < · · · < i j ⩽ n , set B i = B i 1 ⊗ R · · · ⊗ R B i j . ( B { i 1 } = B i 1 and set B ∅ = C 0 .) . . . . . .

  8. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Chain in G 0 ( R ) . Proposition (Sather-Wagstaff) . Assume that [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ C 0 ] is a chain in G 0 ( R ) such that G C 1 ( R ) ⊆ G C 2 ( R ) ⊆ · · · ⊆ G C n ( R ). (1) For each sequence i = { i 1 , · · · , i j } ⊆ [ n ], the R –module B i is a semidualizing. (2) If i = { i 1 , · · · , i j } ⊆ [ n ] and s = { s 1 , · · · , s t } ⊆ [ n ] are two sequences with s ⊆ i , then [ B i ] ⊴ [ B s ] and Hom R ( B s , B i ) ∼ = B i \ s . (3) If i = { i 1 , · · · , i j } ⊆ [ n ] and s = { s 1 , · · · , s t } ⊆ [ n ] are two sequences, then the following conditions are equivalent. (i) The R –module B i ⊗ R B s is semidualizing. (ii) i ∩ s = ∅ . . . . . . . .

  9. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Chain in G 0 ( R ) For a semidualizing R –module C , set ( − ) † C = Hom R ( − , C ). . Definition . Let [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ C 0 ] be a chain in G 0 ( R ) of length n . For each sequence of integers i = { i 1 , · · · , i j } such that j ⩾ 0 and † Ci 1 † Ci 2 ···† Cij 1 ⩽ i 1 < · · · < i j ⩽ n , set C i = C . 0 (When j = 0, set C i = C ∅ = C 0 ). We say that the above chain is suitable if C 0 = R and C i is totally C t –reflexive, for all i and t with i j ⩽ t ⩽ n . . • If [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ R ] is a suitable chain, then C i is a semidualizing R –module for each i ⊆ [ n ]. • For each sequence of integers { x 1 , · · · , x m } with 1 ⩽ x 1 < · · · < x m ⩽ n , the sequence [ C x m ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C x 1 ] ◁ [ R ] is a suitable chain in G 0 ( R ). . . . . . .

  10. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Chain in G 0 ( R ) . Theorem (Sather-Wagstaff) . Let G 0 ( R ) admit a chain [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ C 0 ] such that G C 1 ( R ) ⊆ G C 2 ( R ) ⊆ · · · ⊆ G C n ( R ). { } | = 2 n . • | G 0 ( R ) | ⩾ | [ C i ] | i ⊆ [ n ] { } { } • If C 0 = R , then [ B u ] | u ⊆ [ n ] [ C i ] | i ⊆ [ n ] = . . . . . . . .

  11. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Suitable chains . Lemma (Dibaei and me) . Assume that R admits a suitable chain [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ C 0 ] = [ R ] in G 0 ( R ). Then for any k ∈ [ n ], there exists a suitable chain † Ck † Ck † Ck [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C k +1 ] ◁ [ C k ] ◁ [ C ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C k − 2 ] ◁ [ C k − 1 ] ◁ [ R ] 1 in G 0 ( R ) of length n . . . . . . . .

  12. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Proposition (Suitable chains in G 0 ( R k ) )(Dibaei and me) Let R be Cohen-Macaulay and [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ C 0 ] be a † Ck suitable chain in G 0 ( R ). For any k ∈ [ n ], set R k = R ⋉ C k − 1 the † Ck trivial extension of R by C k − 1 . Set  † Ck   Hom R ( R k , C k − 1 − l ) if 0 ⩽ l < k − 1 C ( k ) = l   Hom R ( R k , C l +1 ) if k − 1 ⩽ l ⩽ n − 1 . • For all l , 0 ⩽ l ⩽ n − 1, C ( k ) is a semidualizing R k –module. l • For any k ∈ [ n ], [ C ( k ) n − 1 ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C ( k ) ] ◁ [ R k ] 1 is a suitable chain in G 0 ( R k ) of length n − 1. 21 . . . . . .

  13. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Main result . Theorem (Dibaei and me) . Let R be a Cohen–Macaulay ring with a dualizing module D . Assume that R admits a suitable chain [ C n ] ◁ · · · ◁ [ C 1 ] ◁ [ R ] in G 0 ( R ) and that C n ∼ = D . Then there exist a Gorenstein local ring Q and ideals I 1 , · · · , I n of Q , which satisfy the following conditions. In this situation, for each Λ ⊆ [ n ], set R Λ = Q / (Σ l ∈ Λ I l ), in particular R ∅ = Q . (1) There is a ring isomorphism R ∼ = Q / ( I 1 + · · · + I n ). (2) For each Λ ⊆ [ n ] with Λ ̸ = ∅ , the ring R Λ is non-Gorenstein Cohen–Macaulay with a dualizing module. (3) For each Λ ⊆ [ n ] with Λ ̸ = ∅ , we have ∩ l ∈ Λ I l = ∏ l ∈ Λ I l . (4) For subsets Λ, Γ of [ n ] with Γ ⊊ Λ, we have G − dim R Γ R Λ = 0, and Hom R Γ ( R Λ , R Γ ) is a non-free semidualizing R Λ –module. . . . . . . .

  14. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules Main result . Theorem (Dibaei and me) . (5) For subsets Λ, Γ of [ n ] with Λ ̸ = Γ, the module Hom R Λ ∩ Γ ( R Λ , R Γ ) is not cyclic and R Λ ∩ Γ Ext ⩾ 1 R Λ ∩ Γ ( R Λ , R Γ ) = 0 = Tor ( R Λ , R Γ ) . ⩾ 1 (6) For subsets Λ, Γ of [ n ] with | Λ \ Γ | = 1, we have i R Λ ∩ Γ � R Λ ∩ Γ ( R Λ , R Γ ) = 0 = � Ext Tor ( R Λ , R Γ ) i for all i ∈ Z . . 22 . . . . . .

  15. Presentations of rings with a chain of semidualizing modules . Construction . We construct the ring Q by induction on n . We claim that the ring Q , as an R –module, has the form Q = ⊕ i ⊆ [ n ] B i and the ring structure on it is as follows. ( ) ( ) For two elements α i i ⊆ [ n ] and θ i i ⊆ [ n ] of Q ∑ ( ) ( ) ( ) α i θ i i ⊆ [ n ] = σ i i ⊆ [ n ] , where σ i = α v · θ w . i ⊆ [ n ] v ⊆ i w = i \ v . • n = 1: set Q = R ⋉ C 1 and I 1 = 0 ⊕ C 1 . (Proved by Foxby and Reiten) • n = 2: The extension ring Q has the form † C 2 Q = R ⊕ C 1 ⊕ C ⊕ C 2 as an R –module. The ring structure 1 ( r , c , f , d )( r ′ , c ′ , f ′ , d ′ ) = on Q is given by ( rr ′ , rc ′ + r ′ c , rf ′ + r ′ f , f ′ ( c ) + f ( c ′ ) + rd ′ + r ′ d ). (Proved by Jorgensen, Leuschke and Sather-Wagstaff) . . . . . .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend