pender island an introduction into small scale composting
play

Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October 25 th , 2014: Resident Information Meeting A BETTER TOMORROW made possible Why should we compost? To demonstrate environmental stewardship Provide cost effective


  1. Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October 25 th , 2014: Resident Information Meeting A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  2. Why should we compost? • To demonstrate environmental stewardship • Provide cost effective organics management • Prepare waste for energy extraction (large scale) • Divert valuable resources from disposal in landfill or incinerator. (Compostable materials represent nearly 50% of the waste stream) A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  3. How does it work? • Organic materials are separated from waste stream • Ratios of carbon and nitrogen are adjusted to optimal level • Moisture level and particle size are adjusted • Naturally occurring microorganisms digest the organic matter, creating a stable product that improves soil condition A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  4. Types of composting Increasing complexity • Static piles • Turned windrows • Aerated static piles • Bays, beds and tunnels • In-vessel systems � A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  5. Static Piles • Rudimentary • Piles must be large enough to heat up, small enough to aerate by convection • No controls • Not recommended A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  6. Turned Windrows A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  7. Turned Windrows • Best suited for yard and garden waste • Can be at almost any scale • Small capital investment and low operating costs • Large land requirement • Most common option in North America • Currently used by City of Vancouver for residential yard waste A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  8. Aerated Static Piles • Applicable to a wider range of materials • Air is forced in or out with fans • Rate of air flow is often controlled by temperature or oxygen feedback • Capital costs are higher than windrow A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  9. Covered Aerated Static Piles • Covers reduce odours and energy requirements • Expanding usage in North America & well established in Europe A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  10. Bays, Beds and Tunnels • Usually inside • A variation on windrows • Good odour control Suitable for a wide • range of materials, including sewage sludge A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  11. In-Vessel Systems • Highest level of containment and control • Highest Operating and Capital Costs • Feedstock mixing is critical • High Complexity A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  12. How to Choose? • Costs • Public Acceptance � Capital � Ease of Siting � Operating � Reputation � Land Requirements � Proven Technology • Flexibility • Process Simplicity � Adaptable to seasonal � Process Duration variations � Front end processing � Ease of expansion A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  13. How to Choose? • Environmental Controls Product Marketability • � Leachate � Process Control � Odors � Product Quality � Vectors � Market Value of End Product • Feedstock Variability � Yard and Garden � Food Wastes � Bio-solids / Manures / Mortalities � Mixed MSW A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  14. Cost Comparison (Example) Static Turned Aerated Bays, In- Piles Windrows Static Beds, Vessel Piles Tunnels Capital Cost $0.5 $2 million $6 million $10 million $13 (excluding million million land) Operating Cost $15 $25 $30 $50 $50 Land Medium High Medium Medium Low requirement � Costs are based on a capacity of 20,000 tonnes per year A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  15. Typical Problems with In-Vessel Composting Technologies • System Complexity and Associated High Capital Costs A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  16. � ECF – $150MM Capital Cost (220,000 T/yr) ($10MM/yr operating costs) � High Capital Cost & complex maintenance systems A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  17. Typical Problems with In-Vessel Composting Technologies Cont’d • System Complexity and Associated High Capital Costs High maintenance on complex equipment in a • hostile environment & labor intensive operations. A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  18. Rotating Digester Drums (2 day retention) � Complex Mechanical Systems � Expensive High Wear Gears and Drive Shaft � Drum Seal Maintenance Issues A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  19. In-Vessel: Maintenance Concerns � Negative Aeration Pipe Clogging � Health and corrosion issues A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  20. Typical Problems with In-Vessel Composting Technologies Cont’d • System Complexity and Associated High Capital Costs (Development) High maintenance on complex equipment in a • hostile environment & labor intensive operations. Large Building Envelope with associated High • Operating Expenses and Site Disturbances (associated with very little operating experience on large plants) A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  21. In-Vessel Technology Review (options) • Ag-Bag Environmental Wright Tech Systems • Gore Cover Membrane System • A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  22. Ag-Bag: Equipment • Uses a plastic “Preferred Organic Digester” (POD) • POD includes � Aeration piping and sealing equipment � Controllable vents � Temperature probes � Starter inoculant • POD is loaded by a specially designed and sized hopper A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  23. Ag-Bag: Process A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  24. A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  25. A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  26. A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  27. Container Systems – Whistler, BC 15,000 tpa = $14 Million A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  28. Tunnel System – Hamilton, ON 60,000 tpa = $31.5 Million A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  29. Wright Environmental: Process • Fully enclosed flow-through tunnels made of stainless steel • Continuously-loading • Automatic material and tray/floor advancement • Oxygen and moisture levels controlled • Leachate re-circulated A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  30. Wright Environmental: Features • Short in-vessel retention time • Zero leachate discharge • Filtering of exhaust air • Modular design • Low energy, labour and maintenance costs • Production of a class A, B or C level compost • Can be modified to produce a renewable energy fuel should market conditions change A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  31. Wright Environmental - Squamish A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  32. Wright Environmental - Whistler A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  33. Other Sites – Technologies – Tour Opportunities � Comox Composting (Campbell River, BC) � ICC (Nanaimo, BC) A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  34. How does the Gore TM Cover System work? 1) Aeration Positive aeration � Small blowers � (2hp per pile) In-ground � channels Leachate removal � A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  35. Solutions to Odour Management • Over 97% reduction in odour concentrations without the need for a bio-filter and facility exhaust fan A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  36. Gore™ Cover ePTFE Laminate GORE TM Cover Laminate • 3-layer laminate • Designed for multiple applications • Various Input Materials A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  37. Gore Cover Composting Facilities Cedar Grove Composting Location: Everett, Washington Capacity: 160,000 ton/ year Food Waste / Green Waste Has successfully treated more than 1 Million tonnes of organics since opening A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  38. Small Scale - Proximity to Neighbors Fish Waste – Sunshine Coast Sechelt, BC A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  39. Sechelt Project Highlights • Various types and sizes of fish are mixed into the center a pile of recycled green waste A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  40. Sechelt Project Highlights • Fish Eggs • Large Pieces • Liquid Waste • Samples Taken A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  41. Green Jobs for Band Members • Currently Processing approximately 20 Tonnes of solid / liquid fish waste in each pile. • 12% – 15% mixture with green waste A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  42. Operational Challenges: Risk • Heavy Snowfall • Freezing Issues • Benefits include Green Jobs for Band Members A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  43. What is this all for? • Healthy Soil = Healthy Streams and Fish • Reclaim and heal mine lands / Community Gardens A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  44. Class “A” Compost Production • Grow food for the community • Food Security: An Issue of the future – especially in remote communities A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  45. Chemainus – Case Study (New In-Building Design) New Tube Frame Building 255’ x 72’ A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  46. Chemainus Project Location & Layout Gore Cover Process Facility Building Wood Waste buried on site Please Note: 100m Buffer to Hwy & Neighbors A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  47. Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights • Leachate and Storm Water Separated • Curbing around building A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  48. Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights • Seal of the building walls for bio-filter odour control A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  49. Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights • Install 1 Hp Blowers on exterior wall A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  50. Chemainus Biofilter and Ducting • 4 Air Exchanges / Hour • Focus on Mixing / Receiving Area A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend