Possibilities of Petri Net Theory to validate metabolic pathways - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

possibilities of petri net theory to validate metabolic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Possibilities of Petri Net Theory to validate metabolic pathways - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Possibilities of Petri Net Theory to validate metabolic pathways Ina Koch Technical University of Applied Sciences Berlin ina.koch@tfh-berlin.de Monika Heiner Brandenburg University of Technology at Cottbus


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Possibilities of Petri Net Theory to validate metabolic pathways

Ina Koch Technical University of Applied Sciences Berlin

ina.koch@tfh-berlin.de

Monika Heiner Brandenburg University of Technology at Cottbus

monika.heiner@informsatik.tu-cottbus.de

Bertinoro, 14th June 2004

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • I nt roduct ion
  • Pet ri net basics
  • Analysis possibilit ies
  • Sucrose-t o-st arch breakdown in t he pot at o t uber
  • Simulat ion of t he net
  • Conclusions

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Metabolic Control Analysis - MCA

Met abolic syst em: connected unit, steady state

MCA is based on solution of systems of differential equations

  • MCA Kacser & Burns, Symp.Soc.Exp.Bio. (1973)

Heinrich & Rapoport, Eur.J.Biochem. (1974)

  • Biochemical syst ems t heory

Savageau, J.Theor.Biol. (1969)

  • Flux orient ed t heory

Crabtree & Newsholme, Biochem.J. (1987)

GEPASI

Mendes, Comp.Appl.Biosci. (1993)

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

Graph-Theory

  • Hybrid graphs

Kohn & Letzkus, J.Theor.Biol. (1983)

  • Bond graphs

Lefèvre & Barreto, J.Franklin Inst. (1985)

  • Net -t her modynamics

Mikulecky, Am.J.Physiol. (1993)

Weight ed linear graphs Goldstein & Shevelev, J.Theor.Biol. (1985)

Goldstein & Selivanov, Biomed.Biochim.Acta (1990)

  • Met a-net s (wit h gene expression syst ems)

Kohn & Lemieux, J.Theor.Biol. (1991)

  • Bipart it e graphs

Zeigarnik & Temkin, Kin.Catalysis (1994)

  • KI NG (KI Net ic Graphs) Zeigarnik, Kin.Catalysis (1994)

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

  • Why is a model validat ion (check model consist ency) usef ul?
  • Bef ore st art ing a quant it at ive analysis it should be sure t hat t he model is valid.
  • I f t he syst ems become larger wit h many int eract ions and regulat ions it could not

be done manually any more.

  • How model validat ion could be perf ormed?

By qualit at ive analysis

Basic dynamic propert ies: liveness, reversibilit y, boundedness, dead st at es, deadlocks, t raps, Basic st ruct ure propert ies: invariant s, robust ness, alt ernat ive pat hways,

Pet ri net t heory provides algorit hms and t ools t o answer t hese quest ions.

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-6
SLIDE 6

etri net basics

Pet ri net s

(PhD thesis of Carl Adam Petri 1962) abstract models of information and control data flows, which allow to describe systems and processes at dif f er ent abst ract ion levels and in a unique language

  • developed for systems with causal concurrent processes

Applicat ions: business processes, computer communication, automata theory,

  • perating systems, software dependability

Biological net works: metabolic networks, signal transduction pathways, gene regulatory networks

Reddy, Mavrovouniotis, Liebman, Proc. ISMB (1993), Comp.Mol.Med. (1996) Hofestädt, J.Syst.Anal., Modell., Sim. (1994), Hofestädt & Thelen, In silico Biol (1998) Matsuno et al., Proc.PSB (2000), In silico Biol. (2003), Proc.IACATPN (2003) , Voss, Heiner, Koch, BioSystems (2004), Heiner, Koch, Will, Proc.Comp.Methods Syst.Biol.

(2003)

Heiner, Voss, Koch, In Silico Biology (2003)

Met abolic Pet ri Net - MPN

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-7
SLIDE 7

etri net basics

Nodes: places transitions (vert iecs)

passive elements active elements conditions events states actions chemical compounds chemical reactions metabolites conversions of metabolites catalysed by enzymes

Pet ri net s: directed, labelled, bipartite graphs

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-8
SLIDE 8

etri net basics

Arcs: pre-conditions post-conditions (edges) event

3 5

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-9
SLIDE 9

etri net basics

Tokens:

movable objects in discrete units, e.g. units of substances (mole) condition is not fulfilled condition is (one time) fulfilled condition is n times fulfilled

Marking:

system state, token distribution, initial marking

Token f low: occurring of an event (firing of a transition)

n

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-10
SLIDE 10

etri net basics

Example: Pentose Phosphate Pathway - one reaction

6-Phosphogluconate

NADP+

Ribose-5-phosphate NADPH CO

2

6PG + NADP + → R5P + NADPH + CO2 6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-11
SLIDE 11

etri net basics

Example: Pent ose Phosphat e Pat hway - sum react ion

Glucose-6-phosphate NADP+ H2O Ribose-5-phosphate

NADPH H+

CO

2

2 2 2

G6P + 2 NADP + + H2O → R5P + 2 NADPH + 2 H+ + CO2 r

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-12
SLIDE 12

etri net basics

Special places:

input: substrates (source, e.g. sucrose)

  • utput: products (sink, e.g. starch)
  • Special arcs: reading arcs

inhibitor arcs

Addit ional places & t ransit ions:

logical hierarchical

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-13
SLIDE 13

etri net basics

Transit ions in MPNs: Reaction: substrate product

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-14
SLIDE 14

etri net basics

Transit ions in MPNs: Reaction: Catalysis: substrate substrate product product enzyme

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-15
SLIDE 15

etri net basics

Transit ions in MPNs: Reaction: Catalysis: Auto-catalysis: substrate substrate product product enzyme product = enzyme pro-enzyme pro-enzyme

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • del validation

(1) Dynamical (behavioural) propert ies (2) Reachabilit y analysis (3) St ruct ur al analysis (4) I nvariant analysis

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ynamic (behavioural) properties

liveness and reversibilit y

  • a net is live, if all its transitions are live in the initial marking
  • a net is reversible, if the initial marking can be reached from each

possible state

  • How often can a transition fire? (0-times, n-times, ∞

∞ ∞ ∞ times)

  • infinite systems behaviour, search for dead transitions
  • prediction of system deadlocks

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ynamic (behavioural) properties

boundedness

  • a net is bounded, if there exists a positive integer number k, which

represents a maximal number of tokens on each place in all states

  • What is the maximal token number for a place?

(0, 1, k, ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ) boundedness (k-bounded)

  • for bounded nets special algorithms exist

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-19
SLIDE 19

eachability analysis

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

How many and which system states could be reached ? (0, 1, k, ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ )

  • the reachabilit y graph represents all possible states
  • computational problem for large and dense biological networks
  • for unbounded networks: computation of the coverabilit y graph
  • Is a certain system state again and again reachable?

progressiveness

  • Is a certain system state never reachable?

saf et y

slide-20
SLIDE 20

tructural analysis

  • aims at discovering net structures to derive conclusions on dynamic

properties Element ary propert ies:

  • rdinary:

the multiplicity of every arc is equal one homogeneous: for any place all outgoing edges have the same multiplicity pure: there is no transition, for which a pre-place is also a post-place (loop-free) conservative: for each place the sum of input arc weights is equal to the sum of output arc weights – a conservative net is bounded static conflict-free: there are no transitions with a common pre-place connected, strongly connected: in graph-theoretical sense

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-21
SLIDE 21

tructural analysis

st ruct ural deadlock: a set of places that delivers its tokens until a state is reached, where the place set is empty and there is no possibility to get a new token t rap: the opposite situation that tokens cannot be removed from a place set

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-22
SLIDE 22

nvariant analysis

  • properties, which are conserved during the working of the system
  • independent of the initial marking
  • only the net structure is relevant for their calculation

Are there invariant structures, which are independent from firing of the system?

Place-invariant s (P-invariant s) Transit ion-invariant s (T-invariant s)

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-23
SLIDE 23

nvariant analysis

C =

  • 2 1 1

1 -1 0 1 0 -1 t1 t2 t3 p2 p3

(

incidence matrix C = P x T

)

t1 t2 t3 p1 p2 p3

2

place (P-) invariant : t ransit ion (T-) invariant : x C = 0 C y = 0 –2x1 + x2 + x3 = 0 –2y1 + y2 + y3 = 0 x1 – x2 = 0 y1 – y2 = 0 x1 – x3= 0 y1 – y3= 0

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-24
SLIDE 24

nvariant analysis

Minimal semi-posit ive solut ions are of int erest wit h

  • all components of the solution vector are ≥ 0
  • basis of the semi-positive solution space such that none solution is

contained in another solution, Lautenbach (1973) The calculat ion

  • of all integer solutions is in P
  • of all semi-positive solutions is in P
  • of all semi-positive integer solutions is NP-complete, Schrijver (1999)

Ext reme P at hways, Schilling et al. (2000)

  • minimal basis of semi-positive integer solutions (Hilbert-base)
  • subset of T-invariants – biological interpretation?

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-25
SLIDE 25

nvariant analysis

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

I nt erpret at ion P-invariant s T -invariant s

  • set of places, whose weighted
  • set of transitions, whose firing

sum of tokens is constant reproduces a given marking

  • covered by P-invariants: - covered by T-invariants:

sufficient condition for boundedness necessary condition for liveness

  • set of metabolites, whose total net - minimal set of enzymes which

concentrations remain unchanged could operate at steady state ADP, ATP - indicate the presence of cyclic NADP+, NADPH firing sequences

Element ary modes

Schuster, Hilgetag, Schuster (1993)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ucrose-to-starch-pathway in potato tuber

Co-operations: Max Planck Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology, Golm Brandenburg University of Technology at Cottbus

  • rich in carbohydrates and energy
  • a natural source of folate
  • full of vitamin C
  • low in calories
  • good source of niacin, vitamin B6,

iodine, thiamine, and minerals

  • no cholesterol
  • completely fat free

Research int erest : incr easing t he st arch cont ent

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

Fernie, Willmitzer, Trethewey (2002)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ucrose-to-starch-pathway in potato tuber

sucrose glucose f ruct ose

invert ase ATP ADP hexokinase ATP ADP

glucose-6-P f ruct ose-6-P

phospho- gluco isomerase ATP ADP

starch glycolysis

f r uct o- kinase

j uvenile:

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ucrose-to-starch-pathway in potato tuber

sucrose glucose f ruct ose

invert ase ADP hexokinase ATP ADP

glucose-6-P f ruct ose-6-P

phospho- gluco isomerase ATP ADP

starch glycolysis

f r uct o- kinase

UDP-glucose UDP glucose-1-P

phosphogluco- mut ase

UTP PP

sucrose- synt hase

adult :

AT P

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-29
SLIDE 29

ucrose-to-starch-pathway in potato tuber

sucrose glucose f ruct ose

invert ase ADP hexokinase ATP ADP

glucose-6-P f ruct ose-6-P

phospho- gluco isomerase ATP ADP

starch glycolysis

f r uct o- kinase

UDP-glucose glucose-1-P

phosphogluco- mut ase

UTP PP

sucrose- synt hase sucrose- phosphat e synt hase

UDP sucrose-6-P UDP

sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase

Pi

ATP

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-30
SLIDE 30

ucrose-to-starch-pathway in potato tuber

sucrose synthase: Suc + UDP ↔ UDPglc + Frc UDP-glucose Pyrophosphorylase: UDPglc + PP ↔ G1P + UTP phosphoglucomutase: G6P ↔ G1P fructokinase: Frc + ATP → F6P + ADP phosophoglucoisomerase: G6P ↔ F6P hexokinase: Glc + ATP → G6P + ADP invertase: Suc → Glc + Frc sucrose phosphate synthase: F6P + UDPglc ↔ S6P + UDP sucrose phosphate phosphatase: S6P → Suc + Pi glycolysis (b): F6P + 29 ADP + 28 Pi → 29 ATP NDPkinase: UDP + ATP ↔ UTP + ADP sucrose transporter: eSuc → Suc ATP consumption (b): ATP → ADP + Pi starch synthesis: G6P + ATP → 2Pi + ADP + starch adenylate kinase: ATP + AMP ↔ 2ADP pyrophosphatase: PP → 2 Pi

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase glycolysis sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hesis ATP consumpt ion phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 28 29 29 P

i

pyrophosphat ase

ATP AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase phosphoglucoisomerase

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ucrose-to-starch-pathway in potato tuber

Suc UDP R1 R1rev Fr c UDPglc

A hierarchical node: I nt erf ace t o t he environment

st arch eSuc rSt ar ch geSuc

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

Tools: Editing: Ped

Heiner BTU Cottbus

Animation: PedVisor http://www.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~wwwdssz/ Qualitative analysis: I NA Starke HU Berlin

http://www.informatik.hu- berlin.de/~starke/ina.html

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Qualitative analysis using INA

Element ary propert ies

The net is not statically conflict-free. The net is pure. The net has transitions without pre-place. The net is not strongly connected. The net is not covered by semipositive P-invariants. The net is not bounded. The net is not structurally bounded. The net is not live and safe. The net is not safe. Transition 18.geSuc has no pre-place. The net has transitions without post-place. Transition 21.rStarch has no post-place. The net is not ordinary. The net is not conservative. At least the following transitions are live: 0.SucTrans, 1.Inv, 18.geSuc, At least the following places are simultaneously unbounded: 0.Suc, 1.eSuc, 2.Glc, 3.Frc, The net is marked. The net is not marked with exactly one toke The net is not homogenous. The net has not a non-blocking multiplicity The net has no nonempty clean trap. The net has no places without pre-transition The net has no places without post-transition. Maximal in/out-degree: 6 The net is connected. ORD HOM NBM PUR CSV SCF CON SC Ft0 tF0 Fp0 pF0 MG SM FC EFC ES N N N Y N N Y N Y Y N N N N N N N

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Qualitative analysis using INA

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

St ruct ural propert ies

DTP CPI CTI B SB REV DSt BSt DTr DCF L LV L&S ? N Y N N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? N

  • liveness could not be decided because the net is unbounded and the

reachability graph cannot be calculated

  • the coverability graph has more than 4 million states

smaller bounded version: more than 1010 states of the reachability graph

slide-35
SLIDE 35

P-Invariant analysis

The net is not covered by P-invariant s. Following P-invariant s were calculat ed:

  • 1. UDPglc, UTP, UDP
  • 2. ATP, AMP, ADP
  • 3. G6P, F6P, G1P, UTP, ATP(2), ADP, S6P, P

i, PP(2)

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-36
SLIDE 36

T-Invariant analysis

Example: The net is covered by 19 T-invariant s

7 t rivials: 1. SPS, SPS_rev, 2. UGPase, UGPASE_rev,

  • 3. SuSy_SuSy_rev, 4. PGM, PGM_rev,
  • 5. NDPkin, NDPkin_rev, 6. AdK, AdK_rev,
  • 7. PGI , PGI _rev

8 | 0.sucrose : 1 | 1.invertase : 1 | 4.R5 : 1 | 9.hexokinase : 1 | 10.fructokinase : 1 | 18.geSuc : 1 | 19.glycolysis : 2 | 20.ATP : 56

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-37
SLIDE 37

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase glycolysis sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hesis ATP consumpt ion phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 29 29 28

phosphoglucoisomerase

T-invariant 14

P

i

pyrophosphat ase

AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase

rSt arch geSuc

slide-38
SLIDE 38

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase glycolysis sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hase ATP consumpt ion phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 29 29 28

phosphoglucoisomerase

T-invariant 14

P

i

pyrophosphat ase

AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase

rSt arch geSuc ATP

slide-39
SLIDE 39

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase glycolysis sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hase ATP consumpt ion phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 29 29 28

phosphoglucoisomerase

T-invariant 14

P

i

pyrophosphat ase

AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase

rSt arch geSuc ATP

slide-40
SLIDE 40

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase Glycolysis (2) sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hase ATP consumpt ion phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 29 29 28

phosphoglucoisomerase

T-invariant 14

P

i

pyrophosphat ase

AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase

rSt arch geSuc ATP

slide-41
SLIDE 41

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase glycolysis (2) sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hase ATP consumpt ion (56) phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 29 29 28

phosphoglucoisomerase

T-invariant 14

P

i

pyrophosphat ase

AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase

rSt arch geSuc ATP

slide-42
SLIDE 42

ATP ADP ATP ATP ATP ATP ADP ADP ADP ADP P

i

P

i

PP P

i

PP Glc Frc F6P UDP UDPglc G1P UTP UDP S6P Suc eSuc st arch G6P

sucrose t ransport er invert ase hexokinase f ruct okinase sucrose synt hase glycolysis (2) sucrose phosphat e phosphat ase st arch synt hase ATP consumpt ion (56) phosphoglucomut ase sucrose phosphat e synt hase UDP-glucose pyrophospho- rylase NDPkinase

2 29 29 28

phosphoglucoisomerase

T-invariant 14

P

i

pyrophosphat ase

AMP ADP 2 2

adenylat e kinase

rSt arch geSuc ATP

slide-43
SLIDE 43

T-Invariant analysis

Invariant number sucrose cleavage SuSy Inv hexoses go into Glyc StaSy ATP used for cycling ATP Inv Inv SuSy cons SuSy_rev SPS, SPP SPS, SPP 8 x x x x 9 x x x x 10 x x x 11 x x x x 12 x x x x 13 x x x x 14 x x x x 15 x x x 16 x x x 17 x x x 18 x x x 19 x x x

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Robustness

Robust ness: sensit ivit y of t he syst em against paramet er (f ragilit y) changes (alt ered enzyme act ivit y, mut at ions)

(Voit, 2000)

Stelling et al., Nature (2002): linear correlat ion bet ween robust ness

and t he number of element ary modes (T-invariant s) Our suggest ion: - enzyme dist ribut ion over T-invariant s

  • number of alt ernat ive pat hs

Pot at o net : - f ruct okinase occurs in all T-invariant s

  • t here is no enzyme t hat occurs in only one

T-invariant

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conclusions & Outlook

Petri nets provide (1) a unique description of biological networks (2) methods for qualitative analysis to check models by the calculation

  • f system properties.

(3) The complexity of biological systems make it necessary to extend Petri net methods. (4) Automatic interpretation of T-invariants is necessary.

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Projects

Ongoing proj ect s:

  • 1. The whole E.coli pat hway

Nina Kramer

  • 2. The whole pot at o t uber pat hway Nina Kramer
  • 3. Det ailed glycolysis wit h coloured Pet r i net s in human

Thomas Runge, BTU Cottbus

  • 4. G1/ S - phase in mammalian cells

Thomas Kaunath (tumour cell lines, Duchenne muscle dystrophy)

  • Glycolysis-pent ose phosphat e pat hway in er yt hr ocyt es

Voss, Heiner, Koch, BioSystems in press (2004)

  • Apopt osis Heiner, Koch, Will, Proc.Comp.Methods Syst.Biol. (2003)

Heiner, Voss, Koch, In Silico Biology (2003) Heiner & Koch, 25th International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri Nets, 21th - 25th June, Bologna, Italy (2004)

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Thanks!

Björn Junker (Max Planck Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology Golm) Monika Heiner (Brandenburg University of Technology at Cottbus)

Ina Koch Bertinoro Computational Biology Meeting Bertinoro, June 14th 2004

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Grazie per la vostra attenzione!