Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions Jarkko Peuron(University of Jyvskyl) In collaboration with: T. Lappi (University of Jyvskyl) June 28 th 2018 Based on: Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) no.1,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions

Jarkko Peuron(University of Jyväskylä) In collaboration with:

  • T. Lappi (University of Jyväskylä)

June 28th 2018

Based on:

  • Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) no.1, 014025,

Phys.Rev. D97 (2018) no.3, 034017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Physics picture

Figure : E. Iancu 1105.0751 [hep-ph] Figure : A. Kurkela, Nucl.Phys. A956 (2016) 136-143.

Left: space-time evolution of an URHIC. Right: the validity ranges of classical and kinetic theory. We are interested in the quasiparticle interpretation of the classical theory. Simulate initial overoccupied gluon fields using classical Yang-Mills equations using real time lattice techniques.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 2 / 15

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quasiparticles in nonequilibrium plasma

Solid state physics: plasmons, collective longitudinal excitations in electron gas. Here: strongly interacting gluon plasma, both transverse and longitudinal excitations. Quasiparticles are gluons, measure their mass using different methods. ε = 2

  • Nc

2 − 1

  • d3k

(2π)3 ω(k)f (k), (1) = 1 2

  • d3k

(2π)3

  • Ei

2 + |Bi|2 . (2) Keeping only quadratic terms in gauge potential we get fA+E (k) = 1 4

  • Nc

2 − 1

1 V

  • |EC (k)|2

ω(k) + k2 ω(k) |AC (k)|2

  • .

(3)

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 3 / 15

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Measuring plasmon mass

Use 3 methods to determine their mass Effective dispersion relation (DR) at zero momentum

  • ˙

E(k)

  • 2
  • |E(k)|2 ≈ ω2

(4) Add uniform chromoelectric field, measure oscillations (UE , Kurkela & Moore Phys.Rev. D86 (2012) 056008). Perturbation theory, Hard Thermal Loops (HTL): ω2

pl = 4

3g2Nc

  • d3k

(2π)3 f (k) |k| (5)

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 4 / 15

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Quasiparticle spectrum, 3D

The initial quasiparticle spectrum satisfies f (k,t = 0) = n0 g2 k ∆ exp

  • −k2

2∆2

  • .

(6)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 k/ f(k) k/ n0= 1, =0.3, 2563, t =57 f(k), t=57 f(k), t=0

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 5 / 15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Time dependence, 3D

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 100 200 300 400 500 600 (t)2/7pl2/(n02) t 1283 HTL UE DR 3 DR 1 0.25 0.5 1 10 100 (tΔ)2/7ωpl2/(n0Δ2) tΔ 1283 n0=0.1 n0=0.5 n0=1 n0=2 n0=3 n0=5

Left: All methods agree on the proposed power law ω2

pl ∼ t−2/7

(Kurkela & Moore Phys.Rev. D86 (2012) 056008) at late times. Left: DR method sensitive to fit cut off (3 and 1 different cutoffs in k/∆). Right: More dense systems enter the scaling regime faster.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 6 / 15

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Dependence on occupation number, 3D

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 pl2/(n02) n0 t = 90, 1283 =0.3, HTL =0.3, UE =0.3, DR

Decreasing trend in n0 explained by self similar scaling (Berges et.

  • al. Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) no.11, 114007), which classical

Yang-Mills theory exhibits self-similar evolution at late times. More dense systems enter this scaling regime faster and have spent larger fraction of their history on the scaling solution.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 7 / 15

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lattice cutoff dependence, 3D

IR cutoff, two datasets for each method correspond to different UV cutoff.

0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.3 50 100 150 200 250 2/2 L n0=1.0, t=57 UE UE HTL HTL DR DR

UV cutoff

0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 2/2 as n0=1.0, t=57 DR HTL UE

We see no IR cutoff dependence HTL method sensitive to UV cutoff. Agrees with UE in the continuum limit.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 8 / 15

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Two-dimensional systems

In the following consider 2D system in a fixed box. Mimic boost invariant expanding system. Use three dimensional lattice with Nz = 1. The differences between different definitions of the occupation numbers are larger in 2D. Use two different estimates, fA and fEA. Due to gauge fixing ambiguities, can not compare directly with the initial scales. Use also autocorrelation to measure frequency in UE method.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 9 / 15

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Occupation number and momentum scale in 2D

Problem: After construction of links and gauge fixing the initial quasiparticle spectrum is deformed.

1 2 3 4 5

k Q

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

g2fA+E(k)

n0

Qt = 0, QL = 614.4, Qa = 0.3

n0 = 0.5 n0 = 1.0 n0 = 1.5 n0 = 2.0 n0 = 2.5 n0 = 3.0

1 2 3 4 5

k Q

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

g2fE+A(k) n0 = 1, Qt = 0, QL = 307

Q = 0.1 Q = 0.2 Q = 0.3 Q = 0.4 Q = 0.5 Q = 0.6

Solution: Define Q and n0 gauge invariantly so that they match to the initial condition for a dilute system.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 10 / 15

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Gauge invariant observables

Define Q2

eff = 1

2

  • Tr(D × B)2
  • Tr
  • B2

neff

0 ≈

πg2 (Nc

2 − 1)

ε2d Q3

eff

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

Q

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

neff

0 (t = 0)

QL = 307.0, Qt = 0

n0 = 0.05 n0 = 0.1 n0 = 0.15 n0 = 0.2 n0 = 0.25 n0 = 0.3 n0 = 0.35 n0 = 0.4 n0 = 0.45 n0 = 0.5 n0 = 0.55 n0 = 0.6 n0 = 0.65 n0 = 0.7 n0 = 0.75 n0 = 0.8 n0 = 0.85 n0 = 0.9 n0 = 0.95 n0 = 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

Q

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Qeff(t = 0) QL = 307.0

n0 = 0.2 n0 = 0.4 n0 = 0.6 n0 = 0.8 n0 = 1.0

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 11 / 15

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Time dependence, 2D

Time dependence using all methods

102

Qefft

10−1

ω2

pl

Q2

eff

neff

0 = 0.22, QeffL = 321.0, Qeffas = 0.31 UE autocor. UE fit. HTL A. HTL EA. DR, T. DR, L t

−1 3

Time dependence at later times with HTL-A method

500 1000 1500 1800

Qefft

10−1

ω2

pl

Q2

eff

QeffL = 264.0, Qeffas = 0.26

neff

0 = 0.09

neff

0 = 0.12

neff

0 = 0.16

neff

0 = 0.2

neff

0 = 0.24

neff

0 = 0.27

neff

0 = 0.28

t

−1 3

Time-evolution of ω2

pl consistent with t

−1/3 power law at late

times.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 12 / 15

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Dependence on occupation number, 2D

0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

neff

0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

ω2

pl

Q2

effneff

(Qefft)UE = 224.0, QeffL = 465.0, Qeffas = 0.26

HTL-A HTL-EA DR,T DR,L UE fit. UE autocor.

Observe similar trend as in 3D. Faster decrease in ω2

pl

Q2

effneff

for larger occupation number.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 13 / 15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cutoff dependence, 2D

IR cutoff

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

QeffL

0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

ω2

pl

Q2

eff

neff

0 = 0.32, Qeffas = 0.37, (Qefft)UE = 203.0 UE autocor. UE fit. HTL A. HTL EA. DR, T. DR, L

UV cutoff

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

Qeffas

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

ω2

pl

Q2

eff

neff

0 = 0.15, QeffL = 254.0, (Qefft)UE = 175.0 UE autocor. UE fit. HTL A. HTL EA. DR, T. DR, L

No IR cutoff dependence All results seem to increase when UV cutoff is taken to zero. The continuum limit does not seem to be divergent.

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 14 / 15

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

We have Measured quasiparticle mass in nonequilibrium gluon plasma Studied the time dependence of the mass. Results consistent with ω2

pl ∼ t−2/7 (3D) ω2 pl ∼ t−1/3 (2D).

Studied the dependence of the mass on occupation number. ω2

pl

n0Q2 falls faster for more dense systems. The UE and HTL seem to agree for 3D systems in the continuum limit. DR agrees with other methods within a factor

  • f 2.

In the future we would like to Measure the quasiparticle properties in anisotropic and expanding geometries using linear response analysis (See talk by K. Boguslavski).

Jarkko Peuron Plasmon mass scale in classical nonequilibrium gauge theory in two and three dimensions 15 / 15