Post-Session Fiscal Report Representative Patricia Lundstrom, Vice - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

post session fiscal report
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Post-Session Fiscal Report Representative Patricia Lundstrom, Vice - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Post-Session Fiscal Report Representative Patricia Lundstrom, Vice Chair, LFC David Abbey, Director, LFC Presented to the New Mexico Tax Research Institute May 2, 2019 Lost decade of job and revenue growth, but growth rates are rising


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Post-Session Fiscal Report

Representative Patricia Lundstrom, Vice Chair, LFC David Abbey, Director, LFC Presented to the New Mexico Tax Research Institute May 2, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Lost decade of job and revenue growth, but growth rates are rising quickly. Jobs levels are nearing pre-recession employment peak.

2

780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 2008 Jan 2008 Jun 2008 Nov 2009 Apr 2009 Sep 2010 Feb 2010 Jul 2010 Dec 2011 May 2011 Oct 2012 Mar 2012 Aug 2013 Jan 2013 Jun 2013 Nov 2014 Apr 2014 Sep 2015 Feb 2015 Jul 2015 Dec 2016 May 2016 Oct 2017 Mar 2017 Aug 2018 Jan 2018 Jun 2018 Nov thousands of employees

Lost Decade: New Mexico Monthly Employment Levels

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (CES data)

$4.5 $5.0 $5.5 $6.0 $6.5 $7.0 $7.5 $8.0 billions

Recurring General Fund Revenues & Appropriations (including Great Recession federal stimulus offset)

Recurring GF Appropriations Federal Funds (Stimulus) Recurring GF Revenue

Source: LFC Files

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Growing dependence on direct revenues from the oil and gas industry: increased from 26 percent average to 35 percent in FY19

3

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 $5.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 est.

General Fund Revenues Dependent on Oil & Gas Industry ($ billions)

Permanent Funds Distrib. GRT (Eddy, Lea, Out of State) Severance Taxes State Land Office Federal Mineral Leasing % excluding perm. funds (avg. 26%)* % including perm. funds (avg. 38%)*

Source: LFC Files

* Average from FY09 – FY18

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Current trends in oil production are surpassing the previous estimates

4

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 est

New Mexico Average Oil Production Per Day 1970 – 2023 (est.)

CREG Dec 2018 Current Trend

Source: OCD, LFC Files

  • Average oil production in FY18

was 557 thousand barrels per day

  • Average oil production for the

first quarter of 2019 was about 810 thousand barrels per day

  • Compound annual growth rate of

about 20 percent from 2012 to 2019

– Unclear when production will level off

  • Macroeconomic forecasts project

Permian basin production to double in the next 5 years

– Could mean annual NM production

  • f over 400 million barrels by 2023
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Where is New Mexico oil production heading?

5

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Jan-1981 Jan-1982 Jan-1983 Jan-1984 Jan-1985 Jan-1986 Jan-1987 Jan-1988 Jan-1989 Jan-1990 Jan-1991 Jan-1992 Jan-1993 Jan-1994 Jan-1995 Jan-1996 Jan-1997 Jan-1998 Jan-1999 Jan-2000 Jan-2001 Jan-2002 Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 Jan-2006 Jan-2007 Jan-2008 Jan-2009 Jan-2010 Jan-2011 Jan-2012 Jan-2013 Jan-2014 Jan-2015 Jan-2016 Jan-2017 Jan-2018 Jan-2019 thousand barrels per day

North Dakota and New Mexico Oil Production (January 1981 to February 2019)

North Dakota New Mexico

Source: Energy Information Administration

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What do changes in production prices mean for New Mexico?

6

  • Based on 2019 direct oil and gas revenues (production

taxes and federal royalties),

– A $1 change in the annual average NM price of oil has about an $18 million impact on the general fund – A $0.10 change in the annual average NM price of natural gas has about a $10 million impact on the general fund – Each additional million barrels of oil generates about $3 million for the general fund

  • NM is currently on track to produce about 290 million barrels in FY19,

40 million barrels above the December 2018 projection

– Each additional 10 billion cubic feet of natural gas generates about $2 million for the general fund

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FY19 oil and gas related revenues are tracking above the forecast

7 $95.9 $4.5 ($25.3) ($37.9) $15.2 $83.8 $25.8 $68.1 ($38.5) ($60) ($40) ($20) $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 Millions

FY19 Revenue Tracking vs. Forecast

* Includes Oil and Gas Emergency School Tax revenues going to general fund and to tax stabilization reserve

Source: DFA General Fund Report, LFC Files

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HEADING INTO THE 2019 SESSION…

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Last year, Moody’s Investor Service flagged the state’s challenges…downgraded bond rating

9

  • State general obligation bond rating downgraded

twice in last two years. Moody’s report flags pressing issues.

– Fiscal stability – Educational outcomes: early childhood to higher education completion rates – Medicaid growth: crowding out effect on state responsibilities – Total compensation & pension solvency: pay falling behind and benefits cost increasing – Tax reform: gross receipts tax rates high with narrowing taxpaying base

slide-10
SLIDE 10

New Mexico needed to take 100 buckets to 3 fires

10

From a fiscal point of view, the legislature needed to focus these pressing issues

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Legislative Focus: Public Education

11

  • Recurring budget of $3.2 billion for FY20, an unprecedented $448

million (or 16 percent) increase from the prior year

  • Companion legislation significantly responding to Martinez and

Yazzie v. New Mexico sufficiency lawsuit

– Funding for at-risk students, extended learning time (longer school day and school year), bilingual and multicultural education, and rural schools – Six percent raises for all school staff and minimum salary increases for teachers and principals – Funding for school buses, instructional materials, and professional development – Funding to help teacher loan repayment, support adult basic education, and expand career technical education

  • LFC studies show evidence these programs improve student
  • utcomes and will be game changers over time
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Legislative Focus: Early Childhood Education

12

  • Over $438 million for early

childhood programs, a $125 million (or 40 percent) increase from the prior year

  • Excluding the extended school

year K-5 Plus initiative, early childhood programs still up $36 million (or 12.6 percent)

  • Over 80 percent of 4-year-olds

are funded for early childhood education and care services

  • Legislation establishing a new

early childhood education and care department

Total 4-year-old Population 80% of Population FRL Population

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 FY19 OpBud FY20 Appropriation FY21 FY22 FY23

New Mexico 4-Year-Old Service Capacity: Care and Education

Prekindergarten Head Start* Childcare Title I & PED DD Misc

Source: LFC Files, DOH Notes: Repesents funded slots not accounting for children enrolled in multiple services or seasonality. Children accessing more than one service is <1,100. *Includes American Indian Head State Programs (slots)=685 +Estimated from free and reduced-fee lunch (FRL) participation rates in New Mexico public schools (185 percent of federal poverty level) Misc = City of Albuquerque and City of Santa Fe funded slots FY20 appropriation is prior to governor action on HB2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Legislative Focus: Economic Development

13

  • Job Training Incentive Program (JTIP)

– JTIP grants subsidize wages for employees, with certain restrictions and job requirements – JTIP has supported the creation of over 46 thousand jobs since its creation – Operating budget increased to $5 million – Special appropriation of $5 million

  • Local Economic Development Act (LEDA)

– Authorizes state reimbursement to qualifying local governments for certain infrastructure developments – The program has created about 3,850 jobs since FY16 at costs ranging $6,000 to $30,000 per job – GAA added $60 million in LEDA funding, with a contingency for $15 million more if revenues exceed the forecast

  • Outdoor Recreation Division

– Created by SB462; intended to increase outdoor based economic development, tourism and ecotourism – Economic Development Department received a $200 thousand appropriation to establish the new division in FY20

1,015 844 1,355 2,086 2,238 2,009 1,736 769

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 JTIP appropriations in millions w orkers trained in thousands

Number of Workers Trained by JTIP

Workers Trained Appropriations

Sources: EDD, LFC f iles

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Robust Increases for Many Other Priorities

14

  • CYFD Child Protective Services: +$4 million (8.2%)
  • Tourism and marketing: +$3 million (26%)
  • Oil Conservation Division: +$800 thousand (16%)
  • State Parks: +$500 thousand (7%)
  • Developmental Disabilities Waiver: +$20 million (13%)
  • Corrections Transitional Living: +$2.2 million
  • Higher Education Department, Center for Technical

Excellence: +$1 million

  • State Employee Compensation: +4%
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Legislative Focus: Increasing Fiscal Stability

15

  • Projected 21% reserves in FY19 and 20% in FY20
  • Backfilling other state funds and fund balances (e.g. Tobacco

Settlement Permanent Fund, State Support Reserve, etc.)

  • Strengthening the “Rainy Day Fund”

– Follow-up to 2017 legislation to manage oil and gas revenue volatility and build a true rainy day fund – HB393 allowed interest earnings to accumulate in the fund & transferred fund management to State Investment Council for premium returns – SB401 transfers federal mineral leasing (oil and gas royalties and bonuses) revenues in excess of the 5-year average to the rainy day fund

  • Even with 12 percent growth in recurring appropriations, the

session ended with a $332 million FY20 recurring budget surplus

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Legislative Focus: Infrastructure

16

2019 Capital Outlay

  • Appropriations total $933 million for 1,570 projects
  • Significant revenues allowed the use of general fund rather than

severance tax bonds

  • Projects funded include:

– $34 million for Impact Aid school districts for teacher housing and to build above statewide adequacy standards – $33 million for the Department of Public Safety’s evidence and crime lab facility – $29.3 million for the Children, Youth and Families Department’s Child Wellness Center – $20 million for renewable energy, energy storage, and energy efficiency system infrastructure improvements at state-owned buildings statewide – $16 million for correctional facilities statewide – $15 million for public safety radio and communications equipment and infrastructure – $10 million for rural broadband infrastructure – $9 million for Department of Health facilities statewide – $5 million for repairs to state agency buildings statewide – $4.5 million museums and historic sites statewide – $4.3 million for a student dormitory and cafeteria for the New Mexico School for the Arts

$857.9 $47.9 $9.8 $17.4

2019 Capital Outlay (all funding sources) Total: $933

(in millions) General Fund Public School Capital Outlay Fund Water Project Fund All other state funds

Source: LFC

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Capital Outlay Concerns

17

  • While $385 million of general and other state funds for “statewide”

projects were reviewed and vetted by LFC and DFA, many did not go through a defined project selection procedure

  • State agencies currently oversee 1,608 outstanding capital outlay

projects with balances of $639.9 million; the significant increase in the number of projects may exceed project management capacity at management and oversight agencies

– GSD’s Facilities Management Division oversees most state agency projects; currently, two of the division’s seven project manager positions are vacant – PED will oversee 267 new projects at traditional public schools and charter schools; PED’s capital outlay bureau only has two FTE – DFA’s Local Government Division will oversee 461 new projects for local governments statewide; seven of that division’s 41 positions are vacant

  • Efforts to increase capital outlay transparency, including publicizing

how elected officials choose to allocate capital funding, were unsuccessful

  • Rising construction costs pose a risk to project completion
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Road Funding – Another Game Changer

18

  • Significant additional recurring and nonrecurring funding for local

governments, state-funded construction projects, and major investment projects

  • Again, concerns about capacity of road-building industry when the

United States is at full employment

  • Nonrecurring (GAA Section 9)

– $250 million in statewide projects – $89 million for prioritized statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) project. Additional $11 million if revenues exceed the forecast – $50 million to new local government transportation project fund (includes up to $5 million for construction of a relief route on U.S. 285 in Carlsbad)

  • Recurring

– HB6 increased motor vehicle excise tax (MVX) from 3 percent to 4 percent FY20-FY21: the additional MVX revenues sent to DOT to mitigate emergency road conditions in district 2 (Southeast NM) Beginning FY22: the additional MVX revenues plus $26 million of existing MVX revenues to be split equally between state road fund and local government road fund

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Legislative Focus: Tax Policy

19

  • Virtually no net change in general fund tax revenues in FY20 and FY21
  • Enacted hospital tax reform to bring nonprofit and government hospitals

into the tax base

  • Enacted internet tax reform to bring remote sales (including third-party

platforms) into the tax base and apply local GRT increments

  • Likely personal income tax increase to 5.9 percent of taxable income over

$315 thousand for joint filers ($210 thousand for single filers)

– Effective in FY21, contingent on FY20 revenues being no more than 5 percent above FY19 revenues

  • Significant boost to local government revenues beginning in FY22, adding

$111 million recurring to local operating funds, not including the additional $40 million for local road funds

– Largest revenue gains from applying local GRT increments to internet sales, applying local increments to the compensating tax, and hospital GRT revenues

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Legislative Focus: Tax Policy

20

  • Revenue gains of the omnibus tax bill (HB6) offset by

increase in film credit

– Film credit changes estimated to cost over $500 million to the general fund over the next five years (in addition to the $250 million that would have been paid out under the existing cap) – Likely the most significant state investment ever in a single industry for economic development, despite evidence of about a 40 cent return on the dollar

  • Significant tax reform initiatives left undone (e.g.

broadening the GRT base and eliminating certain tax expenditures, lowering GRT rates, addressing tax pyramiding issues, etc.)

  • Net effect of all 2019 revenue legislation is a recurring

general fund loss of about $50 million in FY22 and beyond.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fiscal Outlook

21

  • FY19 year-to-date revenues running significantly ahead of the

forecast

  • Oil production soaring

– About 80 percent of all FY19 revenue growth due to oil and gas activity – Stress tests of the December 2018 consensus forecast showed FY20 revenues could come in $1.3 billion above or below projections depending on oil prices and production activity

  • Recession outlook

– Recession signals in the bond markets: recent inversion in the yield curve, meaning very short rates rose above longer 10-year note rates – U.S. gross domestic product forecasts transition from above-trend growth in 2018-2019 to below-trend growth in 2020.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Expenditures

22

  • Continued pressure to increase spending on many fronts, notably

– Public Schools – Early Childhood – Medicaid

  • With U.S. at full employment and N.M. nearing employment

peaks, can the state find workers to increase government services and complete construction projects?

  • Unfinished Issues

– Unfunded pension liability

– Selecting and managing capital outlay projects – Gross receipts tax pyramiding, high rates, and narrowing base – Fiscal stabilization

  • Worth looking at a state like North Dakota