SLIDE 6 12/8/2017 6
TDF & SOF/LDV
– LDV inhibits efflux transporters (P‐gp & BCRP) leading to ↑TFV exposure – In vitro, SOF/LDV increase TFV absorption
- ↑TFV not been shown to be clinically significant. Options:
– Switch to TAF (especially if preexisting renal dysfunction) – Monitor renal function more closely if continue TDF
German P, et al. Abstract O_06. 15th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV and Hepatitis Therapy. 2014; Washington, DC. / German P, et al. Abstract 82. 22nd CROI. 2015; Seattle, WA. / Mathias A. 16th International Workshop
- n Clinical Pharmacology of HIV and Hepatitis Therapy. 2015; Washington, DC.
ARV TFV PK INSTI
- TFV AUC ↑1.7‐fold in DTG+TDF/FTC
NNRTI
- TFV AUC ↑98% in EFV/TDF/FTC
- TFV AUC ↑40% in RPV/TDF/FTC
PI/r
- TFV AUC ↑50% in DRV/r+TDF/FTC
- Unchanged with 12‐hour staggering of dose
AUC: area under the concentration drug concentration‐time curve; DRV: darunavir; FTC: emtricitabine; PK: pharmacokinetics; r: ritonavir; TDF: tenofovir
TAF & SOF/LDV
SOF/LDV does not significantly impact TAF or TFV PK
Custodio JM, et al. IDSA/IDWeek 2015; San Diego, CA.
Side Note: SOF/VEL + TDF or TAF
- SOF/VEL + TDF: increased TFV AUC by 20‐81%
– Recommend: monitor renal function or change TDF
- SOF/VEL + TAF: no clinically significant impact on TFV
Mogalian E, Luetkemeyer A, et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa.
Summary: SOF/LDV‐ARV Interactions
Drug Class Drug Name Recommendation NNRTIs EFV, ETR, NVP, RPV No dose adjustments needed PIs ATV/r, DRV/r, LPV/r No dose adjustments needed TPV Not recommended InSTI ELV/c Monitor for TDF‐associated renal dysfunction COBI levels ↑ (possible ↑AEs) DTG, RAL No dose adjustments needed N(t)RTI TDF+EFV Monitor for TDF‐associated renal dysfunction TDF+ (ATV/r or DRV/r
↑TDF concentraons. Consider alternave therapy; monitor for TDF‐associated renal dysfunction TAF No dose adjustments needed 3TC, ABC, FTC, ZDV No dose adjustments needed CCR5 Inhibitor MVC No data
Only DAA compatible with EFV (& likely with ETR)