Oxy-Fuel Combustion: Laboratory and Pilot Scale Experiments Plus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

oxy fuel combustion laboratory and pilot scale experiments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Oxy-Fuel Combustion: Laboratory and Pilot Scale Experiments Plus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oxy-Fuel Combustion: Laboratory and Pilot Scale Experiments Plus some initial calculations (Qiao)! E. J. Miklaszewski, Y. Zheng, L. Qiao and S. F. Son Department of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Oxy-Fuel Combustion: Laboratory and Pilot Scale Experiments

  • E. J. Miklaszewski, Y. Zheng, L. Qiao and S. F. Son

Department of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907

Plus some initial calculations (Qiao)!

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

2

 Oxy-fuel motivation  Laboratory Experiments  Initial Numerical Simulations  Pilot Scale Experiments  Continuing Work

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Oxy-fuel Motivation

 Clean Coal Options:

 Oxygen combustion (Oxyfuel)

 Concentrated CO2 in products

 Amine (or others) scrubbing for new or existing

plants

 Extracts the CO2 from the flue gas using a

regenerable sorbent-catalyst such as momoethanolamine (or MEA)

 More expensive by some estimates

 Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)

 Also concentrates CO2  Attractive approach, but challenges include

complexity of operation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

From R Gupta

Could be used in retrofit coal plants

Oxy-fuel Motivation

 Oxyfuel

 Pure oxygen as oxidizer (often

diluted with flue gas)

 Reduces or eliminates NOx (no

Nitrogen in oxidizer flow)

  • Increases CO2 concentration

– Easier to recover

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Oxy-coal is gaining momentum internationally

 Oxy-combustion boilers have been studied in laboratory  scale and small pilot units of up to 3 MW  Two larger pilot units at 30 MW are operating  Babcock & Wilcox (B&W), and Swedish power

company Vattenfall.

 An Australian-Japanese project team is pursuing a 30 MW

repowering project at the CS Energy’s Callide A station in Queensland, Australia

 “stands to benefit from developments in oxygen

separation such as membrane-based air separation technology, which could replace energy-intensive cryogenic process air separation technology”

 More work needed in this area!

5

“Advanced Coal Power Systems with CO2 Capture: EPRI’s CoalFleet for Tomorrow Vision”,A Summary of Technology Status and Research, Development, and Demonstra:ons, 1016877, Interim Report, Electric Power Research Ins:tute, September 2008

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Some key areas

  • Radiative Heat Transfer
  • More dominant heat transfer mode in boiler furnace
  • Non-gray body behavior (spectral dependence)
  • Temperature Measurements in Oxy-Fuel Boilers
  • Pilot scale
  • Above 3,000 K in Jupiter burner
  • Challenging to measure
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Laboratory Experiments - Objectives and Apparatus

7

Oxy-Coal Dust Cloud Combustion Experiment Configuration Objectives Document

  • Flame Speed
  • Spectral Radiation
  • Data for Models

Vary

  • Coal type
  • Particle size
  • Oxygen content
  • Diluent
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Laboratory Experiments - Objectives and Apparatus

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 10 100 1000 Volume (%) Particle Diameter (µm)

Further Classify Coal using Sieves:

  • >106 µm
  • 106 µm - 75 µm
  • 75 µm - 53 µm
  • 53 µm - 25 µm
  • < 25 µm

Coal Analysis

Coal Type

Indonesian Coal Illinois Basin #6

Coal Classification Bituminous (low sulfur, low ash) Bituminous Ultimate Analysis (%) Carbon 73.70% 68.30% Hydrogen 5.20% 5.00% Oxygen 18.80% 13.80% Nitrogen 1% 1.30% Sulfur 0.10% 3.50% Ash 1.30% 8.10% Typical Proximate Analysis (%) Moisture 16.12% 10.10% Ash 1.06% 7.30% Volatile 42.59% 35.90% Fixed Carbon 40.23% 46.70%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Flame Speed)

9

How Flame Speed was Obtained

Both cases: Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3 40% O2 and 60% CO2 Indonesian Coal

  • Less Sensitive to Human Error in choosing

effective diameter

y = 0.8179x - 9.8697 R² = 0.99599 y = 1.1597x - 6.9594 R² = 0.98979 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 Effectiv eDiameter (mm) Time After Ignition (ms)

Chart Title

Paricle Dia 25-53 micron

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Flame Speed)

10

Effect of Oxygen On Flame Speed

All cases: Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3 Particle Dia. – 25-53 µm Carbon Dioxide Diluent

60% O2 40% O2

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Flame Speed (m/s) O2 (% by Volume) Indonesian Coal Illinois Coal #6

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Flame Speed)

11

Effect of Particle Diameter On Flame Speed

All cases: Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3 40% O2 and 60% CO2

  • Dia. <25 µm Dia. 53-75 µm

Decrease in flame speed with smallest particle size can be attributed to:

  • Material Sticking to windows (leaner mixture)
  • Agglomerations (can be seen in videos)

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Flame Speed (m/s) Average Particle Diameter (microns) Indonesian Illinois Basin #6

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Flame Speed)

12

Effect of Diluent On Flame Speed

All cases: Particle Dia – 25-53 microns Indonesian Coal Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Flame Speed (m/s) O2 (% by Volume) Carbon Dioxide Nitrogen

Due to property differences between CO2 and N2.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Spectral)

13

  • Fast Infrared Array

Spectrometer (FIAS)

  • Portable
  • Staggered PbSe linear

array sensor cooled by TEC

  • 160 wavelengths from

1.4 to 4.8 um

  • Scan frequency: 6,250

Hz

  • Acquisition frequency:

1,320 Hz

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Spectral)

14

Test Specs: 40% CO2, 60% O2 Particle Dia – 25-53 microns Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3

ignition t = 40ms t = 20ms t = 30ms t = 10ms t = 160ms (Maximum Radiation)

0.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 20,000.00 25,000.00 30,000.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 Intensity (W/m2-sr-µm) Wavelength (µm) Ignition t=10ms t=20ms t=30ms t=40ms t=160ms (Max Specal Radiation)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Spectral)

15

Trends

  • Same General Shape
  • Carbon Dioxide
  • Combating factors of increase in temperature vs. increased radiative potential
  • Nitrogen
  • Increase in Intensity for increase O2 , decrease in Diameter
  • Peak at 2.7 microns for Water and CO2

0.0E+00 5.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.5E+04 2.0E+04 2.5E+04 3.0E+04 3.5E+04 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 Intensity (W/m2-sr-µm) Wavelength (µm) 30% O2 25-53 microns 40% O2 25-53 microns 40% O2 50-75 microns

Maximum Peaks for N2 Diluent

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Laboratory Experiments – Results (Spectral)

Test Specs: Fire Ball Diameter ~ 48mm CO2 Diluent Particle Dia – 25-53 microns Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3

50% O2 40% O2 60% O2

0.00E+00 2.00E+03 4.00E+03 6.00E+03 8.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.20E+04 1.40E+04 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Intensity (W/m2-sr-µm) Wavelength (microns) 40% Oxygen 50% Oxygen 60% Oxygen

Similar features in pilot scale measurements

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Laboratory Results – Experimental (Spectral)

17

0.0E+00 5.0E+03 1.0E+04 1.5E+04 2.0E+04 2.5E+04 3.0E+04 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 Intensity (W/m2-sr-µ m) Wavelength (µm) Indonesian Low Ash Illinois Coal #6

Test Specs: 40% O2, 60% CO2 Particle Dia – 25-53 microns Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Simulations (Qiao)

 We investigated the transient

combustion characteristics of a spherically symmetric cloud containing coal particles, as shown in Fig. 1.

 The cloud has a radius of R0. Coal

particles, with diameter dp and number density nP, are uniformly distributed in the cloud.

 The cloud is numerically ignited using a

hot spot.

  • The Three-Level Fully Implicit (TLFI) scheme of second-order accuracy was

applied to transient terms of the gas phase equations.

  • The convective and diffusive terms are discretized using QUICK scheme and

second order central difference, respectively.

  • The time dependent equations of particle phase were solved using a standard

ODE solver for stiff system, DVODE.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Assumptions

The transient combustion is modeled by conservation equations for mass, species and energy with detailed consideration of devolatilization, homogeneous gas phase reaction, heterogeneous char surface reaction, and radiative heat transfer. Assumptions: (1) Gas phase and particles are uniformly mixed in space; (2) The particles remain quiescent; (3) Coal particles are spherical of various sizes; (4) Each particle has uniform temperature because of its small size.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Temperature profile

Note:

  • 1. The above figure shows the transient gas-phase temperature

as a function of radius.

  • 2. The initial coal particle temperature is assumed to be room

temperature.

  • 3. This is for O2/CO2=30/70 case.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Flame Structure

Note:

  • 1. The above figure shows the species concentration profiles at 6 ms.
  • 2. This is for O2/CO2=30/70 case.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Experimental vs Theoretical Flame Speed

22

All cases: Cloud density - 0.539 kg/m3 Particle Dia. – 25-53 µm Carbon Dioxide Diluent Indonesian Coal

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Flame Speed (m/s) O2 (% by Volume) Experimental Indonesian Theoretical Indonesian

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Pilot Scale Experiments

23

From Jupiter Oxygen in Hammond Indiana Some funding from Jupiter Oxygen

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pilot Scale Experiments - Objectives

  • Measure spectral radiation intensities of a pilot-

scale oxy-fuel boiler at various locations (by Jupiter engineers)

  • Analyze measured radiation data
  • Estimate temperate profile at one cross-section
  • f the boiler furnace using inverse radiation

interpretation

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Pilot Scale Experiments - Objectives

  • The Pilot Scale Boiler
  • Doosan Backcock 23.4 MW boiler
  • Four Maxson 2.93 MW
  • Total heating rate during tests: < 8.79 MW
  • Test Matrix
  • HT oxy-natural gas without CO2 recycling
  • HT oxy-natural gas with CO2 recycling (blanket)*
  • LT oxy-natural gas with CO2 recycling (synthetic air)
  • Air firing natural gas
  • HT oxy-coal without CO2 recycling

25

* http://www.jupiteroxygen.com

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Wall Flame Front FIAS Burner Assembly

Spectral Measurement Configuration

Pilot Scale Experiments – Pilot Scale Apparatus

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The temperature profile was described as the following:

  • Assumed Temperature Profile and best fit to boundary conditions

and spectral data

  • First time this technique applied to coal and pilot scale

experiments

Pilot Scale Experiments – Inverse Flame Temperature Technique

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Pilot Scale Experiments – Results

Spectral Emissions of HT oxy-fuel w/o CO2 recirculation Spectral Emissions of HT oxy-fuel w/ CO2 recirculation Air-Fire Spectral Emissions LT oxy-fuel Spectral Emissions (Synthetic Air with FGR)

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Pilot Scale Experiments – Results

29

Jupiter Oxy-Coal Spectral Results More analysis needed NETL is using this data with modeling efforts there

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Pilot Scale Experiments – Results

Comparison of estimated

temperature profiles

  • Peak temperatures of HT
  • xy-fuel flames are MUCH

higher

  • Temperatures of LT oxy-

fuel air-firing flames are comparable

  • Gas temperature near the

wall of the HT oxy-fuel without FGR configuration is the highest

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Continuing Work

 Modify inverse temperature estimate code for

dust clouds

 Also, can take simulation results and calculate

radiant emission

 More comparisons with calculations

 About an hour for each simulation

 More spectral radiation analysis  Repeat some nitrogen tests  Do some tests with visible spectrometer  Prepare final report

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Future work?

 Would continue oxy-coal experiments with

significant modeling effort (Qiao)

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Future work?

 Diffusion HT burner

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Future work?

 Benchscale 150 kW burner

34

Also submitted white paper to DOE ARPA-E call

slide-35
SLIDE 35

We’d like to thank Prof. Timothee Pourpoint for use of his Matlab Code for analyzing the high-speed images. We thank Jupiter Oxygen engineers for gathering the data and providing pilot scale apparatus. In particular, we thank Brian Patrick and Steve Nied. We thank the Center for Coal Technology Research for funding under contract number 7-PSC-CTR-002. In particular, we thank Marty Irwin and Brian Bowen for their support of this work.

Acknowledgements

35