petar kesic trac
play

Petar Kesic TRAC Summer 2017 Cooling of CMS Detectors CMS C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Petar Kesic TRAC Summer 2017 Cooling of CMS Detectors CMS C ompact M uon S olenoid A general purpose detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. One of 4 detection points around the LHC. Acts like a camera (which


  1. Petar Kesic 
 TRAC Summer 2017

  2. Cooling of CMS Detectors

  3. CMS • C ompact M uon S olenoid • A general purpose detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. • One of 4 detection points around the LHC. • Acts like a camera (which detects photons) taking 3D “photographs” of particle collisions and recreating images of the collisions.

  4. Inner / Silicon / Pixel Trackers High Granularity Calorimeters

  5. • Detectors heat up because of energy released during detection and the operation of the electronic components. • In order to improve operation and prevent damage, it is necessary to transfer heat away from the components. • For performance and environmental reasons, CO2 has been chosen as the primary coolant. • The detector components are mounted on planks with CO2 cooling tubes embedded and then placed into the CMS. • It is necessary to keep the density and thickness of the planks low so that particles may continue to detectors which are farther away. • This poses certain design challenges. • Low density and thickness usually means lower strength, so a high strength material is needed. • Low density usually means poor heat transfer, so a material with exceptional heat transfer capability was needed. • Carbon fiber and carbon foam were chosen as the plank material because of their superior strength to density ratios and excellent heat transfer capabilities.

  6. Performance of CO 2 and Carbon Fiber / Foam Planks • Why are we testing? • To assure that components are able to stay within acceptable operating temperatures when • the system is operating under standard conditions. • the system is operating outside of standard operating conditions. • What parameters are we looking at? • Delta T, Delta P , CO 2 Phase Changes, Thermal Runaway, etc.

  7. CO 2 Phase Diagram

  8. Different Detectors • Flat Barrel / PS Modules • 2S • HG Calorimeter

  9. Flat Barrel

  10. Power Calculations

  11. 2S

  12. HG Calorimeter

  13. HG Calorimeter Testing • Assisted Maral Alyari • Goal: Test the two phase CO2 cooling performance of FH cassette tubing with capillary at various angles around the beam pipe. • Stainless steel tubes are sandwiched between 4 layers of insulation foam. • CO2 temperature is monitored by RTDs placed on the tubing. • Voltage is applied to stainless steel tubing to mimic the heat load on the tubing. • Tubing acts as a heater. • The flow is monitored by a flowmeter placed at the inlet. • Two pressure transmitters are placed at the inlet and the outlet. • Attempted to cool various heat loads with minimum possible flow and lowest possible Δ P . • Data is analyzed by calibrating the RTD measurements to read the same temperature as the return CO 2 at 0 Watts.

  14. 270 deg. 0 deg.

  15. Some HG Cal / CO 2 Results 00000 00000

  16. Some HG Cal / CO 2 Results

  17. 2S Testing • Assisted Kirstyn Carlson • Goal: Test the water and ethylene glycol cooling performance of 2S Module. • Coolant is run through aluminum support structure. • Coolant temperature is monitored by RTDs placed at various locations on the module. • Voltage is applied to resistive heaters to mimic the heat load. • Attempted to cool various heat loads with minimum possible flow and lowest possible Δ P . • Data is analyzed by calibrating the RTD measurements to read the same temperature as the return fluid at 0 Watts.

  18. Some 2S Data / Ethylene Glycol Cooling

  19. FB / PS Modules Testing • Assisted Stefan Gruenendahl • Goal: Test the CO 2 cooling performance of FB Modules. • CO 2 is run through stainless steel tubing sandwiched in carbon fiber foam and sheets. • CO2 temperature is monitored by RTDs placed on the modules. • Voltage is applied to resistive heaters to mimic the heat loTubing acts as a heater. • The flow is monitored by a flowmeter placed at the inlet. • Attempted to cool various heat loads with minimum possible flow and lowest possible Δ P . • Data is analyzed by calibrating the RTD measurements to read the same temperature as the return CO 2 at 0 Watts.

  20. FB / Modules on Plank

  21. Some FB / Co 2 Cooling Results

  22. Interactions / Meetings / Workshops / Lectures • Interactions with Fermilab personnel. • Interactions with other teachers. • Workshops • Lectures • Tours

  23. Back-To-School • What can I take back to my students? • Personal growth. • “Real world” applications. • Ideas for lectures and demonstrations. • Inspiration to integrate particle physics into curriculum.

  24. Acknowledgements • Special thanks to: • Stefan Gruenendahl • Maral Alyari • Kirstyn Carlson • Harry Cheung • and many others

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend