Presentation for the 2009 Amended and Restated Bylaws for Green - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presentation for the 2009 Amended and Restated Bylaws for Green - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presentation for the 2009 Amended and Restated Bylaws for Green Valley Recreation, Inc. February 23, 2009 Introductory Remarks Marge Garneau Bylaws Chair Bylaws changed 19 times since 1978 Reasons for the proposed changes
Introductory Remarks
Marge Garneau – Bylaws Chair
- Bylaws changed 19 times since 1978
- Reasons for the proposed changes
- Internally inconsistent
- Ambiguous
- Not well-organized
- To comply with the Arizona NonProfit
Corporation Act
- Some of the Bylaws do not reflect how GVR
- perates as an organization
- Amendments over the years were done without
the assistance of an attorney
Introductory Remarks
(Continued)
- Poor amendments not well drafted by
previous Bylaws Committees
- Poorly structured
» Bylaws are not placed in the correct Articles » Reorganized to group “like” Sections in the same Article
- Categories of membership classifications not
correct
Introductory Remarks
(Continued)
- Do not comply with the Arizona Non-
Profit Corporation Act –Major oversight by previous Committees
» GVR is not complying with the law » Revisions bring Bylaws into compliance » Arizona statutes differ from existing Bylaws » Expand and clarify the statutes
Introductory Remarks
(Continued)
- Changes to the proposed Bylaws
- Clarify terms
- Correct inconsistencies
- Ballot contains 10 different provisions that
will be voted on
- 9 of those Bylaws will be voted on separately
by the members
- The remaining provisions will be voted on as a
whole
Introductory Remarks
(Continued)
- 9 provisions voted on separately
- If these individually proposed Bylaw
changes are not approved »The approved/disapproved Bylaw would be placed into the main document
- Members encouraged Bylaws
Committee to have a separate vote on these Bylaws
Introductory Remarks
(Continued)
- Members are encouraged to vote “YES”
- n all recommended Bylaws changes
- Improve the structure and flow of the current
Bylaws
- Internally consistent
- Comply with the law
- Introduction of GVR’s attorney – Wendy
Ehrlich
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
Wendy Ehrlich
- Purpose of Bylaws
- To regulate and manage the affairs of the
corporation
- Can’t be inconsistent with Articles of
Incorporation or the law
- Bylaws are adopted when Corporation
is first formed
- GVR established in 1978 - merger of two
previous organizations
- Initial Bylaws adopted that same year
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- General Process of Amending Bylaws
- Generally, the practice of amending the
Bylaws is much like amending the CC&R’s in a subdivision
- If changes are made to the bylaws, they are
drafted in a separate document - usually by an attorney, and are referred to as the “first” amendment to the Bylaws
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- When additional amendments are
passed, they are contained in a third document entitled “second” amendment to Bylaws.
- When there are four or more separate
amendments to the Bylaws, an “amended and restated” bylaws is drafted
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- The purpose of the amended and
restated document is to :
- Incorporate all of the amendments that were
made over the years
- Reorganize the document
- Correct any internal inconsistencies that may
have occurred as a result of the amendments
- Bring the provisions into compliance with law
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- GVR’s Process of Amending Bylaws
- Amendments to GVR’s Bylaws were not drafted
- r reviewed by attorneys
- They were drafted by Bylaws Committee
members and board members in some instances as in 1997 they were drafted by members
- Amendments were not contained in a separate
document where they could be easily identified, they were incorporated into the main document every year
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- No efforts were made to determine whether the
existing provisions or the amendments complied with Arizona law - specifically, the Nonprofit Corporation Act adopted in 1997
- Result of this process was:
- Some of the provisions were ambiguous - in
the 2007 bylaws, increases in dues had to be “justified” by 9 members of the Board
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Some of the provisions are now
inconsistent: Article II Section 3 refers to establishing membership by a “purchase” of property
- Article II, Section 2 defines a member as
an “owner” of property
- Is someone who inherits a property a
member of GVR?
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Some of the provisions were vague
- The current quorum requirement for actions of
the members is “established by the number of ballots returned”
- Some of the provisions did not comply
with the NPCA
- Bylaw amendments require a approval of a
majority of the members - the NPCA provides that bylaws can be amended by a majority vote
- f all members or 2/3 of those voting,
whichever is less
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Provisions in the document are poorly
- rganized. For example, the types of
“fees” that GVR can impose are not easily found in one section:
- Assigned member fees in Article I, Section 2
- New member capital fees are found in Article I,
Section 3
- Lifecare fees are in Article 1, Section 4
- Voting Provisions are in Article II, Section 4
and Article XI
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Because of these issues, the ambiguity,
vague provisions, internal conflicts, and the noncompliance with the NPCA, it was determined that the time had come to rewrite the Bylaws - and that is the document you have in Question 10
- Since it is a complete re-write - a
reorganization and a clarification - it is not practical and perhaps not possible, that members vote on the changes individually
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws (Continued)
- If members voted on individual changes, and
did not pass them all, the result would likely be another set of Bylaws with internal inconsistencies
- The nine separate items that you are voting
- n
- Are either “new” provisions that the Board is
proposing or are “substantive changes” to the existing Bylaws
- As in the past, they are being proposed for
separate votes
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Reorganization of Bylaws and
Clarification of Terms
- Article I - No significant changes -
language that referenced old dates have been removed
- Article II - Most difficult section to
rewrite - intention was to incorporate the current policies and practices of GVR:
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
Wendy Ehrlich, GVR’s Attorney
- Definition of “GVR Property” - more
clearly drafted and includes certain commercial properties previously
- mitted in the definition
- Qualified Member is defined as any
person who holds title to a GVR property - removing the inconsistency that a qualified member be a purchaser”
- f a GVR property
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
Allows members to “assign” their usage of the facilities to occupants - either as assigned members or tenants - by separating “tenants” from “assigned members” - the purpose was to create a new category of members to address changes in ownership of GVR properties over the years: those individuals who occupy a GVR property but do not own it and are not tenants – examples: a long-standing GVR member
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
transfers title of the property to a child for estate purposes - a GVR member places the property in a trust. These individuals, who are not “tenants” may be “assigned members” and have the right to use GVR’s facilities. Under a separate vote, is whether these “assigned” members may also be assigned the right to “vote” as GVR members and serve on the Board.
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- A definition section has been added
where no previously existed. Use of facilities are now in a separate section and address the rights of “members” and the rights of “life care privileges.” Currently these provisions are lumped in with “voting rights”
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- The only significant change is that
where previously only 2 GVR membership cards were allotted per household, now all GVR members, Assigned members, Life Care members, members, commercial residents and tenants are assigned cards
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article III
- Only significant change is to Section 3 -
where all GVR fees are contained in one section and are more clearly defined to reflect the policies and practices of GVR
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- For example: The Board and Bylaws
Committee agreed that the New Member Capital Fee should not apply to:
- New members who become owners by
virtue of a intra-family transfer (parents put the property in their child’s name)
- Members who become owners of a GVR
property by virtue of marrying a GVR member
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- No major changes to nonpayment
provisions except to add a provision that makes delinquent members responsible for the attorneys fees incurred in collecting their unpaid dues as opposed to the corporation having to absorb that cost
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article IV, V, VI and VII
- Changes under separate vote
- Article VIII
- Quorum requirement - changed to
comply with NPCA
- Written Ballot provision - changed to
comply with NPCA
Review of Restated and Amended Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article IX
- Bylaw amendment provisions - changed
to comply with NPCA
- Article X
- Inspection of corporate records -
changed to comply with NPCA
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
Marge Garneau
- Article II – Membership (Section 6)
- Allows a member to vote and to run for the
Board of Directors if GVR rights and privileges are assigned by a qualified member » Long-time GVR residents, who, for personal reasons do not have their names on the deed to a property to participate in GVR » Allows members whose property is in a trust to participate in GVR
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article IV – Board of Directors (Section 7)
- Current Bylaws require a 12 member
Board
- This proposed change follows GVR’s
Articles of Incorporation, which is a legally binding document
- Allows the Board to determine the
number of members needed to make up the Board
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article IV – Board of Directors (Section 9
B)
- Will allow (not require) the Board to
remove a Director for violations of the Code of Conduct »This is not a gag order »Prevents a special referendum vote of the membership
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article VI – Committees of the Board of
Directors (Section 1 C)
- Current Bylaws require three Standing
Committees » The proposed Bylaw does not require specific Committees » Allows the Board to establish specific Committees and functions » Gives the Board the ability to handle business more effectively and efficiently
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article VII – Powers, Duties and
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors (Section 1 B)
- This Section eliminates the Board’s power to
hire and fire and determine the individual salaries for employees with the exception of the Executive Director
- Board members are not in a position to know
enough about each employee to determine if he or she should be hired or fired
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article VII - Powers, Duties and
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors (Section 1 C)
- Current Bylaws allow the Board by a 2/3 vote to
raise membership dues by the amount of the Social Security Index
- Recommended change allows the Board to
raise the membership dues by the Consumer Price Index for Urban and Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W)
» Reflects inflation and uses a 12 month period instead of 3 months used by SSI
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article VII – Powers, Duties and
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors (Section 1 E)
- Allows a Director to participate in Board
meetings by participating by telephone or video conferencing
- Current Bylaws allow members to only be
absent for 3 meetings
– GVR Board members may become ill, are on vacation or have other obligations » This change will allow them to participate in meetings and not be counted absent
Review of 9 Separate Vote Changes to the Bylaws
(Continued)
- Article VII – Powers, Duties and
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors (Section 1 F)
- Addresses an Officer of the Board who is
unable to perform his or her duties
- This Bylaw does not remove the Director from
the Board
- Allows the Board to replace an Officer (not a
Director) if an unforeseen event prevents his/her from performing the duties of the office