Predicting Min Predicting Min-Bias and the Bias and the Underlying - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

predicting min predicting min bias and the bias and the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Predicting Min Predicting Min-Bias and the Bias and the Underlying - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Predicting Min Predicting Min-Bias and the Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Underlying Event at the LHC Extrapolations from the Tevatron to RHIC and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 1

Predicting “Min Predicting “Min-Bias” and the Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC “Underlying Event” at the LHC

Rick Field University of Florida

Outline of Talk

Proton Proton

PT(hard)

Outgoing Parton Outgoing Parton Underlying Event Underlying Event Initial-State Radiation Final-State Radiation

CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2

How precise is precise? The “underlying event” at STAR.

Extrapolations to RHIC.

Predicting MB from the activity in the UE.

Relationship between MB and the UE.

Associated Density ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ plots.

UE&MB@CMS UE&MB@CMS

Extrapolations from the Tevatron to RHIC and the LHC

The PYTHIA MPI energy scaling

parameter PARP(90).

CERN March 2, 2010

Review of the CDF PYTHIA Tunes. QCD Monte-Carlo Models - Overall

Goal.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 2

Proton Proton-Proton Collisions Proton Collisions

Elastic Scattering Single Diffraction M

σ σ σ σtot = σ σ σ σEL + σ + σ + σ + σSD+ + + +σ σ σ σDD+ + + +σ σ σ σHC

Double Diffraction M1 M2

Proton Proton

“Soft” Hard Core (no hard scattering)

Proton Proton

PT(hard)

Outgoing Parton Outgoing Parton

Underlying Event Underlying Event

Initial-State Radiation Final-State Radiation

“Hard” Hard Core (hard scattering)

Hard Core

The “hard core” component contains both “hard” and “soft” collisions. “Inelastic Non-Diffractive Component”

ND

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 3

Inelastic Non Inelastic Non-Diffractive Cross Diffractive Cross-Section Section

The inelastic non-diffractive cross section versus center-of-mass energy from PYTHIA (×1.2).

Inelastic Non-Diffractive Cross-Section: σ σ σ σHC

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV)

Cross-Section (mb) RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

K-Factor = 1.2

Inelastic Non-Diffractive Cross-Section: σ σ σ σHC

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0

Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV)

Cross-Section (mb) RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

K-Factor = 1.2

σ σ σ σtot = σ σ σ σEL + σ + σ + σ + σSD+ + + +σ σ σ σDD+ + + +σ σ σ σND

Linear scale! Log scale!

σ σ σ σHC varies slowly. Only a 13% increase between 7 TeV (≈ 58 mb) and 14 teV (≈ 66 mb). Linear

  • n a log scale!

My guess!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 4

QCD Monte QCD Monte-Carlo Models: Carlo Models: High Transverse Momentum Jets High Transverse Momentum Jets

Start with the perturbative 2-to-2 (or sometimes 2-to-3) parton-parton scattering and add initial and final- state gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation).

Hard Scattering

PT(hard)

Outgoing Parton Outgoing Parton Initial-State Radiation Final-State Radiation

Hard Scattering

PT(hard)

Outgoing Parton Outgoing Parton Initial-State Radiation Final-State Radiation

Proton Proton

Underlying Event Underlying Event

Proton Proton

Underlying Event Underlying Event

“Hard Scattering” Component

“Jet” “Jet”

“Underlying Event”

The “underlying event” consists of the “beam-beam remnants” and from particles arising from soft or semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI). Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment into hadron “jet” and inevitably “underlying event”

  • bservables receive contributions from initial and final-state radiation.

“Jet”

The “underlying event” is an unavoidable background to most collider observables and having good understand of it leads to more precise collider measurements!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 5

Charged Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Toward” “Away”

“Toward-Side” Jet “Away-Side” Jet

Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ relative to the leading charged particle jet.

Define |∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ| < 60o as “Toward”, 60o < |∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ| < 120o as “Transverse”, and |∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ| > 120o as “Away”.

All three regions have the same size in η

η η η-φ φ φ φ space, ∆η ∆η ∆η ∆ηx∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ = 2x120o = 4π π π π/3. Charged Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

  • 1

+1

φ φ φ φ

2π π π π η η η η Leading Jet Toward Region Transverse Region Transverse Region Away Region Away Region

Charged Particle ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ Correlations PT > 0.5 GeV/c |η η η η| < 1

Look at the charged particle density in the “transverse” region! “Transverse” region very sensitive to the “underlying event”!

CDF Run 1 Analysis

CDF Run 1: Evolution of Charged Jets CDF Run 1: Evolution of Charged Jets

“Underlying Event” “Underlying Event”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 6

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density CTEQ3L CTEQ4L CTEQ5L CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20 1.8 TeV |η η η η|<1.0 PT>0.5 GeV Pythia 6.206 (default) MSTP(82)=1 PARP(81) = 1.9 GeV/c

CDF Data

data uncorrected theory corrected

Default parameters give very poor description of the “underlying event”!

Note Change PARP(67) = 4.0 (< 6.138) PARP(67) = 1.0 (> 6.138)

Parameter 6.115 6.125 6.158 6.206 MSTP(81) 1 1 1 1 MSTP(82) 1 1 1 1 PARP(81) 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 PARP(82) 1.55 2.1 2.1 1.9 PARP(89) 1,000 1,000 1,000 PARP(90) 0.16 0.16 0.16 PARP(67) 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

Plot shows the “Transverse” charged particle density versus PT(chgjet#1) compared to the

QCD hard scattering predictions of PYTHIA 6.206 (PT(hard) > 0) using the default parameters for multiple parton interactions and CTEQ3L, CTEQ4L, and CTEQ5L. PYTHIA default parameters

PYTHIA 6.206 Defaults PYTHIA 6.206 Defaults

MPI constant probability scattering

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 7 Parameter Default Description PARP(83) 0.5 Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) PARP(84) 0.2 Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. PARP(85) 0.33 Probability that the MPI produces two gluons with color connections to the “nearest neighbors. PARP(86) 0.66 Probability that the MPI produces two gluons either as described by PARP(85) or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. PARP(89) 1 TeV Determines the reference energy E0. PARP(82) 1.9 GeV/c The cut-off PT0 that regulates the 2-to-2 scattering divergence 1/PT4→1/(PT2+PT02)2 PARP(90) 0.16 Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off PT0 as follows PT0(Ecm) = PT0(Ecm/E0)ε

ε ε ε with

ε ε ε ε = PARP(90) PARP(67) 1.0 A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initial- state radiation.

Multiple Parton Interaction

Color String Color String

Multiple Parton Interaction

Color String Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0

1 2 3 4 5 100 1,000 10,000 100,000

CM Energy W (GeV)

PT0 (GeV/c)

PYTHIA 6.206 ε ε ε ε = 0.16 (default) ε ε ε ε = 0.25 (Set A))

Take E0 = 1.8 TeV Reference point at 1.8 TeV Determine by comparing with 630 GeV data! Affects the amount of initial-state radiation!

Tuning PYTHIA: Tuning PYTHIA:

Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters

Determines the energy dependence of the MPI!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 8

“Transverse” Cones “Transverse” Cones vs “Transverse” Regions vs “Transverse” Regions

Sum the PT of charged particles in two cones of radius 0.7 at the same η η η η as the leading jet but with |∆Φ ∆Φ ∆Φ ∆Φ| = 90o. Plot the cone with the maximum and minimum PTsum versus the ET of the leading (calorimeter) jet.

  • 1

+1

φ φ φ φ

2π π π π η η η η Leading Jet Toward Region Transverse Region Transverse Region Away Region Away Region

  • 1

+1

φ φ φ φ

2π π π π η η η η Leading Jet Cone 1 Cone 2

Transverse Region: 2π π π π/3=0.67π π π π Transverse Cone: π π π π(0.7)2=0.49π π π π

1 2 3 4 5 6 50 100 150 200 250

MAX Data MAX Herwig+QFL MAX Pythia6.115+QFL (tuned) MIN Data MIN Herwig+QFL MIN Pythia6.115+QFL (tuned)

CDF PRELIMINARY ET of leading jet (GeV) PT90 (GeV/c)

“Cone Analysis”

(Tano, Kovacs, Huston, Bhatti)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 9

Energy Dependence Energy Dependence

  • f the “Underlying Event”
  • f the “Underlying Event”

Sum the PT of charged particles (pT > 0.4 GeV/c) in two cones of radius 0.7 at the same η η η η as the leading jet but with |∆Φ ∆Φ ∆Φ ∆Φ| = 90o. Plot the cone with the maximum and minimum PTsum versus the ET of the leading (calorimeter) jet. Note that PYTHIA 6.115 is tuned at 630 GeV with PT0 = 1.4 GeV and at 1,800 GeV with PT0 = 2.0 GeV. This implies that ε ε ε ε = PARP(90) should be around 0.30 instead of the 0.16 (default). For the MIN cone 0.25 GeV/c in radius R = 0.7 implies a PTsum density of dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ = 0.16 GeV/c and 1.4 GeV/c in the MAX cone implies dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ = 0.91 GeV/c (average PTsum density of 0.54 GeV/c per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ).

1 2 3 4 5 6 50 100 150 200 250

MAX Data MAX Herwig+QFL MAX Pythia6.115+QFL (tuned) MIN Data MIN Herwig+QFL MIN Pythia6.115+QFL (tuned)

CDF PRELIMINARY ET of leading jet (GeV) PT90 (GeV/c)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

ET of leading Jet (GeV) PT90 (GeV/c)

MAX Data MAX Herwig+QFL MAX Pythia6.115+QFL (tuned) MIN Data MIN Herwig+QFL MIN Pythia6.115+QFL (tuned)

CDF PRELIMINARY

“Cone Analysis”

(Tano, Kovacs, Huston, Bhatti)

630 GeV

PYTHIA 6.115 PT0 = 2.0 GeV

1,800 GeV

PYTHIA 6.115 PT0 = 1.4 GeV

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 10

“Transverse” Charged Densities “Transverse” Charged Densities

Energy Dependence Energy Dependence

"Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c)

Charged PTsum Density (GeV)

Pythia 6.206 (Set A)

630 GeV |η η η η|<1.0 PT>0.4 GeV CTEQ5L HERWIG 6.4 ε ε ε ε = 0.25 ε ε ε ε = 0 ε ε ε ε = 0.16

"Min Transverse" PTsum Density: dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c)

Charged PTsum Density (GeV) 630 GeV |η η η η|<1.0 PT>0.4 GeV ε ε ε ε = 0.25 HERWIG 6.4 ε ε ε ε = 0.16 ε ε ε ε = 0 CTEQ5L

Pythia 6.206 (Set A)

Shows the “transverse” charged PTsum density

(|η η η η|<1, PT>0.4 GeV) versus PT(charged jet#1) at 630 GeV predicted by HERWIG 6.4 (PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c, CTEQ5L) and a tuned version of PYTHIA 6.206 (PT(hard) > 0, CTEQ5L, Set A, ε ε ε ε = 0, ε ε ε ε = 0.16 (default) and ε ε ε ε = 0.25 (preferred)).

Also shown are the PTsum densities (0.16 GeV/c and

0.54 GeV/c) determined from the Tano, Kovacs, Huston, and Bhatti “transverse” cone analysis at 630 GeV.

Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0

1 2 3 4 5 100 1,000 10,000 100,000

CM Energy W (GeV)

PT0 (GeV/c)

PYTHIA 6.206 ε ε ε ε = 0.16 (default) ε ε ε ε = 0.25 (Set A))

Lowering PT0 at 630 GeV (i.e. increasing ε ε ε ε) increases UE activity resulting in less energy dependence. Increasing ε ε ε ε produces less energy dependence for the UE resulting in less UE activity at the LHC! Reference point E0 = 1.8 TeV

Rick Field Fermilab MC Workshop October 4, 2002!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 11 Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation)

Parameter Tune B Tune A MSTP(81) 1 1 MSTP(82) 4 4 PARP(82) 1.9 GeV 2.0 GeV PARP(83) 0.5 0.5 PARP(84) 0.4 0.4 PARP(85) 1.0 0.9 PARP(86) 1.0 0.95 PARP(89) 1.8 TeV 1.8 TeV PARP(90) 0.25 0.25 PARP(67) 1.0 4.0

Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation)

Plot shows the “transverse” charged particle density

versus PT(chgjet#1) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of two tuned versions of PYTHIA 6.206 (CTEQ5L, Set B (PARP(67)=1) and Set A (PARP(67)=4)).

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density 1.8 TeV |η η η η|<1.0 PT>0.5 GeV

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected theory corrected

CTEQ5L

PYTHIA 6.206 (Set A) PARP(67)=4 PYTHIA 6.206 (Set B) PARP(67)=1

Run 1 Analysis

Run 1 PYTHIA Tune A Run 1 PYTHIA Tune A

PYTHIA 6.206 CTEQ5L

CDF Default!

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 12

CDF Run 1 P CDF Run 1 PT(Z) (Z)

Shows the Run 1 Z-boson pT distribution (<pT(Z)> ≈ 11.5 GeV/c) compared with PYTHIA Tune A (<pT(Z)> = 9.7 GeV/c), and PYTHIA Tune AW (<pT(Z)> = 11.7 GeV/c).

Parameter Tune A Tune AW MSTP(81) 1 1 MSTP(82) 4 4 PARP(82) 2.0 GeV 2.0 GeV PARP(83) 0.5 0.5 PARP(84) 0.4 0.4 PARP(85) 0.9 0.9 PARP(86) 0.95 0.95 PARP(89) 1.8 TeV 1.8 TeV PARP(90) 0.25 0.25 PARP(62) 1.0 1.25 PARP(64) 1.0 0.2 PARP(67) 4.0 4.0 MSTP(91) 1 1 PARP(91) 1.0 2.1 PARP(93) 5.0 15.0

The Q2 = kT2 in α α α αs for space-like showers is scaled by PARP(64)! Effective Q cut-off, below which space-like showers are not evolved. UE Parameters ISR Parameters Intrensic KT

PYTHIA 6.2 CTEQ5L

Z-Boson Transverse Momentum

0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Z-Boson PT (GeV/c)

PT Distribution 1/N dN/dPT

CDF Run 1 Data PYTHIA Tune A PYTHIA Tune AW

CDF Run 1

published

1.8 TeV

Normalized to 1

Tune used by the CDF-EWK group!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 13

Jet Jet-Jet Correlations (D Jet Correlations (DØ) Ø)

Jet#1-Jet#2 ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ Distribution

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ Jet#1-Jet#2

MidPoint Cone Algorithm (R = 0.7, fmerge = 0.5) = 150 pb-1 (Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 221801 (2005)) Data/NLO agreement good. Data/HERWIG agreement good. Data/PYTHIA agreement good provided PARP(67) = 1.0→4.0 (i.e. like Tune A, best fit 2.5).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 14

CDF Run 1 P CDF Run 1 PT(Z) (Z)

Shows the Run 1 Z-boson pT distribution (<pT(Z)> ≈ 11.5 GeV/c) compared with PYTHIA Tune DW, and HERWIG.

Parameter Tune DW Tune AW MSTP(81) 1 1 MSTP(82) 4 4 PARP(82) 1.9 GeV 2.0 GeV PARP(83) 0.5 0.5 PARP(84) 0.4 0.4 PARP(85) 1.0 0.9 PARP(86) 1.0 0.95 PARP(89) 1.8 TeV 1.8 TeV PARP(90) 0.25 0.25 PARP(62) 1.25 1.25 PARP(64) 0.2 0.2 PARP(67) 2.5 4.0 MSTP(91) 1 1 PARP(91) 2.1 2.1 PARP(93) 15.0 15.0

UE Parameters ISR Parameters Intrensic KT

PYTHIA 6.2 CTEQ5L

Z-Boson Transverse Momentum

0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Z-Boson PT (GeV/c)

PT Distribution 1/N dN/dPT

CDF Run 1 Data PYTHIA Tune DW HERWIG

CDF Run 1

published

1.8 TeV

Normalized to 1

Tune DW has a lower value of PARP(67) and slightly more MPI! Tune DW uses D0’s perfered value of PARP(67)!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 15

PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes

Parameter Tune AW Tune DW Tune D6 PDF CTEQ5L CTEQ5L CTEQ6L MSTP(81) 1 1 1 MSTP(82) 4 4 4 PARP(82) 2.0 GeV 1.9 GeV 1.8 GeV PARP(83) 0.5 0.5 0.5 PARP(84) 0.4 0.4 0.4 PARP(85) 0.9 1.0 1.0 PARP(86) 0.95 1.0 1.0 PARP(89) 1.8 TeV 1.8 TeV 1.8 TeV PARP(90) 0.25 0.25 0.25 PARP(62) 1.25 1.25 1.25 PARP(64) 0.2 0.2 0.2 PARP(67) 4.0 2.5 2.5 MSTP(91) 1 1 1 PARP(91) 2.1 2.1 2.1 PARP(93) 15.0 15.0 15.0

Intrinsic KT ISR Parameter UE Parameters Uses CTEQ6L All use LO α α α αs with Λ Λ Λ Λ = 192 MeV! Tune A energy dependence!

None of the CDF Tunes included any “min-bias” data in the determination of the parameters!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 16

PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes

Parameter Tune DWT Tune D6T ATLAS PDF CTEQ5L CTEQ6L CTEQ5L MSTP(81) 1 1 1 MSTP(82) 4 4 4 PARP(82) 1.9409 GeV 1.8387 GeV 1.8 GeV PARP(83) 0.5 0.5 0.5 PARP(84) 0.4 0.4 0.5 PARP(85) 1.0 1.0 0.33 PARP(86) 1.0 1.0 0.66 PARP(89) 1.96 TeV 1.96 TeV 1.0 TeV PARP(90) 0.16 0.16 0.16 PARP(62) 1.25 1.25 1.0 PARP(64) 0.2 0.2 1.0 PARP(67) 2.5 2.5 1.0 MSTP(91) 1 1 1 PARP(91) 2.1 2.1 1.0 PARP(93) 15.0 15.0 5.0

Intrinsic KT ISR Parameter UE Parameters All use LO α α α αs with Λ Λ Λ Λ = 192 MeV! ATLAS energy dependence!

Tune A Tune AW Tune B Tune BW Tune D Tune DW Tune D6 Tune D6T These are “old” PYTHIA 6.2 tunes! There are new 6.420 tunes by Peter Skands (Tune S320, update of S0) Peter Skands (Tune N324, N0CR) Hendrik Hoeth (Tune P329, “Professor”)

CMS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 17

  • 1

+1

φ φ φ φ

2π π π π η η η η Leading Jet Toward Region Transverse Region Transverse Region Away Region Away Region

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Toward” “Away”

“Toward-Side” Jet “Away-Side” Jet

“Towards”, “Away”, “Transverse” “Towards”, “Away”, “Transverse”

Look at correlations in the azimuthal angle ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ relative to the leading charged particle jet (|η η η η| < 1) or the leading calorimeter jet (|η η η η| < 2).

Define |∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ| < 60o as “Toward”, 60o < |∆φ| ∆φ| ∆φ| ∆φ| < 120o as “Transverse ”, and |∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ| > 120o as “Away”. Each of the three regions have area ∆η∆φ ∆η∆φ ∆η∆φ ∆η∆φ = 2×120o = 4π π π π/3.

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ Correlations relative to the leading jet

Charged particles pT > 0.5 GeV/c |η η η η| < 1 Calorimeter towers ET > 0.1 GeV |η η η η| < 1

“Transverse” region is very sensitive to the “underlying event”! Look at the charged particle density, the charged PTsum density and the ETsum density in all 3 regions!

Z-Boson Direction

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 18

Event Topologies Event Topologies

“Leading Jet” events correspond to the leading

calorimeter jet (MidPoint R = 0.7) in the region |η η η η| < 2 with no other conditions.

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

“Leading Jet”

“Leading ChgJet” events correspond to the leading

charged particle jet (R = 0.7) in the region |η η η η| < 1 with no other conditions.

ChgJet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Jet #2 Direction

“Charged Jet” “Inc2J Back-to-Back” “Exc2J Back-to-Back”

“Inclusive 2-Jet Back-to-Back” events are selected to

have at least two jets with Jet#1 and Jet#2 nearly “back- to-back” (∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ12 > 150o) with almost equal transverse energies (PT(jet#2)/PT(jet#1) > 0.8) with no other conditions .

“Exclusive 2-Jet Back-to-Back” events are selected to

have at least two jets with Jet#1 and Jet#2 nearly “back- to-back” (∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ12 > 150o) with almost equal transverse energies (PT(jet#2)/PT(jet#1) > 0.8) and PT(jet#3) < 15 GeV/c.

subset subset

Z-Boson Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Z-Boson

“Z-Boson” events are Drell-Yan events

with 70 < M(lepton-pair) < 110 GeV with no other conditions.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 19

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Jet #2 Direction

“Back-to-Back”

Observable Particle Level Detector Level

dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ Number of charged particles per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) Number of “good” charged tracks per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ Scalar pT sum of charged particles per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) Scalar pT sum of “good” charged tracks per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) <pT> Average pT of charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) Average pT of “good” charged tracks (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) PTmax Maximum pT charged particle (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) Require Nchg ≥ 1 Maximum pT “good” charged tracks (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) Require Nchg ≥ 1 dETsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ Scalar ET sum of all particles per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ (all pT, |η η η η| < 1) Scalar ET sum of all calorimeter towers per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ (ET > 0.1 GeV, |η η η η| < 1) PTsum/ETsum Scalar pT sum of charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) divided by the scalar ET sum of all particles (all pT, |η η η η| < 1) Scalar pT sum of “good” charged tracks (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) divided by the scalar ET sum of calorimeter towers (ET > 0.1 GeV, |η η η η| < 1) “Leading Jet”

Observables at the Observables at the Particle and Detector Level Particle and Detector Level

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 20

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

“Leading Jet”

“Towards”, “Away”, “Transverse” “Towards”, “Away”, “Transverse”

Data at 1.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dN/dη

η η ηdφ φ φ φ, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |η η η η| < 1 for “leading jet” events as a function of the leading jet pT for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

1 2 3 4 5 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Average Charged Density

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected pyA generator level

"Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 |η η η η(jet#1)|<2 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) "Away" "Toward" "Transverse"

Data at 1.96 TeV on the charged particle scalar pT sum density, dPT/dη

η η ηdφ φ φ φ, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |η η η η| < 1 for “leading jet” events as a function of the leading jet pT for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse”

  • regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and

the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

Data at 1.96 TeV on the particle scalar ET sum density, dET/dη

η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for |η η η η| < 1 for “leading jet” events as a function of the leading jet pT for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

Factor of ~4.5

Charged PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c)

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected pyA generator level

"Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 |η η η η(jet#1)|<2 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) "Toward" "Away" "Transverse"

Factor of ~16 ETsum Density: dET/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

ETsum Density (GeV)

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected pyA generator level

"Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 |η η η η(jet#1)|<2 Stable Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, all PT) "Toward" "Away" "Transverse"

Factor of ~13

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 21

“Transverse” Charged Density “Transverse” Charged Density

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

ChgJet#1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 5 10 15 20 25 30

PT(jet#1) or PT(chgjet#1) or PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

RDF Preliminary

py Tune A generator level

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

1.96 TeV

ChgJet#1 Jet#1 PTmax

Jet#1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Shows the charged particle density in the “transverse” region for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) at 1.96 TeV as defined by PTmax, PT(chgjet#1), and PT(jet#1) from PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

0.6

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 22

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” regions as a function of PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events at 0.2 TeV and 14 TeV from PYTHIA Tune DW and Tune DWT at the particle level (i.e. generator level). The STAR data from RHIC favors Tune DW!

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density Min-Bias 0.2 TeV

RDF Preliminary

generator level

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

PY Tune DWT PY Tune DW

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

RDF Preliminary

generator level

Min-Bias 14 TeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

PY Tune DW PY Tune DWT PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

RHIC LHC 0.2 TeV → 14 TeV (~factor of 70 increase)

~1.35 ~1.35 35% more at RHIC means 26% less at the LHC!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 23

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events at 0.2 TeV, 1.96 TeV and 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

RHIC Tevatron 0.2 TeV → 1.96 TeV (UE increase ~2.7 times)

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 5 10 15 20 25

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

Min-Bias

14 TeV 1.96 TeV 0.2 TeV PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

LHC 1.96 TeV → 14 TeV (UE increase ~1.9 times)

~2.7 ~1.9

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 24

The “Underlying Event” at STAR The “Underlying Event” at STAR

At STAR they have measured the “underlying event at W = 200 GeV (|η

η η η| < 1, pT > 0.2 GeV) and compared their uncorrected data with PYTHIA Tune A + STAR-SIM.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 25

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

The “Underlying Event” at STAR The “Underlying Event” at STAR

Data on the charged particle scalar pT sum density, dPT/dη

η η ηdφ φ φ φ, as a function of the leading jet pT for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions compared with PYTHIA Tune A.

Charged PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c)

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected pyA generator level

"Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 |η η η η(jet#1)|<2 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) "Toward" "Away" "Transverse"

Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary

“Toward” Charged PTsum Density

“Back-to-Back” Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.2 GeV/c)

“Away” “Transverse” PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Jet #2 Direction

“Leading Jet”

Data uncorrected PYTHIA Tune A + STAR-SIM "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

"Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Back-to-Back"

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected to particle level

MidPoint R = 0.7 |η η η η(jet#1) < 2 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

1.96 TeV

"Leading Jet" PY Tune A HW

0.37 0.55 “Back-to-Back” ~1.5

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 26

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

RHIC Tevatron 0.2 TeV → 1.96 TeV (UE increase ~2.7 times)

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

LHC 1.96 TeV → 14 TeV (UE increase ~1.9 times)

Linear scale!

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 5 10 15 20 25

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

Min-Bias

14 TeV 1.96 TeV 0.2 TeV 7 TeV 0.9 TeV 10 TeV

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV)

"Transverse" Charged Density

RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PTmax = 5.25 GeV/c

RHIC Tevatron 900 GeV LHC7 LHC14 LHC10

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 27

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

Log scale!

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 5 10 15 20 25

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

Min-Bias

14 TeV 1.96 TeV 0.2 TeV 7 TeV 0.9 TeV 10 TeV

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0

Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV)

"Transverse" Charged Density

RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PTmax = 5.25 GeV/c

RHIC Tevatron 900 GeV LHC7 LHC14 LHC10

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

LHC7 LHC14 7 TeV → 14 TeV (UE increase ~20%) Linear on a log plot!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 28

“Transverse” Charge Density “Transverse” Charge Density

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

LHC 900 GeV LHC 7 TeV 900 GeV → 7 TeV (UE increase ~ factor of 2.1)

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

HC 900 GeV RDF Preliminary

generator level

pyS320 pyDW

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

RDF Preliminary

py Tune DW generator level

900 GeV 7 TeV

Shows the charged particle density in the “transverse” region for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 2) at 900 GeV as defined by PTmax from PYTHIA Tune DW and Tune S320 at the particle level (i.e. generator level).

factor of 2!

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 29

“Transverse” Charged Particle Density “Transverse” Charged Particle Density

Fake data (from MC) at 900 GeV on the “transverse” charged particle density, dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) and the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |η η η η| < 2. The fake data (from PYTHIA Tune DW) are generated at the particle level (i.e. generator level) assuming 0.5 M min-bias events at 900 GeV (361,595 events in the plot).

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

900 GeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

RDF Preliminary

Fake Data pyDW generator level

ChgJet#1 PTmax

361,595 events

"Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)

PTsum Density (GeV/c)

900 GeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) ChgJet#1 PTmax

RDF Preliminary

Fake Data pyDW generator level

Fake data (from MC) at 900 GeV on the “transverse” charged PTsum density, dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, as defined by the leading charged particle (PTmax) and the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |η η η η| < 2. The fake data (from PYTHIA Tune DW) are generated at the particle level (i.e. generator level) assuming 0.5 M min-bias events at 900 GeV (361,595 events in the plot).

ChgJet#1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Talk by Edward Wenger Yesterday

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 30

PYTHIA Tune A Min PYTHIA Tune A Min-Bias Bias “Soft” + ”Hard” “Soft” + ”Hard”

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4

Pseudo-Rapidity η η η η dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

Pythia 6.206 Set A CDF Min-Bias 1.8 TeV

1.8 TeV all PT CDF Published

PYTHIA regulates the perturbative 2-to-2

parton-parton cross sections with cut-off parameters which allows one to run with PT(hard) > 0. One can simulate both “hard” and “soft” collisions in one program.

The relative amount of “hard” versus “soft” depends on the cut-off and can be tuned.

Charged Particle Density

1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00

2 4 6 8 10 12 14

PT(charged) (GeV/c)

Charged Density dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φdPT (1/GeV/c) Pythia 6.206 Set A CDF Min-Bias Data

CDF Preliminary 1.8 TeV |η η η η|<1

PT(hard) > 0 GeV/c

Tuned to fit the CDF Run 1 “underlying event”! 12% of “Min-Bias” events have PT(hard) > 5 GeV/c! 1% of “Min-Bias” events have PT(hard) > 10 GeV/c!

This PYTHIA fit predicts that 12% of all “Min-Bias” events are a result of a hard 2-to-2

parton-parton scattering with PT(hard) > 5 GeV/c (1% with PT(hard) > 10 GeV/c)!

Lots of “hard” scattering in “Min-Bias” at the Tevatron!

PYTHIA Tune A CDF Run 2 Default

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 31

Charged Multiplicity Distribution

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Number of Charged Particles Probability

CDF Run 2 <Nchg>=4.5 py64 Tune A <Nchg> = 4.1 pyAnoMPI <Nchg> = 2.6 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.4 GeV/c)

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

HC 1.96 TeV

Normalized to 1

Charged Multiplicity Distribution

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Number of Charged Particles Probability

CDF Run 2 <Nchg>=4.5

Normalized to 1

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

Min-Bias 1.96 TeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.4 GeV/c)

Charged Particle Multiplicity Charged Particle Multiplicity

Data at 1.96 TeV on the charged particle multiplicity (pT > 0.4 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) for “min-bias” collisions at CDF Run 2.

Proton AntiProton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

The data are compared with PYTHIA Tune A and Tune A without multiple parton interactions (pyAnoMPI).

No MPI! Tune A! 7 decades!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 32

The “Underlying Event” The “Underlying Event”

Proton Proton

Select inelastic non-diffractive events that contain a hard scattering

Proton Proton Proton Proton

+

Proton Proton

+ + …

“Semi-hard” parton- parton collision (pT < ≈2 GeV/c) Hard parton-parton collisions is hard (pT > ≈2 GeV/c) The “underlying-event” (UE)! Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)! Given that you have one hard scattering it is more probable to have MPI! Hence, the UE has more activity than “min-bias”.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 33

The Inelastic Non The Inelastic Non-Diffractive Diffractive Cross Cross-Section Section

Proton Proton

Proton Proton

+

Proton Proton Proton Proton

+

Proton Proton

+ + …

“Semi-hard” parton- parton collision (pT < ≈2 GeV/c) Occasionally one of the parton-parton collisions is hard (pT > ≈2 GeV/c) Majority of “min- bias” events! Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 34

The “Underlying Event” The “Underlying Event”

Proton Proton

Select inelastic non-diffractive events that contain a hard scattering

Proton Proton Proton Proton

+

Proton Proton

+ + …

“Semi-hard” parton- parton collision (pT < ≈2 GeV/c) Hard parton-parton collisions is hard (pT > ≈2 GeV/c) The “underlying-event” (UE)! Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)! Given that you have one hard scattering it is more probable to have MPI! Hence, the UE has more activity than “min-bias”.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 35

Charged Particle Multiplicity Charged Particle Multiplicity

Data at 1.96 TeV on the charged particle multiplicity (pT > 0.4 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1) for “min-bias” collisions at CDF Run 2.

Proton AntiProton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

The data are compared with PYTHIA Tune A and Tune A without multiple parton interactions (pyAnoMPI).

Charged Multiplicity Distribution

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Number of Charged Particles Probability

CDF Run 2 <Nchg>=4.5 py Tune A <Nchg> = 4.3 pyAnoMPI <Nchg> = 2.6 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.4 GeV/c)

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

Min-Bias 1.96

Normalized to 1

No MPI! Tune A!

Charged Multiplicity Distribution

1.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.0E-06 1.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Number of Charged Particles Probability

CDF Run 2 <Nchg>=4.5 py Tune A <Nchg> = 4.3 pyA 900 GeV <Nchg> = 3.3 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.4 GeV/c)

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

Min-Bias

Normalized to 1

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Prediction from PYTHIA Tune A for proton-proton collisions at 900 GeV.

Tune A prediction at 900 GeV!

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 36

LHC Predictions: 900 GeV LHC Predictions: 900 GeV

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Compares the 900 GeV data with my favorite PYTHIA Tunes (Tune DW and Tune S320 Perugia 0). Tune DW uses the old Q2-ordered parton shower and the old MPI model. Tune S320 uses the new pT-ordered parton shower and the new MPI

  • model. The numbers in parentheses are the average value of dN/dη

η η η for the region |η η η η| < 0.6.

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4 5

  • 3.0
  • 2.5
  • 2.0
  • 1.5
  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

ALICE INEL UA5 INEL pyDW INEL (2.67) pyS320 INEL (2.70)

RDF Preliminary INEL = HC+DD+SD 900 GeV

Charged Particles (all pT)

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4 5

  • 3.0
  • 2.5
  • 2.0
  • 1.5
  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

UA5 ALICE pyDW_10mm (3.04) pyS320_10mm (3.09)

NSD = HC+DD 900 GeV RDF Preliminary

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 37

LHC Predictions: 900 GeV LHC Predictions: 900 GeV

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Shows the individual HC, DD, and SD predictions of PYTHIA Tune DW and Tune S320 Perugia 0. The numbers in parentheses are the average value of dN/dη η η η for the region |η η η η| < 0.6. I do not trust PYTHIA to model correctly the DD and SD contributions! I would like to know how well these tunes model the HC component. We need to look at observables where only HC contributes!

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4 5

  • 3.0
  • 2.5
  • 2.0
  • 1.5
  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

ALICE INEL UA5 INEL pyDW times 1.11 (2.97) pyS320 times 1.11 (3.00)

RDF Preliminary INEL = HC+DD+SD 900 GeV

times 1.11 Charged Particles (all pT)

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

pyDW HC (3.30) pyS320 HC (3.36) pyDW SD (0.61) pyS320 SD (0.53) pyDW DD (0.59) pyS320 DD (0.53)

900 GeV RDF Preliminary

Only HC Only DD Charged Particles (all pT) Only SD

Off by 11%!

CMS dN/dη η η η

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 38

“Transverse” Charged Particle Density “Transverse” Charged Particle Density

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Data at 1.96 TeV on the charged particle density, with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |η

η η η| < 1 for the “transverse” region for “Leading Jet” events as a function of the leading jet pT. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune A and HERWIG (without MPI) at the generator level (i.e. particle level).

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected generator level theory

"Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 |η η η η(jet#1)|<2 Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) HW PY Tune A

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Data /Theory

"Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 |η η η η(jet#1)|<2

CDF Run 2 Preliminary

data corrected generator level theory

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PY Tune A

A Closer Look!

Room for 10% increase!

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 39

PYTHIA Tune X1 PYTHIA Tune X1

Tune X1 (modify Tune DW slightly, PYTHIA 6.42). Uses old Q2 ordered shower and old UE model.

10% increase at Tevatron!

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 2 4 6 8 10 12

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density RDF Preliminary

generator level theory

900 GeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) DW X1

20% increase at 900 GeV!

Change pT0 = PARP(82) slightly at the Tevtron. Change ε ε ε ε = PARP(90). Change color connection back to those in Tune A.

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 2 4 6 8 10 12

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density RDF Preliminary

generator level theory

1.96 TeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) DW X1

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 2 4 6 8 10 12

PTmax (GeV/c)

"Transverse" Charged Density RDF Preliminary

generator level theory

200 GeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Tune A X1

22% increase at 200 GeV!

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 40

The “Underlying Event” at STAR The “Underlying Event” at STAR

Data at 200 GeV on the charged particle density, dN/dη

η η ηdφ φ φ φ, as a function of the leading jet pT for the “toward”, “away”, and “transverse” regions compared with PYTHIA Tune A.

Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary

“Toward” Charged Particle Density

“Back-to-Back” Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.2 GeV/c)

“Away” “Transverse” PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Jet #1 Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Jet #2 Direction

Data uncorrected PYTHIA Tune A + STAR-SIM

“Back-to-Back”

"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

PT(jet#1) (GeV/c)

Data /Theory

A Closer Look!

Room for 30% increase!

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 41

LHC Predictions: 900 GeV LHC Predictions: 900 GeV

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Shows the individual HC, DD, and SD predictions of PYTHIA Tune DW and Tune S320 Perugia 0. The numbers in parentheses are the average value of dN/dη η η η for the region |η η η η| < 0.6

Proton Proton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

pyDW HC (3.30) pyS320 HC (3.36) pyDW SD (0.61) pyS320 SD (0.53) pyDW DD (0.59) pyS320 DD (0.53)

900 GeV RDF Preliminary

Only HC Only DD Charged Particles (all pT) Only SD

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4

  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

pyX1 HC (3.62) pyDW HC (3.30) pyDW SD (0.61) pyDW DD (0.59)

900 GeV CMS Preliminary

Only HC Only DD Charged Particles (all pT) Only SD

10% increase at 900 GeV!

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η η

1 2 3 4 5

  • 3.0
  • 2.5
  • 2.0
  • 1.5
  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

PseudoRapidity η η η η

Charged Particle Density

ALICE INEL UA5 INEL pyX1 ALICE-INEL (2.92) pyDW ALICE-INEL (2.67)

RDF Preliminary INEL = HC+DD+SD 900 GeV

Charged Particles (all pT)

Better! But not perfect!

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 42

Use the maximum pT charged particle in the event, PTmax, to define a direction and look

at the the “associated” density, dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, in “min-bias” collisions (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1).

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Charged Particle Density

PTmax Associated Density PTmax not included

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Charge Density

Min-Bias

“Associated” densities do not include PTmax! Highest pT charged particle!

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

Shows the data on the ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged particle density, dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 180o) for “min-bias” events. Also shown is the average charged particle density, dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for “min-bias” events. It is more probable to find a particle accompanying PTmax than it is to find a particle in the central region!

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 43

Associated Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Associated Particle Density

PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 1.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected PTmax PTmax not included Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

Min-Bias

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

Shows the data on the ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged particle density, dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 180o) for “min-bias” events with PTmax > 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 GeV/c.

Transverse Region Transverse Region

Jet #1

Shows “jet structure” in “min-bias” collisions (i.e. the “birth” of the leading two jets!).

Jet #2

Ave Min-Bias 0.25 per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

Rapid rise in the particle density in the “transverse” region as PTmax increases!

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 44

Charged PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c)

PTmax Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected PTsum Density Associated Density PTmax not included

Min-Bias

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged PTsum Density Charged PTsum Density

Use the maximum pT charged particle in the event, PTmax, to define a direction and look

at the the “associated” PTsum density, dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ.

Shows the data on the ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged PTsum density, dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 180o) for “min-bias” events. Also shown is the average charged particle density, dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for “min-bias” events.

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Associated” densities do not include PTmax! Highest pT charged particle!

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 45

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged PTsum Density Charged PTsum Density

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

Shows the data on the ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged PTsum density, dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 180o) for “min-bias” events with PTmax > 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 GeV/c.

Transverse Region Transverse Region

Jet #1

Shows “jet structure” in “min-bias” collisions (i.e. the “birth” of the leading two jets!).

Jet #2

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away” Associated PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Associated PTsum Density (GeV/c)

PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 1.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c PTmax

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected Charged Particles (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PTmax not included

Min-Bias

Ave Min-Bias 0.24 GeV/c per unit η η η η-φ φ φ φ Rapid rise in the PTsum density in the “transverse” region as PTmax increases!

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 46

Shows the data on the ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged particle density, dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 180o) for “min-bias” events with PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c and PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c compared with PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM).

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

Associated Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Associated Particle Density

PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PY Tune A PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c PY Tune A

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected theory + CDFSIM PTmax PTmax not included (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PY Tune A 1.96 TeV

PYTHIA Tune A predicts a larger correlation than is seen in the “min-bias” data (i.e.

Tune A “min-bias” is a bit too “jetty”).

PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Transverse Region Transverse Region

PY Tune A

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 47

Associated PTsum Density: dPT/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Associated PTsum Density (GeV/c)

PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PY Tune A PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c PY Tune A PTmax

CDF Preliminary

data uncorrected theory + CDFSIM (|η η η η|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PTmax not included PY Tune A 1.96 TeV

Min Min-Bias “Associated” Bias “Associated” Charged PTsum Density Charged PTsum Density

Shows the data on the ∆φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged PTsum density, dPTsum/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 1, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 180o) for “min-bias” events with PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c and PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c compared with PYTHIA Tune A (after CDFSIM).

PTmax Direction

Correlations in φ φ φ φ

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

PYTHIA Tune A predicts a larger correlation than is seen in the “min-bias” data (i.e.

Tune A “min-bias” is a bit too “jetty”).

PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Transverse Region Transverse Region

PY Tune A

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 48

“Associated” Charged Particle Density “Associated” Charged Particle Density

Shows the ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ dependence of the “associated” charged particle density, dNchg/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ, for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |η η η η| < 2, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax at 900 GeV with PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c from PYTHIA Tune DW, Tune DWPro, and Tune S320 (generator level).

Associated Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60

  • 180
  • 150
  • 120
  • 90
  • 60
  • 30

30 60 90 120 150 180

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Associated Charged Density

pyDW PT1 > 2 GeV/c <Nasc> = 10.3 pyDWPro PT1 > 2 GeV/c <Nasc> = 9.5

RDF Preliminary

generator level

900 GeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Excluding PT1

Associated Charged Particle Density: dN/dη η η ηdφ φ φ φ

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60

  • 180
  • 150
  • 120
  • 90
  • 60
  • 30

30 60 90 120 150 180

∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ (degrees)

Associated Charged Density

pyDW PT1 > 2 GeV/c <Nasc> = 10.3 pyS320 PT1 > 2 GeV/c <Nasc> = 9.2

RDF Preliminary

generator level

900 GeV

Charged Particles (|η η η η|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Excluding PT1

PY Tune DWPro PY Tune S320 PY Tune DW

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Joint UE&MB@LHC Working Group CERN - March 2, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS Page 49

The Goal The Goal – – QCD MC QCD MC

Proton AntiProton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

Proton AntiProton

PT(hard) Outgoing Parton Outgoing Parton Underlying Event Underlying Event Initial-State Radiation Final-State Radiation

Proton AntiProton

Drell-Yan Production

Anti-Lepton Lepton Underlying Event Underlying Event

Do not want a separate MC tune for MB at each energy

(200 GeV. 630 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV, and 7 TeV)!

PTmax Direction ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Z-BosonDirection ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ ∆φ

“Toward”

“Transverse” “Transverse”

“Away”

Do not want a separate MC tune for the UE at each energy

(200 GeV. 630 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV, and 7 TeV)!

Do not want a separate tune for MB and the UE! Do not want a separate tune for PTmax, PT(jet), and Drell-

Yan! Want “universal” tune for all hard scattering processes! Want “universal” tune that predicts correctly the energy dependence of MB! Want “universal” tune that predicts correctly the energy dependence of the UE! Want “universal” tune that describes both MB and the UE!

Proton AntiProton

PT(hard) Outgoing Parton Outgoing Parton Underlying Event Underlying Event Initial-State Radiation Final-State Radiation

Proton AntiProton

“Minumum Bias” Collisions

How precise does this have to be before one considers it a great success? My Dream!

Stay tuned! UE studies at 900 GeV coming soon from CMS and ATLAS.