Presentation by Dr. David Dzombak, Chair SAB Hydraulic Fracturing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation by dr david dzombak chair sab hydraulic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Presentation by Dr. David Dzombak, Chair SAB Hydraulic Fracturing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation by Dr. David Dzombak, Chair SAB Hydraulic Fracturing Research Advisory Panel Science Advisory Board Meeting June 14, 2016 The EPAs June 2015 draft Assessment Report follows five stages of the hydraulic fracturing water cycle:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation by Dr. David Dzombak, Chair SAB Hydraulic Fracturing Research Advisory Panel Science Advisory Board Meeting June 14, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The EPA’s June 2015 draft Assessment Report follows five stages of the hydraulic fracturing water cycle:

  • (1) Water acquisition for hydraulic fracturing fluids

– (Chapter 4 of Draft Assessment Report)

  • (2) Chemical mixing to form fracturing fluids

– (Chapter 5 of Draft Assessment Report)

  • (3) Well injection of fracturing fluids

– (Chapter 6 of Draft Assessment Report)

  • (4) Flowback and produced water

– (Chapter 7 of Draft Assessment Report)

  • (5) Wastewater treatment and disposal

– (Chapter 8 of Draft Assessment Report)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources

Presentation by Dr. Jeffrey Frithsen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development

Science Advisory Board Meeting 28 October 2015

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Assess the potential for hydraulic

fracturing for oil and gas to change the quality or quantity of drinking water resources

  • Identify factors affecting the

frequency or severity of any potential changes

HF Assessment Objectives

4

Presentation by Dr. Jeffrey Frithsen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Science Advisory Board Panel Meeting, October 28, 2015

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Draft HF Assessment Report

What it is:

  • A state-of-the-science

integration and synthesis of information concerning impacts

  • n drinking water resources
  • Based upon EPA research

results, a robust literature review, and other information, including input from stakeholders

  • Identifies potential mechanisms

and addresses questions identified in the Study Plan and Progress Report

What it is not:

  • Not a human health, exposure,
  • r risk assessment
  • Not site specific
  • Does not identify or evaluate

best management practices

  • Not designed to inform specific

policy decisions

  • Does not identify or evaluate

policy options

5

Presentation by Dr. Jeffrey Frithsen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Science Advisory Board Panel Meeting, October 28, 2015