physiological and self reported data n 1
play

physiological and self-reported data (n=1)? - 22 september 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How to analyze a dynamic system of physiological and self-reported data (n=1)? - 22 september 2017 - H.G. van Lier When developing an just in time intervention you try to predict the future for a person. First we need to evaluate if this is


  1. How to analyze a dynamic system of physiological and self-reported data (n=1)? - 22 september 2017 - H.G. van Lier

  2. When developing an just in time intervention you try to predict the future for a person.

  3. First we need to evaluate if this is possible in a context.

  4. Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time?

  5. Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? Predict self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  6. Replace self-reported measurement with physiological measurement? Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? Predict self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  7. Replace self-reported (Dis)prove measurement with dependence between physiological self-reported and measurement? physiological craving? Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? Predict self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  8. Replace self-reported (Dis)prove measurement with dependence between physiological self-reported and measurement? physiological craving? Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? 2 physiological Predict self-reported 2 self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  9. Data Questionnaire every 3 hours.

  10. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) skin conductance (SC) level  (total) amplitude

  11. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude

  12. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude (Leiner, Fahr & Früh, 2012)

  13. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude (Leiner, Fahr & Früh, 2012)

  14. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude (Leiner, Fahr & Früh, 2012)

  15. Variables 2 self-reported:  craving  coping

  16. Variables 2 self-reported:  craving  coping How strong is your craving currently? On a scale of 0 (no craving) to 10 (extreme craving).

  17. Variables 2 self-reported:  craving  coping To what extent do you think you are able to resist your craving currently? On a scale of 0 (not resistible) to 10 (easy to resist).

  18. Cattel’s Data box (Cattel, 1952) Variables

  19. N=1 Variables

  20. Dynamic system Two or more variables measured over time. Not one outcome and another explanatory variable, but a system of variables continuously influencing each other back and forth over time.

  21. Longitudinal data: - (Linear) trend

  22. Longitudinal data: - (Linear) trend Time series data: - Autocorrelation - (Linear) Trend

  23. Time series data We want to study:

  24. Time series data We want to study:  relationships between a variable and itself on prior time point: autoregressive relations

  25. Time series data We want to study:  relationships between a variable and itself on prior time point: autoregressive relations  relationship between different variables on prior time point: cross-lagged relations

  26. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  27. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  28. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology autoregressive relation Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  29. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology cross-lagged relationships Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  30. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology covariance error Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  31. Vector Auto Regressive Model Level Amplitude Craving Coping TIME T T-1

  32. Vector Auto Regressive Model Level Two Physiological parameters Amplitude Craving Two Self-reported parameters Coping TIME T T-1

  33. Time series data Y Y 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 … Y T

  34. Time series data Y Y at lag 1 Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 Y 3 Y 2 Y 4 Y 3 … … Y T Y T-1 Y T

  35. Time series data Y Y at lag 1 Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 Y 3 Y 2 Y 4 Y 3 … … Y T Y T-1 Y T

  36. Vector Auto Regressive Model Level Two Physiological parameters Amplitude Craving Two Self-reported parameters Coping TIME T T-1

  37. Results Level + + Amplitude + Craving - - Coping TIME T T-1

  38. Conclusion No dependence between physiology and self-reported craving over time for this person.

  39. Conclusion No dependence between physiology and self-reported craving over time for this person. Craving predicts coping 3 hours later and Coping predicts craving 3 hours later

  40. Conclusion No dependence between physiology and self-reported craving over time for this person. Craving predicts coping 3 hours later and Coping predicts craving 3 hours later Total amplitude predicts mean SC level 3 hours later

  41. Wrap Up.. If you want to predict the future for a person , it is advisable to use a VAR model (instead of linear regression) to evaluate the dependence between physiological and self-reported measures.

  42. Wrap Up.. If you want to predict the future for a person , it is advisable to use a VAR model (instead of linear regression) to evaluate the dependence between physiological and self-reported measures. Added benefit: You don’t need to identify an outcome and an explanatory variable, but can analyze a system of variables continuously influencing each other back and forth over time.

  43. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy?

  44. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy? - Other physiological parameters might predict craving?

  45. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy? - Other physiological parameters might predict craving? - Does a similar non-dependence between the physiological and self-reported parameters exist in other persons as well?

  46. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy? - Other physiological parameters might predict craving? - Does a similar non-dependence between the physiological and self-reported parameters exist in other persons as well? - Physiology might predict relapse?

  47. Questions? H.G. van Lier h.g.vanlier@utwente.nl

  48. Significant results only 1.875 (.671) Mean Level .206 (.078) .029 (.010) Total Amplitude .445 (.166) .070 (0.024) .384 (.193) Craving 1.216 (.418) Coping TIME T T-1

  49. MPLUS CODE TITLE: MODEL: Physiology vs self-reported data; Crave ON Crave1; Crave ON Coping1; DATA: Crave ON Amp1; FILE IS y.dat; Coping ON Coping1; VARIABLE: Coping ON Crave1; NAMES ARE Crave Crave1 Coping Coping1 Amp Amp1 Level Level1; Amp ON Amp1; Amp ON Crave1; USEVARIABLE ARE Crave Crave1 Coping Coping1 Amp Amp1 Level Amp ON Level1; Level1; Level ON Level1; MISSING ARE ALL (999); Level ON Amp1; OUTPUT: Amp WITH Crave; TECH1 MODINDICES; Crave WITH Coping; Level WITH Amp ;

  50. Normal regression 𝑧 = 𝛾 1 𝑦 1 + 𝜗

  51. Linear trend 𝑧 = 𝛾 1 𝑦 1 + 𝜗 𝑧 𝑢 = 𝛾 𝑢 𝑢 + 𝜗

  52. Auto correlation 𝑧 = 𝛾 1 𝑦 1 + 𝜗 𝑧 𝑢 = 𝛾 𝑢 𝑢 + 𝜗 𝑧 𝑢 = 𝛾 𝑢−1 𝑧 𝑢−1 + 𝜗

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend