Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comparison Between Hospitals With and Without Cardiac Surgery On-Site Ather Anis, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Robert E. Wolf, Ann Lovett, Laura Mauri,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comparison Between Hospitals With and Without Cardiac Surgery On-Site

Ather Anis, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Robert E. Wolf, Ann Lovett, Laura Mauri, Neal Patel, Alice K. Jacobs

Boston University Medical Center Harvard Medical School & Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Disclosures

  • This study was funded through a contract

with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (620022A4PRE; Dr. Normand,

  • A. Lovett, and R.E. Wolf).
  • There are no relevant RWI to disclose.

However, four of the authors (Anis, Mauri, Patel, Jacobs) perform primary PCI at hospitals with cardiac surgery on-site.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Background

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy. It is an ACC/AHA guidelines Class I indication if the procedure can be performed with a door-to-balloon time of within 90 minutes. The majority of STEMI patients present to hospitals without primary PCI capability. In many states including Massachusetts, the performance of PCI is not allowed in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories within hospitals without cardiac surgery on-site. To increase the number of STEMI patients with timely access to primary PCI, in 1997 the Massachusetts Department of Public Health approved a pilot program for primary PCI at hospitals without cardiac surgery on-site.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Aim

To determine the safety and effectiveness

  • f primary PCI for STEMI performed at

hospitals with in comparison to without cardiac surgery on-site (SOS) in Massachusetts

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Methods

Massachusetts residents with STEMI treated with primary PCI 1/1/05 – 9/30/07 Massachusetts residents with STEMI treated with primary PCI 1/1/05 – 9/30/07 Demographic, Clinical, Angiographic, Procedural factors collected within ACC NCDR instrument Demographic, Clinical, Angiographic, Procedural factors collected within ACC NCDR instrument Data reported to Massachusetts Data Analysis Center (Mass-DAC), state DPH mandated and physician-audited database Data reported to Massachusetts Data Analysis Center (Mass-DAC), state DPH mandated and physician-audited database Mortality: Hospital Record, MA Registry of Vital Records & Statistics, National Death Index, Social Security website Mortality: Hospital Record, MA Registry of Vital Records & Statistics, National Death Index, Social Security website Myocardial Infarction and Revascularization: Mass-DAC PCI and Mass-DAC CABG registries merged with hospital billing Myocardial Infarction and Revascularization: Mass-DAC PCI and Mass-DAC CABG registries merged with hospital billing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Statistical Methods

Propensity score matching: Logistic regression to predict treatment at No SOS Hospital (versus SOS Hospital) by demographic, clinical, and angiographic variables Caliper matching of 1 No SOS patient to 2 SOS patients Primary outcomes presented as hazard ratios at 30-days and at one-year for: All-cause mortality Myocardial infarction (MI) Repeat revascularization (RR) Target vessel revascularization (TVR)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Requirements for Primary PCI at No SOS Hospitals

Signed Collaboration Agreement with Tertiary Hospital (24/7 back-up support, accept transfers) Training

  • CPORT training of all staff
  • Ongoing training by Tertiary Hospital

Procedural Volume

  • Hospital perform minimum 300 diagnostic

procedures in each of previous 2 years

  • 36 primary PCI procedures/year
  • Physicians perform minimum 75 PCI

procedures/year Data Collection Joint Quality Assurance Committee

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS N=6139 STEMI Patients Undergoing PCI

January 1, 2005- September 30, 2007 Complete 1 year follow-up

N=6139 STEMI Patients Undergoing PCI

January 1, 2005- September 30, 2007 Complete 1 year follow-up

288 (31 No SOS) patients no unique identifier 288 (31 No SOS) patients no unique identifier 412 (3 No SOS) patients not primary PCI 412 (3 No SOS) patients not primary PCI N=5870 Patients N=5870 Patients N=977 (32.3%) No SOS N=977 (32.3%) No SOS N=2041 SOS N=2041 SOS N=5170 Patients N=5170 Patients 269 (53 No SOS) patients not linked to billing data 269 (53 No SOS) patients not linked to billing data 2152 (39 No SOS) transferred for primary PCI 2152 (39 No SOS) transferred for primary PCI N=3018 Patients N=3018 Patients

Exclusions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Differences in Characteristics Before Match

No SOS (n 977) SOS (n=2041) % Stand Diff

Race (%) White 90.28 86.92 10.58 Black 1.02 3.67

  • 17.57

Hispanic 1.54 3.87

  • 14.43

Insurance (%) Commercial 14.84 18.72

  • 10.38

HMO 41.66 32.97 18.02

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Differences in Characteristics Before Match

No SOS (n=977) SOS (n=2041) % Stand Diff Hypertension (%) 56.19 61.98

  • 11.79

Triple vessel Disease (%) 26.9 21.6 12.41 II/b/IIIa platelet antagonist (%)* 92.43 84.57 24.81

* Not included in propensity score model

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Patient Demographic Characteristics After Match

No SOS (n=781) SOS (n=1562) % Stand Diff* Mean age (yrs) 62.7 63.0

  • 0.02

Female (%) 30.57 29.65 2.01 Insurance (%) Commercial 17.17 16.17 2.70 Government 40.80 40.89

  • 0.17

HMO 36.78 38.20

  • 2.93

None 5.24 4.62 2.86

* % Stand Diff = Percent Standardized Difference Values <10% reflect well-matched characteristics

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Patient Demographic Characteristics After Match

No SOS (n=781) SOS (n=1562) % Stand Diff* Race (%) White 91.72 91.14 2.08 Black 1.22 1.06 1.48 Hispanic 1.83 1.75 0.60 Other 5.24 6.05

  • 3.54

* % Stand Diff = Percent Standardized Difference Values <10% reflect well-matched characteristics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Clinical Characteristics After Match

No SOS (n=781) SOS (n=1562) % Stand Diff* Diabetes (%) 19.73 19.48 0.65 Hypertension (%) 58.59 59.11

  • 1.07

Current Smoker (%) 37.76 35.77 4.13 Prior MI (%) 15.59 17.17

  • 4.26

Prior PCI (%) 13.89 14.17

  • 0.82

Prior CABG (%) 3.65 4.24

  • 3.03

* % Stand Diff = Percent Standardized Difference Values <10% reflect well-matched characteristics

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Clinical Characteristics After Match

No SOS (n=781) SOS (n=1562) % Stand Diff* Symptoms < 6 hours (%) 85.87 86.27

  • 1.14

CHF (%) 4.39 5.06

  • 3.16

Cerebrovasc Disease (%) 6.70 6.93

  • 0.91

PVD (%) 9.14 9.30

  • 0.57

Renal Failure (%) 3.17 3.37

  • 1.15

Shock (%) 5.24 5.68

  • 1.95

* % Stand Diff = Percent Standardized Difference Values <10% reflect well-matched characteristics

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics After Match

No SOS (n=781) SOS (n=1562) % Stand Diff Triple vessel Disease (%) 24.24 23.91 0.77 Left Main Disease (%) 3.65 4.74

  • 5.43

Target Lesion LAD (%) 38.61 37.58 2.13 Target Lesion SVG (%) 2.44 2.31

  • 0.83

* % Stand Diff = Percent Standardized Difference Values <10% reflect well-matched characteristics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Death and MI at 30-Days and 1-Year

5 10 15 20 25 2 30 60 365 No SOS n=781 SOS n- 1562

Days following Primary PCI Cumulative Incidence (%)

5 10 15 20 25 2 30 60 365 No SOS n=781 SOS n= 1562

Days following Primary PCI Cumulative Incidence (%)

Death Myocardial Infarction

4.35% 2.82% 6.66% 5.06%

p=0.05 p=0.11

5.70% 4.48% 8.58% 9.41%

p=0.22 p=0.51

ll ll

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Revascularization at 30-Days and 1-Year

10 20 30 40 50 2 30 60 365 No SOS n=781 SOS n- 1562

Days following Primary PCI Cumulative Incidence (%)

10 20 30 40 50 2 30 60 365 No SOS n=781 SOS n= 1562

Days following Primary PCI Cumulative Incidence (%)

Target Vessel Revascularization Repeat Revascularization

14.85% 7.55% 21.0% 14.72%

p<0.0001 p<0.0001

6.27% 4.99% 9.73% 10.88%

p=0.21 p=0.39

ll ll

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Hazard Ratios for the Primary Outcomes at 1 Year

Hazard Ratio (95% CI), No SOS vs. SOS Hazard Ratio (95% CI), No SOS vs. SOS Favors No SOS Favors SOS

TVR

1.0

RR MI Mortality

1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 HR 0.9 (0.7-1.2) p=0.51 HR 1.4 (0.9-2.0) p=0.11 HR 1.6 (1.3-2.0) p<0.0001 HR 0.9 (0.7-1.2) p=0.39

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Conclusions

In STEMI patients treated with primary PCI in No SOS compared to SOS Hospitals in Massachusetts: There is no difference in mortality at 30-days and 1-year. There is a small but significant increase in the rate of MI at 30 days in No SOS Hospitals but no difference at 1-year.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PRIMARY PCI in MASSACHUSETTS

Conclusions

In STEMI patients treated with primary PCI in No SOS compared to SOS Hospitals in Massachusetts: There is a significant increase in the rate of repeat revascularization at 30-days and 1-year in No SOS Hospitals. There is no difference in the incidence of TVR at 30-days and 1-year.