potato seed crop management on
play

Potato seed crop management on processing crop quality & yield - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Potato seed crop management on processing crop quality & yield January 25, 2018 Brandon, MB Seed Age Trial Impact of seed crop management on the subsequent processing potato crop 4 management factors tested, 2 levels of each:


  1. Potato seed crop management on processing crop quality & yield January 25, 2018 Brandon, MB

  2. Seed Age Trial • Impact of seed crop management on the subsequent processing potato crop • 4 management factors tested, 2 levels of each: – Planting date – Harvest date – Moisture regime – Storage regime • All combinations of the 4 factors x 2 levels • Each run of the trial takes two years to complete

  3. Seed Age – Year 1 • Apply treatments in year 1, test impact in year 2 Seed from Year 1 Trts Stored at U of M Constant Ramp Up • All combinations of the factors for 16 treatments

  4. Seed Age – Year 2 • Year 2 Test Plots – Randomize and Replicated – Factorial • 4 main factors (plant, harvest, moisture, storage) • All interactions – All test plots treated equally – Emergence, stems, yield and quality

  5. Plot Map Plot #: 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Guard Guard Guard Rep 4 15 7 14 3 10 9 8 13 2 1 11 16 5 12 4 6 Plot #: 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Guard Guard Guard Guard Rep 3 3 10 6 1 4 9 8 7 5 11 13 16 2 12 15 14 Plot #: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Guard Guard Guard Guard Rep 2 1 11 5 8 14 2 9 15 13 16 3 4 7 12 6 10 Plot #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Guard Guard Guard Guard Rep 1 1 16 9 15 14 4 13 11 3 6 2 10 8 7 5 12

  6. Storage Treatment

  7. Emergence by Storage Treatment 100 90 80 70 60 50 2016 Constant 40 2016 Ramp-Up 30 2017 Constant 20 2017 Ramp-Up 10 0 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 36

  8. Constant storage Ramp up storage

  9. Constant storage Ramp up storage

  10. LP-EH-IRR-Constant LP-EH-IRR-Ramp Up

  11. How did years compare? 700 600 37 39 58 500 59 >12 oz 210 400 10-12 oz 6-10 oz 228 300 3-6 oz <3 oz 200 254 171 100 68 41 0 2016 2017 2016 2017 Yield 516 541 Specific Gravity 1.098 1.096 > 6 oz of Mkt 67% 53% > 12 oz of Mkt 11% 7% Total Defects 7% 3% Sugar Ends 0% 0% Dark Ends 4% 2%

  12. Seed Age – Years Combined Tuber Gross Yield Total Number Stems/Plant (no dirt) Defects <3 oz 3-6 oz 6-10 oz 10-12 oz >12 oz Main Factors (#000/ac) (cwt/ac) (%) (%) Planting ** ** Early 4.2 7 Late 4.0 9 Harvest Early Late Moisture ** Dryland 4 Irrigated 6 Storage *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Constant 159 3.9 7.8 31.7 40.2 10.3 9.9 Ramp up 182 4.3 10.6 40.7 35.4 6.7 6.6

  13. Seed Age – Size Profile 1.0 6.6 9.9 6.7 10.3 0.8 35.4 >12 oz 0.6 40.2 10-12 oz 6-10 oz 0.4 3-6 oz 40.7 <3 oz 31.7 0.2 10.6 7.8 0.0 Constant Ramp Up

  14. Summary • Early planted seed did have more stems and fewer tubers >12oz • Storage temperatures had the most significant impact on processing crop performance

  15. Summary • Aging of seed by altering storage temperatures in last month has a significant impact – Emergence a few days earlier – No impact on yield, BUT – Changed the size profile to smaller tubers • The constant storage treatment – Emergence catches up by about 30 DAP – 10% more tubers > 6oz

  16. Thank you! Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend