PRESENTATION OUTLINE Our City Our City Our Homeless Our Shared - - PDF document

11/1/2011 1

OUR CITY, OUR HOMELESS, OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Moving our Community Forward to Address Homelessness

Community & Staff Presentation November 1 2011 Community & Staff Presentation November 1, 2011

1

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

• Our City

Our City

• Our Homeless
• Our Shared

Responsibility

2

11/1/2011 2

OUR CITY

• Who We Are
• A History of What We’ve Done
• Our Vision for the Future

3

OUR CITY

Who We Are

• City staff
• Non‐profit service

providers

• Faith‐Based Organizations
• Organized into many

partnerships to help end homelessness in Virginia Beach

• Also part of a regional

partnership to end homelessness in the region

4

11/1/2011 3

OUR CITY

A Brief History of Our Work

Frank Bragg, Art Mann and Dick Powell Brenda McCormick and Mothers Inc. start winter shelter program at area churches. Inter‐faith network of Mann and Dick Powell serve first meal of the Virginia Beach Christian outreach; continues at the Fire Escape on 17th St. JCOC purchases

1980s

5

70 faith communities join together to push for a shelter in Virginia Beach. property on Virginia Beach Blvd., providing 10 beds for women and families, and 20 for single men.

OUR CITY

A Brief History of Our Work

1997: Lighthouse Center opens at the Oceanfront. 2005: South d 2006: Gosnold opens in Norfolk, providing 60 units of permanent supportive housing. 2007: City C il d t 2008: Cloverleaf opens in Virginia Beach, providing additional 60 units of permanent supportive housing.

1990‐ 2000s

6 Hampton Roads Regional Task Force to End Homelessness is formed. Council adopts 10‐year Plan.

11/1/2011 4

OUR CITY

A Brief History of Our Work

Below: South Bay in Portsmouth (Opened February 2011) Above: Cloverleaf in Virginia Beach (Opened November 2008)

7

OUR HOMELESS

How Do We Compare to Other Cities and the U.S. as a Whole?

2010 ‐ Homeless Persons per 10,000 of General Population

140 KW

80 100 120 140 160

Virginia Beach (434,922) Ocean City (167,857)

• Ft. Lauderdale (1,759,132)

United States (301,461,533) Norfolk (236,071) 12 VB 14 OC 18 Ft L 22 U.S. 24 N 30 MB 35 SD 37 DB

20 40 60

Myrtle Beach (501,134) San Diego (1,297,618) Daytona Beach (580,076) Key West (74,024) 8

11/1/2011 5

OUR CITY

Our Vision

“This is our city, they are our homeless, it is our shared responsibility.”

9

Pictured: 2009 Faith‐Based Forum; 2010 Regional Conference on Ending Homelessness

• Addressing homelessness is “our

shared responsibility”!

• Our system prioritizes the use of

resources and uses them efficiently

OUR CITY

Our Vision

• Our community is well‐informed

about and supportive of our work

• We are a true community

partnership, including regional neighbors, operating a sustainable system that succeeds in getting help to people who need it

• People in need can access our

services

• Our work is done according to a

philosophy of opportunity and mutual accountability from all

• We see our work to end

homelessness in the context of all

• People who become homeless are

safely and quickly sheltered and

• btain housing in quality facilities

that contribute to our city and neighborhoods

• ther city goals, including

promoting economic vitality and safe, well‐maintained, quality neighborhoods

10

11/1/2011 6

OUR CITY

Our Overall Goals

1) Prevent homelessness wherever possible 2) Rapidly re‐house people 3) Maintain and expand affordable housing resources ) d h l b l f 4) Expand the availability of resources 5) Connect people to needed services

11

• Relocate the Lighthouse Center and provide

enhanced day services including a focus on re

OUR CITY

Three‐Year Action Plan

enhanced day services, including a focus on re‐ housing and employment

• Reduce encampments and street homelessness

through effective outreach and the creation of additional housing

• Create another efficiency apartment building or

similar facility

• Enhance and expand our ability to quickly re‐

house homeless families.

12

11/1/2011 7

• Upgrade Judeo‐Christian Outreach Center campus
• n 17th St

OUR CITY

Three‐Year Action Plan

• n 17th St.
• Create a regional Healing Place
• Improve efficiency and effectiveness of our overall

system through increased coordination, new services that address needs and potential co location of that address needs, and potential co‐location of facilities

• Improve monitoring, data collection and reporting for

better analysis, understanding and planning

13

Mayors’ Action Challenge unveiled in 2008 at the National League of Cities Congress & Exposition in Florida

OUR CITY

Nation‐Wide Mayors’ Action Challenge

g g p Challenged Mayors across the country to set goals to ensure that every child has:

• Opportunities to learn and grow
• A safe neighborhood to call home
• A healthy lifestyle and environment
• A financially fit family in which to thrive

Mayor Sessoms and the City Council embraced the challenge We believe that our work to address homelessness is consistent with the Mayors’ Action Challenge

14

11/1/2011 8

OUR HOMELESS

• Causes of Homelessness
• Who Are Our Homeless?
• Counting the Homeless

F t & Fi

• Facts & Figures

15

• Financial causes – job loss major expenses including

OUR HOMELESS

Causes of Homelessness

Financial causes job loss, major expenses including health care

• Short or long‐term disability leading to inability to

work

• Mental health issues leading to poor choices
• Family break‐up due to various causes

Different causes require different solutions.

16

11/1/2011 9

Not just single adult men and women on the street.

OUR HOMELESS

Who Are Our Homeless?

Also…

• Families with children

– A growing part of homeless the population – Less visible – generally in motels, doubled‐up

• Disconnected youth
• Disconnected youth

– Those exiting the foster care system with nowhere to go – Forced out of childhood home by their own family

Different households require different solutions.

17

• We cannot control the causes of homelessness

OUR HOMELESS

About Counting Homelessness

• People move in and out of homelessness on an
• ngoing basis
• There is not a single number of homeless people

that we can house and say we have succeeded Wh t d t th b t ibl

• What we can do: get the best possible

understanding of the different needs in our community, and act to address them

18

11/1/2011 10

OUR HOMELESS

Facts & Figures

• 427 people – January 2011 Point‐in‐Time Count,

including 92 single adults including 92 single adults

• Summer Count – 125 unsheltered single adults
• 762 homeless children in VB schools during 2010‐

2011 school year

• An estimated 4,300 people (1% of the

population) could experience an episode of h l ll

(C f U b d C i

homelessness annually (Center for Urban and Community

Studies 2010 Report)

• Connection Point: 1,300+ calls for emergency

housing assistance, September 2011

19

OUR HOMELESS

2010 ‐ Major Effort to Combat Effect of the Recession on Families

Point‐in‐Time Comparisons 2008‐2011

251 218 266 179 233 215 251 245

150 200 250 300

Persons in Homeless Households with Children Persons in Homeless

20

50 100 2008 2009 2010 2011

Persons in Homeless Households without Children

11/1/2011 11

OUR HOMELESS

2010 ‐ Major Effort to Combat Effect of the Recession on Families

2011 2010 Dragas Grant HPRP Funds

$1.5 million in new, one‐time funding

21

2011 HUD‐Defined Homeless in VB 427 people 2010 HUD‐Defined Homeless in VB 517 people Fewer At‐Risk Families Falling into Homelessness OUR HOMELESS

Housing Affordability Problems for Renters Can Lead to Homelessness

Total Households (50,750) Households with Housing Problems (25,375) Households with Moderate Cost Burdens (12,995) Households with Severe Cost Burdens

48% of total renters are cost‐burdened

(9,015) Households with Overcrowding (1,010)

Households with housing condition issues (450) 22

Source: US Census, American Communities Survey

11/1/2011 12

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

• Progress Made
• What’s In Motion

23

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Progress Made

O 500 h h ld id d ith

A lot has been accomplished since the 10‐Year Plan was adopted in 2007:

• Over 500 households provided with

homeless prevention funds

• 73 formerly homeless adults have moved

into permanent supportive housing beds (Cloverleaf , JCOC, & other programs)

• 60 HUD‐Veterans Affairs Supportive

H i (VASH) h h b Housing (VASH) vouchers have been issued to formerly homeless veterans

• Hundreds of homeless families have been

assisted with Dragas and Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re‐housing (HPRP) assistance

24

11/1/2011 13

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Donation Meters & Special Council Funding from 2010

G d $5 000 i hi Generated $5,000 in sponsorships and $2,032.65 in donations so far

25

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Donation Meters & Special Council Funding from 2010

How You’re Helping ‐ $25,000 you allocated to the program + Donation Meter funds resulted in:

• 1,195 tickets for travel to job and benefits interviews, medical

appointments, employment

• Prescriptions for 116 persons
• I.D. cards for 226 persons
• …More detail on this program in an upcoming presentation

26

11/1/2011 14

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

What’s In Motion

Current Planning and Advisory Groups:

• BEACH (Bringing an End to All City Homelessness) Community
• BEACH (Bringing an End to All City Homelessness) Community

Partnership

— Oceanfront Homeless Advisory/Single Homelessness Committee — Family Homelessness Committee — Services Coordination Committee — Fundraising Committee — Advocacy Committee Advocacy Committee

• Lighthouse Site Options and Neighborhood Issues Committees
• South Hampton Roads Regional Task Force to End Homelessness
• VBHARP – Continuum of Care planning
• Project HOPE – VB City schools

27

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

What’s In Motion

Projects planned or currently being developed: developed:

• Cedar Grove: VBCDC’s 32‐unit apartment

complex to serve homeless and/or disabled veterans

• Heron’s Landing: VSH’s 60‐unit SRO in

Chesapeake to serve 8 people

• Healing Place: Regional substance abuse

The Healing Place ‐ Louisville, KY Healing Place: Regional substance abuse recovery center and program

• 1,000 Homes Campaign: Regional initiative

to house the most medically fragile homeless people g ,

28

11/1/2011 15

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

What’s In Motion

Below: Cedar Grove (Opening 2012) Above: Heron’s Landing (Opening 2012)

29

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

What’s In Motion

Outreach efforts in place or being planned: P i t i Ti C t/P j t H l

• Point‐in‐Time Count/Project Homeless

Connect : annually in January

• Summer Count : Done in August 2011, perhaps

annually

• Lighthouse Center Client Survey: in process

C ti P i t ll t f i t

• Connection Point – call center for assistance
• Ongoing DHS/PATH Outreach
• Non‐profit and Faith‐based outreach efforts

30

Pictured: 2010 Day of Services; Stuff‐a‐Backpack Campaign

11/1/2011 16

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Lighthouse Center Relocation

During 2011…

January Proposed vote re: locating Lighthouse Center on Birdneck Rd. → community concern about location

• Jan. – April

Public meetings March Site Options Committee appointed May 27 City Manager letter with action plan direction (details to follow)

31

• Aug. – Nov.

Community input meetings (details on following slides) Sept. Research report re: best practices for homeless service centers

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Lighthouse Center Relocation

Community Input Meetings*

A 3 1st C it Di l M ti @ B h F ll hi Ch h

• Aug. 3

1st Community Dialogue Meeting @ Beach Fellowship Church 78 attendees

• Aug. 31

2nd Community Dialogue Meeting @ VB Law Enforcement Training Academy 42 attendees

• Sep. 14

Core stakeholders meeting re: neighborhood issues @ EMS Facility 30 attendees

• Sep. 19

Lighthouse Site Options Committee Meeting @ VB Municipal Center 27 attendees

32

Meeting 27 attendees

• Oct. 5

Neighborhood Issues Committee Meeting @ 2nd Police Precinct Facility 19 attendees

• Nov. 7

Service Provider Meeting re: Expectations for Homeless Clients

*Councilman Uhrin attended a number of these meetings

11/1/2011 17

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Community Input Summary

• Current homeless assistance system and facility

l ti i t f t i hb h d locations impact oceanfront neighborhoods

• Expending funds for a new center without providing

new housing options was questioned

• Siting criteria need to be reviewed, including the

33

rationale for location at the resort area

• Provider and city policies should be reviewed closely

to determine how they affect neighborhoods

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter

Plan: Review existing criteria for locating the Lighthouse Center and determine if there are more factors and issues that should be included and if they should be adjusted R

34

Response: Criteria were reviewed and results are summarized in this presentation

11/1/2011 18

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (2)

Plan: Complete additional research on best practices; obtain more detailed information on the homeless population in Virginia Beach; obtain examples of the location of day service centers in other cities and how they affected service utilization Response:

35

p Report is complete and on our website; summer census; Lighthouse user survey; site visit to Union Mission‐at their new campus

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (3)

Plan: Plan: Identify additional sites, including some outside the Resort Area Response: Site identification has continued; pending your guidance

36

f ; p g y g from this meeting, site recommendations will be reviewed with the community and Council

11/1/2011 19

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (4)

Plan: Establish a functional, high‐quality temporary Lighthouse Center site on city‐owned land north of the current JCOC campus on 17th St. Response:

37

This option was evaluated but has significant cost and timing issues and therefore alternatives are being sought

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (5)

Plan: Establish ongoing dialogue between area residents and JCOC and VOA Response: Meetings to discuss community concerns in detail have been held.

38

In addition, staff are meeting with providers to identify potential policy issues to address. This process includes the Police Department, Human Services and DHNP and is ongoing now.

11/1/2011 20

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (6)

Plan: Expand the membership of, and hold a limited number of additional meetings of the Lighthouse Site Options Committee Response:

39

Meetings were held during the summer; additional public participation did occur

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (7)

Plan: Present each of the proposed site options in the context of

• ur overall plan to address homelessness, showing the

context and impact of the various options. Response: Our presentation today and the report that accompanies it

40

Our presentation today, and the report that accompanies it, presents our overall plan. Based on your guidance, site

• ptions that are proposed will be evaluated based on

elements of this plan.

11/1/2011 21

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

City Manager’s May 27th Letter (8)

Plan: Staff to report to City Manager in October; City Manager to make site recommendation Response: Site recommendations will follow this report

41

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Lighthouse Relocation Criteria

Recommendations from Lighthouse Site Options Committee

C Id Consensus Ideas

• In an industrial or commercial zone, away from residential
• Public transit route within 1,000 ft.
• Near social services
• Near police
• Accessible to other providers, resources, employment
• pportunities

42

pp Non‐Consensus

• In a central location
• Located no more than 1.5 miles from Oceanfront

11/1/2011 22

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Current Homeless Assistance System in the Resort Area

• Made possible through the continuing generosity of

p g g g y community members and faith organizations

• Multiple sites in close proximity provide “circuit” of services
• Negative impact of circuit on community

S i f iliti d i t d l ti

43

• Service facilities need improvement and relocation

– Lighthouse Center – JCOC

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Research Report

Purpose: u pose

• Provide baseline for comparison of Virginia Beach

homeless facilities to those in other resort cities

• Compile list of best practices for homeless service

centers Report available on DHNP website as of September

44

11/1/2011 23

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Research Report

Localities included in report Other localities reviewed during research process

• Daytona Beach, FL
• Fort Lauderdale, FL
• Key West, FL
• Myrtle Beach, SC
• Norfolk, VA
• Ocean City MD
• Baltimore, MD
• Dallas, TX
• Oklahoma City, OK
• Phoenix, AZ
• Richmond, VA
• San Antonio, TX

Ocean City, MD

• San Diego, CA
• Virginia Beach, VA
• Hennepin County (Minneapolis, MN)
• Franklin County (Columbus, OH)

San Antonio, TX

• St Louis, MO

45

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Research Report

Conclusions

1) There are only a few cities with day service only centers (such as the 1) There are only a few cities with day‐service‐only centers (such as the current Lighthouse Center) 2) Trend toward consolidating full spectrum of services for the homeless (including overnight shelter) into one campus location 3) Homeless‐serving facility can be successfully located away from beach/resort area /

• Housing and/or shelter component necessary
• May also require transportation component to bring people to

the campus 4) An effective data management system is critical to track outcomes / success rates

46

11/1/2011 24

• Staff and community proposed a combination shelter and

h i f ili i 1989 d C il d i

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Our History re: the Campus Model

permanent housing facility in 1989, and Council approved it

• The facility could not be built because of issues with the

seller

• The current Lighthouse Center, completed in 1997, was

intended to include a shelter; the current day‐services‐only center is the result of a compromise that removed the shelter in order to obtain approval.

• Faith communities have continued to support the Winter

Shelter program as a substitute

47

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

What is a Campus Model?

• Consolidates multiple complementary services for homeless in one location

– Provides for all/majority of daily needs and offers supportive services

• Guiding philosophy

– Provide a complete continuum of services to facilitate progression out of homelessness, permanently – Maximize time homeless able to spend on enrichment/development activities – Minimize burden on homeless having to travel throughout city to obtain multiple services

C i

• Campus sizes vary

(can be actual campus or one multi‐use building)

– Haven for Hope, San Antonio – 100 acres – Union Mission, Norfolk – 24 acres – Broward County Partnership, Fort Lauderdale – 3.2 acres

48

11/1/2011 25

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Campus Model Example: Union Mission, Norfolk

New Men’s Shelter 49 49

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Union Mission: Rendering of Proposed Men’s Overnight Shelter

50

11/1/2011 26

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Daily Bread, Baltimore

51

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

• St. Patrick Center, St. Louis

Business Incubator Lobby

52

11/1/2011 27

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Broward Partnership, Fort Lauderdale

53

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Bridge Homeless Center: Dallas, TX

AIA 2009 National Housing Award Winner

Photo: Overland Partners Photo: Overland Partners

Housing Award Winner

• 3.41 acres
• 75,000 sq. ft.
• Assist approx. 1400

individuals per day

54

11/1/2011 28

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Campus Model

Potential Facilities on a Virginia Beach Homeless Services Campus

• Day services center

y

• Short‐term / Emergency shelter or short term housing

– Singles and families – Beds for hospital release

• Specialized services through community providers

– Vocational training/experience – Education programs M di l / d l li i – Medical / dental clinic

• Long‐term housing
• Social detox facility
• City offices (Dept. of Human Services, more…)
• Possible relocation of some Judeo‐Christian Outreach facilities from 17th St.

55

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Campus Model

Benefits to the Community

(Depending on what services are located on the Campus) 1) Improved results for moving people permanently out of homelessness reduces cost to the community for:

– Police – Courts – Jail stays – Emergency room visits /EMS services – Foster care placements – Estimated $20,000+ per person / per year

2) Reduce foot traffic through community of homeless seeking out assistance 3) Provides a service and geographic focus for community support

– Funding; Donations; Volunteering

4) Facilitates improved synergy and coordination among multiple city, non‐ profit, faith and business community partners

56

11/1/2011 29

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Campus Model

Benefits to the Homeless 1) P id f d bl i 1) Provides safe and stable environment 2) Access to services much easier and less costly than traveling to multiple locations throughout city (by walking/biking/bus) 3) Ease of meeting daily needs frees up time to spend addressing barriers to housing

– Accelerates opportunity to progress toward permanent housing situation

57

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Campus Model

Principles for Design and Operation E ll Si D i

• Excellent Site Design

– Be a model for good design and sustainability – Provide flexible spaces to meet changing community needs – Provide separate spaces for singles and families

• Operational Principles

Establish and enforce guidelines that insure campus is a good neighbor – Establish and enforce guidelines that insure campus is a good neighbor – Provide continuum of complementary programs to help people progress

• ut of homelessness

58

11/1/2011 30

Campus Model Flow Chart

Homeless Population Those at‐risk of Homelessness

Existing Housing Resources

Vouchers

Future Regional Healing Place

(substance abuse recovery)

Vouchers Non‐profit Providers Faith Organizations Permanent Housing Options Adult Overnight Shelter Family Overnight Shelter

Off C

Central Intake/Assessment/Referral

59

Day Services Partner Organizations

Vocational Training Education Programs More…

Permanent Housing Options

On Campus Off‐Campus Resources

Track & Measure Outcomes OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Summary

1) We should be proud of the intensive efforts that have been made by the community, city, and region y, y, g

• Without them the current Virginia Beach homeless rate would be

higher 2) Must continue to stay ahead of future needs through proactive, long‐ range planning

• It takes years to plan, fund and develop quality facilities
• JCOC and the Lighthouse Center need upgrading

3) Neighborhood impacts of facilities and services at the resort area should be addressed 4) Streamlining homeless services under a centralized operations structure and campus model will allow us to achieve better outcomes with our existing set of resources

60

11/1/2011 31

OUR SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

What Are We Asking Today?

• Your questions and comments
• Your guidance and feedback on community efforts to

reduce homelessness

• Should staff develop a formal proposal for Council to

consider that would include site and program options consider that would include site and program options for a homeless services “campus” facility?

61

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME & SUPPORT!

Questions, comments, suggestions?

62