Presentation to the Facility Task Force Lindenwold Board of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation to the facility task force
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Presentation to the Facility Task Force Lindenwold Board of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation to the Facility Task Force Lindenwold Board of Education March 9, 2020 Committee Purpose To educate committee stakeholders on the facility constraints and corresponding impact on educational programs in the Lindenwold School


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation to the Facility Task Force

Lindenwold Board of Education March 9, 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Committee Purpose

To educate committee stakeholders on the facility constraints and corresponding impact on educational programs in the Lindenwold School

  • District. This committee will serve as key

communicators to address the facility needs of the District.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Conversation Points

Topics to Include:

  • Enrollment Growth
  • Building Capacity and Current Usage
  • Property Discussion
  • Steps to Date
slide-4
SLIDE 4

ENROLLMENT GROWTH & BUILDING CAPACITY

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ENROLLMENT CONTINUES TO GROW

10 Year Enrollment Growth (Now vs FY09 School Funding Reform Act)

1 Year Enrollment Growth (Now vs Prior Year)

Selected Categories of Enrollment Category Net Increases since SFRA 2019 2008-2009

Resident Student Count

558 2,828 2,270

On Roll Student Count

679 2,946 2,272

Low income on roll

1,037 2,404 1,367

LEP on roll

581 736 155

Selected Categories of Enrollment Category Net Increases since SFRA 2019 October 2018

Resident Student Count

144 2,828 2,684

On Roll Student Count

187 2,946 2,764

Low income on roll

314 2,404 2,090

LEP on roll

123 736 613

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Past 10 years of enrollment shows multiple spikes and continued growth

ON ROLL 2015-2019 ON ROLL 2010-2014

Date On Roll Inc(Dec)

  • ver PY

10.15.19 2946 182 10.15.18 2764

  • 13

10.15.17 2777 52 10.15.16 2725

  • 9

10.15.15 2734 100 Date On Roll Inc(Dec)

  • ver PY

10.15.14 2634 168 10.15.13 2466 9 10.15.12 2457 147 10.15.11 2310 22 10.15.10 2288 16

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NJ CHOICE Program Historical Analysis

School CHOICE Current Enrolled Elementary 5 Middle School 8 High School 16 Total Enrollment 29 Budget Year Student Count CHOICE Aid 2011-12 4 61,368 2012-13 26 115,336 2013-14 37 221,815 2014-15 54 323,730 2015-16 55 323,730 2016-17 51 323,730* 2017-18 38 323,730* 2018-19 32 297,472 2019-20 32 246,934 2020-21 29 203,091 * State provided “adjustment aid” to districts with declining Choice enrollment

slide-8
SLIDE 8

School 4 School 5

Grade Level Enrollment Enrollment FULL DAY K 129 138 ONE 115 127 TWO 135 119 THREE 134 112 FOUR 129 108 TOTAL 642 604

Elementary Enrollment by School

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Elementary Room Inventory

School #4 56,501 GSF School #5 52,691 GSF

Total Classrooms Available

34

Grade Level Classroom

29

Special Education Classroom

4

Shared Instructional/Offices

1

Total Classrooms Available

33

Grade Level Classroom

28

Special Education Classroom

3

Shared Instructional/Offices

2

Total Classrooms Available

34

Grade Level Classroom

29

Special Education Classroom

4

Shared Instructional/Offices

1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Elementary Educational Program Limitations

 All specialists, such as technology, art and music are

  • n carts and have to push into classrooms

 Both buildings have one multi-purpose room that has

to accommodate 5 lunch periods and all gym and assembly functions on daily basis

 Growing enrollment has corresponding growing staff

with inadequate space to work and sometimes inadequate privacy to confer on confidential matters

 Administrative areas such as main offices and nurse’s

  • ffices not designed to handle current enrollments
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lindenwold Middle School Enrollment

Grade Level Enrollment FIVE 266 SIX 230 SEVEN 222 EIGHT 206 TOTAL 924

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Middle School Room Inventory

Current 5th Grade has enrollment

  • f 265 students spread over 10
  • homerooms. All other grade

levels have 8 homerooms. For 2020-2021, we will need to add 2 homerooms in Grade 6 to move Grade 5 up. All rooms are utilized as listed here, and we are either close or at capacity for all Special Education class size limits. We may have to consider either utilizing trailers, split sessions or moving the 8th grade to the High School for the 2020-2021 school year. Total Classrooms Available

51

Grade Level Homerooms

34

Special Education Classrooms

5

Read 180

4

ESL

1

ISS

1

Basic Skills (Enrich/Inter)

2

Music/Art/Technology/STEM

4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

History of Preschool Education

Prior to 2014

  • Self contained preschool program classrooms in place
  • Half Day Inclusion Preschool which eventually changed to full day

preschool for about 4-5 inclusion classrooms housed throughout the District

2014-2015

  • Began leasing current Preschool Building
  • 9 Inclusion classrooms in place – class size capped at 18

Beginning 2015-2016

  • Preschool Expansion Grant(PEG) Funding awarded – expanded to 12

Inclusion classrooms – class size capped at 15

  • PEG ended YE2019, expanded to 4 additional HeadStart classrooms

during the 4 year grant period – total of 240 student seats

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Enrollment History of Preschool Program

Enrollment

Year End General Ed Special Ed HeadStart Total PreK Seats Universe 2013 68 46 114 432 2014 68 46 114 432 2015 110 52 162 462 2016 135 45 15 195 462 2017 130 50 30 210 502 2018 132 48 30 210 502 2019 130 50 60 240 454 2020 130 50 60 240 454

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Current Preschool Building

 Annual rental cost – Approximate $100K  No bathrooms in classrooms and for 7 classrooms not

even on the same floor

 5 floors in building and no elevator to create

accessibility for students/staff/parents

 Very old infrastructure – costly repairs for mechanical

and building envelope including the HVAC, plumbing, exterior doors, windows and walls

 Feasibility study prepared by Architect in 2017

estimated $16 million to renovate without bathrooms in classrooms and with no additional space added

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cohort Study performed by Demographer as required by NJDOE for building study

  • Projected growth – future

enrollment of 2,716 by FY2017

  • ASSA reported 2,725

10.15.16

Cohort Study 2013

  • Projected growth – future

enrollment of 2,962 by FY2024

  • ASSA will report approx 2,951

10.15.19

Cohort Study 2019

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Student Calculations of Unhoused Students per NJ State Long Range Facility Plan (LRFP) Program Guidelines

Lindenwold School District Grades 1 – 5 State Calculation is 645 “Unhoused” Students Grades 6 – 8 State Calculation is 240 “Unhoused” Students Note: The NJDOE calculates facility housing loads for Elementary and Middle School based on Grades 1-5 and Grades 6-8. The Lindenwold School District is currently configured as K-4 and 5-8.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Lindenwold State Aid History

2009 - SFRA

  • Schools funded in line

with SFRA (School Funding Reform Act)

  • This funding act was

not funded after the initial year (2009) and so state aid funding was held essentially flat for almost a decade 2016-2019

  • Inequities in funding

became larger focus at state level

  • Advocacy by Board &

Admin by involving local legislature representatives and attending House and Assembly meetings to testify on underfunded status of

  • ur District

Beginning 2019-2020

  • State implemented S2

legislation which dictated that full SFRA should be funded over next 7 years with phase out of “adjustment aid” to

  • verfunded districts
  • We received additional

$2.4 million & $4.9 million in state aid FY20 & FY21

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Why Is State Aid Funding Important?

The cost of a new building will be supported by issuing debt, which is funded primarily by the Debt Service Tax

  • Levy. Currently our High School debt, originally issued

at approx $25 million, expires in June 2025. To have the least impact to the taxpayer, the plan will be for the new building debt to begin very close to the end of the HS building debt so that the debt tax levy already collected can be utilized towards the new building debt. However, this is not enough as the new building will cost significantly more money based on today’s construction costs. If we continue to receive increased State Aid in line with S2 legislation, we will be able to reduce the General Fund Tax Levy simultaneous to increasing the Debt Service Tax Levy. Continued state aid funding is crucial to this plan.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Addressing the Overall Issues

Overcrowding at the Elementary

Buildings and the Middle School

Leased, Inadequate Space for Pre-

School

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Proposed new configurations will address all current and projected capacity issues

 Consideration of an Early Childhood

Center (ECC) to House Pre-School, Kindergarten, and First Grade

 Move Fifth Grade Back to the Elementary

Buildings

 Schools 4 and 5 will House Grades 2 - 5  Middle School will House Grades 6 – 8

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Property Discussion

Architect: Scott England

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Selection of Building Site – Properties Considered

Location/Address PROS CONS Linden Ave Partially owned by Board Families would be displaced Environmental concerns and wetlands Accessible with minimal busing Insufficient space Lake Worth Good space - a lot of area DEP/County owned Green Acres 100% busing required Egg Harbor (near county complex) Sufficient space 100% busing required Privately owned Camden County shooting range in close proximity Emerson Ave Accessible - minimal busing Insufficient space Existing public park Owned by the Borough Chews Landing & Park Ave Wetlands restrictive Privately owned Insufficient space

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Selection of Building Site – Properties Considered

Location/Address PROS CONS

MS Lower Field Board owned Wetlands restrictive Insufficient space Tight area for traffic 4th & Scott Ave Owned by the Borough Wetlands restrictive Public Park Tight area for traffic Insufficient space Current preschool site with additional properties Sufficient space Accessible minimal busing Multiple commercial properties involved Church property Cost of acquisition Pre-school students would be displaced during construction for approximately 2 years

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Best Potential Location for New ECC Building – Current HS Sports Fields

Land owned by Board of Education Proximity – transportation will NOT be required for all students Large enough to handle 90,000 SqFt Building

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Steps Taken To Date

 Creating Facility Task Force  Acquiring Requisite Professional Services

  • Bond Counsel
  • Financial Advisors
  • Architects/Engineers

 Planning for Bond Referendum (ongoing)