pathology in neurodegenerative disease Susan M Landau, PhD Helen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pathology in neurodegenerative disease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

pathology in neurodegenerative disease Susan M Landau, PhD Helen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PET neuroimaging approaches to characterizing underlying molecular pathology in neurodegenerative disease Susan M Landau, PhD Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Disclosures


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PET neuroimaging approaches to characterizing underlying molecular pathology in neurodegenerative disease

Susan M Landau, PhD Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cortexyme NeuroVision

Disclosures

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Detection of b-amyloid (Ab) and tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease Time course of changes Regional specificity NIA-AA Research Framework Practical considerations for PET in clinical trials Future imaging biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases a-synuclein, inflammation, synaptic density, vascular disease, TDP-43

Overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Age Related Neuropathology

b-amyloid plaques (Ab) Neurofibrillary Tangles (tau)

Ab plaques

A B C

NFTs

I/II III/IV V/VI

slide-5
SLIDE 5

In vivo Measurement of Ab and Tau with PET Imaging

Ab PET Imaging

e.g. [11C] PIB, [18F] florbetapir, [18F] florbetaben, [18F] flutemetamol

Fibrillar Ab Ab and tau Paired helical filament tau

Tau PET Imaging

e.g. [18F] flortaucipir (AV1451), [18F] MK-6240, [18F] GTP1, [18F] PI- 2620

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Alzheimer’s Disease Normal Aging (Amyloid Negative) Normal Aging (Amyloid Positive)

Ab PET imaging in aging and dementia

~30% of cognitively normal people in their 70s and above have substantial Ab accumulation by PET

slide-7
SLIDE 7

b-amyloid

Cognitive Decline and Dementia

Amyloid Hypothesis: AD Biomarker progression

Neurodegeneration: Tau pathology Synaptic dysfunction Metabolic decline Brain atrophy

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Regional specificity

Amyloid PET

Florbetapir SUVR: cortical sumary region mean/ whole cerebellum mean

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Frequency Florbetapir Cortical SUVR

Cortical Ab accumulation over the disease trajectory

32% florbetapir+ 35% florbetapir+ 48% florbetapir+ 65% florbetapir+ 86% florbetapir+

Normal Late MCI AD Total N=1064 Subjective Memory Complaint Early MCI

slide-10
SLIDE 10

La Joie et al. Alz & Dementia (in press)

Ab PET imaging – postmortem associations

Cortical Ab PET retention is highly associated with Ab plaques at autopsy in 179 diverse cases

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Elevated Ab predicts ADAS-cog decline in MCI and AD And in cognitively normal individuals In cognitively normal, Ab- individuals, negative but increasing Ab is associated with memory decline

Cortical Ab accumulation predicts cognitive decline

Landau et al Neurology 2016 Donohue et al JAMA 2017 Landau et al Neurology 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Villemagne et al. Lancet Neurol (2013) Jack et al. Neurology (2013)

  • 0.025

0.000 0.025 0.050 0.8 1.0 1.2 Florbetapir Cortical Summary SUVR Florbetapir SUVR annual change

Time course of changes

Rate of Aβ accumulation is not constant throughout the disease trajectory

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Regional specificity

Braak I/II Medial temporal Braak III/IV Inferolateral temporal/ limbic Braak V/VI Neocortical (extra-temporal)

Amyloid PET

Florbetapir SUVR: cortical sumary region mean/ whole cerebellum mean

Tau PET

Flortaucipir SUVRs: Braak stage-based region means/ cerebellar grey matter mean

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tau increases with impairment and elevated Ab

Medial temporal AV1451 Neocortical (extra-temporal) AV1451 Inferolateral temporal/limbic AV1451

Ab - Ab + Ab - Ab + Ab - Ab +

Unimpaired Impaired Unimpaired Impaired Unimpaired Impaired

slide-15
SLIDE 15

=

Higher tau is linked to poorer cognition for Ab+ individuals

Co-occurrence of Ab and tau are linked to cognitive decline

Ab- Ab+ Ab- Ab+

Higher tau is linked to retrospective cognitive decline in Ab+ individuals

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Jack et al. Alz & Dementia 2018

2018 NIA-AA Research Framework

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Jack et al. Alz & Dementia 2018

2018 NIA-AA Research Framework

Jack et al. Alz & Dementia 2018

Hippocampal Volume

FDG metaROI Ab PET

Abnormal (+) Abnormal (+)

Abnormal (+)

Normal (-) Normal (-)

Normal (-)

Distributions differ across A, T, N biomarkers Determining standardized cut-points for positivity is challenging

Abnormal (+) Normal (-)

Tau PET

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Medial temporal AV1451 Neocortical (extra-temporal) AV1451 Inferolateral temporal/limbic AV1451

Ab - Ab + Ab - Ab + Ab - Ab +

90% upper threshold of 141 Ab-normals

Unimpaired Impaired Unimpaired Impaired Unimpaired Impaired

19% 29%

Ab- High FTP Ab+ Low FTP Lowe et al. Brain 2018 Maass et al. NeuroImage 2017 Atypical/EOAD ADNI LOAD

Tau increases with impairment and elevated Ab

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Longitudinal tau PET

Jack et al. Brain 2018

Still early!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PET in Clinical Trials: Practical considerations

Cross-sectional PET (Subject selection) Longitudinal PET (Target Engagement)

Participant burden and cost Multiple PET scans (+ MRI?) Radiation exposure PET vs blood-based vs CSF markers Multisite studies Different scanners Different tracers Identification of intervention “sweet spot” (biomarker-specific) Scan cost Scanner changes Scan-rescan variability; Longitudinal changes are usually small Ligand-specific methodological challenges Determining a followup time period with adequate power (biomarker-specific)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Amyloid clearance

Klein et al. AAIC 2018 Baseline 3 months 6 months

LY3002813 (N3pG) Gantanerumab

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Jack et al. Alz & Dementia 2018

2018 NIA-AA Research Framework

Rabinovici et al Alz & Dem 2017

Beyond amyloid and tau

[A] Plasma or retinal amyloid [T] New tau PET ligands [N] Neurofilament light, Synaptic density ([C11] UCB-J) [V] Vascular disease [I] Inflammation [S] a-synuclein TDP-43

Biomarker targets in development

Jack et al. Alz & Dementia 2018

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Upcoming imaging biomarkers

Chen et al. JAMA Neurol 2018

Synaptic density with [11C] UCB-J

Parbo et al. Neurobiol Dis 2018

Neuroinflammation with [11C]–(R)-PK11195 PET markers of a-synuclein and TDP-43 in development

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cerebrovascular Disease Age Genetics (ApoE) Other pathology (a-synuclein, TDP-43)

b-amyloid

Cognitive Decline and Dementia Neurodegeneration: Tau pathology Synaptic dysfunction Metabolic decline Brain atrophy Lifestyle and environment

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Recent Ab and tau PET work has emphasized detection of earliest pathological AD changes, and associations with cognitive decline Research framework relies on amyloid [A], tau [T], and neurodegenerative [N] biomarkers to identify and stage AD pathological changes PET has been used successfully in clinical trials for participant selection and tracking of target engagement despite methodological challenges In vivo characterization of other comorbid pathology is a key developing area

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ADNI collaborators Michael Weiner Robert Koeppe Duygu Tosun Chester Mathis Eric Reiman Kewei Chen Leslie Shaw John Trojanowski Clifford Jack Danielle Harvey Laurel Beckett Andrew Saykin Paul Aisen Ronald Petersen Michael Donohue Arthur Toga Karen Crawford UC Berkeley Bill Jagust Suzanne Baker Deniz Korman Gil Rabinovici Renaud La Joie Tessa Harrison

ADNI sponsors

Thank you

ADNI participants & staff

slide-27
SLIDE 27

0.5 2.0 1.2

MCI: 80yo male Ab- (4 scans) ApoE4- CDR-sb=0.5 ADAS-cog=12 Braak III/IV = 1.72

Ab- High FTP

MCI: 78yo male Ab+ (4 scans) ApoE4- CDR-sb=1.0 ADAS-cog=6 Braak III/IV = 1.14

Ab+ Low FTP

MCI: 83yo male Ab+ (4 scans) ApoE4+ CDR-sb=1.5 ADAS-cog=9 Braak III/IV = 1.35

Ab+ Low FTP A B C

Example [18F] flortaucipir tau PET cases

slide-28
SLIDE 28

High vs low FTP groups

Inferolateral temporal/limbic AV1451

Unimpaired Impaired

Ab - Ab +

Non-AD dementia Possible AD with comorbid pathology Primary Age Related Tauopathy (PART) Typical MCI/AD

Low FTP High FTP Ab – (N=80) Ab + (N=71)

Non-AD dementia Possible AD with comorbid pathology Primary Age Related Tauopathy (PART) Typical MCI/AD

81% 29% 19% 71%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Flortaucipir is variable among impaired (MCI / AD) individuals

Schneider et al Brain 2016

Non-AD dementia Possible AD with comorbid pathology Primary Age Related Tauopathy (PART) Typical MCI/AD

Low FTP High FTP Ab – Ab +

Non-AD dementia Possible AD with comorbid pathology Primary Age Related Tauopathy (PART) Typical MCI/AD

81% 29% 19% 71%

  • Fewer AD-specific biomarker

characteristics

  • Mostly male
  • Cerebrovascular or TDP-43 pathology

may account for cognitive symptoms

(e.g. Schneider et al Brain 2016)

Understanding the characteristics of “atypical tau” individuals will be important for effective selection of participants for clinical trials of tau-modifying treatments

Greater hippocampal atrophy + hypometabolism supports a medial temporal predominant role that could be AD-independent

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Tau PET variability

Whitwell et al Ann Neurol 2018 Ossenkoppele et al JAMA 2018

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Ab- Ab+

Distribution of suprathreshold (>1.4 SUVR) voxels

10% 80% 50% % subjects with suprathreshold voxels

Unimpaired (N/SMC) Impaired (Early/Late MCI, AD)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Fan et al. Brain 2018

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Cons Consid iderable overla rlap p with thin in the he low tau au rang ange am among ind ndiv ivid iduals s acr acros

  • ss

s the he di dise sease sp spect ctrum (i (in n LOAD) D) Con Conversely ly, hi high gh ne neoc

  • cortic

tical tau au in n unim unimpair ired su subje bjects ts has has al also so be been n repo port rted (e (e.g.

  • g. Lowe et al
  • al. Br

Brain in 20 2018 18)  PART

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Medial temporal AV1451

Ab - Ab +

Resembles MAPT406W mutation pattern

slide-35
SLIDE 35

All Unimpaired (N/SMC) Entire AV1451 range p=0.04 “Normal” AV1451 range ns All Impaired (EMCI/LMCI/AD) Entire AV1451 range p<0.001 “Normal” AV1451 range ns

Ab- Ab+

FDG comparison

Impaired Ab+ : High inferotemporal/limbic FTP < Low FTP Impaired Ab- : High inferotemporal/limbic FTP < Low FTP

3.0 7.0 p<0.001 uncorr N=57 N=23 N=13 N=56

High vs low FTP group comparison