Police District 5 Headquarters Police District 5 Headquarters Site - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Police District 5 Headquarters Police District 5 Headquarters Site Selection Update Site Selection Update McKie Recreation Center April 3, 2018 2 Agenda Introduction Kelly Carr, City Managers Office Lt. Col. Teresa Theetge, Cincinnati
McKie Recreation Center April 3, 2018
2
Introduction Kelly Carr, City Manager’s Office
Site Selection Update James Weaver, City Planning Future Building Design Jamie Accurso, City Facilities Management Nestor Melnyk, MSA Architects Next Steps Maraskeshia Smith, Director of Public Services Community Advisory Group Katherine Keough-Jurs, Director of City Planning
3
Kelly Carr, City Manager’s Office
4
5
Existing building constructed in 1957 Existing building constructed in 1957
Meant to be temporary
Structurally and technologically obsolete
Insufficient parking
Insufficient community space
Insufficient space for staff
Insufficient storage
Not accessible, not compliant with ADA
6
Support the needs of needs of all the citi all the citizens zens served in the district, served in the district, current and future. current and future.
Create a building and culture building and culture that that is accessible, friendly, is accessible, friendly, welcoming to welcoming to the the public, and public, and a a part of part of the the community. community.
Evoke civic pride and inspire and inspire confidence in a highly confidence in a highly visible visible location. location.
Be both economically both economically and environmentally and environmentally sound. sound.
Allow flexibility for operational and functional
changes.
Provide the opportunity for
recruitment and retention of retention of a a high quality staff. high quality staff.
Be efficient and cost efficient and cost effective to effective to build, use, maintain, adapt build, use, maintain, adapt and manage. and manage.
7
Achieve cost savings through efficient through efficient consolidation consolidation and and capital cost capital cost avoidance. avoidance.
Be a pleasure a pleasure to see and use as an identifying to see and use as an identifying landmark landmark within the within the community. community.
Strive for a 50+ year value. for a 50+ year value.
Be located to located to allow for allow for efficient operations and efficient operations and equal equal provision of provision of services. services.
Incorporate community policing and community policing and changing police changing police approaches in approaches in all design decisions. all design decisions.
Gain efficiencies and increase productivity and increase productivity through leading through leading edge technologies. edge technologies.
8
James Weaver, City Planning
9
10
11
Id Site Zoning Acres Status 1 Bethlehem Temple CC‐A 10.97 Privately Owned 2 Center Hill Ave & Este Ave MG 7.80 City Owned 3 3244‐3300 Central Parkway CC‐A 7.19 City/Privately Owned 4 3917 Colerain Avenue MG 2.64 Privately Owned 5 5088 Colerain Avenue PR 0.65 City Owned 6 Colerain Avenue Access SF‐4 7.16 City Owned 7 1670 Cooper Street MG/ML 2.79 Privately Owned 8 Dane & Knowlton MG 3.43 Privately Owned 9 Hamilton Avenue T5N.LS 3.18 Privately Owned 10 1676 Hoffner Street ML 1.45 Privately Owned 11 Kings Run Drive PR 3.49 City Owned 12 1805 Larch Avenue PR 3.16 City Owned 13 1012 Ludlow Avenue PR 1.27 City Owned 14 Mt. Airy Forest PR 8.98 City Owned 15 Police Impound Lot MG 14.12 City Owned 16 Rummymede ‐ Colerain & Virginia RM‐2.0 4.40 State Owned 17 1444 Springlawn Avenue ML 2.86 Privately Owned 18 Stock Street SF‐2 3.04 City Owned 19 William Dooley Bypass MG 2.38 City Owned 20 4981 Winton Road MA 5.37 Privately Owned ‐ Available
12
Bethlehem Temple
Center Hill & Este Este
Central Parkway
Colerain Ave (2) (2)
Colerain Ave Ave Access Access
Cooper Street
Dane & Knowlton Knowlton
Hamilton Avenue ton Avenue
Hoffner Street Street
Kings Run Drive Drive
Larch Avenue
Ludlow Avenue
Forest
Police Impound Lot Lot
Runnymede – Colerai
n & Virgini Virginia
Springlawn Ave Ave
Stock Street
William Dooley Bypass Bypass
Winton Road
13
14
15
Strengths Strengths
7.2 acres – 3.25 usable .25 usable acres curre acres currentl tly
Close to existing HQ ng HQ
Direct access to main roads roads
1/2 Mile Walk Shed Mile Walk Shed
Between two high-call n two high-call neighborhoods neighborhoods
Correct zoning
ilities available Challenge Challenges
Steep slopes in rear
Portion of site privately site privately
Most of site in site in Hillside Hillside Distri District ct
16
Strengths Strengths
Easy access to to major major roads – roads – get rid of get rid of motel!! motel!!
Not too far away
Happy medium
Accessible but not heavy heavy traffic traffic
Challenges Challenges
Too expensive to demolish to demolish & & rebuild rebuild
Congested and overlap with
existing substations existing substations
Don’t stick them in an old
building nobody building nobody wants wants
Not walkable – too far
from heart of community heart of community
In Hillside District – Hillside District – hard to hard to build on build on with hill behind with hill behind
17
18
7.16 acres, City-owned
~3.5 acres not in 100- year flood plain year flood plain
Geographically central
In medium-call neighborhood neighborhood
mile Walk Shed Shed
Zone change required
Some slope issues
Potential Ingress/ Egress issues Egress issues
Portion of site within 100-year flood plain 100-year flood plain
Utilities need to be extended ~1/2 mile extended ~1/2 mile
Combined sewer
19
Strengths Strengths
Centrally located – great great location location & access to all & access to all neighborhoods neighborhoods
Good access to major roads & roads & expressways expressways
Potential Northside gateway gateway
3 of top 4 top 4 areas for areas for service calls near here service calls near here
New utilities already already coming coming
Challenges Challenges
Hard to find access? find access?
Due to 100 year flood again again more expense possible more expense possible
Northside may not want it ay not want it here – here – could have poor could have poor access and ingress/egress access and ingress/egress
20
21
Strengths Strengths
3.43 acres
Geographically central ntral
Access to major roadwa major roadways ys
Zoned properly ly
In medium-call all neighborhood neighborhood
1/2 Mile Walk Shed Mile Walk Shed
ilities available
Challenges Challenges
Private ately owned y owned
Not directly visible on a a major street major street
Potential brownfield ld site site
Some demo required
22
Strengths Strengths
Good access to major roads & roads & business district – business district – central central
Site on major cut-thru to major cut-thru to avoid Hamilton so avoid Hamilton so good good visibility visibility
Potential for community community interaction interaction
Easy access near walkshed near walkshed & enough room & enough room
Most viable – centrally centrally located, manageable traffic located, manageable traffic
Challenges Challenges
Possible brownfield issues
Remote – not
large roads accessing it accessing it
Not visible
Some demo required required
23
24
Strengths Strengths
3.875 acres
Access to major roadways roadways
Multiple access points points
In high-call neighborhood neighborhood
Within College Hill NBD
Correct zoning
Privately owned (City option (City option to purchase) to purchase)
Challenges Challenges
Temporary location for for District District 5 staff who would 5 staff who would need to be relocated need to be relocated during construction during construction
Existing building would need to be demolished need to be demolished
Located in Historic District (plaza non- District (plaza non- contributing) contributing)
Potential relocation costs
Utilities would need to to be be extended ~2.75 miles extended ~2.75 miles
25
Strengths Strengths
Janice will bake bake for police for police
Positive economic/social/crime economic/social/crime impact on impact on NBD NBD - visible isible
Major road access
Available for purchase purchase
In high-call area area
Clean and flat – flat – ingress/egress ingress/egress
Tie in with Firehouse 51
Great parking
Challenges Challenges
Too expensive to purchase to purchase
Too far north – north – great great for for College Hill, College Hill, bad for bad for Distri District 5 ct 5
Only one main artery main artery
Cannot assume current high- call area call area will always be will always be high- high- call area call area
26
27
14.1 acres, City-leased
Access to major major roadways roadways
Zoned properly ly
Geographically central ntral
Could help revitalize area – area – between two etween two NBDs NBDs
ilities available
Police impound lot is at capacity and capacity and would would need to be relocated need to be relocated
Not within Walk Shed
Not City-owned
Potential brownfield ld (former CSX (former CSX maintenance site) maintenance site)
28
Strengths Strengths
Community would love this lot to this lot to go somewhere go somewhere else else
Plenty of space – space – impound mpound lot needs more space lot needs more space anyway anyway
Challenges Challenges
So much much pollution from 20 pollution from 20th
th
Century Industrial Century Industrial
Too costly to move to move impound impound
Floods
Not a great location – a great location – not
visible – visible – too
far from major from major business district business district
29
30
4.4 acres, State-owned
Geographically central ntral
Access to major roadwa major roadways ys
Multiple access points access points
In medium-call all neighborhood neighborhood
mile Walk Shed
Zone change required
Potential Ingress/ s/ Egress near a Egress near a road road curv curve
Portion of site within site within 100-year 100-year flood plain flood plain
This area was planned planned to be a to be a skate skate park park for for the neighborhood the neighborhood
ilities need to be extended ~1/2 mile extended ~1/2 mile
31
Strengths Strengths
Centrally located – great great location location & access to all & access to all neighborhoods neighborhoods
Good access to major roads & roads & expressways expressways
Potential Northside gateway gateway
3 of top 4 top 4 areas for areas for service calls near here service calls near here
New utilities already already coming coming
Challenges Challenges
Hard to find access? find access?
Due to 100 year flood again again more expense possible more expense possible
Northside may not want it ay not want it here – here – could have poor could have poor access and ingress/egress access and ingress/egress
Not walkable
No skatepark?
32
Id Site Zoning Acres Status 3‐1‐18 Circled 3‐1‐18 Crossed Off 3‐1‐18 Net Score 3‐7‐18 Circled 3‐7‐18 Crossed Off 3‐7‐18 Net Score Total Net Score 8 Dane & Knowlton MG 3.43 Privately Owned 5 5 5 5 10 3 3244‐3300 Central Parkway CC‐A 7.19 City/Privately Owned 5 1 4 5 5 9 9 Hamilton Avenue T5N.LS 3.18 Privately Owned 4 1 3 6 6 9 16 Rummymede ‐ Colerain & Virginia RM‐2.0 4.40 State Owned 6 6 4 2 2 8 6 Colerain Avenue Access SF‐4 7.16 City Owned 5 5 4 2 2 7 15 Police Impound Lot MG 14.12 City Leased 3 3 4 1 3 6 1 Bethlehem Temple CC‐A 10.97 Privately Owned 1 ‐1 2 1 1 4 3917 Colerain Avenue MG 2.64 Privately Owned 1 ‐1 ‐1 5 5088 Colerain Avenue PR 0.65 City Owned 1 ‐1 1 ‐1 ‐2 10 1676 Hoffner Street ML 1.45 Privately Owned 1 ‐1 1 ‐1 ‐2 12 1805 Larch Avenue PR 3.16 City Owned 2 ‐2 ‐2 13 1012 Ludlow Avenue PR 1.27 City Owned 1 ‐1 1 ‐1 ‐2 18 Stock Street SF‐2 3.04 City Owned 1 ‐1 1 ‐1 ‐2 20 4981 Winton Road MA 5.37 Privately Owned ‐ Available 1 ‐1 1 ‐1 ‐2 7 1670 Cooper Street MG/ML 2.79 Privately Owned 2 ‐2 1 2 ‐1 ‐3 11 Kings Run Drive PR 3.49 City Owned 2 ‐2 1 ‐1 ‐3 17 1444 Springlawn Avenue ML 2.86 Privately Owned 2 ‐2 1 ‐1 ‐3 19 William Dooley Bypass MG 2.38 City Owned 2 ‐2 1 ‐1 ‐3 2 Center Hill Ave & Este Ave MG 7.80 City Owned 4 ‐4 1 ‐1 ‐5 14 Mt. Airy Forest PR 8.98 City Owned 5 ‐5 2 ‐2 ‐7
33
34
Excited about this open process – process – Thanks! Thanks!
Ask Fire Department for artment for their input their input
Colerain Avenue is a a faster faster north/ north/south corr south corrido idor than than Hamilton Avenue Hamilton Avenue
Buffer map based on travel map based on travel time from stations time from stations
How are substations used? are substations used?
Break down calls by crime crime type for next meet type for next meeting ing
Describe how police respond to each type of crime each type of crime
UC Police not enough in CUF CUF
Would CUF be better in District 1?
Who will pay for the moving cost?
Has to be >3 acres – to be >3 acres – no no brownfie brownfield, no floodplain! ld, no floodplain!
Don’t take park land take park land
35
Potentially build new east/west connec connector tor arter arterial from north al from north
Colerain Avenue/Shepherd Colerain Avenue/Shepherd Road Road
No roads running east/west? east/west??
It’s a waste of waste of taxpayer funds taxpayer funds to pay to pay to relocate another to relocate another government e government entity for this tity for this project project
Pick a site that is site that is city owned or city owned or readily readily available and available and proper properly ly zoned zoned
36
37
Clifton Ave & & Mill Creek Mill Creek
Daily Mart
Farm near CH Pet Clinic
GCWW
Kahns - Rhinegeist hinegeist
Kenard
Kroger
Ludlow Ave & & Central Central Parkway Parkway
Mercy Mt. Airy Airy
MLK and Clifton
Airy Forest - West Fork Rd est Fork Rd
NE Corner Hamilton & Corner Hamilton & North North Bend Bend
NW Corner Hamilton & North Bend Bend
Sansolone Family Site Family Site
Spring Grove & & Crawford Crawford
W North Bend
William Dooley & Dooley & Blue Rock Blue Rock
38
Id Site Zoning Acres Status 21 Clifton Ave & Mill Creek CC‐A 3.1 Privately owned 22 Daily Mart T5N.LS, RMX 2.53 Privately owned 23 Farm near CH Pet Clinic SF‐6 31.82 Privately owned 24 GCWW MG 13.51 City owned 25 Kahns ‐ Rhinegeist MG 8.01 Privately owned 26 Kenard CC‐A 2.96 Privately owned 27 Kroger CC‐A 8.65 Privately owned 28 Ludlow Ave & Central Parkway MG 5.2 Privately owned 29 Mercy Mt. Airy IR 45.82 Privately owned 30 MLK and Clifton CN‐P 3.30 Privately owned 31
PR 6.44 City owned 32 NE Corner Hamilton & North Bend T5MS 2.29 Privately owned 33 NW Corner Hamilton & North Bend T5N.LS, T5MS, T5N.MF‐O 5.29 Privately owned 34 Sauselone Family MG, CC‐A 4.08 Privately owned 35 Spring Grove & Crawford MG 9.62 Privately owned ‐ multiple owners 36 W North Bend CC‐M, SF‐6 2.96 Privately owned 37 William Dooley & Blue Rock MG 2.93 Privately owned
39
40
Strengths Strengths
3.1 acres in medium - call neighborhood call neighborhood
Direct access to primary road primary road
Correct zoning
Utilities available Challenges Challenges
Demo required
Privately owned
Not within ½ mile mile walk shed walk shed
Partially in hillside, which is tight which is tight
41
42
Strengths Strengths
In high-call ar gh-call area ea
Located within College Hill NBD and Hill NBD and ¼ mile mile walk shed walk shed
Flat
Challenges Challenges
2.53 acres – too small too small
3 separate parcels/owners parcels/owners
Multiple zoning districts iple zoning districts
Takes away ½ the the park parking from the ing from the existing church existing church
Not fully available available
ilities would need to d need to be extended ~2.75 miles be extended ~2.75 miles
43
44
31 acres
Located on major east- major east- west arterial west arterial
Requires zone change
Private ately owned -not y owned -not available available
Not within ½ mile mile walkshed walkshed
At edge of city limits city limits
ilities would need to d need to be extended ~2.75 miles be extended ~2.75 miles
45
46
Strengths Strengths
13.5 acres
Centrally located
City owned (GCWW)
Direct access to primary roads with primary roads with safe access safe access
Correct zoning
Utilities available Challenges Challenges
GCWW would need to be relocated to be relocated
Not within ½ mile mile walkshed walkshed
47
48
Strengths Strengths
8 acres
Correct zoning
Could be catalyst for further further rede redevel velopment pment
Within ½ mile walkshed mile walkshed
Vacant
ilities close
Could potentially incorporate new incorporate new range range
Challenges Challenges
Private ately owned y owned
In low-call ar w-call area ea
Not as visible as visible as other
locations locations
49
50
In medium-call neighborhood neighborhood
Correct zoning
No structures
Somewhat centrally located located
Flat
Utilities close
Privately owned (Woody Sander Ford) (Woody Sander Ford)
Not within ½ mile mile walkshed walkshed
Just under 3 acres acres
Not on main road
51
52
8.65 acres
Correct zoning
Multiple access points
In medium-call neighborhood neighborhood
Flat
Utilities close
Privately owned (Kroger) (Kroger)
Not available
Not within ½ mile mile walkshed walkshed
53
54
5.2 acres
Correct zoning
Across Ludlow from previous District 5 previous District 5 HQ HQ
Utilities available
Multiple parcels with multiple owners multiple owners
Existing businesses would have to would have to relocate relocate
Potential brownfield
55
56
45.8 acres
Correct zoning
Available
In high-call gh-call neighborhood neighborhood
Far NW part of Distr District ct
Not in ½ mile walkshed mile walkshed
Discussion of new residential development sidential development
site
Utilities almost 4 miles miles away away
57
58
3.3 acre site in high- call neighborhood call neighborhood
Correct zoning
Relatively flat site
In ½ mile walk shed mile walk shed
Utilities close
Located in south part of district part of district
Surrounded by residential zoning on residential zoning on 3 sides 3 sides
Potential traffic issues issues
59
60
Strengths Strengths
6.44 acres
City owned (Park Board) Board)
Relatively flat Challenges Challenges
Zone change required
Not in ½ mile mile walkshed walkshed
This portion of West Fork Road is Fork Road is within within 100 year flood plain 100 year flood plain
Utilities ~ 1 mile away
61
62
Strengths Strengths
City-owned
Correct zoning
In high-call neighborhood neighborhood
In College Hill NBD
Located at corner of two major two major arterials arterials
Vacant Challenges Challenges
2.29 acres acres
Surrounded by residential uses residential uses
Not centrally located entrally located
Utilities over 3 miles away away
63
64
Strengths Strengths
5.29 acres
City owned
Correct zoning
In high-call neighborhood neighborhood
In College Hill NBD
Located at corner of two major two major arterials arterials
Vacant Challenges Challenges
Several development proposals proposals
Surrounded by residential uses residential uses
Not centrally located located
Utilities over 3 miles away away
65
66
Strengths Strengths
4.07 acres
Correct zoning
In high-call gh-call neighborhood neighborhood
In ½ mile walkshed mile walkshed
Potential to re-align Central Parkway to Central Parkway to make it one make it one parcel to parcel to improv improve safety safety
ilities close
Challenges Challenges
Private ately owned y owned
Multiple zoning districts iple zoning districts
Two parcels across a major arterial major arterial
Re-aligning the street would add significant would add significant time and cost time and cost
67
68
Strengths Strengths
9.62 acres
In 1/2 mile walk shed
Correct zoning
Good frontage on major street major street
Utilities available Challenges Challenges
Multiple parcels with multiple owners multiple owners
Lots of demo required required
69
70
Strengths Strengths
2.96 acres acres
In high-call neighborhood neighborhood
Would help solve neighborhood issues neighborhood issues in this area (truck in this area (truck parking, drainage) parking, drainage) Challenges Challenges
Zone change required for part for part of site
Multiple parcels with multiple owners multiple owners
Surrounded by residential uses residential uses
Edge of City
Utilities ~3.5 miles away
71
72
Strengths Strengths
2.93 acres
Correct zoning
In medium-call neighborhood neighborhood
Utilities close Challenges Challenges
Requires closure of Mad Anthony St in this Anthony St in this location location
Multiple parcels with multiple owners multiple owners
Partially within 100 year flood plain flood plain
73
Clifton Ave & & Mill Creek Mill Creek
Daily Mart
Farm near CH Pet Clinic
GCWW
Kahns - Rhinegeist hinegeist
Kenard
Kroger
Ludlow Ave & & Central Central Parkway Parkway
Mercy Mt. Airy Airy
MLK & Clifton Clifton
Airy Forest - West Fork Rd est Fork Rd
NE Corner Hamilton & Corner Hamilton & North North Bend Bend
NW Corner Hamil Hamilton & & North North Bend Bend
Sansolone Family Site amily Site
Spring Grove & & Crawford Crawford
W North Bend
William Dooley & Dooley & Blue Rock Blue Rock
74
think best meets the overall needs
5?
should we keep
75
Please keep the following three factors in mind: Please keep the following three factors in mind:
Constructability
Engineering feasibility (hillsides, soil c lsides, soil conditions, fl
plain, etc.), Real estate costs, brownfield mitigat plain, etc.), Real estate costs, brownfield mitigation
Operations
Proximity to
major thor r thoroughfares, ac
ss to utilities utilities
Community Development Impact
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
**This vote does not determine the location of the new District 5 HQ. The purpose of the vote was to gauge community support for each site and to see if any site above was completely unacceptable.**
89
Jamie Accurso, City Facilities Management Nestor Melnyk, MSA Architects
90
91
92
Building program and use areas +/- 200 officers, multiple shifts, staff, parking, & maintenance
93
Spatial relationships, adjacencies and flow
94
Credentialing agencies, standards, technical reviews
95
LEED Silver certification goal – payback & simplicity
96
97
Character and stature of the building, landmark
98
Contextual, accessible, connected
99
Public spaces, public art, resources
100
CPTED: passive and unimposing
101
Transparency, use of glass, openness (where appropriate)
102
Open, well-lit & pleasing – yet durable and secure
103
Comfortable, efficient, flexible, secure
104
105
Maraskeshia Smith, Director of Public Services
106
107
Katherine Keough-Jurs, Director of City Planning
108
Art and public space to uniquely represent all uniquely represent all 8 neighborhoods in Police District 5 8 neighborhoods in Police District 5
109