POINT OF CARE COAGULATION TESTING Dr Danny Morland Royal Victoria - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

point of care coagulation testing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

POINT OF CARE COAGULATION TESTING Dr Danny Morland Royal Victoria - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POINT OF CARE COAGULATION TESTING Dr Danny Morland Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne 11 th October 2016 Introduction Declarations of Interest: None CONTENT Introduction to POCT Principles Interpretation Treatment Literature


slide-1
SLIDE 1

POINT OF CARE COAGULATION TESTING

Dr Danny Morland Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne 11th October 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Declarations of Interest: None

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CONTENT

Introduction to POCT Principles Interpretation Treatment Literature NUTH Experience

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Point Of Care Testing (POCT)

Medical diagnostic testing at (or near) the point of care.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

POCT

PROS

  • Quick
  • Convenient
  • Reliable
  • Efficient

CONS

  • Cost (potentially)
  • Quality
  • Training
  • Workload
  • Recording
  • Risk of inappropriate

decision-making

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Point of Care Coagulation Testing (POCCT)

Viscoelastic properties of whole blood clot Thromboelastography = Thromboelastometry (TEG) (ROTEM)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Purported Benefits over Standard Tests

  • Measures whole blood, not just plasma
  • Looks at clot generation and propagation beyond the

point of clot appearance

  • Allows comment on clot ‘quality’
  • Can identify fibrinolysis

FAST –potential information on clotting status within 5mins

  • f test starting
slide-8
SLIDE 8

POCCT vs Standard Lab Tests

POCCT

  • Whole blood
  • Clot beyond first

appearance

  • Clot quality
  • Identify fibrinolysis
  • FAST

LAB

  • Highly standardised
  • Trained, professional staff
  • Quality control
  • Well established
  • Complete picture
  • Cost
slide-9
SLIDE 9

PRINCIPLES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Viscoelasticity

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hardware

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

OUTPUTS

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Panel Testing – Normal results

slide-16
SLIDE 16

INTERPRETATION

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Normal

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Low Platelets

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Normal

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hypo-fibrinogenaemia

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Heparin Effect

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Normal

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TREATMENT

slide-28
SLIDE 28

LIMITATIONS AND WARNINGS

  • Treatment should be administered according to the

clinical picture (e.g. volume & current rate of blood loss)

  • Viscoelastic devices are not uniformly sensitive to all

disturbances of coagulation status

  • e.g. platelet dysfunction, antiplatelets, LMWHs, warfarin, DOACs
  • Pre-existing local protocols should be respected, given

current level of evidence for POCCT devices.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Where is it useful?

  • Perioperative
  • Livers, cardiac, unanticipated bleeding
  • Trauma
  • Pre- and in-theatre
  • Obstetrics
  • PPH
  • ITU
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Algorithms

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Algorithms

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Algorithms

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Algorithms

slide-34
SLIDE 34

LITERATURE

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

TRAUMA

slide-39
SLIDE 39

http://www.c4ts.qmul.ac.uk/bleeding-and- coalgulation/itactic (Accessed on 9/10/16)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

OBSTETRICS

slide-41
SLIDE 41

OBSTETRICS

slide-42
SLIDE 42

OUR EXPERIENCE

slide-43
SLIDE 43

NUTH Experience

  • Introduced POCCT end of 2014 after an evaluation period

to assess feasibility, reliability and accuracy.

  • Trialled TEG 5000, ROTEM Delta in theatre (POCCT),

TEG and ROTEM in lab and compared with standard lab tests coag tests.

  • Findings
  • Generally good concordance between POCT and lab tests
  • Higher user error for more complicated procedures
  • Sending samples to lab could introduce a delay of 50mins over

POCT

slide-44
SLIDE 44

NUTH algorithm

Patient has significant on-going bleeding? YES NO OBSERVE Reassess & Repeat ROTEM EXTEM – CT > 90 sec EXTEM – A10 <40mm EXTEM – LI30 >5% FIBTEM A10 <10mm FIBTEM A10 > 10mm Give 2 Unit Cryoprecipitate Give 1 Pool Platelets Give 4 FFP Give Tranexamic Acid 1g bolus YES YES YES NO +/- +/- EXTEM result NORMAL YES Continue as per Major Haemorrhage Policy

Physiological Targets:

  • Temp>36°C
  • pH>7.2, Base Excess <-6
  • iCa >1.0, K+ <5.5
  • Hb >80, Plt > 100, Fib >1.5

NOTE – ROTEM does not reliably detect effects of,

  • Warfarin
  • Aspirin, Clopidogrel
  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants
  • LMWH

Effect of heparin should be assessed using,

  • INTEM & HEPTEM tests

There may be > 1 clotting defect. Treat all defects simultaneously

RVI ROTEM Treatment Algorithm Use these Products to supplement NOT replace the Major Haemorrhage Packs

Replace ongoing losses + correct specific deficit = Give contents of MHP + additional products as directed by ROTEM

slide-45
SLIDE 45

NUTH Experience since…

  • Valuable technology, very useful addition to arsenal.
  • Can be ‘transfusion-sparing’; imparts confidence that

management strategy is correct.

  • Speed of testing and results
  • Issues
  • Training
  • Regular use
  • QC
  • Interpretation
  • IT
  • Interference with MHP
slide-46
SLIDE 46

When is it useful?

  • To confirm that MHP is addressing specific transfusion

requirements of patient (e.g. bleed then DIC)

  • In cases of slow, steady transfusions that haven’t reached

MHP level

  • To exclude ‘anaesthetic’ bleeding
  • To confirm that transfusion goals have been achieved
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48

SUMMARY

  • Viscoelastic, POCCT devices offer the prospect of rapid

assessment and rational, individually tailored transfusion therapy in the management of major haemorrhage.

  • Barriers remain to their effective and efficient use, and in

many areas a protocolised transfusion strategy may still produce the best outcomes overall.

  • Evidence of effectiveness is lacking still, but it is difficult to

imagine these devices will not be more widely used in the near future.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

THANK YOU