People Movement Modeling Capabilities and Expansion of Current - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

people movement modeling capabilities and expansion of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

People Movement Modeling Capabilities and Expansion of Current - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

People Movement Modeling Capabilities and Expansion of Current Models for Broader and More Robust Uses Fire and Evacuation Modelling Technical Conference 2016 Jennifer Wiley Michael Ferreira Steven Strege Agenda Background


slide-1
SLIDE 1

People Movement Modeling – Capabilities and Expansion of Current Models for Broader and More Robust Uses Fire and Evacuation Modelling Technical Conference 2016

Jennifer Wiley Michael Ferreira Steven Strege

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Background
  • Current Capabilities
  • Non-Traditional Uses

Agenda

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • People movement models traditionally

developed for evacuation in emergencies, especially fire

  • Needs and interest in non-traditional

applications have grown with the models

  • Expansion of uses increases

functionality for existing building models Background

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Typical evacuation analysis:
  • Build geometry
  • Populate model
  • Occupants proceed to exit (sometimes

with intermediate tasks)

Current Capabilities

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • In general, primary goal is to exit
  • Typically, some level of omniscience is

inherent

  • Routes
  • Relative travel distance
  • Locked/unlocked status of doors

Current Capabilities

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Ingress into buildings or facilities with

entrance procedures (security, ticketing) may incur significant delays Ingress and Security

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • People movement models can be

used to:

  • Determine maximum arrival rate without

congestion

  • Identify limiting factors (e.g., screening

equipment, elevators)

  • Assess alternate approaches,

arrangements, or equipment

Ingress and Security

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Ingress into high-

rise building

  •  Street Entrance

 Lobby  Badge Scan/ Turnstiles  Elevators

Ingress and Security

8

Elevators Street Entrance Elevators Turnstiles

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Ingress and Security

9

  • Queuing at Elevators
  • Accumulated usage
slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Alternate turnstile placement

Ingress and Security

10

Original Alternate

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Detailed study of ingress w/badge scan

and revolving door

  • Field observations and modeling
  • Lessons learned:
  • Card misread and door “kickback” led to

slower flow rates than manufacturer data

  • Bursts and lulls in arrivals important to
  • capture. Using averages may not be a

good representation.

Ingress and Security

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Existing models generally well-suited

to ingress

  • May require some “outside the box”

thinking

  • Potential adaptations (existing in some

models)

  • Turnstiles/ticket gates (fixed delay)
  • Source term for occupants
  • Final target/goal that is not an exit

Ingress and Security

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Exit signs are so ubiquitous as to

become easily overlooked “visual clutter” in emergencies

  • In response, new exit signs have been

developed that

  • Attract attention in emergencies
  • Provide dynamic information

Dynamic Signage

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Provides customized occupant egress

routing and way-finding during an emergency exit

  • Adjusts the egress path of occupants

to mitigate exposure to hazardous areas Dynamic Signage

14

Galea, et al., 2015

slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • People movement models used for

development and use of adaptive dynamic signage systems

  • For intelligent systems: provide faster-

than-real-time analysis for feedback to signs

  • For manually-controlled systems: run

many scenarios for guidance in anticipated events

Dynamic Signage

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Models used for intelligent adaptive

signage systems must be able to:

  • Receive/use information on the active

scenario (environmental sensors, etc)

  • Run faster than real time
  • Output results in a way that can be

interpreted and implemented

Dynamic Signage

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Existing models give
  • ccupants some level of
  • mniscience with respect to
  • Egress routes
  • Travel distances
  • Exit availability
  • May lead to a more

idealized or optimistic result

  • No backtracking
  • Reduced counterflow

Active Wayfinding

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

  • Redirection and signage limited in existing

models

  • Tends to require manual redirection
  • Full implementation requires dynamic

redirection or re-tasking

  • Receive information within the model from
  • Signage
  • Direct observation
  • Other occupants

Active Wayfinding

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Assisted Evacuation and Carrying Behavior

19

  • Traditional uses of models consider:
  • Individual or group (some models)

movement towards exit

  • Mobility impaired move more slowly and

may not use stairs

  • Mobility aides (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers)

increase size of occupants or not accounted for

slide-20
SLIDE 20

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Assisted Evacuation and Carrying Behavior

20

  • In practice, assisted evacuation results in:
  • Complex staff itineraries
  • Varying speeds
  • Increased counterflow
  • Altered movement patterns due to use of

mobility aides

  • Horizontal exiting or internal relocation
slide-21
SLIDE 21

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Assisted Evacuation and Carrying Behavior

21

  • When pushing a

bed/wheelchair or carrying large items, different shape/size profile affects:

  • Movement pattern
  • Queuing and door

throughput

  • Recent airport study:
  • Occupants w/roller bags

reduced flow rate through doors by 33%.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Assisted Evacuation and Carrying Behavior

22

  • Some existing models have a group

feature that could be adapted

  • May not be practical for multiple trips for a

single staff member

  • In the case of internal relocation, a final goal

that is not an exit may be needed

  • May be possible to force this behavior

indirectly with existing models

slide-23
SLIDE 23

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Assisted Evacuation and Carrying Behavior

23

  • New assisted evacuation function

currently under development for Pathfinder

Thunderhead Engineering, 2016

slide-24
SLIDE 24

www.jensenhughes.com Advancing the Science of Safety

Jennifer Wiley jwiley@jensenhughes.com www.jensenhughes.com

DISCUSSION

24