Parkinsons disease Stephen Lord Why are falls a problem? One in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

parkinson s disease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Parkinsons disease Stephen Lord Why are falls a problem? One in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fall prevention in people with Parkinsons disease Stephen Lord Why are falls a problem? One in three people 65 years and older living in the community fall at least once per year The rate is higher for people with Parkinsons


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Fall prevention in people with Parkinson’s disease

Stephen Lord

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why are falls a problem?

  • One in three people 65 years and older living

in the community fall at least once per year

  • The rate is higher for people with Parkinson’s

disease (50-60%)

  • Falls account for 4% of all hospital admissions

in people aged 65+

  • By 2051 one quarter of the Australian

population will be aged 65 years and over

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Consequences of falls

  • 10-15% of falls result in major injuries - soft tissue

damage, head trauma, dislocations and fractures

  • Reduced quality of life and independence- due to

disability, loss of confidence and activity restriction

  • Can result in need for residential aged care
  • Can result in death - more than 1000 people in Australia

each year

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Established fall risk factors in PD

  • Having had a fall in the past
  • Being concerned about falls
  • More PD symptoms – greater disease severity
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Loss of arm swing
  • More episodes of freezing
  • More stooped posture
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fall risk in Parkinson’s disease: What we have found so far

  • Reduced strength and power
  • Slower reaction time
  • Impaired executive functioning
  • Poorer controlled leaning balance
  • Less smooth walking pattern
  • Slow choice stepping reaction time
  • Impaired gait adaptability
  • Reduced ability to respond appropriately to

perturbations while standing or walking

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fall prevention in Parkinson’s disease

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Exercise interventions in PD

53% reduction in falls overall

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lancet 2016; 388: 1170–82

New approaches

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Methods

  • 202 participants assigned to either treadmill

training plus virtual reality or treadmill training alone

  • Both groups aimed to train three times per week

for 6 weeks, with each session lasting about 45 min and structured training progression individualised to the participant's level of performance

  • Stratified by subgroups: history of falls (109),

mild cognitive impairment (43), Parkinson’s disease (130)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Virtual Reality intervention

The Virtual Reality system consisted of a motion-capture camera and a computer-generated simulation projected on to a large screen, including challenges such as obstacles, multiple pathways, and distracters that required continual adjustment of steps.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Falls

  • 51% reduction in the PD participants
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Safe-PD

Voluntary and reactive step training in people with PD

  • 44 people with PD (> 40 years);
  • Community dwellers; idiopathic PD;
  • Exclusion criteria: visual, cognitive or other neurological impairments and

insufficient English skills

  • Randomised controlled trial ACTRN12618001515280

Aims: to examine the effects of combined voluntary and reactive step training

  • n:
  • Falls in the laboratory and stepping responses
  • Balance, gait and mobility
  • Neuropsychological function (i.e. cognitive performance)
  • Neural plasticity (i.e. changes in brain function assessed with fNIRS)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

The slipping tile The tripping board Damper Weight scale Safety harness Infrared cameras Ceiling rail Stepping tiles Metronome Control PC Foot detection sensor

Unpredictable trip and slip training

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TRIPS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SLIPS

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Home-based system

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Smart±Step Interventions

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Study progress

  • Recruitment completed May 2019
  • Study completed as of 20 September 2019
  • Dropout < 10%
  • Both interventions feasible and acceptable
  • Analysis underway
  • Trip and slip training may be better on a

programmable perturbation treadmill

slide-20
SLIDE 20

NHMRC application

– with everyday falls as the main outcome measure

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Thank you