Precision calculations in the MSSM H + decay to t b Hana Hluch a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

precision calculations in the mssm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Precision calculations in the MSSM H + decay to t b Hana Hluch a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction H + decay to t b Conclusion Precision calculations in the MSSM H + decay to t b Hana Hluch a Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna March 2009 Hana Hluch a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009 Introduction H + decay


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion

Precision calculations in the MSSM

H+ decay to t¯ b Hana Hluch´ a

Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna

March 2009

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion

Table of contents

1

Introduction MSSM theory plan and motivation work done so far

2

H+ decay to t¯ b review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

renormalization of the charged Higgs sector linear Rξ gauge running of the couplings resummation of leading tan β terms preliminary results

3

Conclusion

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion MSSM theory plan and motivation work done so far

Brief Intro to MSSM

MSSM: is the minimal supersymmetric extension of the SM

supersymmetry: relates bosons and fermions minimal:

1

minimal (=1) set of Susy generators Q, ¯ Q

2

minimal (=2) number of Higgs doublets

has the following particle spectrum SM with extended Higgs sector Susy partners fermions, higgses sfermions, higgsinos gauge bosons (g, γ, W , Z) gauginos (˜ g, ˜ γ, ˜ W , ˜ Z) neutral gauginos + neutral higgsinos ⇒ neutralinos charged gauginos + charged higgsinos ⇒ charginos requires many new parameters: mA0, tβ, µ, M1, M2, M3, Al, Au, Ad, ME, ML, MD, MQ, MU (msugra: m0, m 1

2 , A0, sign(µ), tβ) Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion MSSM theory plan and motivation work done so far

plan and motivation

plan

long term: to create a numerical program for calculating full

  • ne-loop total decay widths and branching ratios for Susy and Higgs

particles within the SPA convention

motivation

application to 1 → 3 and 2 → 3 processes with resonant propagators; total 1-loop widths are necessary for these one-loop calculations

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion MSSM theory plan and motivation work done so far

work done so far

  • ur work - brief overview :

we use the packages FeynArts, FormCalc, LoopTools, SPheno we have been developing a fully automatized generator for the calculation of decay processes we have been developing an automatic calculation of particle decay widths at one-loop level we have implemented all the 1-loop counterterms in a mathematica .m file calculated processes are UV and IR convergent soft radiation is included, hard radiation is implemented in fortran code for SSS, SFF, SSV, SVV configurations; works generally - also with clashing arrows and one zero fermion mass we have calculated the H+ → t¯ b process in the DR scheme and in the linear RξW ,ξZ gauge (Rξγ,g gauge automatization is on the plan)

  • ur work is done within the SPA convetion

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b

Bartl, Eberl, Hidaka, Kon, Majeroto, Yamada: QCD corrections to the decay H+ → t¯ b in the Minimal Sypersymmetric Standard Model, (1995) ֒ → complete QCD corrections, Susy-QCD comparable to SM-QCD in a large region of MSSM parameter space Jimenez, Sola: Supersymmetric QCD corrections to the top quark decay

  • f a heavy charged Higgs boson, (1996)

֒ → comparison of Susy-QCD and SM-QCD Coarasa, Garcia, Guasch, Jimenez, Sola: Quantum effects on t → H+b in the MSSM: A window to ”virtual” supersymmetry?, (1996) ֒ → analysis of strong and electroweak one-loop effects on top quark decay, OS scheme, Standard QCD and Susy-QCD corrections have

  • pposite sign → regions where Susy-EW corr. are not negligible

Coarasa, Garcia, Guasch, Jimenez, Sola: Heavy charged Higgs boson decaying into top quark in the MSSM, (1997) ֒ → inclusion of leading EW corrections originating from large yukawas, comparable to QCD corrections in relevant portions of MSSM par. space

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b

Eberl, Hidaka, Kraml, Majeroto, Yamada: Improved Susy QCD corrections to Higgs boson decays into quarks and squarks, (2000) ֒ → expansion of the Higgs decay width in terms of mb(mH+) → better convergence Carena, Garcia, Nierste, Wagner: Effective lagrangian for the ¯ tbH+ interaction in the MSSM and charged Higgs phenomenology, (2000) ֒ → resummation of the dominant supersymmetric corrections proportional to tan β to all orders for large tan β

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

Tree level

lagrangian: LH+¯

tb = H−†¯

t (ytPL + ybPR) b = H−†¯ t (htcβPL + hbsβPR) b where ht, hb are yukawa couplings. The CKM matrix is assumed to be diagonal. yt = e √2mW sw mt cot β, yb = e √2mW sw mb tan β tree-level width: Γ0 = κ 16πm3

H+

CF[−2mtmb(y ∗

t yb + yty ∗ b ) + (m2 H+ − m2 t − m2 b)(|yt|2 + |yb|2)]

where κ =

  • (m2

H+ − m2 t − m2 b)2 − 4m2 t m2 b

note: tan β ∼ 20 → y 2

t ∼ 0.01y 2 b

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

One-loop level

corrected width Γ1 = κ 16πm3

H+

CF[−2mtmb(y ∗

t Yb + Yty ∗ b )

+(m2

H+ − m2 t − m2 b)(y ∗ t Yt + y ∗ b Yb)] + Γrad

where Yb,t = yb,t + y (v)

b,t + y (w) b,t + y (c) b,t

DR scheme: y (c)

b,t → only UV divergent part

y (w)

b,t → UV part + part due to LSZ formula

(y (v)

b,t + y (w) b,t + y (c) b,t )UV = 0

IR divergence present in: y (v)

b,t , y (w),LSZ b,t

, Γrad

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

charged Higgs sector

The relevant parts of the tree level lagrangian read: L = ∂µG −†∂µG − + ∂µH−†∂µH− − (m2

H± + tH±H±)|H−|2

− (m2

G ± + tG ±G ±)|G −|2 − (tG ±H±)G −†H− − tH±G ±H−†G −

where: m2

= m2

A0 + m2 W ±

m2

= ξ±

W m2 W ±

tH±H± =

e 2mW sw

  • Th0
  • −s2

βsα/cβ + c2 βcα/sβ

  • + TH0
  • s2

βsα/cβ + c2 βsα/sβ

1 tG±H± =

e 2mW sw [Th0 (sαsβ + cβcα) + TH0 (−sβcα + cβsα)]

tree-level: TH0 = Th0 = 0,

  • ne-loop level: TH0 → τH0

✐iτH0 renormalization conditions: ˆ ΓH−H−(m2

H±)|∆ = ˆ

ΓG −H−(m2

H±)|∆ = 0,

∂ˆ ΓH−H−(p2) ∂p2

p2=m2

= 12

1see for example Pierce and Papadopoulos, arXiv:hep-ph/9206257 2∆ - parts of tGH, tHH and Π(p2) are taken

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

charged Higgs sector

The above RCs lead to: m2

= m2

A0 + m2 W 0 +δm2 A0 + δm2 W + t∆ H±H± − Π∆ H−H−(m2 H±)

δZH−H− = − ˙ Π∆

H−H−(m2 H±)

δZG −H− = 2 m2

G ± − m2 H±

(Π∆

G −H−(m2 H±) − t∆ G−H−)

LSZ formula: S(p1, . . . , pn) ∼ G tr

0 (p1, . . . , pn)R

n 2

3

after field renormalization f → √ Zf : S(p1, . . . , pn) ∼ G tr

R (p1, . . . , pn)R

n 2

R ,

where RR = R0/Z in the DR scheme: RR = 1 − ˙ Πfin

H−H−(m2 H±) ⇒ δZH−H− → − ˙

Π∆

H−H−(m2 H±) − ˙

Πfin

H−H−(m2 H±)

3written for n fields of the same type

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

linear Rξ gauge

By a proper modification of the packages FeynArts and FormCalc, we are now able to get a working numerical code in the general Rξ gauge (except photon/gluon gauge - on the plan). We have checked the gauge independence of the calculated result. notice: ∆mξ=1

t

− ∆mξ

t =

αmt 32πm2

ws2 w

  • A0(m2

Z) − A0(ξm2 Z) + 2A0(m2 W ) − 2A0(ξm2 W )

  • ∆m1−0

t

µ-scale

200 400 600 800 1000 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1. 1.2 200 400 600 800 1000 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1. 1.2

PDG: mt = 171.2 ± 2.1 GeV SPheno: RGEs in Landau gauge SEs in Feynman gauge

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

running of the couplings

The running of the couplings yt, yb is ξ-independent and is given by ∂yt ∂ ln Q = −64π 3 αs − 13 9 g 2

1 − 3g 2 2 + 3h2 t + h2 b

+ (1 + s2

β)

  • f =u,c,t

Nf

Ch2 f − s2 β

  • f =e,µ,τ,d,s,b

Nf

Ch2 f

∂yb ∂ ln Q = −64π 3 αs − 7 9g 2

1 − 3g 2 2 + 3h2 b + h2 t

+ (1 + c2

β)

  • f =e,µ,τ,d,s,b

Nf

Ch2 f − c2 β

  • f =u,c,t

Nf

Ch2 f

where Nf

C =

1 for leptons 3 for quarks note: running of tan β at one-loop level is ξ-independent 4

4see Yamada, arXiv:hep-ph/0112251

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

resummation of leading tan β terms

the leading tan β terms in the one-loop level relation: m0

b = (mR b + δmR b ) = mb(1 − ∆b)

can be resummed to all orders 5: m0

b = (mR b + δmR b ) =

mb 1 + ∆b with 6 ∆b = 2αs 3π m˜

gµ tan β I(m2 ˜ b1, m2 ˜ b2, m2 ˜ g) +

h2

t

16π2 µAt tan β I(m2

˜ t1, m2 ˜ t2, µ2) + . . .

thus mDR

b (Q) =

mDR

b,SM

1 + ∆b(Q) + ReΣ

b(Q)

5Carena, Garcia, Nierste, Wagner (arXiv:hep-ph/9912516) 6for full ∆b see note 4 or SPA paper (arXiv:hep-ph/0511344)

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

Preliminary results

constraints (not all): b → sγ, vacuum conditions, ∆ρ SPS 1a slope: m0 = 0.4m 1

2 , A0 = −0.4m 1 2 , tan β = 10, µ > 0 7

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 1 1.5 2. 2.5 3. 3.5 4. 4.5 5. 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 1 1.5 2. 2.5 3. 3.5 4. 4.5 5.

bremsR treeR brems tree

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 0.3 0.2 0.1 0. 0. 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 0.3 0.2 0.1 0. 0. 0.1 0.2 0.3

smewR photonbremsR susyew2R susyew1R gluinoR gluonbremsR smew photonbrems susyew2 susyew1 gluino gluonbrems

Γ m 1

2

∆Γ m 1

2

susy-EW1: χ ∧ ˜ f gluon: g gluino: ˜ g UV-finite susy-EW2: χ ∨ ˜ f photon: γ smew: rest IR finite

mH+

500 1000 1500 2000 700 1200 1700 2200 2700 500 1000 1500 2000 700 1200 1700 2200 2700

7for constraints and DR parameters SPheno was used

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion review of several works on H+ decay to t¯ b tree-level

  • ne-loop level

Preliminary results

MSSM DR parameter set: M1 = 100, M2 = 200, M3 = 600, Atril = −500, µ = 400, mA0 = 400, MSL = MSE = MSQ = 900, MSU = MSD = 1000

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1 2 3 4 5 6

bremsR treeR brems tree

Γ tan β

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 330 350 370 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 330 350 370

mH+

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion

future work and conclusion

finish the decay H+ → t¯ b and put the package to the web finish the programming of the generator use the generator to calculate total widths of all sfermions at

  • ne-loop level

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction H+ decay to t¯ b Conclusion

Thank you for the attention!

Hana Hluch´ a HEPTOOLS meeting, Lisbon, 2009