Powered Exoskeletons Upper-Limb Design and Technical Trends Kevin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

powered exoskeletons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Powered Exoskeletons Upper-Limb Design and Technical Trends Kevin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Powered Exoskeletons Upper-Limb Design and Technical Trends Kevin Chu The Papers Discussed 2 Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design by Joel C. Perry, Jacob Rosen, and Stephen Burn The Technical Trend of the Exoskeleton Robot System for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Upper-Limb Design and Technical Trends

Powered Exoskeletons

Kevin Chu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Papers Discussed ◆ Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design

by Joel C. Perry, Jacob Rosen, and Stephen Burn

◆ The Technical Trend of the Exoskeleton Robot System for Human Power Assistance

by Heedon Lee, Wansoo Kim, Jungsoo Han, and Changsoo Han

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Technical Trend of the Exoskeleton Robot System

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Technical Trend - Five Ws

Who - Heedon Lee, Wansoo Kim, Jungsoo Han, and Changsoo Han What - Analysing Powered Exoskeletons When - 2012 Where - Hanyang University, Seoul, S. Korea

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Technical Trend - Why

Why were they motivated? Why is this problem interesting? Why do we even care!?!?

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Technical Trend - Approach

Purpose of exoskeleton robot systems: Assist - Give power to human joints Augment - Augment the power of the wearer

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Technical Trend - Approach

Exoskeleton mechanism structure types: Anthropomorphic - rotation axis of the robot joint in alignment with the rotation axis of the human joint Quasi-anthropomorphic - robot joint functionally similar to the human joint Non-anthropomorphic - robot joint is in misalignment with the human joint

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Technical Trend - Approach

Joint mechanism of exoskeleton robot: Active - rotation axis of the robot joint in alignment with the rotation axis

  • f the human joint

Passive - robot joint functionally similar to the human joint Quasi-anthropomorphic - robot joint is in misalignment with the human joint

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Technical Trend - Approach

Human-robot interactions can be divided into cHRI (cognitive human- robot interaction) and pHRI (physical human-robot interaction).

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Technical Trend - Approach

cHRI (cognitive HRI) control methods: user-command control - Receives signals from normal parts of the human body and generate motion command signals for the robot to assist abnormal parts of the body. Myosignal control - predicts motions by measuring the body’s mircoelectric signals that are generated when humans move

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Technical Trend - Approach

pHRI (physical HRI) control methods: Force control - basic purpose is to control the action force between human and robot Master-Slave control - reads human motions and implements the same motion Preprogrammed - preprogrammed motions

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Technical Trend - Results

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Technical Trend - Conclusions

◆ Assistive vs Augment ◆ Anthropomorphic vs. Quasi-anthropomorphic vs. Non- anthropomorphic ◆ Active vs. Passive vs Quasi-passive ◆ cHRI vs pHRI ◆ Future work elsewhere? More classifications?

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Technical Trend - Discussion

◆ What did you like about it? Dislikes? ◆ What did you learn? ◆ Other applications?

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design

First Prototype (1999) Third Prototype (2007)

15 5

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Upper Limb Design - Five Ws Who - Joel C. Perry, Jacob Rosen, and Stephen Burn What - Wearable Robotics (and other topics) When - Third prototype 2007 (Active Research in Virtual

Worlds/Games with Haptics)

Where - Bionics Lab at UCLA

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Upper Limb Design - Why

Why were they motivated? Why is this problem interesting? Why do we even care!?!?

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Upper Limb Design - Approach

Preliminary Investigation Pilot Study on ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) System/Safety requirements Mechanical Human-Machine Interfaces (mHMI) Exoskeletal Joint Design Cable drive system

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Upper Limb Design - Approach

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Upper Limb Design - Approach

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Upper Limb Design - Testing Modeled CAD Design System bandwidth is limited by a system’s lowest natural frequency

Oscillating Inputs with increasing frequency

21 1

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Upper Limb Design - Results

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Upper Limb Design - Results

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Upper Limb Design - Conclusions

◆ Until higher power to weight ratio motors and structural materials are developed, the state of the art in human strength wearable robotics will remain fixed to either immobile platforms or to full body support structures, such as powered wheelchairs or lower limb exoskeleton systems. ◆ They still have lot to offer to assistive and rehabilitative services, as well as virtual simulations and advanced control applications. ◆ Future work elsewhere?

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Upper Limb Design - Discussion

◆ What did you like about it? Dislikes? ◆ What did you learn? ◆ Other applications?

25