Philippine eGovernment Interoperability Framework (PeGIF) Initiative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Philippine eGovernment Interoperability Framework (PeGIF) Initiative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Philippine eGovernment Interoperability Framework (PeGIF) Initiative Al Alegre/FMA | DOST-ICT Of Al Alegre/FMA | DOST-ICT Offi fice ce Oct 2013 ROADMAP Introduction to eGov Interoperability Introduction to eGov Interoperability 1. 1.
ROADMAP
1. 1.
Introduction to eGov Interoperability Introduction to eGov Interoperability
q
Technical Technical
q
Informational/Semantic Informational/Semantic
q
Operational Operational
2. 2.
Standards Selection & Interoperability Standards Selection & Interoperability
3. 3.
The The PeGIF PeGIF Initiative Initiative
- 1. Introduction to Govt Interoperability
interoperability
e-government interoperability e-government interoperability, in its broad sense, is , in its broad sense, is the ability
the ability
- f constituencies to work together.
- f constituencies to work together.
- It is the ability of two or more diverse government
It is the ability of two or more diverse government information systems or components to information systems or components to meaningfully and meaningfully and seamlessly exchange data & information, (interpret and) use seamlessly exchange data & information, (interpret and) use the information that has been exchanged the information that has been exchanged.
. [UNDP 2007]
- the ability of ICT systems, and of the
the ability of ICT systems, and of the business processes they business processes they support support, , to exchange to exchange data data and to enable the sharing of and to enable the sharing of information and knowledge information and knowledge. . [European Commission 2004] INTEROPERABILITY IS KEY TO E-GOVERNMENT
- `
interoperability
The e ability y to
- exchange
e & & reuse e government t data a & & information n in a uniform and ef in a uniform and effi ficient manner cient manner across multiple ICT systems and agencies. across multiple ICT systems and agencies. INTEROPERABILITY IS KEY TO E-GOVERNMENT Increased EFFICIENCY in govt services Improved govt DECISION-MAKING REDUCED COSTS/ increased govt savings Enhanced ability to INTEROPERATE with other nations CITIZEN SATISFACTION in transacting with govt
Interoperability Goals
l Data Exchange >> Standards
Data Exchange >> Standards
l Meaning Exchange
Meaning Exchange
l Process Agreement
Process Agreement
Interoperability Levels
l Technical (Syntax)
Technical (Syntax)
l Information (Semantics)
Information (Semantics)
l Organizational (Pragmatics)
Organizational (Pragmatics)
Technical
Data Exchange
Informational
Meaning Exchange
Organizational
Process Agreement Systems can participate Systems can participate in multi-organizational in multi-organizational business processes business processes Systems can exchange Systems can exchange meaningful data meaningful data (“semantic”) (“semantic”) Systems can exchange Systems can exchange data (incl “syntactic”: data (incl “syntactic”: data structure/format) data structure/format)
Govt Enterprise Architecture
1.1 Addressing Technical Interoperability
Technical interoperability has multiple layers, e.g.: Technical interoperability has multiple layers, e.g.:
l Interconnection
Interconnection: Covers standards related to networks and system
- development. This layer enables communications between systems.
(e.g., TCP/IP…)
l Data integration:
Data integration: Contains standards for the description of data
that enables exchange between disparate systems. (e.g., information
exchanges – disaster response, health, etc)
l Information access and presentation
Information access and presentation: Refers to the
presentation of data to the user in the various means of access to e- government services. (e.g., document, video, audio, security…)
l Content management and metadata
Content management and metadata: Pertains to the standards
for retrieving and managing government information.
1.1 Addressing Technical Interoperability
l Technology Standards Catalogue/s
Technology Standards Catalogue/s
l Use of Open Standards
Use of Open Standards
l Understanding the Limitations of Standards
Understanding the Limitations of Standards
- Technology standards will not guarantee semantic or
- rganizational interoperability: need separate consensus-building
- Periodic review & updating: Standards evolve, can become
unstable or irrelevant, and can conflict with other standards
1.2 Addressing Informational Interoperability
Public service providers have to agree on Public service providers have to agree on characteristics of the characteristics of the data data to be exchanged, the to be exchanged, the data structure data structure, and , and data attributes data attributes such as such as
l units
units (e.g., metric versus imperial units) (e.g., metric versus imperial units)
l validity
validity (e.g., health insurance-related information is valid only if the (e.g., health insurance-related information is valid only if the age of the person is greater than 65) age of the person is greater than 65)
l time period
time period (e.g., a policy may not apply if an event occurred during (e.g., a policy may not apply if an event occurred during a certain period of time) a certain period of time)
1.2 Addressing Information Interoperability
l Stakeholders typically go through discussion, negotiation
and consensus-building.
l Common approach to building this consensus:
Construct an ontology or set of ontologies
- ntology or set of ontologies, which are basically data
data models models that define the data items that are exchanged—including the exact exact meaning and structure meaning and structure assigned to them assigned to them—and the relationships between data items relationships between data items. e.g. Public Finance: Unified Account Code System (UACS) DOF, DBM, COA
PeGIF will suggest a PROCESS for this to happen
- esp. within the sectoral/thematic clusters
1.3 Addressing Organizational Interoperability
l public service providers have to agree on not only what
information is exchanged, when it is exchanged, and how it is exchanged but also what to do with it when it is
- exchanged. >> BUSINESS PROCESSES
l Common methods, processes, services for collaboration:
workflow, decision-making, business transactions… Shared Services, e.g., > iGovPhil: PKI, govmail, govcloud, NARMIS…. Sectoral, e.g., > health: PHIE > records archiving: NAP-SIAP digitization
- 2. Standards Selection
Standard Selection Criteria
- Enhancing Data Exchange
Enhancing Data Exchange
- Promoting Openness
Promoting Openness
- Conforming with International Practices
Conforming with International Practices
- Adapting to Scale
Adapting to Scale
- Existing Market Support
Existing Market Support
Preference will be given to open standards.
However:
- where no such Open Data specifications exist;
- where these are not appropriate; or
- products supporting the open standard are neither available, mature nor
widely-used;
Other standards may be considered provided that
- such standards are developed by an industry organization or association,
- is widely-used and implemented in multiple products and supported by
different vendors; and
- are made available under fair and non-discriminatory terms for free or
with royalty fees.
On the selection of standards: CATALOGUE
An OPEN STANDARD, as used in the context of this framework, is defined as a set of technical specifications published by formal standard-setting organizations using an open decision-making process which are made generally available to the public on royalty-free terms without any restrictions as to its use or redistribution
- f any of its implementations.
The actual written specifications must be available for free or for a nominal fee.
What is an Open Standard?
- 3. The Phil. eGovt Interoperability
Framework (PGIF) Task Force
The PGIF Initiative
- Philippine eGovernment Interoperability Framework
Philippine eGovernment Interoperability Framework (PGIF) (PGIF): standards and processes standards and processes to guide and govern the technical and informational interoperability technical and informational interoperability of government.
- The PGIF will include common standards
common standards for inter- connection, data & information discovery, exchange and presentation, particularly for shared operations and services shared operations and services
- f the Philippine government
- f the Philippine government—between and among its
various agencies, as well as these agencies with their various constituencies
- INITIALLY: Technical IF + Data Catalogue &
Informational IF process (timetable: December 2013; mandaroty
review after 1 year, and periodically after every 2 yrs)
The PGIF Initiative
PGIF Task Force PGIF Task Force
Chair Chair: Dir. Denis F. Villorente (DOST) Co-Chair Co-Chair: Dr. Emmanuel C. Lallana (ideacorp) From Government From Government
- USec Richard Moya (DBM)
- Ms Crispinita Valdez/
- Ms. Jovita Aragona (DoH)
- Mr. Rage Callao (DOST-ASTI)
- Mr. Rage Callao (DOST-ASTI)
- Mr. Jonathan Cuevas (OP)
- Ms. Maria Teresa Garcia (DBM)
- Mr. Bayani Lara (ASTI)
- Ms. Angelica Sarmiento (DOF)
From the Non-Government Sector From the Non-Government Sector
- Dr. William Yu (ADMU)
- Dr. William Yu (ADMU)
- Dr. Rommel Feria (UP Dil)
- Dr. Alvin Marcelo (UP Mla)
- Dr. Sherwin Ona (DLSU)
- Dr. Arnulfo Azcarraga (DLSU)
- Mr. Clarito Magsino (CIOFF)
- Mr. Paul Prantilla (chikka)
- Mr. Raymond Nunez (UP Dil)
- Mr. Alan G. Alegre (FMA)
The PGIF Initiative
CURRENT STATUS (Oct 2013) CURRENT STATUS (Oct 2013) DRAFT DRAFT PeGIF PeGIF (ver 0.5.1) & Standards Catalogue
- Technical Interoperability Framework
+ PH Govt Data Standards Catalogue Process for achieving Informational Operability: SECTORAL > via MITHI clusters ++ > SECURITY will be cross-cutting > Orientation to documenting GOOD PRACTICE & best use cases Online Consultations: Online Consultations: wiki/blog site for public comments wiki/blog site for public comments
The PGIF Initiative
CURRENT STATUS (Oct 2013) CURRENT STATUS (Oct 2013)
- F2F Stakeholders Consultations
F2F Stakeholders Consultations (Nov-Dec) (Nov-Dec)
- NCR: Stakeholders
> CIOF (25 Oct) > ITAP ++ (5 Nov) > MITHI (6 Nov) > eHealth Summit (28 Nov) > NCR Public Consultation (1st wk Dec)
- Regional Clusters:
> Baguio (12 Nov) > Cebu? or Iloilo (18 Nov) > Davao (25 Nov)
The PGIF Initiative
NEXT STEPS (2014) NEXT STEPS (2014)
- Issuance
Issuance (December/January)
- MC (a la MITHI)? AO? or EO?
- Implementation (2014)
Implementation (2014)
- Harmonization with existing plans & initiatives
- Compliance Framework + Institutionalization
- Governance: Successor body to PGIF TF
Integration into new ICTO structure
The PGIF Initiative
- “HARMONIZATION” with other plans & initiatives
“HARMONIZATION” with other plans & initiatives
- NEDA: Phil Development Plan
- eGovernment Master Plan (EGMP) & Philippine Digital
Strategy
- GPPB & ICTO: ICT Procurement
- DTI: BPS Coordination
- Sectoral:
- Phil Health Interoperability Exchange (PHIE w DOH)
- Public Finance Cluster (e.g., UACS)
- Other MITHI clusters: leadership & policy/tech support