overview on geometries of shape spaces diffeomorphism
play

Overview on Geometries of Shape Spaces, Diffeomorphism Groups, and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overview on Geometries of Shape Spaces, Diffeomorphism Groups, and Spaces of Riemannian Metrics Peter W. Michor University of Vienna, Austria Workshop: Geometric Models in Vision Institut Henri Poincar e October 22-24, 2014 Based on


  1. Overview on Geometries of Shape Spaces, Diffeomorphism Groups, and Spaces of Riemannian Metrics Peter W. Michor University of Vienna, Austria Workshop: Geometric Models in Vision Institut Henri Poincar´ e October 22-24, 2014 Based on collaborations with: M. Bauer, M. Bruveris, P. Harms, D. Mumford

  2. ◮ A diagram of actions of diffeomorphism groups ◮ Riemannian geometries of spaces of immersions and shape spaces. ◮ A zoo of diffeomorphism groups on R n ◮ Right invariant Riemannian geometries on Diffeomorphism groups. ◮ Robust Infinite Dimensional Riemannian manifolds, Sobolev Metrics on Diffeomorphism Groups, and the Derived Geometry of Shape Spaces.

  3. � �� � � � � � � � A diagram of actions of diffeomorphism groups. r-acts l-acts Diff( M ) Imm( M , N ) Diff A ( N ) (LDDMM) r-acts l-acts needs ¯ g Diff( M ) (LDDMM) Met( M ) B i ( M , N ) Diff( M ,µ ) r-acts Diff( M ) needs ¯ g � � Vol 1 Met( M ) + ( M ) Met A ( N ) Diff( M ) M compact , N pssibly non-compact manifold Met( N ) = Γ( S 2 + T ∗ N ) space of all Riemann metrics on N ¯ g one Riemann metric on N Diff( M ) Lie group of all diffeos on compact mf M Diff A ( N ) , A ∈ { H ∞ , S , c } Lie group of diffeos of decay A to Id N Imm( M , N ) mf of all immersions M → N B i ( M , N ) = Imm / Diff( M ) shape space Vol 1 + ( M ) ⊂ Γ(vol( M )) space of positive smooth probability densities

  4. � � � � � � �� � � � � r-acts l-acts Diff( S 1 ) Imm( S 1 , R 2 ) Diff A ( R 2 ) (LDDMM) r-acts l-acts r-acts needs ¯ Diff( S 1 ) g (LDDMM) Vol + ( S 1 ) Met( S 1 ) B i ( S 1 , R 2 ) r-acts Diff( S 1 ) needs ¯ g � � � fd θ Vol + ( S 1 ) Met( S 1 ) = � R > 0 Met( R 2 ) � √ gd θ Diff( S 1 ) = Diff( S 1 ) Diff( S 1 ) Lie group of all diffeos on compact mf S 1 Diff A ( R 2 ) , A ∈ {B , H ∞ , S , c } Lie group of diffeos of decay A to Id R 2 mf of all immersions S 1 → R 2 Imm( S 1 , R 2 ) B i ( S 1 , R 2 ) = Imm / Diff( S 1 ) shape space Vol + ( S 1 ) = � f d θ : f ∈ C ∞ ( S 1 , R > 0 ) � space of positive smooth probability densities g d θ 2 : g ∈ C ∞ ( S 1 , R > 0 ) Met( S 1 ) = � � space of metrics on S 1

  5. � � � The manifold of immersions Let M be either S 1 or [0 , 2 π ]. Imm( M , R 2 ) := { c ∈ C ∞ ( M , R 2 ) : c ′ ( θ ) � = 0 } ⊂ C ∞ ( M , R 2 ) . The tangent space of Imm( M , R 2 ) at a curve c is the set of all vector fields along c :   T R 2       T c Imm( M , R 2 ) = ∼ = { h ∈ C ∞ ( M , R 2 ) } h h : π    c  R 2  M  Some Notation: v ( θ ) = c ′ ( θ ) 1 ds = | c ′ ( θ ) | d θ, | c ′ ( θ ) | , n ( θ ) = iv ( θ ) , D s = | c ′ ( θ ) | ∂ θ

  6. � Inducing a metric on shape space Imm( M , N ) π B i := Imm( M , N ) / Diff( M ) Every Diff( M )-invariant metric ”above“ induces a unique metric ”below“ such that π is a Riemannian submersion.

  7. Inner versus Outer

  8. The vertical and horizontal bundle ◮ T Imm = Vert � Hor. ◮ The vertical bundle is Vert := ker T π ⊂ T Imm . ◮ The horizontal bundle is Hor := (ker T π ) ⊥ , G ⊂ T Imm . It might not be a complement - sometimes one has to go to the completion of ( T f Imm , G f ) in order to get a complement.

  9. The vertical and horizontal bundle

  10. � Definition of a Riemannian metric 1. Define a Diff( M )-invariant metric G Imm( M , N ) on Imm. π 2. If the horizontal space is a B i ( M , N ) complement, then T π restricted to the horizontal space yields an isomorphism (ker T f π ) ⊥ , G ∼ = T π ( f ) B i . Otherwise one has to induce the quotient metric, or use the completion. 3. This gives a metric on B i such that π : Imm → B i is a Riemannian submersion .

  11. � Riemannian submersions Imm( M , N ) π B i := Imm( M , N ) / Diff( M ) ◮ Horizontal geodesics on Imm( M , N ) project down to geodesics in shape space. ◮ O’Neill’s formula connects sectional curvature on Imm( M , N ) and on B i . [Micheli, M, Mumford, Izvestija 2013]

  12. � � � � � � L 2 metric � G 0 c ( h , k ) = � h ( θ ) , k ( θ ) � ds . M Problem: The induced geodesic distance vanishes. r-acts l-acts Diff( S 1 ) Imm( S 1 , R 2 ) Diff c ( R 2 ) (LDDMM) l-acts r-acts needs ¯ g Diff( S 1 ) (LDDMM) Met( S 1 ) B i ( S 1 , R 2 ) Movies about vanishing: Diff( S 1 ) Imm( S 1 , R 2 ) [MichorMumford2005a,2005b], [BauerBruverisHarmsMichor2011,2012]

  13. The simplest ( L 2 -) metric on Imm( S 1 , R 2 ) � � G 0 c ( h , k ) = S 1 � h , k � ds = S 1 � h , k �| c θ | d θ Geodesic equation � | c t | 2 c θ 1 1 � c tt = − 2 | c θ | ∂ θ − | c θ | 2 � c t θ , c θ � c t . | c θ | A relative of Burger’s equation. Conserved momenta for G 0 along any geodesic t �→ c ( , t ): � v , c t �| c θ | 2 ∈ X ( S 1 ) reparam. mom. � S 1 c t ds ∈ R 2 linear moment. � S 1 � Jc , c t � ds ∈ R angular moment.

  14. Horizontal Geodesics for G 0 on B i ( S 1 , R 2 ) � c t , c θ � = 0 and c t = an = aJ c θ | c θ | for a ∈ C ∞ ( S 1 , R ). We use functions a , s = | c θ | , and κ , only holonomic derivatives: a t = 1 2 κ a 2 , s t = − a κ s , κ t = a κ 2 + 1 � a θ θ = a κ 2 + a θθ s 2 − a θ s θ � s 3 . s s We may assume s | t =0 ≡ 1. Let v ( θ ) = a (0 , θ ), the initial value for a . Then s t s = − a κ = − 2 a t a , so log( sa 2 ) t = 0, thus s ( t , θ ) a ( t , θ ) 2 = s (0 , θ ) a (0 , θ ) 2 = v ( θ ) 2 , a conserved quantity along the geodesic. We substitute s = v 2 a 2 and κ = 2 a t a 2 to get

  15. − a 5 a 2 a tt − 4 a 2 a − a 6 a θθ 2 v 4 + a 6 a θ v θ t θ = 0 , v 5 v 4 a (0 , θ ) = v ( θ ) , a nonlinear hyperbolic second order equation. Note that wherever v = 0 then also a = 0 for all t . So substitute a = vb . The outcome is ( b − 3 ) tt = − v 2 2 ( b 3 ) θθ − 2 vv θ ( b 3 ) θ − 3 vv θθ b 3 , 2 b (0 , θ ) = 1 . This is the codimension 1 version where Burgers’ equation is the codimension 0 version.

  16. Weak Riem. metrics on Emb( M , N ) ⊂ Imm( M , N ). Metrics on the space of immersions of the form: � g ( P f h , k ) vol( f ∗ ¯ G P f ( h , k ) = ¯ g ) M g is some fixed metric on N , g = f ∗ ¯ where ¯ g is the induced metric on M , h , k ∈ Γ( f ∗ TN ) are tangent vectors at f to Imm( M , N ), and P f is a positive, selfadjoint, bijective (scalar) pseudo differential operator of order 2 p depending smoothly on f . Good example: P f = 1 + A (∆ g ) p , where ∆ g is the Bochner-Laplacian on M induced by the metric g = f ∗ ¯ g . Also P has to be Diff( M )-invariant: ϕ ∗ ◦ P f = P f ◦ ϕ ◦ ϕ ∗ .

  17. Elastic metrics on plane curves Here M = S 1 or [0 , 1 π ], N = R 2 . The elastic metrics on Imm( M , R 2 ) is � 2 π G a , b a 2 � D s h , n �� D s k , n � + b 2 � D s h , v �� D s k , v � ds , ( h , k ) = c 0 with P a , b ( h ) = − a 2 � D 2 s h , n � n − b 2 � D 2 s h , v � v c + ( a 2 − b 2 ) κ � � � D s h , v � n + � D s h , n � v a 2 � n , D s h � n + b 2 � v , D s h � v � � + ( δ 2 π − δ 0 ) .

  18. � � � � � � Sobolev type metrics Advantages of Sobolev type metrics: 1. Positive geodesic distance 2. Geodesic equations are well posed 3. Spaces are geodesically complete for p > dim( M ) + 1. 2 [Bruveris, M, Mumford, 2014] for plane curves. A remark in [Ebin, Marsden, 1970], and [Bruveris, Meyer, 2014] for diffeomorphism groups. Problems: 1. Analytic solutions to the geodesic equation? 2. Curvature of shape space with respect to these metrics? 3. Numerics are in general computational expensive p ≥ 1 / 2 p ≥ 1 p ≥ 1 wellp.: r-acts l-acts Diff( S 1 ) Imm( S 1 , R 2 ) Diff c ( R 2 ) Space: (LDDMM) geod. dist.: +: p > 1 2 , − : p ≤ 1 − : p =0 , +: p ≥ 1 − : p < 1 2 , +: p ≥ 1 2 l-acts r-acts needs ¯ g Diff( S 1) (LDDMM) p ≥ 0 p ≥ 1 wellp.: Met( S 1 ) B i ( S 1 , R 2 ) Space: geod. dist.: +: p ≥ 0 − : p =0 , +: p ≥ 1

  19. � � � � � � Sobolev type metrics Advantages of Sobolev type metrics: 1. Positive geodesic distance 2. Geodesic equations are well posed 3. Spaces are geodesically complete for p > dim( M ) + 1. 2 [Bruveris, M, Mumford, 2013] for plane curves. A remark in [Ebin, Marsden, 1970], and [Bruveris, Meyer, 2014] for diffeomorphism groups. Problems: 1. Analytic solutions to the geodesic equation? 2. Curvature of shape space with respect to these metrics? 3. Numerics are in general computational expensive wellp.: p ≥ 1 p ≥ 1 p ≥ 1 r-acts l-acts Space: Diff( M ) Imm( M , N ) Diff c ( N ) (LDDMM) dist.: +: p > 1 , − : p < 1 − : p =0 , +: p ≥ 1 − : p < 1 2 , +: p ≥ 1 2 l-acts r-acts needs ¯ g Diff( M ) (LDDMM) wellp.: p = k , k ∈ N p ≥ 1 Space: Met( M ) B i ( M , N ) dist.: +: p ≥ 0 − : p =0 , +: p ≥ 1

  20. Geodesic equation. The geodesic equation for a Sobolev-type metric G P on immersions is given by ∇ ∂ t f t =1 2 P − 1 � Adj( ∇ P )( f t , f t ) ⊥ − 2 . Tf . ¯ g ( Pf t , ∇ f t ) ♯ � g ( Pf t , f t ) . Tr g ( S ) − ¯ − P − 1 � � ( ∇ f t P ) f t + Tr g � � g ( ∇ f t , Tf ) ¯ Pf t . The geodesic equation written in terms of the momentum for a Sobolev-type metric G P on Imm is given by:  p = Pf t ⊗ vol( f ∗ ¯ g )    ∇ ∂ t p = 1  Adj( ∇ P )( f t , f t ) ⊥ − 2 Tf . ¯ g ( Pf t , ∇ f t ) ♯ � 2   g ( Pf t , f t ) Tr f ∗ ¯ g ( S )  � ⊗ vol( f ∗ ¯ − ¯ g ) 

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend