Physical Theory of the Immune System NIH Michael W. Deem DARPA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

physical theory of the immune system
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Physical Theory of the Immune System NIH Michael W. Deem DARPA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Physical Theory of the Immune System NIH Michael W. Deem DARPA Rice University DOE Outline Grand challenges in global health The order parameter p epitope (a new tool for vaccine design) Virus evolution Epidemiology


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Michael W. Deem Rice University NIH DARPA DOE

Physical Theory of the Immune System

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Grand challenges in global health
  • The order parameter pepitope

(a new tool for vaccine design)

  • Virus evolution
  • Epidemiology
  • Detection via clustering
  • Dengue fever
  • CRISPR

BRC, Rice University

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Grand Challenges in Global Health

  • H. Varmus et al., Science

302 (2003) 398-399.

  • To improve

vaccines

  • To create new

vaccines Bill Gates, World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Science and Technology: progress against disease.

Hilbert’s 23 open questions in mathematics 7 Millenium Problems, Clay Institute

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Flu and Public Health

  • Annual influenza epidemics kill

250,000-500,000 people worldwide

  • Cause illness in 5 to 15% of total

population each year

  • Typical annual cost in the US is

$10 billion

  • Typical US mortality is 40,000

JAMA 289 (2003) 179

May be 90,000 if complications are included

  • CDC estimates $71-167 billion in

US alone for pandemic

  • Vaccination primary method to

prevent infection

slide-7
SLIDE 7

La Grippe July 2009

  • Arriving in Paris,

Gare du Nord

  • Arriving in London, St. Pancras
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Swine Flu CNN Headline

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Background: History

Circulation of flu virus in history

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Background: Virus structure

Structure of the virus

  • Two antigenically critical proteins: hemagglutinin (HA) and

neuraminidase (NA)

  • five epitopes on the surface of HA

Epitope A Epitope B Epitope C Epitope D Epitope E

~13 nm

~100 nm

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Influenza Evolution

  • Influenza is recognized by

the immune system antibodies binding the epitopes of hemagglutinin

  • Hemagglutinin evolves as

cluster in sequence space

Time

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pressure on Hemagglutinin

  • Antibody pressure on hemagglutinin from

antibodies

  • Virus will evolve away from this pressure
  • Simplest idea

– Viral fitness proportional to free energy of binding disruption

  • E.g. virus may increase interaction with water

and decrease interaction with Ag

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Background: Mortality data

  • Upper left: Long‐time data. Source:

http://www.vaclib.org/legal/MTstat e/US‐Flu‐1900‐2002.gif

  • Lower right: Annual data. Source:

http://media.mercola.com/imagese rver/public/2009/November/flu%20 mortality.gif

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Influenza structure

Deem & Pan, Protein Engineering, Design and Application. 2009; 1‐4.

Nomenclature: A/Texas/05/2009(H1N1) type/locality of isolation/isolate number/year(H&N subtype)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hierarchical Creation of Antibody Diversity

  • Antibody genes are created by

recombination of gene segments in VDJ recombination

  • Antibodies that recognize self die
  • Antibodies that recognize disease

multiply

  • The amino-acid space of disease-

recognizing antibodies is searched by point mutation in somatic hypermutation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Predicting Next Season’s Strain

  • Each year the next likely epidemic strain is

identified by WHO by examining circulating strains in different locations

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Vaccine Development and Efficacy

  • Long development time
  • Egg adaptation and individual

inoculation

  • Varying efficacy from year to

year

  • Lack of flexibility to make

arrangements for post inoculation changes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Flu Shot Paradox

  • “A flu shot this year and not next year, may

lead to a greater risk of contracting the flu next year”

(costco, 1998)

  • Yet flu shot does not affect susceptibility to

most other diseases

  • And vaccination normally provides protection

against disease for multiple years

  • Surprising that vaccine can

make one more susceptible to the disease

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Original Antigenic Sin and the Binding Constant

  • Compare primary

and secondary immune response

  • The localization is

visible in the binding constant

Deem and Lee, PRL 91 068101 (2003)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

When Does Cross-Reactivity Cease?

  • Examine affinity of memory

antibodies for mutated antigen

  • Cross-Reactivity ceases

when Km

eq < 102 l/mol, the

non-specific value

  • No cross-reactivity for

p > 0.36

  • Experimentally, cross-

reactivity ceases for p = 0.33 - 0.42

  • J. J. East et al., Mol. Immunol. 17 (1980) 1545
slide-21
SLIDE 21

How Many Mutations Occur in the Dynamics?

  • Mutations in primary and

secondary responses

  • Measure smallest distance

between best evolved sequence and starting sequences

  • Secondary response has fewer

mutations than primary for p < 0.20

  • More mutations in secondary

than primary for 0.20 < p < 0.70

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Order Parameter pepitope

  • The theory is a form of spin glass model,

first used to describe nuclear cross sections, e- spins in solid

  • Mutation of the flu virus corresponds to

changing parameters in the model with probability p

  • In the immune system, pepitope is the

fraction of amino acids that change in the dominant epitope

  • We observe the efficacy of vaccination to

subsequent exposure to the flu

slide-23
SLIDE 23

E = u − v u

Vaccine Efficacy

  • H3N2 human efficacy from last 35 years (epidemiological)
  • Efficacy correlates well with pepitope
  • psequence and dferret correlate modestly with human efficacy
  • Negative efficacy is mostly at large pepitope (OAS)
  • Theory validates correlation

Gupta, Earl, and Deem, Vaccine 24 (2006) 3881-3888. Munoz and Deem, Vaccine 23 (2005) 1144-1148.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pressure on Hemagglutinin

  • Antibody pressure on hemagglutinin from

antibodies

  • Virus will evolve away from this pressure
  • Simplest idea

– Viral fitness proportional to free energy of binding disruption

  • E.g. virus may increase interaction with water

and decrease interaction with Ag

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Viral Evolution

  • Expect pepitope > 0.19 to evade

immune system; For H3N2 – Vaccine(n) vs. virus(n, n+1) – average pepitope= 0.129, 0.157

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Hong Kong flu in Humans

  • E.g. virus may increase charge in

epitope region

  • Track fraction of Asp, Glu, Arg,

Lys, His

  • Charge does increase in

dominant epitope, early on

  • J. Mol. Evol. (2011) 72:90–103
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Modeling the Selection Pressure

  • One can fit amino acid selection

models to observed data

  • The model is statistically

significantly different from standard protein evolution models, e.g. PAM22

  • J. Mol. Evol. (2011) 72:90–103
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Animal Models also show Selection Pressure

  • Guinea pigs infected with

– CDC A/Wyoming/2003 virus mixture – homogeneous WyB4 virus isolate

  • Naïve, primary, secondary

responses

  • J. Mol. Evol. (2011) 72:90–103
slide-29
SLIDE 29

More Sophisticated Theory

  • Calculate free energy of

antibody/hemagglutinin interaction – Requires we have co-crystal – And that a single Ab is representative

  • Assume viral fitness is monotonic in

disruption of recognition by antibody

  • J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7 (2011) 1259
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Calculate Free Energy Changes Due to aa Substitution

  • Statistical Mechanics
  • Details associated with thermodynamic integration
  • Hess’s Law: ∆∆G=∆G42 - ∆G31 = ∆G43 - ∆G21
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Thermodynamic Integration

  • Free energy changes calculated from

simulations by exact formula:

  • Some details associated with endpoints of

this integration (e.g. Einstein crystals)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

∆∆G Values

  • Tables of values

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Average ∆∆G Values

  • Charge is disruptive
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Substitutions 1968-1975

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Modeling Viral Dynamics

  • Viral dynamics for some early substitutions

1970-1973

  • Mutation rate from observation
  • Fitness proportional to ∆∆G
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Stochastic Model of Influenza Spread and Evolution

  • Global Hierarchical Scale Free

Network

  • Human distribution
  • Worldwide air transportation
  • Person to person contact

within city

  • Virus Transmission & Evolution
  • Contact based transmission
  • Evolution derived by mutation
  • H. Zhou, R. Pophale, and M. W. Deem, ``Computer-Assisted Vaccine Design,''

in Influenza: Molecular Virology, Horizon Scientific Press (2009)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Human Distribution

  • N=10 Groups (≈10³

Persons/Group)

  • Max=13,000 Groups/Cities

(12,778,721,Mumbai,India); Min=60 Groups/Cities (60,006, Evosmo,Greece)

  • Distributed in around 4,000 cities
  • P(k) k-2.2

(G., Zipf, “Human Behavior and the principle of last effort”, 1949) http://www.mongabay.com/cities_pop_01.htm

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Human Distribution

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Worldwide Air Transportation

  • Max=4000 Flights/City/Day (R.

Guimera et al., PNAS, 2005)

Min=1 Flights/City/Day

  • N=60,000 Flights/Day

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_alliance)

Npred = 60,937 from model

  • Assume Flights Contact Map:

P(k) k-2.01

(R. Guimera et al., PNAS, 2005)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Worldwide Air Transportation

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Within City Network

  • Group to Group Contact: Min=1
  • P(k) k-2.8

(Stephen Eubank et al., Nature, 2005)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Model Prediction

  • FluNet Database (Isolates)
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Model Prediction

  • Simulation & FluNet Data Comparison
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Reproductive Ratio

  • R0 should be a prediction of the model, not an

input

  • R0 is time dependent
  • R0 is spatially dependent
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Viral Diversity

  • Quantify viral diversity and

expected vaccine efficacy

  • Expect more diversity late

in the season

  • Because pressure to

evolve exists only as virus is being eradicated

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Mitigation Strategies for Flu Pandemics

  • Quantify expected vaccine efficacy, 2 initial strains
  • Different percentages of population vaccinated
  • Vaccination at different days
  • Single-component or multi-component vaccine
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Risk Analysis: Population at Risk (PaR)

  • PaR: The fraction of the population that will

be infected in a X% of worst-case epidemic

  • Depends on vaccination strategy
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Clustering to Detect Strains

  • Standard dimensional scaling (CMDSCALE)
  • Project sequence to best 2 dimensions
  • Kernel density estimation

#12: A/Texas/05/2009 #28: A/New York/19/2009

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Protein distance map of swine flu

  • Kernel density estimation estimates the probability density function

from protein distance map and it shows the density of influenza in sequence space

Protein distance map Kernel density estimation

A/Texas/05

A/New York/19

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Criteria for New Strains

  • Criteria

– New strain is in cluster found by kernel density estimation – pepitope between new cluster and current dominant strain cluster is larger than size of new cluster

  • For novel A/H1N1(2009), there is no

new strain as of mid-2010

slide-51
SLIDE 51

British Columbia H3N2

  • A/British

Columbia/RV1222/2009 appeared 15 March 2009.

  • CDC did not consider it a

new strain until 24 July 2009

  • Our method can detect it

at end of March 2009

  • 20-30% of some South

American epidemics were this strain this year

slide-52
SLIDE 52

A/Fujian H3N2

  • Became

dominant in 2003/2004

  • We detect by

end of 2001/2002

slide-53
SLIDE 53

A/California H3N2

  • We detect at

end of 2003/2004 season

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Systematic Summary

  • Over past 15 years of H3N2
slide-55
SLIDE 55

Dengue Fever

  • The most important vector borne human virus Clin. Microbiol.
  • Rev. 11 (1998) 480; PNAS 96 (1999) 7352; Rev. Med. Virol. 11 (2001) 301; BMJ 324 (2002)

1563; Emer Themes Epidemiol. 2 (2005) 1

  • The most important mosquito-borne virus in 2005 (CDC,

WHO)

  • Transmitted by Aedes aegypti and
  • A. albopictus mosquitos
  • 2.5 Billion people live in 100 countries affected
  • 50-100 million people infected each year
  • 500 000 cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever
  • 24 000 yearly human mortality
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Dengue fever: Immunodominance

  • 4 serotypes of dengue fever, 1 conservative mutation

between each pair of strains

  • Most important vector-borne human virus
  • Immunodominance inhibits tetravalent vaccine

Rothman et al., Vaccine 19 (2001) 4694 Park and Deem, Physica A 341 (2004) 455 Zhou and Deem, Vaccine 24 (2006) 2451

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Multisite Vaccination

  • Humans have hundreds of lymph

nodes

  • T cells take 4-5 days to leave

lymph nodes in large numbers

  • Vaccination so that antigen is

presented in physiologically distinct lymph nodes

  • 2-4x improvement in uniformity
  • f response
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Experimental Verification

  • Two studies investigated the diversity of a CD8T cell response to a

mixture of HIV epitopes.

  • In [1], mice were immunized with a mixture of AL11 and KV9 Db-

restricted HIV epitopes. Injection to the same site resulted in a specific response to the KV9 epitope. Anatomic separation between injection sites resulted in a response against both epitopes.

  • In [2], whether a broad CD8 T cell response recognizing multiple HIV-1

clades could be induced by a multi-component vaccine was assessed in mice. Single-clade A, B, and C vaccines generated limited cross- clade reactivity. Combining the three clades into one vaccine resulted in a reduced breadth of response due to immunodominance. Simultaneous administration of individual clade-specific vaccines into anatomically distinct sites on the body alleviated immunodominance and increased the number of epitopes recognized by the T cell response.

  • In [3], a broader immune response to the 4-component vaccine was

generated in moneys by multi-site than by single-site vaccination

  • Sanofi-Pasteur dengue vaccine [4].
  • 1) J. Virol., 80:11991–11997, 2006.
  • 2) Eur. J. Immunol., 37:1–12, 2007.
  • 3) AJTMH, 80:302-311, 2009.
  • 4) US patent #7,718,358
slide-59
SLIDE 59

CRISPR

  • Discovered in 1987 in E. Coli, J Bacteriol 169 (12): 5429–33
  • Found in other species, 2002, Mol Microbiol 43 (6): 1565–75
  • 40% of bacteria
  • 90% of archaea
  • Spacers found to match

phage, noticed increased polymorphism toward leader

  • crRNA from spacers silences

exogenous genes

  • Immune system
  • Gene knockdown

Science, 327 (2010) 167

(Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)

slide-60
SLIDE 60

The Spacers

  • Typical repeat in S. thermophilus CRISPR1
  • Hairpin repeats
slide-61
SLIDE 61

Dynamics

  • Five types of events
slide-62
SLIDE 62

First Model

  • 2 spacers
  • Infinite population (mean field)
  • Definitions

vk = population of viruses with spacer k xij = population of bacteria with spacers i,j

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Prediction from Model

  • Generalizes 2-spacer

model – Mutation, ε = 0.01 – 30 spacers – Random deletion – r = 0.05 – n = 10, 150 phage strains, logarithmic

  • Diversity decreases with

leader distance

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Experimental Result 1

  • Diversity of spacers of 124 strains of S. Thermophilus
  • Theoretical modeling consistent with experiment results
  • J. Bacteriol., 190 (2008) 1401
  • J. He, M.W. Deem, PRL, 105 (2010)128102
slide-65
SLIDE 65

Conclusions

  • H1N1 vaccine efficacy generally superior to H3N2
  • pepitope measure of antigenic distance is a useful

tool for vaccine design

  • Incipient novel dominant strains can be detected

early with multidimensional scaling and kernel density estimation

  • Multi-site vaccination for dengue fever appears to

alleviate immunodominance