Porosity, XRD, SEM and SAXS Measurements on Greek Natural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

porosity xrd sem and saxs measurements on greek natural
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Porosity, XRD, SEM and SAXS Measurements on Greek Natural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Porosity, XRD, SEM and SAXS Measurements on Greek Natural Clinoptilotite Student: Dimitris Katsios Supervisor: Nikos Lygeros EMT-IT Msc Oil & Gas Technology 11/11/2014 Structure of the presentation } What is zeolite? } Possible


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Porosity, XRD, SEM and SAXS Measurements on Greek Natural Clinoptilotite

Student: Dimitris Katsios Supervisor: Nikos Lygeros EMT-IT Msc Oil & Gas Technology 11/11/2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

} What is zeolite? } Possible applications } Current status in Greece } Importance of studying it } Sampling, sample preparation } Results } Conclusions

Structure of the presentation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

} Zeolites are microporous, aluminosilicate

minerals commonly used as commercial adsorbents and catalysts

} Discovered in 1756 by Axel Fredrik Cronstedt } Framework structure characterized by the

existence of interconnected cages, occupied by the relatively large cations and water molecules

What is zeolite?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

} Agriculture and Animal husbandry } Human health } Oil & gas Industry } Nuclear industry } Water purification } Catalysts and sorbents } Construction } Heating and refrigeration } Detergents

Possible applications

slide-5
SLIDE 5

} 10 zeolite deposits have been located in

Greece

} Five of the at the area of Evros } Important due to quantity and quality } Kokkalo, Petrota, Pentalofos, Metaxades, Kirki } For one of them exploration license has been

approved at July 2014 (Olympus S.A.)

Current status in Greece

slide-6
SLIDE 6

} Chemical analysis for hazardous and toxic

substances

} Compound analysis for zeolite concentration and

zeolite types

} Porosity analysis for molecular structure and

porod’s properties

} Based on these results the possible applications can

be found, subject to specific constraints and limits (e.g. EC regulations)

Importance of studying

slide-7
SLIDE 7

} 2 deposits: Petrota and Kokkalo (North Evros) } 3 samples from each deposit } 3 granularities for each sample (125, 90 and 45 µm) } In order to remove organic matter and other

impurities, samples were dived in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 35% solution for 20 hours

} In order to remove the absorbed H2O2, water and

  • ther liquid residues from the samples’ pores, they

were calcinated at 500 oC for 5 hours

Sampling, sample preparation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

} For each sample 3 scans at x200, x1000, x5000

and x10.000

} The crystalline nature of the material is obvious

from the sharp edges of the surface supporting the smaller particles

} Fractal structure is also observed } The sharp edges and the smooth surfaces of the

zeolite crystals are present for the different grain sizes

SEM results

slide-9
SLIDE 9

P4M2 O3M2 O2M3 P6M3

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Kokkalo Element Percent Oxygen 78.45 Silicon 13.26 Aluminium 3.34 Carbon 1.95 Potassium 1.03 Calcium 0.67 Magnesium 0.34 Sodium 0.25 Copper 0.20 Iron 0.19 Zinc 0.13 Rhenium 0.09 Titanium 0.05 Tantalum 0.02 Sulfur 0.02

EDX elememental Kokkalo

78,4517

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Petrota Element Percent Oxygen 76.19 Silicon 13.84 Aluminium 3.83 Carbon 2.33 Potassium 1.23 Sodium 0.70 Calcium 0.55 Copper 0.29 Zinc 0.27 Vanadium 0.26 Iron 0.25 Magnesium 0.16 Titanium 0.09 Sulfur 0.01

EDX elememental Petrota

76,1867

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sample Si/Al O1 4.34 O2 4.13 O3 3.53 P4 3.86 P5 3.59 P6 3.40

EDX Si/Al ratio

Values near 4 indicate the existence of hydrophilic zeolites specifically clinoptilolite and heulandite which is accordance with the XRD results

slide-13
SLIDE 13

} XRD and EDX results have quantitative but not

qualitative differences

} The major difference is obtained at the

Oxygen percentage

} EDX analysis shows much higher quantities

(78.45% and 76.19%) compared to those of the XRD analysis (53.26% and 52.96%)

XRD elemental results

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Average Kokkalo

Oxygen 53.26% Silicon 28.31% Aluminium 7.01% Calcium 2.62% Fluorine 1.64% Hydrogen 1.63% Sodium 1.60% Zirconium 1.43% Potassium 1.36% Nickel 0.41% Rubidium 0.21% Bismuth 0.14% Arsenic 0.13% Gallium 0.12% Cobalt 0.06% Nitrogen 0.04% Magnesium 0.03% Titanium 0.00%

XRD elememental Kokkalo

Average Kokkalo

0,5326

slide-15
SLIDE 15

XRD elememental Petrota

Average Petrota

Oxygen 52.96% Silicon 27.21% Aluminium 7.33% Calcium 3.32% Hydrogen 1.67% Iodine 1.49% Potassium 1.23% Carbon 0.99% Sodium 0.91% Molybdenum 0.85% Fluorine 0.67% Zirconium 0.59% Chromium 0.23% Nitrogen 0.19% Zinc 0.11% Manganese 0.10% Cobalt 0.09% Lithium 0.06%

Average Petrota

0,5296

slide-16
SLIDE 16

} The zeolites (clinoptilolites and heulandites)

percentage for the Kokkalo and Petrota deposits are 94.7% and 91% respectively

XRD zeolite percentage

Average Kokkalo

0,947 Average Kokkalo

Average Petrota

0,9105 Average Petrota

slide-17
SLIDE 17

XRD zeolites percentage

Sample Zeolites Other O1M3 92.71% 7.29% O2M3 96.89% 3.10% O3M3 94.49% 5.50% P4M3 91.84% 8.17% P5M3 88.61% 11.39% P6M3 92.69% 7.32% ¡ ¡ ¡ Average ¡Kokkalo 94.70% 5.30% Average ¡Petrota 91.05% 8.96%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sample Si/Al O1M3 4.85 O2M3 3.81 O3M3 3.65 P4M3 3.62 P5M3 3.99 P6M3 3.57 Average ¡Kokkalo 4.04 Average ¡Petrota 3.71

XRD Si/Al ratios

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sample Crystallinity O1 43.6% O2 44.4% O3 54.9% P4 59.4% P5 53.6% P6 59.3% Average ¡Kokkalo 47.6% Average ¡Petrota 57.4%

XRD Crystallinity

slide-20
SLIDE 20

} The I(q) vs log(q) curves are characterized by a

slight bend between two linear portions after q = 0.01 Å-1

} This indicates that the scattering intensities are

caused by different regimes of constant mass/size scaling and size scales of structure

} Applying segmented linear regression at the data,

the greater change of slope is found at q = 0.03 Å-1

SAXS results

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Log(I) vs log(q) graph

slide-22
SLIDE 22

} The Ds values of the samples fluctuate around 2.45

being for all larger than 2.

} This means that the primary particles of the

measured zeolites are characterized by micropores inside and a rough pore-solid interface.

} The Dm of the measured zeolites have similar

trends, indicating the similar length scales of the primary particles for the samples.

Ds and Dm values

slide-23
SLIDE 23

} The bend in log I versus log q figure

(q = 0.03 Å-1) reflects a change of exponential decay in scattered intensity that corresponds to different average structural sizes for heterogeneities according to Guinier’s law in exponential form.

Explanation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Two segmented linear fitting 
 (log I vs log q)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

} The radii of gyration (Rg) calculated for each

q-region are approximately the same at around 270 Å and 24 Å respectively for each sample

Radius of gyration

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Dm Ds Rg ¡(Å) Rg ¡(Å) q-­‑range <0.03 0.03-­‑0.1 <0.01 ~0.1 O1 2.93 2.42 272.15 23.72 O2 2.89 2.50 272.17 23.74 O3 2.85 2.50 270.11 21.14 P4 2.69 2.46 261.5 24.97 P5 2.81 2.44 268.33 24.50 P6 2.82 2.44 269.12 24.74

Dm Ds and Rg SAXS results

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Porod characteristics based on SAXS measurements

Sample Qp S/V Dp Pp T O1 1.16E-­‑03 2.59 2.15E-­‑02 3.50E-­‑01 5.12E-­‑03 O2 1.66E-­‑04 3.06 8.11E-­‑03 1.56E-­‑01 3.24E-­‑04 O3 9.68E-­‑04 3.04 1.96E-­‑02 3.75E-­‑01 4.55E-­‑03 P4 9.96E-­‑04 3.46 1.99E-­‑02 4.33E-­‑01 5.42E-­‑03 P5 7.35E-­‑04 2.96 1.71E-­‑02 3.18E-­‑01 2.94E-­‑03 P6 8.65E-­‑04 2.92 1.85E-­‑02 3.40E-­‑01 3.70E-­‑03

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Sample Average ¡r ¡(Å) O1 18.63 O2 19.43 O3 19.20 P4 19.15 P5 18.27 P6 18.31 Kokkalo 19.09 Petrota 18.58

Size distribution based on SAXS

Sample Average ¡r ¡(Å) O1 314 O2 320 O3 315 P4 301 P5 306 P6 305 Kokkalo 316 Petrota 304

slide-29
SLIDE 29

} All the samples examined from both Petrota and

Kokkalo deposits found to contain more than 90% clinoptilolite.

} No hazardous or toxic concentrations were

detected at the compound and chemical analyses.

} The characteristics of both minerals are similar to

each other, possibly due to the common creation conditions of the two deposits and indicate a high quality zeolitic tuff.

Conclusions 1/2

slide-30
SLIDE 30

} Based on the results both deposits can be

commercially exploited since no extended chemical treatment shall be needed after the extraction of the minerals.

} The wide range of applications of zeolite

create the best expectations for economic development not only in primary but also in secondary sector of economy.

Conclusions 2/2

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Thank you
 Very much!