Outcome Based Teaching and Learning (OBTL) Course Design in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Outcome Based Teaching and Learning (OBTL) Course Design in Introduction to Nursing Asst. Prof. Kader Tekkas Kerman Koc University School of Nursing Content What is OBTL? How it is used? NURS 101 Implementation Course Course of the
Koc University School of Nursing
What is OBTL? How it is used? NURS 101 Course Design Process Implementation
Course Evaluation Challenges and Future Plans
OBTL is a student-centered approach for the delivery
topics in a program and the courses contained in it are expressed clearly as the intended outcomes for students to achieve
teach but rather the emphasis is on what is the
intended to be.
Macro
Classroom Learning
Micro KUSON Program Intended Learning Outcomes
Course Intended Learning Outcomes
Teaching and Learning Activities (TLAs) Assessment Methods (AMs)
How can I facilitate that learning? How do I know that learning does happen?
Lecturing
transmitting content to the students
how well the message has been received
OBTL
able to do after my teaching that they couldn’t do before?
that will help them achieve those
well they have achieved them?
What learning process (activity) will contribute to students’ mastery
How can the outcome be assessed quantitatively or qualitatively?
Purpose of the course Course Learning Outcomes Selecting Outcome Based Learning Activities Determining Outcome Based Assessment Procedure Converting Assessment Into Grades
and responsibilities of nurses.
health, environment, health promotion and disease prevention, holism, humanism, human needs, human growth and development, culture and diversity, ethics.
1. Describe the attributes and roles of the professional nurse and the factors that form nursing’s professional identity 2. Define and analyze the concepts of human-being, health, environment, health promotion and disease prevention. 3. Critically examine the importance of culture and diversity as they relate to health care 4. Explain ethical and legal dimensions related to professional nursing practice. 5. Describe healthcare systems and policies related to nursing profession.
Critique Analyze Synthesis Interaction Collaboration Group work
Game
Insights for Global Citizens Video, Discussion and Reflection
Solution Tree
Engagements
Self-reflection Interpretation
nursing mean to you? Metalog Emotion Cards
Activities
Observation Reflection Interview Analysis Presentation
Museum Visit reflection paper
Development Interview/Observ ation Paper and Presentation
essay Assignments
(assignment) Describe the attributes and roles of the professional nurse and the factors that form nursing’s professional identity
(assignment)
Define and analyze the concepts of human-being, health, environment, health promotion and disease prevention
Critically examine the importance of culture and diversity as they relate to health care
Explain ethical and legal dimensions related to professional nursing practice
Describe healthcare systems and policies related to nursing profession
belief you hold about a topic related to wellness, health promotion, and/or disease prevention.
development concepts to observations of infants, children, adolescents, young adults, middle adults, and late adults.
Growth and Development Interview/Observation Group Presentation Grading Rubric
4-Well done 3-Satisfactory 2-Needs improvement 1-Incomplete Score Overview Confident introduction of roles and contribution; clear purpose
agenda; relevant and clear background Confident and fluent introduction; clear overview, agenda and background, bur could be more complete or polished Introduction of presenters but awkward, sketchy
and background No introduction
background or agenda Organization Clearly, concisely written. Logically, intuitive progression of ideas and supporting information. Clear and direct cues to all information. Logical progression of ideas and supporting
cues to information are clear and direct. Vague in conveying viewpoint and
logical progression of ideas and supporting information, but cues are confusing or flawed. Lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
not evident. Analysis Describes interrelationship between developmental domains (physical/social/ emotional/cogniti ve/language/ aesthetic), holistic well-being (including health, nutrition, safety and environment), and adaptive/living skills. Describes interrelationship between developmental domains briefly (physical/social/ emotional/cogniti ve/language/ aesthetic), holistic well-being (including health, nutrition, safety and environment), and adaptive/living skills. Describes only developmental domains and does not mention the interrelationship (physical/social/ emotional/cogniti ve/language/ aesthetic), holistic well-being (including health, nutrition, safety and environment), and adaptive/living skills. Does not describe developmental domains (physical/social/ emotional/cogniti ve/language/ aesthetic), holistic well-being (including health, nutrition, safety and environment), and adaptive/living skills. Rationale Logical reasoning, examples/evidenc e integrated with course references
Good logical reasoning and examples/evidenc e, but not integrated. Reasoning and examples/evidenc e presented but not well
sources. Little or no reasoning, explanation, or examples/evidenc e provided. Coverage Through coverage of topic Generally through and balanced but Either through but biased, or Very incomplete, significant gaps,
0-1 Infants First
all, your choice
using real life examples by sharing real infants’ videos was so creative. You were free to choose the
and critiquing style and I liked your idea! Your analysis
interrelationship between developmental domains and well-being and living skills was well done. You analyzed the infants’ life skills and characteristics based
Erickson’s and Piaget’s theory. However, you haven’t covered Freud’s theory. I think you had good logical reasoning and your examples were integrated with course references. Your conclusion during presentation and in report was good! Things to improve:
couldn’t use time effectively so you couldn’t have time for reflection, to ask question and create a discussion in class.
use time effectively and create a discussion You did not interact with your friends. Pay attention for interactive presenting Be self confident! Do not speak with monotone voice! Please rehearse before the presentation day not have any technical problems!
presentation rubric score is attached. Your presentation score is 73 (50%
presentation score) Your report score is 90 (50%
your report score) Instructor’s sum up evaluation score is 82 Please see below for peer evaluation, self evaluation and
evaluation
Evaluatio n
Evaluation (%25) Self Evaluatio n Self Evaluatio n (%25) Instructor 's Evaluatio n
's Evaluatio n (%50) Final Score Yeşim Çetin 71,8 17,95 71 17,75 82 41 76,7 Merve Özgölet 71,8 17,95 71 17,75 82 41 76,7
score for this assignment is
6-12 ages
all, you covered all the topics very well. Your examples were integrated with course references. I think you did a good job in making
in the primary school. I liked the idea
taking photos
6-12 aged child and supporting the developmental domains with those photos. Well done!!! During your presentation, you described the terminology very well. During you presentation
you friend used humor and drew attention from the audience which was good! You used time effectively and had time to start for discussion! Well done! Your report was
based the guidelines! You analyzed all
the developmental aspects very well. You interacted with your friend before starting to your presentation which was good however, you haven’t provide enough time for your friends to think about the question and answer. Please provide more time for your friends to think about it in your next presentations.
to improve:
more time for interaction. Your slide background color and font were similar, so it made hard to read the slide. Use contrast colors, next time. You had a brief introduction. Do not forget to talk about your
your plan for the presentation.
presentation rubric score is attached. Your presentation score is 97,5 (50%
presentation score) Your report score is 95 (50%
your report score) Instructor’s sum up evaluation score is 96,25 Please see below for peer evaluation, self evaluation and
evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation (%25) Self Evaluation Self Evaluation (%25) Instructor's Evaluation
Evaluation (%50) Final Score
Özkan 90,2 22,55 98 24,5 96 48 95,05 95 İrem Engin 90,2 22,55 96 24 96 48 94,55 95 Pelin Akyürek 90,2 22,55 98 24,5 96 48 95,05 95
12-18 yo Adolescence
you had a good introduction and described the
well.
described background information about adolescence. I think it was helpful. The interaction with your friends at the beginning
your presentation was good. I liked the videos that supports the theoretical information. For example, comparing two developmental stage (6-12 and 12-18) was well
to show the differences. I wish you had presented your
about the high school students throughout the presentation. You could have
your presentations by focusing
your
and interviews at high school. you could not have enough time for Q&A section ( you had
1 minute!). Discussion is
the most essential part
a presentation to have feedback and reflections. For the Q&A section, you haven’t have any prepared questions
key areas. Your report was well
in terms
balanced treatment
perspectives. However, you did not described the environment that you made your
Also, you did not share the examples in your report that you used in your presentation.
to improve:
speak too fast.
you had limited eye contact, maintain eye contact with the audience while you are presenting! You asked some questions to your friends but did not wait enough time to receive the answers because
having limited time.
rehearse before the presentation day not have any problems! Use time effectively.
presentation rubric score is attached. Your presentation score is 87,5 (50%
presentation score) Your report score is 85 (50%
your report score) Instructor’s sum up evaluation score is 86.25 Please see below for peer evaluation, self evaluation and
evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation (%25) Self Evaluation Self Evaluation (%25) Instructor's Evaluation
Evaluation (%50) Final Score
Şengül 83,2 20,8 90 22,5 86 43 86,3 86 Dilara Kanak 83,2 20,8 88 22 86 43 85,8 86 Serena Özabrahamyan 83,2 20,8 90 22,5 86 43 86,3 86
Pre-Course Knowledge Level Evaluation Date: Using a scale of 1-10 where 1 means “very little” and 10 means “very much”, please rate your knowledge level on the following items (Place circle the number to indicate your rating)
nurses
life-span
3.1 8.5 1
Current status of of nursing as a profession
Series1 Series2
3.1 8.6 1
Professional identity and professionalism
Series1 Series2
3.7 8.3 1
Concept of nursing
Series1 Series2
4.5 8.4 1
Professional roles and responsibilities
Series1 Series2
1.4 8.5 1
Holism in nursing
Series1 Series2
4.7 9.1 1
Humanism in nursing
Series1 Series2
3.2 8.6 1
Health promotion and disease prevention
Series1 Series2
3.6 8.7 1
Human growth and development across the life-span
Series1 Series2
3.9 8.5 1
Ethics and ethical decision making in nursing practice
Series1 Series2
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Pre-course evaluation vs. Post-course evaluation
Series2 Series1
activities
my teaching that they couldn’t do before?
taking the class.
KUSO N PO
Ethic Communication Care and technology Life-long learning Leadership
I would like to thank to KUSON faculty and my students for their contributions in designing and having this course together Special Thanks to KOLT Office Murat Sozer Zuhal Zeybekoglu Ferhat Cagan Saliha Akbas