Overland hydrology modeling Goran Pejanovi Assistant director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

overland hydrology modeling
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Overland hydrology modeling Goran Pejanovi Assistant director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overland hydrology modeling Goran Pejanovi Assistant director National Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia (host of the SEEVCCC) Hydrologic cycle and its modeling atmosphere model: cloud microphysics precipitation land surface


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Overland hydrology modeling

Goran Pejanović Assistant director National Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia (host of the SEEVCCC)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Hydrologic cycle and its modeling

  • atmosphere model:
  • land surface model:
  • hydrology model:
  • ocean model

precipitation snowmelt subsurface runoff

  • verland flow

underground flow river discharge

  • available high-resolution datasets on:

topography land use, land cover soil types, soil texture vegetation cover cloud microphysics soil moisture evapotranspiration interception surface runoff infiltration

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Hydrological models

  • statistical models

simple equations, lot of parameters that should be calibrated correlation between precipitation amount and river discharge

  • conceptual models
  • physically based models

differential equations based on physical lows, but often oversimplified (kinematical approximation), fewer parameters for calibration

  • dynamically treat overland and underground flow
  • be universal (easy to apply on any watershed, short and long term integrations)
  • be computationally efficient

Hydrological model should:

  • be a callable routine within an atmospheric model
slide-4
SLIDE 4

HYdrology PROgnostic Model

  • atmosphere:

NCEP’s Numerical Mesoscale Model NMM-E non-hydrostatic model

  • land:

NOAH land surface scheme

  • hydrology:

HYPROM2d: surface runoff HYPROM1d: river routing

  • datasets:

HYDRO1km USGS topography FAO soil texture data USGS landuse data

slide-5
SLIDE 5

=       − + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂

x fx

S S x h g y u v x u u t u =       − + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂

y fy

S S y h g y v v x v u t v

( ) ( )

= + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂

  • H

y hv x hu t h

Governing equations:

A B C D E F

d

A-B-C-D-E-F

h – points u – points river points

  • Reference:

Nickovic et al., 2010, HYPROM Hydrology Surface-Runoff Prognostic model, Water Resources Research, 46, W11506

  • Dynamical treatment of overland flow

(NO kinematical approximation!)

  • Numerically stabile implicit time scheme for

the friction term

  • New numerical scheme for preventing grid

decoupling noise

  • Horizontal advection scheme is mass

conserving and positive definite

slide-6
SLIDE 6

l

W

l

W

l

W

precipitation surface runoff interc. snow melt evaporation baseflow

LSM as a vertical hydrology component

Liquid water content forecast: Darcy’s Law

ex w l w l

R z W K z t W +       + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ γ

saturated conductivity saturated diffusivity porosity (max. soil moisture content) Clapp-Horneberger constant

ws

K

ws

γ

s

W b

3 2 +

        =

b s l ws w

W W γ γ

2 +

        =

b s l ws w

W W K K

diffusivity conductivity

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Case study: the Savinja river, flash flood event

T and V at 850 hPa, 1Nov1990

  • acc. rainfall

26 Oct – 6 Nov1990

accumulated precipitation (mm) forecast hour (h) forecast hour (h) river discharge (m^3/s)

watershed: 1850 km2 model .vs. observations

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Case study: the Moraca river

7th Feb. 2003 5th Feb. 2003

watershed: 3200 km2 heavy rain event: example of model’s dynamics

surface runoff and streamlines

slide-9
SLIDE 9

0.20 0.465 porosity 8.17 2.45 x 10‐6 0.113 x 10‐4 Clay Loam (09) 2.79 CH constant 1.41 x 10‐4 sat. conductivity 0.136 x 10‐3

  • sat. diffusivity

Bedrock (15) parameter

River discharge sensitivity to soil types

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Water budget components: six months accumulations

precipitation runoff evaporation snow melt

November 2002 – April 2003

slide-11
SLIDE 11

One year runs: river discharge

year: 2003 year: 2008 model .vs. observations

BIAS: - 2.43 MAE: 35.48 RMSE: 55.48 CC: 0.94 FEC: 0.87

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Case study: the Skadar lake, climate simulations

the Skadar lake watershed: 5180 km2 RCM-SEEVCCC: resolution ~35km, A1B SRES/IPCC scenario NMM-E nesting: resolution ~8km control year: 2003 simulation: 2020 - 2030 modeled river discharge

  • n the Bojana river
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Dynamical treatment of overland flow
  • Suitable for long term and flash flood simulations
  • Computationally efficient
  • Applicative to small and large watersheds
  • No calibration needed
  • Off-line and on-line mode

HYPROM example for the Danube watershed

HYPROM conclusions:

  • Couple with NMM-B + LISS
  • Dynamical treatment of

subsurface flow (if possible)

slide-14
SLIDE 14