Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pender island an introduction into small scale composting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October 25 th , 2014: Resident Information Meeting A BETTER TOMORROW made possible Why should we compost? To demonstrate environmental stewardship Provide cost effective


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Pender Island: An Introduction into Small Scale Composting October 25th, 2014: Resident Information Meeting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Why should we compost?

  • To demonstrate environmental stewardship
  • Provide cost effective organics management
  • Prepare waste for energy extraction (large scale)
  • Divert valuable resources from disposal in landfill or
  • incinerator. (Compostable materials represent nearly

50% of the waste stream)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

How does it work?

  • Organic materials are separated from waste

stream

  • Ratios of carbon and nitrogen are adjusted to
  • ptimal level
  • Moisture level and particle size are adjusted
  • Naturally occurring microorganisms digest the
  • rganic matter, creating a stable product that

improves soil condition

slide-4
SLIDE 4

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Types of composting

  • Static piles
  • Turned windrows
  • Aerated static piles
  • Bays, beds and tunnels
  • In-vessel systems
  • Increasing complexity
slide-5
SLIDE 5

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Static Piles

  • Rudimentary
  • Piles must be large enough to heat up, small

enough to aerate by convection

  • No controls
  • Not recommended
slide-6
SLIDE 6

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Turned Windrows

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Turned Windrows

  • Best suited for yard and garden waste
  • Can be at almost any scale
  • Small capital investment and low operating

costs

  • Large land requirement
  • Most common option in North America
  • Currently used by City of Vancouver for

residential yard waste

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Aerated Static Piles

  • Applicable to a wider range of materials
  • Air is forced in or out with fans
  • Rate of air flow is often controlled by

temperature or oxygen feedback

  • Capital costs are higher

than windrow

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Covered Aerated Static Piles

  • Covers reduce odours and energy

requirements

  • Expanding usage in North America & well

established in Europe

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Bays, Beds and Tunnels

  • Usually inside
  • A variation on windrows
  • Good odour control
  • Suitable for a wide

range of materials, including sewage sludge

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

In-Vessel Systems

  • Highest level of containment and control
  • Highest Operating and Capital Costs
  • Feedstock mixing is critical
  • High Complexity
slide-12
SLIDE 12

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

How to Choose?

  • Costs

Capital Operating Land Requirements

  • Flexibility

Adaptable to seasonal

variations

Ease of expansion

  • Public Acceptance

Ease of Siting Reputation Proven Technology

  • Process Simplicity

Process Duration Front end processing

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

How to Choose?

  • Environmental Controls

Leachate Odors Vectors

  • Feedstock Variability

Yard and Garden Food Wastes Bio-solids / Manures /

Mortalities

Mixed MSW

  • Product Marketability

Process Control Product Quality Market Value of End

Product

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Cost Comparison (Example)

Static Piles Turned Windrows Aerated Static Piles Bays, Beds, Tunnels In- Vessel

Capital Cost (excluding land) $0.5 million $2 million $6 million $10 million $13 million Operating Cost $15 $25 $30 $50 $50 Land requirement Medium High Medium Medium Low

Costs are based on a capacity of 20,000 tonnes per year

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Typical Problems with In-Vessel Composting Technologies

  • System Complexity and Associated High

Capital Costs

slide-16
SLIDE 16

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

High Capital Cost & complex maintenance systems

ECF – $150MM Capital Cost (220,000 T/yr)

($10MM/yr operating costs)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Typical Problems with In-Vessel Composting Technologies Cont’d

  • System Complexity and Associated High Capital

Costs

  • High maintenance on complex equipment in a

hostile environment & labor intensive operations.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Complex Mechanical Systems

Rotating Digester Drums (2 day retention)

Drum Seal Maintenance Issues Expensive High Wear Gears and Drive Shaft

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

In-Vessel: Maintenance Concerns

Negative Aeration Pipe Clogging Health and corrosion issues

slide-20
SLIDE 20

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  • System Complexity and Associated High Capital

Costs (Development)

  • Large Building Envelope with associated High

Operating Expenses and Site Disturbances (associated with very little operating experience on large plants)

Typical Problems with In-Vessel Composting Technologies Cont’d

  • High maintenance on complex equipment in a

hostile environment & labor intensive operations.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  • Ag-Bag Environmental
  • Wright Tech Systems
  • Gore Cover Membrane System

In-Vessel Technology Review (options)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Ag-Bag: Equipment

  • Uses a plastic “Preferred Organic Digester” (POD)
  • POD includes

Aeration piping and sealing equipment Controllable vents Temperature probes Starter inoculant

  • POD is loaded by a specially designed and sized

hopper

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Ag-Bag: Process

slide-24
SLIDE 24

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

slide-25
SLIDE 25

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

slide-27
SLIDE 27

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Container Systems – Whistler, BC 15,000 tpa = $14 Million

slide-28
SLIDE 28

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Tunnel System – Hamilton, ON 60,000 tpa = $31.5 Million

slide-29
SLIDE 29

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Wright Environmental: Process

  • Fully enclosed flow-through tunnels made of

stainless steel

  • Continuously-loading
  • Automatic material and tray/floor

advancement

  • Oxygen and moisture levels controlled
  • Leachate re-circulated
slide-30
SLIDE 30

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Wright Environmental: Features

  • Short in-vessel retention time
  • Zero leachate discharge
  • Filtering of exhaust air
  • Modular design
  • Low energy, labour and maintenance costs
  • Production of a class A, B or C level compost
  • Can be modified to produce a renewable

energy fuel should market conditions change

slide-31
SLIDE 31

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Wright Environmental - Squamish

slide-32
SLIDE 32

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Wright Environmental - Whistler

slide-33
SLIDE 33

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Other Sites – Technologies – Tour Opportunities

ICC (Nanaimo, BC) Comox Composting (Campbell River, BC)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

How does the GoreTM Cover System work?

1) Aeration

  • Positive aeration
  • Small blowers

(2hp per pile)

  • In-ground

channels

  • Leachate removal
slide-35
SLIDE 35

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  • Over 97%

reduction in

  • dour

concentrations without the need for a bio-filter and facility exhaust fan

Solutions to Odour Management

slide-36
SLIDE 36

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Gore™ Cover ePTFE Laminate

GORETM Cover Laminate

  • 3-layer laminate
  • Designed for multiple applications
  • Various Input Materials
slide-37
SLIDE 37

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Gore Cover Composting Facilities

Cedar Grove Composting Location: Everett, Washington Capacity: 160,000 ton/ year Food Waste / Green Waste Has successfully treated more than 1 Million tonnes

  • f organics since opening
slide-38
SLIDE 38

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Fish Waste – Sunshine Coast Sechelt, BC

Small Scale - Proximity to Neighbors

slide-39
SLIDE 39

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Sechelt Project Highlights

  • Various types

and sizes of fish are mixed into the center a pile

  • f recycled

green waste

slide-40
SLIDE 40

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Sechelt Project Highlights

  • Fish Eggs
  • Large Pieces
  • Liquid Waste
  • Samples Taken
slide-41
SLIDE 41

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Green Jobs for Band Members

  • Currently

Processing approximately 20 Tonnes of solid / liquid fish waste in each pile.

  • 12% – 15%

mixture with green waste

slide-42
SLIDE 42

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Operational Challenges: Risk

  • Heavy Snowfall
  • Freezing Issues
  • Benefits include

Green Jobs for Band Members

slide-43
SLIDE 43

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

What is this all for?

  • Healthy Soil =

Healthy Streams and Fish

  • Reclaim and

heal mine lands / Community Gardens

slide-44
SLIDE 44

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Class “A” Compost Production

  • Grow food for

the community

  • Food Security:

An Issue of the future – especially in remote communities

slide-45
SLIDE 45

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus – Case Study (New In-Building Design)

New Tube Frame Building 255’ x 72’

slide-46
SLIDE 46

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus Project Location & Layout

Gore Cover Process Facility Building Please Note: 100m Buffer to Hwy & Neighbors Wood Waste buried

  • n site
slide-47
SLIDE 47

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights

  • Leachate

and Storm Water Separated

  • Curbing

around building

slide-48
SLIDE 48

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights

  • Seal of the

building walls for bio-filter

  • dour control
slide-49
SLIDE 49

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights

  • Install 1 Hp

Blowers on exterior wall

slide-50
SLIDE 50

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus Biofilter and Ducting

  • 4 Air Exchanges

/ Hour

  • Focus on Mixing

/ Receiving Area

slide-51
SLIDE 51

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Chemainus Gore Cover Project Highlights

  • Capable of

treating approx. 6,000 - 8,000 tpa bio-solids / wood waste.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  • We need a solution that optimizes the Compost Process and

aggressively breaks down the most difficult organic wastes

  • We need Odor reduction > 90% compared to open windrow to

ensure safe environment for workers and neighbors

  • We need to provide an effective barrier against dust, weed seeds

and bacteria resulting in superior quality compost

  • We need a Simple & Flexible Technology which is Easy to

Construct and Expand

  • We need something which is Proven & Low Risk
  • Other suggestions from the Composting Advisory Committee

“Small-Scale” Composting Available to Small Communities (Pender): Options to Consider?

slide-53
SLIDE 53

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

Pender Island Project Details / Considerations

  • What are disposal costs

for organics currently? What are existing

  • ptions? (CRD @

$140/T)

  • Waste costs are

susceptible to impacts associated with low volumes

  • Localized participation

from Mayne, Saturna, Salt Spring & Galiano will minimize costs for all participants

slide-54
SLIDE 54

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  • Disposal costs are expected to continue to rise
  • Monthly fluctuations / likely participation rate (Bowen Is Above)

Pender Island Project Details / Considerations

slide-55
SLIDE 55

A BETTER TOMORROW made possible

  • Costs must be minimized for operation to be successful
  • Additional information is required before a project can be launched
  • Bowen Island Capital Cost Estimate was $350,000

Pender Island Project Details / Considerations

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Questions

MATEO OCEJO

P.Eng, LEED™ A.P.

CEL: 604.868.6075 EMAIL: mateo@netzerowaste.com